Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Use of Conceptual Analysis in PsychologyRealism, but Not Empiricism: Wittgenstein versus Searle

A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Use of Conceptual Analysis in Psychology: Realism, but Not... [In a note on page 56 of the Philosophical Investigations, Wittgenstein writes:What we have to mention in order to explain the significance, I mean the importance, of a concept, are often extremely general facts of nature: such facts as are hardly ever mentioned because of their great generality. (PI, p. 56, bottom note, my emphasis)] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Use of Conceptual Analysis in PsychologyRealism, but Not Empiricism: Wittgenstein versus Searle

Editors: Racine, Timothy P.; Slaney, Kathleen L.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-wittgensteinian-perspective-on-the-use-of-conceptual-analysis-in-1By0eheUXO

References (10)

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Copyright
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013
ISBN
978-1-349-35031-5
Pages
153 –171
DOI
10.1057/9781137384287_9
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[In a note on page 56 of the Philosophical Investigations, Wittgenstein writes:What we have to mention in order to explain the significance, I mean the importance, of a concept, are often extremely general facts of nature: such facts as are hardly ever mentioned because of their great generality. (PI, p. 56, bottom note, my emphasis)]

Published: Nov 5, 2015

Keywords: Mental Causation; Emphasis Original; Grammatical Rule; Universal Grammar; Collective Intentionality

There are no references for this article.