Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/a-world-with-robots-a-21st-century-ethical-hierarchy-for-robots-and-IMTz3WMOr6
References (31)
-
A. Saptawijaya, L. Pereira (2015)
The Potential of Logic Programming as a Computational Tool to Model Morality -
M. Opler, J. Ladd (1957)
The Structure of a Moral Code -
S. Bringsjord (2008)
The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology: Declarative/Logic-Based Cognitive Modeling -
P. Schermerhorn, J. Kramer, Christopher Middendorff, Matthias Scheutz (2006)
DIARC: A Testbed for Natural Human-Robot Interaction -
S. Bringsjord, Owen Kellett, A. Shilliday, Joshua Taylor, B. Heuveln, Yingrui Yang, J. Baumes, K. Ross (2006)
A new Gödelian argument for hypercomputing minds based on the busy beaver problemAppl. Math. Comput., 176
-
S. Bringsjord, M. Zenzen (2003)
Superminds: People Harness Hypercomputation, and More -
S. Bringsjord, D. Ferrucci (1998)
Logic and Artificial Intelligence: Divorced, Still Married, Separated ...?Minds and Machines, 8
-
Martin Davis, E. Weyuker (2014)
Computability, complexity, and languages - fundamentals of theoretical computer science -
J. Ganascia (2007)
Modelling ethical rules of lying with Answer Set ProgrammingEthics and Information Technology, 9
-
G. NaveenSundar, S. Bringsjord (2015)
Ethical Regulation of Robots Must Be Embedded in Their Operating Systems -
P. Suppes (1969)
Axiomatic set theory -
Brian Chellas (1980)
Modal Logic: Normal systems of modal logic -
S. Bringsjord (1999)
The Zombie Attack on the Computational Conception of MindPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59
-
P. Bello, S. Bringsjord (2013)
On How to Build a Moral MachineTopoi, 32
-
Thomas Powers (2011)
Machine Ethics: Prospects for a Kantian Machine -
S. Bringsjord, Joshua Taylor, A. Shilliday, M. Clark, Konstantine Arkoudas (2008)
Slate: An Argument-Centered Intelligent Assistant to Human Reasoners -
A. Winfield, Christian Blum, Wenguo Liu (2014)
Towards an Ethical Robot: Internal Models, Consequences and Ethical Action Selection -
Patrick Lin, Keith Abney, G. Bekey (2012)
The Divine-Command Approach to Robot Ethics -
S. Bringsjord, Naveen Govindarajulu (2011)
Toward a Modern Geography of Minds, Machines, and Math -
M. Schmitt (2013)
Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare: The law of cyber armed conflict -
D. Voth (2006)
Practical pattern matchingIEEE Intelligent Systems, 21
-
S. Bringsjord, Konstantine Arkoudas, P. Bello (2006)
Toward a General Logicist Methodology for Engineering Ethically Correct RobotsIEEE Intelligent Systems, 21
-
R. Chisholm (1963)
Contrary-To-Duty Imperatives and Deontic LogicAnalysis, 24
-
S. Bringsjord, P. Bello (2005)
Toward a logical framework for cognitive effects-based operations: some empirical and computational results -
S. Bringsjord (2008)
The logicist manifesto: At long last let logic-based artificial intelligence become a field unto itselfJ. Appl. Log., 6
-
J. Klagge, R. Chisholm (1986)
Brentano and Intrinsic Value -
S. Bringsjord, John Licato (2015)
Crossbows, von Clauswitz, and the Eternality of Software Shrouds: Reply to ChristiansonPhilosophy & Technology, 28
-
R. Arkin (2009)
Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots -
N. Block (1995)
On a confusion about a function of consciousnessBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 18
-
Matthias Scheutz, Thomas Arnold (2016)
Feats without Heroes: Norms, Means, and Ideal Robotic ActionFrontiers Robotics AI, 3
-
S. Bringsjord, John Licato (2015)
By Disanalogy, Cyberwarfare Is Utterly NewPhilosophy & Technology, 28
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Copyright
- © Springer International Publishing AG 2017
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-46665-1
- Pages
- 47 –61
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-46667-5_4
- Publisher site
- See Chapter on Publisher Site
Abstract
[I introduce and propose theEthical hierarchy ethical hierarchy (EH\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mathscr {E \! H}$$\end{document}) into which can be placed robots and humans in general. This hierarchy is catalyzed by the question: Can robots be more moral than humans? The light shed by EH\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mathscr {E \! H}$$\end{document} reveals why an emphasis on legal obligation for robots, while not unwise at the moment, is inadequate, and why at least the vast majority of today’s state-of-the-artDeontic logics deontic logics are morally inexpressive, whether they are intended to formalize the ethical behavior of robots or persons.]
Published: Jan 7, 2017
Keywords: Robot ethics; Machine ethics; Ethics; Deontic logic; Ethical hierarchy