Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A World with RobotsReporting Robot Ethics for Children-Robot Studies in Contemporary Peer Reviewed Papers

A World with Robots: Reporting Robot Ethics for Children-Robot Studies in Contemporary Peer... [How are robot ethics described in peer-reviewed papers for children-robot studies? Do publications refer to robot ethics such as: (a) gaining children’s assent, (b) providing a robot’s description prior to data collection, (c) having a robot exposure phase before data collection and (d) informing children about a robot’s semi-autonomy or not? A total of 27 peer-reviewed papers with an average impact factor of 1.8 were analysed. 63 % of the studies did not state any ethical procedures followed. In eight studies children gave their assent for the experiment; six studies described the robot to children prior to data collection; two studies provided a robot exposure phase prior to data collection and one study informed children that robots are operated machines. The outcomes indicate problematic applications of robot ethics in peer-reviewed journals and the necessity for the publishing industry to consider stricter actions on this aspect of a publication.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A World with RobotsReporting Robot Ethics for Children-Robot Studies in Contemporary Peer Reviewed Papers

Editors: Aldinhas Ferreira, Maria Isabel; Silva Sequeira, Joao; Tokhi, Mohammad Osman; E. Kadar, Endre; Virk, Gurvinder Singh
A World with Robots — Jan 7, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-world-with-robots-reporting-robot-ethics-for-children-robot-studies-xhr8WF90np

References (7)

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
ISBN
978-3-319-46665-1
Pages
109 –117
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-46667-5_8
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[How are robot ethics described in peer-reviewed papers for children-robot studies? Do publications refer to robot ethics such as: (a) gaining children’s assent, (b) providing a robot’s description prior to data collection, (c) having a robot exposure phase before data collection and (d) informing children about a robot’s semi-autonomy or not? A total of 27 peer-reviewed papers with an average impact factor of 1.8 were analysed. 63 % of the studies did not state any ethical procedures followed. In eight studies children gave their assent for the experiment; six studies described the robot to children prior to data collection; two studies provided a robot exposure phase prior to data collection and one study informed children that robots are operated machines. The outcomes indicate problematic applications of robot ethics in peer-reviewed journals and the necessity for the publishing industry to consider stricter actions on this aspect of a publication.]

Published: Jan 7, 2017

Keywords: Children-robot interaction; Robot ethics; Children’s assent; Ethics

There are no references for this article.