Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The importation, innovation, and performance of disruptive forms of contention are taken up in this chapter. This chapter opens by surveying militant direct action by animal activists in Britain and the United States in the late 1960s and 1970s, experiences that began to influence Australian activism. The performance of militant, disruptive methods took various forms across Australia, but perhaps some of the most significant and enduring displays emerged on the wetlands of Victoria and in the city of Hobart, Tasmania. Direct action and deliberate animal rescue emerged as relatively effective tools. Proto-undercover investigations emerged and were an important precursor to the episodes that unfolded in the 1990s.]
Published: Oct 24, 2017
Keywords: Animal movement; Disruptive methods; Direct action; Civil disobedience; Animal liberation front; Animal liberation; Property damage; Duck rescue; Laurie levy; Pam clarke; Patty mark; Undercover investigations; Intensive farms; Laboratories; Contentious politics; Animal welfare; Moral shock
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.