Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Walters, D. Syrdal, K. Dautenhahn, René te Boekhorst, K. Koay (2008)
Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companionAutonomous Robots, 24
A. Mirelman, P. Bonato, J. Deutsch (2009)
Effects of Training With a Robot-Virtual Reality System Compared With a Robot Alone on the Gait of Individuals After StrokeStroke, 40
K. Čapek, P. Selver
R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots) : a fantastic melodrama
M. Lohse, F. Hegel, B. Wrede (2008)
Domestic applications for social robots: an online survey on the influence of appearance and capabilities, 2
Jennifer Goetz, Sara Kiesler, Aaron Powers (2003)
Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperationThe 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003.
M. Goodrich, D. Olsen (2003)
Seven principles of efficient human robot interactionSMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483), 4
Jenay Beer, A. Fisk, W. Rogers (2014)
Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interactionJournal of Human-Robot Interaction, 3
(2014)
Toward a framework for levelsof robot autonomy in human-robot interaction
J. Bradshaw, R. Hoffman, D. Woods, Matt Johnson (2013)
The Seven Deadly Myths of "Autonomous Systems"IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28
M. Goodrich, D. Olsen (2003)
Metrics for Evaluating Human-Robot Interactions
E. Broadbent, I. Kuo, Yong Lee, J. Rabindran, N. Kerse, Rebecca Stafford, Bruce MacDonald (2010)
Attitudes and reactions to a healthcare robot.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 16 5
Erin Bradner, G. Mark (2002)
Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception
K. Dautenhahn (2002)
Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robotsProceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication
L. Ye, Paul Johnson (1995)
The Impact of Explanation Facilities in User Acceptance of Expert System AdviceMIS Q., 19
B. Duffy (2003)
Anthropomorphism and the social robotRobotics Auton. Syst., 42
Sonya Kwak, Yunkyung Kim, E. Kim, Christine Shin, Kwangsu Cho (2013)
What makes people empathize with an emotional robot?: The impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot2013 IEEE RO-MAN
B. Turner (2014)
Center for a New American Security
Matt Johnson, J. Bradshaw, R. Hoffman, P. Feltovich, D. Woods (2014)
Seven Cardinal Virtues of Human-Machine Teamwork: Examples from the DARPA Robotic ChallengeIEEE Intelligent Systems, 29
(2012)
The role of autonomy inDoDSystems
J. Telotte (1995)
Replications: A Robotic History of the Science Fiction Film
Mike Blow, K. Dautenhahn, Andrew Appleby, Chrystopher Nehaniv, David Lee (2006)
The art of designing robot faces: dimensions for human-robot interaction
Matthew Johnson, J. Bradshaw, P. Feltovich, R. Hoffman, C. Jonker, Birna Riemsdijk, M. Sierhuis (2011)
Beyond Cooperative Robotics: The Central Role of Interdependence in Coactive DesignIEEE Intelligent Systems, 26
M. Spong, S. Hutchinson, M. Vidyasagar (2005)
Robot Modeling and Control
F. Kaplan (2005)
Everyday robotics: robots as everyday objects
P. Hancock, D. Billings, Kristin Schaefer, Jessie Chen, E. Visser, R. Parasuraman (2011)
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot InteractionHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53
R. Looije, A. Zalm, Mark Neerincx, R. Beun (2012)
Help, I need some body the effect of embodiment on playful learning2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication
(2011)
A metaanalysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction
M. Harbers, K. Bosch, J. Meyer (2010)
Design and Evaluation of Explainable BDI Agents2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 2
[Due to advances in technology, the world around us contains an increasing number of robots, virtual agents, and other intelligent systems. These systems all have a certain degree of autonomy. For the people who interact with an intelligent system it is important to obtain a good understanding of its degree of autonomy: what tasks can the system perform autonomously and to what extent? In this paper we therefore present a study on how a system’s characteristics affect people’s perception of its autonomy. This was investigated by asking fire-fighters to rate the autonomy of a number of search and rescue robots in different shapes and situations. In this paper, we identify the following seven aspects of perceived autonomy: time interval of interaction, obedience, informativeness, task complexity, task implication, physical appearance, and physical distance to human operator. The study showed that increased disobedience, task complexity and physical distance of a robot can increase perceived autonomy.]
Published: Jan 7, 2017
Keywords: Autonomy; Robots; Intelligent agents; Intelligent systems; Robot design; User expectations; Human-robot interaction; Perceived autonomy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.