Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Burton (1987)
Ronald Dworkin and Legal PositivismIowa Law Review, 73
David Hume (1972)
A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects
J. Donnelly, R. Dworkin (1986)
A Matter of PrincipleHuman Rights Quarterly, 8
G. Postema (2007)
Integrity: Justice in Workclothes
W. Waluchow (1994)
Inclusive Legal Positivism
K. Kress (1999)
Coherentist Methodology is Morally Better Than Either its Proponents Or its Critics Think (But Still Not Good Enough)Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 12
E. Soper (1977)
Legal Theory and the Obligation of a Judge: The Hart/Dworkin DisputeMichigan Law Review, 75
M. Murphy (2008)
Natural Law Theory
A. White, R. Dworkin (1977)
Taking Rights Seriously.The Philosophical Quarterly, 27
J. Raz (1972)
Legal Principles and the Limits of LawYale Law Journal, 81
Jules Coleman (2000)
CONSTRAINTS ON THE CRITERIA OF LEGALITYLegal Theory, 6
K. Kress (1987)
The Interpretive TurnEthics, 97
Matthew Kramer (1999)
In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law without Trimmings
Jules Coleman (2009)
Beyond Inclusive Legal PositivismWiley-Blackwell: Ratio Juris
Andrei Marmor (2006)
Legal Positivism: Still Descriptive and Morally NeutralOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26
R. Dworkin (1987)
Law's Empire
G. join (1963)
Dworkin on Judicial Discretion: CommentsThe Journal of Philosophy, 60
Scott Shapiro (2002)
LAW, PLANS, AND PRACTICAL REASONLegal Theory, 8
Stuart Brown, H. Hart (1962)
The Concept of Law.The Philosophical Quarterly, 13
N. Stavropoulos (2001)
Hart’s Semantics
D. Réaume, R. Dworkin (1989)
Is Integrity a Virtue? Dworkin's Theory of Legal Obligation@@@Law's EmpireUniversity of Toronto Law Journal, 39
J. Coleman (2001)
Philosophy and the Law of Torts: Tort Law and Tort Theory: Preliminary Reflections on Method
G. Annas (2020)
Bioterrorism, Public Health, and Civil LibertiesBioterrorism: The History of a Crisis in American Society
Jules Coleman (1982)
Negative and Positive PositivismThe Journal of Legal Studies, 11
R. Dworkin (1996)
Objectivity and Truth: You'd Better Believe ItPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 25
J. Austin (1971)
A plea for excuses
H. Hart, R. Gavison (1989)
Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H.L.A. Hart
J. Finnis (1987)
On reason and authority in Law's EmpireLaw and Philosophy, 6
J. Finnis (1998)
Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory
N. Stavropoulos (1996)
Objectivity in Law
G. Postema (2007)
Philosophy and the Law of Torts
Timothy Endicott (1998)
Herbert Hart and the Semantic StingLegal Theory, 4
G. Postema (1980)
Bentham and Dworkin on Positivism and AdjudicationSocial Theory and Practice, 5
J. Raz (1998)
Two Views of the Nature of the Theory of Law: A Partial ComparisonLegal Theory, 4
Andrei Marmor (1995)
Interpretation and Legal Theory
F. Schauer (1999)
Positivism as Pariah
L. Fuller, William Perdue (1936)
The Reliance Interest in Contract DamagesYale Law Journal, 46
Scott Hershovitz, R. Dworkin (2006)
Exploring law's empire : the jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin
Jules Coleman, Scott Shapiro, K. Himma (2004)
The Oxford handbook of jurisprudence and philosophy of law
Benjamin Zipursky (2001)
The Model of Social Facts
J. Burley (2004)
Dworkin and His Critics
Owen Fiss (2001)
The Autonomy of LawYale Journal of International Law, 26
Dennis Patterson (2010)
A companion to philosophy of law and legal theory
R. Dworkin (2006)
Justice in Robes
A. Altman (1990)
Critical legal studies : a liberal critique
Marshall Cohen (1998)
Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence
Richard Tuck, J. Finnis (1980)
Natural Law and Natural Rights.The Philosophical Quarterly, 31
L. Alexander (1999)
"With Me, It's All er Nuthin'": Formalism in Law and MoralityUniversity of Chicago Law Review, 66
L. Green (1987)
The Political Content of Legal TheoryPhilosophy of the Social Sciences, 17
K. Himma (2002)
Substance and Method in Conceptual Jurisprudence and Legal TheoryVirginia Law Review, 88
N. Simmonds (1987)
Imperial Visions and Mundane PracticesThe Cambridge Law Journal, 46
M. Moore (1992)
Moral Reality RevisitedMichigan Law Review, 90
Frank Michelman, K. Sullivan (1986)
The Supreme Court, 1985 TermHarvard Law Review, 100
Jeremy Waldron (2009)
Who Needs Rules of Recognition
H. Hart (1955)
Inquiries into the Nature of Law and Morals . By Axel Hagerstrsm. Edited by Karl Olivecrona. Translated by C. D. Broad. (Stockholm, Almquist and Wiksell. Pp. xxxi + 377. Price Sw. cr. 25.00.)Philosophy, 30
J. Finnis (1990)
Natural Law and Legal Reasoning
[Sometimes jurisprudence mimics the physical world, each new theory provoking an opposite and sometimes equally powerful theory. This is not an iron law, perhaps, but the claim is borne out by developments in Anglo-American jurisprudence the last quarter of the twentieth century. Hart’s powerful restatement of positivism at mid-century stimulated a revival of natural-law jurisprudence in the last two decades of the century. From different philosophical quarters, a variety of theories emerged pursuing quite different theoretical agendas, but all were united in their opposition to positivism. Rejecting Hart’s underlying empiricism, anti-positivist theories like those of John Finnis (1980, 1992, 1998) and Ernest Weinreb (1988, 1995) revived rationalist jurisprudence; Aristotle, Aquinas, and Kant, rather than Hume and Bentham, provided the philosophical foundations for these two quite different contemporary natural-law theories (see below, chap. 12). In contrast, Michael Moore (1985, 1992, 1995) offered a thoroughly modern, revisionist naturallaw theory, drawing on philosophical realism in contemporary metaphysics and meta-ethics. In Chapter 12, we will consider the most influential of these natural-law theories, but in this chapter we explore positivism’s most widely discussed challenger, Ronald Dworkin’s interpretive jurisprudence and “law as integrity.”]
Published: Jun 24, 2011
Keywords: Legal Principle; Legal Argument; Legal Practice; Political Morality; Normative Proposition
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.