Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

AI, the beauty of places, and the metaverse: beyond “geometrical fundamentalism”

AI, the beauty of places, and the metaverse: beyond “geometrical fundamentalism” As the tech world moves increasingly toward an AI-generated virtual universe — the so-called “metaverse” — new paradigms define the impacts of this technology on its human users. AI and VR, like the Internet before them, offer both remarkable opportunities and pitfalls. Virtual Reality constitutes a new kind of human environment, and experi- encing it relies upon human neurological mechanisms evolved to negotiate — and survive in — our ancestral physi- cal environments. Despite the unrestricted freedom of designing the virtual universe, interacting with it is affected strongly by the body’s built-in physiological and psychological constraints. The eventual success of the metaverse will be determined by how successfully its designers manage to accommodate unconscious mechanisms of emo- tional attachment and wellbeing. Some fundamental misunderstandings coming from antiquated design models have influenced virtual environmental structures. It is likely that those design decisions may be handicapping the metaverse’s ultimate appeal and utility. Keywords AI, Architecture, Artificial intelligence, Beauty, Christopher Alexander, Design, Digital aesthetics, Emotional attachment, Engagement, Healing environments, Metaverse, Objective beauty, Text-to-image system, Virtual Reality One definition of the metaverse is that it is a “massively 1 Introduction scaled and interoperable network of real-time rendered Digital aesthetics are rapidly assuming a central role in 3D virtual worlds and environments which can be expe- both the commercial sector and cutting-edge technol- rienced synchronously and persistently by an effectively ogy. Virtual environments are defining new concepts unlimited number of users with an individual sense of and opportunities in the art world (Mazzone & Elgam- presence, and with continuity of data, such as identity, mal, 2019; Audry & Ippolito, 2019; Revell, 2022; Zylinska, history, entitlements, objects, communications, and pay- 2020) and in architecture (Eloy et  al., 2021). This essay ments.” (Ball, 2021) The metaverse is often confused with will argue, however, that most of what has been devel- VR, but VR is but one component of the metaverse. If oped up to now has been extremely limited in the key the metaverse is ever going to take off on a  large scale, respect of objective beauty. it will be as an immersive sensory environment whose visual attraction far surpasses that of most physical set- tings. Curiosity may trigger a first visit, but it is sensual *Correspondence: feedback that will draw users back. Both real and virtual Nikos A. Salingaros worlds are subject to the same design principles because salingar@gmail.com 1 human beings experience the environment unconsciously Eurac Research, Institute for Biomedicine, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Via Galvani 31, 39100 Bolzano, Italy in order to use it. So the question is really about beauty. The Human Architecture & Planning Institute, Inc, 43 Bradford St, Is it possible to create a virtual world that is more emo- Concord, MA 01742, USA 3 tionally enticing than the real one of a user’s desk and the Sustasis Foundation, P.O. Box 2579, White Salmon, WA 98672, USA Departments of Mathematics and Architecture, The University of Texas, immediately perceivable surroundings? San Antonio, TX 78249, USA © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 2 of 18 Technologists and investors are understandably excited engagement as possible. Otherwise, it feels too “alien”, too about the potential capacities of a digital universe. As detached. with any technological advance — particularly those The outline of this paper is as follows. The associa - involving the prodigious capacities of AI — there are sig- tion of beauty with special configurations of ordered nificant uncertainties ahead (Rosenberg, 2021; Anderson complexity has been developed by scientists, including & Rainie, 2022; Gorichanaz, 2022a). Many saw similarly the present authors. The concept of “objective beauty” optimistic, even utopian possibilities in the first genera - remains problematic and questionable to many readers, tion of the Internet, only to later experience an age of yet it is established by a considerable body of research clickbait, fake news, and deeply negative impacts on the and follows from derivations of its mathematical and wellbeing of human users, notably including children neurological characteristics. (Mehaffy, 2020a). It is too early to predict what conse- Two additional, distinct sources give evidence that vis- quences might arise as this interconnected set of virtual- ual information from more complex, traditional enviro- reality projects moves forward. nents is preferred unconsciously over what architectural Architect Michael Benedikt outlined some specula- culture offers today. First, a clear predisposition comes tive ideas about Cyberspace early on following, unsur- from AI image generators, which combine preferences of prisingly, an architectural approach (Benedikt, 1992). billions of ordinary people; and second, from films and However, the key design and grounding tools for cre- video games. AI text-to-image programs help to con- ating a viscerally-attractive Virtual Reality setting for firm survey popularity through films and videogames navigation are not generally known to mainstream by establishing the distinct characteristics of objective architects. Having focused upon other, formal concerns beauty: we are not claiming that those programs alone for decades, architectural culture is not the best source are sufficient. to provide an emotionally-engaging environment People might think that different-looking architecture where it is most needed. And developers of virtual is good or not for misguided reasons, which we explain worlds have prioritized dominant architectural styles as the phenomenon of “geometrical fundamentalism”. over the totally distinct look of the gaming world. This Despite established historical and political arguments point is critical.  for the stark plainness of geometrical fundamentalism, it This paper offers a conjectural explanation of why the in fact contradicts human psychophysiology. Data from virtual world known as the metaverse has so far strug- Medicine and Neuroscience reveal that good design gled to realize its potential appeal among users (Manjoo, based on objective beauty — that is, from  evolved bio- 2022; Du, 2022). For example, according to Samantha logically-grounded responses — helps to boost human Frew: “Compared to the impressive CGI (computer-gen- health. Dominant architecture tends to have the opposite erated imagery) we are accustomed to in gaming and cin- informational effect, and evidence suggests that this con - ema ... [the metaverse] appears as a basic world designed trast could be detrimental. by tech moguls who are excited by minimalism. People Therefore, it is not such a good idea for the metaverse with little to no imagination regarding the design of phys- to be drawing its cues from mainstream architectural ical spaces.” (Frew, 2022). This criticism is harsh indeed. culture. The metaverse should instead rely upon beauti - But how could a multi-billion dollar project, with access ful architecture (as defined by precise biological codes to the latest scientific advances, start off on the wrong underlying objective beauty) and thus promote not only track? (Thompson, 2022) pleasure and engagement, but also human health. We The metaverse’s lack of appeal may be due, in part, to propose the need for a “pattern language of metaverse a lack of biologically-based beauty in its intrinsic struc- design” that documents discovered and tested design ele- ture (Lavdas & Salingaros, 2022). If this is a contributing ments and best practices, following the example of pat- factor, then by responding to the innate need for “objec- tern languages in other fields. This approach towards tive beauty” (a term to be explained later), the metaverse creating a better virtual reality experience would begin could greatly increase its user allure. Moreover, there with objective beauty. is tantalizing evidence that the metaverse could even The rest of this paper outlines our understanding of become a new healing environment. Technical limita- beauty and how to implement it. Biologically-based tions in a virtual world cut down most of the neurologi- beauty is objective. The evidence for this comes from cal channels of the unconscious engagement possible in AI beauty ratings, experiments in neuroaesthetics, the a comparable real  physical setting. An experience that mathematics of organic form, etc. We also give details drastically reduces the biological sensory experience of of beauty as a prescription of how to create it. Objective the real world nevertheless needs to maintain as much beauty is grounded in geometric structure that combines La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 3 of 18 fractals with informational complexity and multiple example, by travel companies as “the most beautiful nested symmetries. This part of our discussion is neces - places in the world” — to ones that many might consider sary to debunk the mistaken notion that it is somehow ugly. Those places share the common geometrical char - not possible to create visceral beauty today. acteristics responsible for objective beauty, which we describe later in this paper, and those are easily imple- 2 How unattractive design might impact mented in the metaverse. The truly revolutionary next the metaverse step will occur when users begin to demand that physi- The metaverse is becoming a big player in generating new cal places embody the same quality of elevated objective virtual worlds (Dwivedi et al., 2022; Bibri & Allam, 2022). beauty they have already experienced in a virtual world. Yet major developers seem to have miscalculated in mov- Virtual environments wishing to have some semblance ing over to virtual universes being created for online of reality that attracts regular participants must draw on socializing and participatory gaming. An infatuation with positive-valence emotions. Absurdly, in today’s world of contemporary minimalist architecture reflects the same almost unlimited technical possibilities, architecture — subjective aesthetic in a virtual world into which billions both material and virtual — tends to be limited by design of dollars have been invested; but the public is reacting elements that diminish its degree of objective beauty. An unenthusiastically or even negatively to the perceived ingrained professional and social inertia inhibits build- aesthetics of the result (Pahwa, 2022). This problem ing new physical structures today with a high degree of will remain unresolved as long as metaverse designers objective beauty, thus limiting emotional engagement. continue to rely uncritically upon favored architectural To realize its full creative potential, metaverse designers images. need to embrace a biology-based understanding of archi- Major companies of several countries in the Asia- tectural elements that give rise to healing environments. Pacific region are investing massively on competitive Alexandrian design patterns (discussed later in this individual metaverse platforms (Sun & Zhang, 2022; paper) and traditional architecture already spell out ANI, 2022; Goschenko, 2022). It is no coincidence that what makes an attractive space, so there is no excuse not those governments have, for decades, replaced human- to apply this knowledge, or in trying to figure out what scale traditional urban fabric with clusters of skyscrap- we already know. Yet today’s metaverse settings tend to ers and unattractive urban spaces that, because of their look like high-tech industrial districts. This is under - form and size, appear “alien” and oppressive to common standable, as clients and patrons, from governments to people. The metaverse offers a welcome escape from private companies, pay design firms to be cutting-edge this perceived physical dystopia. Yet the “look-and-feel” and innovative but do not insist on testing adaptation of previewed metaverse scenes seems informationally before and after implementation. We now have evidence deficient, handicapped by inadequately-engaging design that new high-tech industrial districts such as Shanghai’s styles. Lingang industrial district and Boston’s Seaport technol- Metaverse designers do not realize that dated futuris- ogy hub fail as attractive environments (Zhu & Lu, 2022; tic architecture might be precisely the sort of inhuman Sussman, 2019) What about the open-ended nature of experience users are trying to sneak away from. One the metaverse? Whereas metaverse users freely alter virtual universe looks like it’s made out of giant LEGO human features and form in search of “digital beauty”, blocks, with intentionally crude modular geometries. they regard the virtual environment itself as untouchable Other metaverse developers brought in fashionable (Wharry, 2022). In practice, users are able to choose to international architects as consultants, who then offered alter their own avatar, but leave the background environ- their signature curved, industrial, metallic, shiny, and ment and spaces alone. We are not even sure whether sleek spaces lacking human qualities. This “look” may any such mechanism exists for users to shape spaces and be fashionable in cutting-edge architecture, but does it visual surroundings; hence we assume not. At present, really generate a viscerally-attractive virtual environ- therefore, user-generated creative content will not solve ment? We claim not, based on medical and neurological the potential visual problems with the metaverse setting. data.  Alarmingly, educational institutions are promot- ing this vision as a metaverse paradigm before testing its 3 Aor ff dance, healing environments, kinesthesia, commercial success. This is a big gamble.  objective beauty, and proprioception The metaverse provides a unique opportunity for re- This paper attempts to tackle what for some is the “ele - establishing architectural beauty by selecting architec- phant in the room” of architectural design, i.e. beauty; tural styles based entirely on visual emotional appeal to define what it is, how is it understood, and how it (Gorichanaz, 2022b). Millions of online users prefer might influence virtual worlds. Others do not see an objectively beautiful environments — documented, for “elephant in the room” since they regard beauty as a Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 4 of 18 subject that is objectively non-measurable. The argu - with an unprejudiced sense of objective beauty can cre- ments presented here are pushing the debate forward ate the successful metaverse. Individuals such as game at a time when beauty is being measured, crudely and designers have no problem applying new and tradi- ignorantly, by AI. Yet, amazingly, those results corrob- tional design tools in designing beautiful environments orate other measures of objective beauty based upon that dominant architectural culture dismisses  because mathematics and neuroscience. of style. Special attention should be paid to the subtle but This opens up a promising new application: the extremely powerful emotional/neurological forces that metaverse as a therapeutic (visually salutogenic) envi- define the spatial experience in dance and sport. The ronment (Petrigna & Musumeci, 2022). Wearable sen- same experiences are obviously felt by metaverse users sors that recognize emotions detect the user’s state moving their body while wearing a headset. Insuffi - of wellbeing. The healing response from feedback is cient attention has been paid to the body-space inter- supposed to regulate participants’ emotions towards action due to kinesthesia/proprioception, and, while it a positive mood (Fernández-Caballero et  al., 2016; is difficult to envisage a real solution for this gap, we Marín-Morales et  al., 2018). Until now, changing the can at least point it out. Related mechanisms involve “smart” health environment was limited to adjusting affordances, whereby the human neural system per - piped music and color illumination. It is hardly feasi- ceives unconsciously the bodily “fit” of geometrical ble to change the physical architecture in real time, and components in the immediate environment for human this is where a virtual environment opens up enormous actions, including actual or potential handles available opportunities. A better understanding of those mecha- for “grasping” (Salingaros, 2017). nisms will help to make salutogenic virtual environ- We call for research that generalizes the perception of ments feasible. beauty so as to include other factors such as fundamen- The technological basis for this development is already tal influences of cultural conditioning, environmental in place, since the new generation of metaverse headsets literacy, regional and peer iconography, age, etc. There includes built-in eye-tracking and facial expression sen- are really two distinct topics that the metaverse experi- sors. It should be straightforward to use this feedback to ence intertwines: (i) objective beauty of the surround- change the appearance of the virtual environment in real ings; and (ii) the emotional feedback from the geometry time. The second half of this paper offers a new “form of the virtual spatial experience. Elsewhere, we talk at language” for achieving emotionally-nourishing virtual th length about the inadequacy of 20 Century physical (as well as real) places. urban spaces to accommodate people’s movements and to elicit positive emotional responses (Salingaros, 2005; Salingaros & Pagliardini, 2016; Franco et  al., 2019; 4 The computable and geometrical basis Salingaros, 2021). of objective beauty To truly enhance our understanding of beauty, one 4.1 Definition and independent verification of objective needs to investigate topics that are usually consid- beauty ered less architectural, even though they underpin the Objective beauty combines fractals with nested symme- immediate physical (or virtual) experience. We need to tries, together with other sources of biologically-mean- open the conversation to investigating notions of com- ingful visual information (Lavdas & Salingaros, 2022). fort, contradiction between human biology and learned Unconscious viewer engagement is clearly not based on preferences, cultural baggage, environmental triggers intellectualizing subjective criteria. The more intense of spontaneity, and other related topics. It is essential to yet mathematically ordered the stimulus, the higher the delve deeper into the infinite diversity of human cultures degree of objective beauty. This definition is complexity- and psychologies that propel us to make beautiful things, based: it outlines a beauty scale in which low values cor- whether they be cities, buildings, tools, or artifacts. respond either to less visual information or disordered Designing affordance (i.e. physiological and psycho - information; while high values correspond to coherent, logical “fit” to the physical environment) creates viscer - high-content, organized information (Salingaros, 2014a; ally engaging materiality (Mystakidis, 2022; Shin, 2022). Salingaros, 2018). Affordance — neglected in favor of abstract visual for - Experimental results and industry initiatives support malism ever since the 1920s — significantly enhances methods for evaluating objective beauty using AI. On the user’s embedded experience. (But minimalist design the one hand, experimental neuroaesthetics is fast estab- identifies both physical and visual “handles” as “clutter” lishing the physiological basis of how the body reacts to and eliminates them.) As an architectural license is not environmental information. On the other, computational required to practice in the metaverse, non-architects neuroaesthetics is making possible new insights through La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 5 of 18 machine learning. Their overlap has already created can overwhelm their own body’s signals. The psycho - breakthroughs in aesthetic commercial applications. The logical “familiarity principle” or “mere-exposure effect” following list contains a synopsis of basic points, whose (Zajonc, 1968; Montoya et  al., 2017; Nickerson, 2022) detailed explanation follows in the main text. shapes the discipline because consumer culture is tied to images of modernity. The media are engaged in market - 1. Neuroscience supports the existence of objective ing architecture through images that draw attention to correlates of the experience of beauty, and helps to design qualities not indicative of engagement. For dec- distinguish between what we can call objective and ades, the most prestigious architecture prizes have been subjective beauty. awarded for buildings ranking low in objective beauty, 2. Computational methods of assessing objective archi- thus validating this stylistic standard through authority. tectural beauty correlate well with intuitive methods. Much of the business of architecture occurs strictly in a 3. The personal beauty industry now employs revolu - world of images with little or no further analysis. Images tionary software tools to carry out diagnostics and become buildings, fueling a self-reinforcing loop that evaluations. transforms architecture into image. 4. AI-based graphics/painting programs confirm the high and low evaluations on the beauty scale, hence 4.2 Artificial intelligence and neuroscience support its directionality (which is very important). biologically‑based architectural beauty 5. The digital art world is beginning to use such meth - The neurological approach resurrects historical archi - ods of evaluation to rate fine artworks for the global tecture’s instinctive basis that was replaced by abstract, market. th formal ideals at the beginning of the 20 Century. These 6. “Ugliness” in the built environment induces facial two foundational bases — AI and neuroscience — are distortions, perceived as ugly, and physiological sen- mutually supportive. Recent software can not only help sors combined with AI-based software detect this to evaluate visual beauty, but moreover, is now trained to effect. generate it. This is important because it fixes the direc - 7. Biomedical research to date rates the design styles tionality of the beauty axis, thus validating the biolog- promoted by architectural culture very poorly as ically-based beauty scale. AI diagnoses design rather healing environments, because of the ugliness-stress than implementing an already-decided formal design connection. vocabulary (which is what dominant architectural culture chooses to focus on). Individuals certainly differ in their beauty judgments AI is rapidly evolving, with revolutionary develop- (Vessel et  al., 2018; Vessel et  al., 2019; Corradi et  al., ments motivated, in part, by the realism of the video 2020). Researchers find agreement among subjects game industry. The AI text-to-image generators Craiyon responding to life and natural scenes such as images of and DALL·E 2 are each capable of generating photoreal- faces and landscapes. This result is consistent with the istic original images in response to a verbal description. underlying commonality of the unconscious response, These programs were trained on online images and their 8 9 which links to emotional and physical wellbeing. We captions (more than 10 for Craiyon and 10 for DALL·E would argue that this response comes into play not only 2). The prompt “beautiful building” produces traditional- when people are confronted with natural scenes, but looking buildings high in objective beauty, whereas ask- also when confronted with artwork and architecture that ing for “ugly building” produces industrial-modernist shares certain geometrical organizational features of nat- high-rise buildings low in objective beauty (OpenAI, ural scenes. Also, divergent education, media influence, 2022; Dayma, 2022). peer pressure, and social conformity shape people’s tastes The same results arise when using the photorealistic on consumer and cultural objects (Asch, 1951; Berns AI text-to-image generators DreamStudio (DreamStu- et  al., 2005; Salingaros, 2014b; Hesslinger et  al., 2017). dio, 2022) and Stable Diffusion (Stable Diffusion, n.d.), Artifacts of human culture exist in a feedback loop that two direct competitors of DALL·E 2. Asking for “beau- enforces — and generates — culturally-specific acquired tiful building” produces neo-classical traditional build- tastes (Paßmann & Schubert, 2020). This effect is prob - ings high in objective beauty, whereas asking for an “ugly ably responsible for the observed low agreement among building” generates industrial-modernist high-rises low participants when responding to artworks and to interior in objective beauty. and exterior architecture, where a shared aesthetic taste Using Midjourney, yet another AI-based image-gen- is not observed. erating program that creates artistic paintings rather People’s understanding of architectural beauty is influ - than photorealistic images, the same two prompts as enced by what they see promoted around them, which above generate colorful and curved buildings closer to Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 6 of 18 Art-Nouveau (high objective beauty), versus drab and objective beauty  in photos. Current programs develop structurally top-heavy brutalist ones (low objective Google’s initial NIMA (Neural Image Assessment) by beauty) (Holz, 2022). The results are unequivocal: Art training it on sets of images (Talebi & Milanfar, 2018). Nouveau and traditional buildings satisfy the require- The ones relevant to the present study use prize-win - ments for biologically-based beauty, whereas industrial- ning photographs to train the software: design minimal- modernist/brutalist buildings violate them. Verbal cues ism scores very low. Assessments so far tend to cluster signifying positive-valence emotional engagement thus around a mean value, hence they do not represent the generate a spectrum of traditional architectures. wide range of results that are intuitively obvious from rat- These software packages correlate with general opinion ing architecture on an objective beauty scale. worldwide about what is beautiful. Consistency between It is also possible to measure “ugliness” indirectly intuitive beauty rankings and AI-based imaging/painting through physiological sensors. AI-based programs couple programs is remarkable, because that software was not with input from portable body sensors to detect people’s originally conceived for this purpose. Each of the above unconscious reactions to objective beauty. This informa - AI programs represents a “black box” that is trained from tion is unconscious, hence unbiased when compared to actual user responses to images, and has learned what surveys based on self-reporting (Moore et al., 2011; Men- most people consider beautiful and ugly, so it can gen- zel et  al., 2020). Any signal that alters facial features so erate images corresponding to these reactions. While, in that those are perceived as being “uglier” than normal (a principle, the programs tell us something that we could relative, not absolute measure) indicates induced stress find from a survey, the scale of their data base makes this on the entire body. In this manner, visual ugliness — as application exceed all normal expectations. Duplication information that triggers alarm in the neural system — is not possible in any survey that we can do, or that has induces stress, a reaction that permits “ugliness” to be been done before. detected through its negative effect on wellbeing. As if anticipating our proposals, the new generation of 4.3 Human ph ysiology implies a directionality metaverse headsets are equipped with eye-tracking and of enhancing objective beauty facial expression sensors. This capability makes possible AI applied to image-processing establishes a direction the instant evaluation of virtual environments on the for increasing objective architectural beauty. Going “up” basis of how emotionally-comfortable they are to experi- correlates with increasing informational richness organ- ence, versus any stress they impose. We expect a wealth ized by multiple nested symmetries that guarantee per- of research to be done in classifying the visual “look” of ceptual processing fluency. This result brings to light a places according to a spectrum of differing degrees of basic incompatibility between architectural culture and engagement. the personal beauty industry. Although personal beauty standards vary widely in his- 4.4 Objective beauty in the world of fine art tory, a specific direction of enhancing natural beauty in In a separate application, Naiada software by Kellify com- the millennial quest to improve one’s appearance would pany classifies fine artworks according to their AI-per - seem to be fixed (Grammer et al., 2003; Little et al., 2011). ceived beauty or ugliness (Naiada, 2022; Malfanti, 2022). People are driven by an innate need to display biological By simulating human cognitive processes, the program attractiveness that signals health, and not its opposite. combines a tiny minority opinion, which in the past vali- The huge cosmetics and facial beauty industry is capital - dated art exclusively, with majority popular preferences. izing on AI-based beauty measures (Spapé et  al., 2021; Published details are sketchy; however, regardless of Beauty.AI 2.0, 2022). Applications in that field are grow - whether the results agree or not with objective beauty, all ing exponentially, despite cautionary warnings of possi- of this new research shares a common analytical ground ble bias and stereotyping. It’s only a matter of time before combining AI with measured neurological responses. the same type of software is trained to evaluate objective Going beyond neural networks, software is trained to architectural beauty directly. recognize objective beauty from features in an image AI tools are already available for assessing image aes- directly. thetics through convolutional neural networks (CNN) Many design professionals hold a strong opinion of (Li & Zhang, 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Takimoto et al., 2021; what constitutes a beautiful or ugly building. Architects Goree, 2021; Valenzise et al., 2022; Chambe et al., 2022). evaluate architectural beauty by how far a design con- Originally developed for selecting technically-superior forms to “approved” versus “unacceptable” design styles, images from a set of photos, this method has evolved to in an absolute, all-or-none appraisal. Standard evalua- measure aesthetic appeal. General agreement on like- tions go in an opposite direction to the biology-based ability or intuitive pleasure response is used to evaluate beauty scale, however; what architects now consider La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 7 of 18 desirable (substituting for “beautiful”) actually points (often new) traditional place. Or the character who is in towards lower values of objective beauty (Gifford et  al., a sleek modern place is revealed to be a villain later (e.g. 2002; Greenfield, 2018; Tylecote, 2018; Mehaffy, 2020b; a wealthy corporate figure). This is not entirely universal, Safarova et  al., 2019; Cunningham, 2019; Mack, 2019; e.g. “Tony Stark” AKA “Iron Man” lives in modernist sur- The School of Life collective, 2021; Douglas-Home, 2021; roundings. But it is surely a very high percentage in one Holmquist, 2021; Lind, 2022). The cumulative result direction, revealing something unconscious about audi- is that with very few exceptions, structures built every- ence preferences and perceptions. (And “Tony Stark” has where following World War II fall significantly below a a slightly ironic and comical attitude towards all his sur- median objective beauty value. The generic International roundings and technologies — as if to say they are some- Style is made possible by excessive simplification. This is what silly toys for silly boys ...). the reason why the modern world clashes dramatically The Japanese Studio Ghibli has produced popular ani - with previous millennia of human building activity. mated feature films that portray a colorful, detailed, The overt antagonism between architectural culture human-scaled world. The depicted urban spaces mix and common preferences is therefore also about the with nature and are viscerally attractive, emphasizing fundamental directionality of the beauty axis. Society the engagement of the characters to the place occur- has accepted an ideological predilection for low-ranking ring through biologically-based beauty. Paralleling Dis- buildings, and puts its faith in the postulate that “better” ney, which capitalized on its animated features to create means lower on the beauty scale. These results are likely hugely successful theme parks, Studio Ghibli is opening to generate a controversy, since they favor more tradi- its own theme park in Nagoya (JRailPass, 2022). tional environments over buildings embodying indus- trial modernism. A biology-based model of architectural 4.6 What the profession is doing about this beauty does not favor certain design styles, even though All of this discussion comes from outside mainstream those may be popular in global construction today and be design. Contemporary architectural discourse skirts praised by the architectural media. Yet arguments rely- around “beauty” and “ugliness” while turning a blind eye ing upon scientific analysis are not style-based, and have to debates occurring outside its restricted sphere of influ - nothing to do with promoting traditional design for rea- ence. The profession’s strategy of uncritically trusting a sons of historicism. rigid and  subjective design canon evades the core ques- tion of emotional wellbeing by emphasizing other, unre- 4.5 L essons on biologically‑based beauty from the film lated topics. th industry Styles of the 20 Century and the first two decades st While dominant architectural culture has doggedly pur- of the 21 predominate in commercial-industrial and sued its own aesthetic standards for decades, the film and state-sponsored construction today. Abstract minimal- videogame industries have catered to the public’s sen- ism has had a long and successful run — about one cen- sory cravings and basic intuitions in architecture. It is no tury — and has consequently become established in a accident that architectural settings associated with mor- collectively-shared social identity. Nevertheless, it does ally “good” elements look overwhelmingly friendly-tradi- not correspond to the objective-based aesthetics of most tional (high in objective beauty), whereas their opposites people outside the profession; these common aesthetic are likely to be techno-modernist (very low in objective attitudes are explained by neuroscience, whereas the sub- beauty) (Viladas, 1987; Critton, 2013; Oppenheim & Gol- jective aesthetics established in the 1920s are explained lin, 2019; Colette, 2022; Boys-Smith, 2022; Moffat, 2022; mostly in socio-political terms. Elvenar, 2022). The much-vaunted recent applications of AI to design The brilliant actor and film director Jacques Tati cre - within the profession are limited so far to taking care of ated two comedies, Mon Oncle (1958) (https:// www. technical problems, machine fabrication, and generat- archd aily. com/ 259325/ films- archi tectu re- my- uncle) and ing innovative (usually strange-looking) shapes. Major Playtime (1967) (https:// www. archd aily. com/ 395674/ architecture firms doing this work are apparently not at films- and- archi tectu re- play- time), that are scathing con- all curious about using AI to learn how those structures demnations of industrial-modernist architecture (Moon, will be experienced by the users after they are in place. 2017). Audiences inside the cinemas laughed at these They assume that they already know this; or perhaps the satirical put-downs. Once outside, however, the people question never arises. Architectural culture holds onto its never took any corrective action to halt modernist archi- preferred images, and uses AI-based analytical software tecture replacing their traditional cities. only to implement them, not to challenge them. There are many films that portray the villain(s) in a In every historical case where a new tool has been sleek modernist redoubt, while the hero is in a beautiful developed, it can be used either to extend an existing Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 8 of 18 paradigm, or to question the basis of the paradigm itself been taught to actively ignore engagement and what so as to open up new possibilities. In the case of design, the human perceptive system registers as violations of architects have embraced text-to-image programs to visual organization.  We are dealing with two groups generate more of the same type of product as before. For having opposite preferences, and not comparing an edu- example, AI software is used to mimic the style of current cated versus an ignorant group.  “star” architects, or the styles of an established minimal- The “novices”, along with all humans (and animals), ist design canon (Leach, 2022). We interpret this phe- start to process complex environmental information as nomenon as a limited application of technology. babies, and that interaction in turn contributes to the Remarkably, none of the technology discussed so far is shaping of the synaptic profile and, effectively, the wir - used by the mainstream design profession to evaluate the ing of their brains (Mehaffy & Salingaros, 2012; Lavdas health responses in users. An insistence on reusing a very & Salingaros, 2021; Aresta & Salingaros, 2021; Bourgeois limited set of design and tectonic typologies prevents the et  al., 1994; Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000; Sakai, 2020). It physiological and psychological evaluation of a building is therefore wrong to use this term, because it hints at before it is erected; as well as discouraging the same anal- someone who has come to a topic only now without any ysis in post-occupancy evaluations. previous background. That impression is deceiving, since from birth, people use their neurophysiology to engage 5 How the misuse of language prejudices with and negotiate the built environment, while they experimenters instinctively avoid immersing themselves in a setting that Readers who admire contemporary and minimalist evokes anxiety. architecture will probably react to the above prefer- ences, derived from film and AI-based programs, with a 6 Geometrical fundamentalism predictable objection: that those represent the popular 6.1 Biological complexity is the basis for life preferences of an ignorant public. But this then raises the A deep network structure is a key to living processes, question of whom the architecture of buildings and vir- including human intelligence, and by extension, human tual reality settings is actually for. And, while the debate environments. Much of what it means to be alive, and about the visual style of physical buildings can range much of what humans create, is based on organized com- without resolution, the metaverse is supposed to attract plexity, with its overlapping, pattern-like relationships. paying users, and not to make an ideological statement. It Life itself is an emergent property of highly complicated is, therefore, imperative to re-establish the aesthetic value and organized structure. Its main function is to construct of common shared experience. and maintain — and also reproduce — this remarkable There exists a split between ordinary people endowed “discovered” complexity. Death occurs when an organ- with common biological responses, and individuals who ism can no longer preserve its organized complexity. If it have been psychologically conditioned into a simulated is unable to pass on the encoded information on how to universe where neuro-responses are muted (Weinberger recreate itself, then the pattern is lost forever. et  al., 2021; Weinberger et  al., 2022). These two catego - Human creations can be interpreted as natural exten- ries of humans react very differently to buildings (both sions of the geometry of life, which is why traditional real and virtual). An unfortunate choice of language architecture, art, design, music, ornament, etc. depend perpetuates an old confusion. Instead of identifying the upon and embody organized complexity. Respecting conditioning process that causes clustering in judging this link amounts to a re-focusing of the design profes- beauty, some authors divide the world into “novices” and sions on the essential needs for humans, and the planet, “experts”. But these labels prejudice the situation because so that they can maintain a healthy life. There are specific they belittle people with evolved, unsullied neuro- geometrical and informational attributes required in the responses as being “novices”, while endowing an unde- environment, which reflect human evolution and sur - served authority on “experts” who diverge from the vival. They cannot be obscured or “undone”; and when intrinsic, shareable basis of beauty. societies try to do that, it leads to long-term problems. Categorizing the participants in any experimental sur- vey into “novices” and “experts” can be quite misleading. 6.2 Oversimplification removes essential life qualities In common language, “experts” are people who possess The architectural character of many recent VR designs technical knowledge and an understanding of the sub- seems to be no accident, but rather, a deliberate choice of ject matter as, for instance, when comparing musicians the designers. In part this is because they are influenced and non-musicians in experiments studying reactions by the current design fashions prevalent in the physical to tonal or harmonic violations. But regarding contem- world. In part, too, they are limited by the same oversim- porary architecture, that label refers to people who have plified mechanical forms that are rooted in a primitive La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 9 of 18 stage of industrial development — what we have previ- The neural sensing system tries to predict sensory ously described as “geometrical fundamentalism” (Salin- inputs from the environment in a way that optimizes garos & Mehaffy, 2014). Industrial design has moved informational meaning, thus assuring the organism’s sur- through several historic phases of increasing complexity, vival. Such a fit between the external environment and a but styles remain in a relatively crude phase — particu- small set of internal patterns cannot waste energy in pro- larly when compared to complex biological structures. cessing random or structurally-surprising forms. It is this The architect Christopher Alexander made a key con - “free-energy” minimization that favors the organization tribution to this growing understanding with his first of complexity (Friston, 2010; Parr & Friston, 2018), and book, Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Alexander,1964), which apparently gives rise to animal — and eventually, and a later successor, A Pattern Language: Towns, Build- human — intelligence (Kagan et al., 2022). ings, Construction (Alexander et al., 1977). His “patterns” were design elements that could be operated upon in 6.4 Architectural myopia context, while remaining “interrelated into an organic Today’s interconnected world working through infor- whole”. For Alexander, designers had over-emphasized mation and communications technologies is precisely the neat, top-down (tree-like) hierarchies of many men- what Alexander predicted, decades before the fact. tal constructs, erasing the critical web-like connections Nevertheless, we will argue that the dominant (and that formed overlapping, reinforcing relationships. These flawed) conceptual model of the living world goes back in turn formed clusters of “strong forces”, surrounded by much further, to a non-network hierarchy, and that connections he called “weak forces”. Clusters of relation- has never changed despite all the intervening technical ships, called “patterns”, could be managed more success- advances. fully within a language-like web of larger relationships Alexander observed that contemporary design was lag- — a “pattern language”. ging far behind in coming to terms with the insights of organized complexity. If the life sciences have made such brilliant progress, why do architects and city planners 6.3 The “deep net” structure of Alexander’s patterns, (among other designers) continue to lag behind? We have artificial intelligence, and organized complexity previously pointed to several interrelated causes, includ- Alexander pointed to an essential web-like structure ing the continued dominance of the outmoded pre-bio- within human environments, which was not captured logical models, the continuation of economic incentives in earlier scientific and technological models. A related that tend to reduce design to marketing and commodifi - recognition of network structures is occurring across cation (e.g. an image of the future as a marketable fantasy, the biological sciences. These insights have been con - not one grounded in human realities), and, most relevant firmed and greatly expanded in the intervening years, here, forms of cognitive bias that result from overspe- in fields like ecology, genetics, and even brain science. It cialized training and cognitive distance. We refer to this is now recognized that, just as the genome of DNA and phenomenon as “architectural myopia”: the inability to the “proteome” of proteins are not simple linear or sta- actually see what users experience, and thus the failure tistically average collections of elements, but have an to serve the users’ actual needs (Mehaffy & Salingaros, essential interrelated network structure, the so-called 2011). “connectome” of the brain has an essential deep network th More broadly, both contemporary and 20 century structure. architectural geometries are in fact very poorly adapted These “deep network” insights are finding particular to the complexity of human physiology and psychol- relevance in the field of artificial intelligence. There is ogy (Salingaros, 2014c; Lavdas & Schirpke, 2020; Lav- an intriguing coorollary with the structure of the most das et  al., 2021; Salingaros & Sussman, 2020; Mehaffy & robust neural networks at the heart of many AI systems. Salingaros, 2019a; Mehaffy & Salingaros, 2019b; Mehaffy The process of machine learning mimics what happens & Salingaros, 2020; Brielmann et  al., 2022; Mehaffy & in human brains to some degree, as the neural networks Salingaros, 2015; Mehaffy et al., 2020). As part of a grow - are allowed to evolve and “learn”, in order to more accu- ing movement, researchers use scientific analysis to rately manage the structure of their subject of interest. expose the limitations of the architectural tradition of For example, an elementary AI program “learns” to dis- the past hundred years, and propose a return to more tinguish a dog from a cat, not by absorbing principles or human-centered design techniques, both new and tradi- rules, but by generating and evolving neural networks in tional (Buras, 2020; Alexander, 1979; Ruggles, 2018; Suss- response to numerous examples, and “learning” through man & Hollander, 2021; Galle, 2020). feedback. The system develops its own overlapping A new adaptive design paradigm becomes apparent, pattern-like structure, and its own form of organized which is based on scientific experimental data (Zeki, complexity. Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 10 of 18 2019; Chatterjee & Vartanian, 2014; Coburn et  al., 2017; 3. Geometrical coherence defined by continuity and Armstrong & Detweiler-Bedell, 2008; Pelowski et  al., multiple nested sub-symmetries (whereas an overall 2017; Gallese & Freedberg, 2007; Kirk et al., 2009; Kawa- bilateral symmetry is unimportant). bata & Zeki, 2004; Brielmann & Pelli, 2019). Evidence 4. Definition of the vertical axis through symmetries reveals a four-way relationship among: (1) the web-like that privilege the gravitational sense and also allude structure of organized complexity in buildings and cities; to bilateral face-like symmetries. (2) the design pattern structure employed by Alexander 5. Curvature, especially in the smaller scales (whereas and his associates, and later applied to design patterns in arbitrary, unbalanced curvature strictly on the largest software; (3) the pattern structure of wikis and Wikipe- scale can be disorienting). dia, and the logic behind Agile Methodology and other 6. The presence of rich colors intensified and made developments in software and project management; coherent through color contrast and color harmony. and (4) the structure of neural networks and machine 7. Organized complexity containing a large amount of learning. visual information that is made coherent — hence Our point is that the architecture of the virtual uni- easy to process — via multiple nested symmetries. verse does not have to abide by limitations — the dictates 8. Representations of living organisms, and the actual of fashion, the imperatives of a technocracy, and the eco- presence of plants, animals, and other people. nomic and institutional power structures — that control and influence physical architecture. A new world, and It is useful to itemize the elements found in Indus- one that can be controlled and shaped totally without trial-Modernist, Post-Modernist, and Deconstructiv- investing in building materials or engineering, can define ist buildings that this list excludes. Anxiety-inducing its own logic. So far, the digital universe has inherited architectural styles include standard design and tec- contradictions from the architecture of physical build- tonic characteristics such as: plate-glass curtain-walls; ings. Those stylistic priorities are unnecessary baggage.  minimalist grey, metal, or white surfaces; brutalist raw concrete walls; exaggerated horizontal windows; mis- aligned or randomly-distributed windows on a façade; 7 Toward a “Form Language” of new geometries tilted columns, edges, pilasters, tectonic elements, and 7.1 R ediscovering the biological basis for design windows; a lack of frames and borders; elimination of Bonna Jones and Yen Wong already suggested that virtual organized detail; willful avoidance or distortion of any environments be made more viscerally attractive through symmetries in patterns, etc. Those design typologies human biology, designed by following Christopher Alex- are visually hostile because the neural system does not ander’s results (Jones & Wong, 2008). They wished to expect them (Silber, 2007; Millais, 2019; Curl, 2018; endow online virtual library spaces with the same beauty Curl & Calder, 2019; Salingaros, 2014d). and human feeling found in the most emotionally attrac- While the above list may appear to be deliberately tive of evolved traditional places. But more recently, the anti-modernist, including some arguments of other Lingang Digital Technology Library, claiming to be the schools of thought in favor of minimalism or modern- world’s first metaverse library, simply mimics the high- ism is problematic. We are unaware of scientifically- tech industrial architecture of Lingang Science and Tech- validated arguments (among a very large volume of nology City. This misses an opportunity.  writings promoting the exceptionalism of a narrow Below is a summary of the qualities that human-adap- set of styles) that justify those dominant styles by the tive architecture requires to promote wellbeing through effect they have on the user, as opposed to advantages the physiological and psychological reactions of the for the construction industry. A genuinely salutogenic viewer. These qualities combine descriptions from theo - aspect of the modernist style was the development of retical constructs suggested by Christopher Alexander the glass curtain wall, which let in more light than the (the Fifteen Properties), Donald Ruggles, Ann Sussman, typical building at the time around World War I. The researchers on Biophilic Design, several generations of antiseptic and antibiotic properties of sunlight are ben- traditional practitioners, and a complexity model devel- eficial. Yet the widely accepted notion of smooth, shiny oped by one of the present co-authors (NAS). surfaces having antiseptic properties is not supported by the data (MPHonline, 2023; Miranda & Schaffner, 1. Fractal scaling, in which structure is present at 2016; Aviat et al., 2016). every magnification, possibly with scaling symmetry We mention the history of workspace environments, (where a magnified portion looks similar to the origi - settings that provide closely related precedents to work- nal). ing in the metaverse. A sequence of invented — but 2. Sufficient detail and coherent detailed structure to untested — design ideas have continuously re-shaped define the smaller scales sharply (through contrast). La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 11 of 18 office distribution and interiors ever since World War II 8 Approaching environmental aesthetics (Salingaros, 1995). Dominant architectural culture con- through biology siders that workers have to inhabit the latest “concept” 8.1 The incompleteness of “modern” aesthetics imposed top-down. Corporate and government clients What, then, are the missing aesthetic characteristics, and buy into this “innovative” thinking without insisting how can we re-integrate them into the structures of the on prior user evaluation. The result has been one sub- metaverse? Once again, the work of Christopher Alexan- optimal working environment transformed into yet der offers an instructive contribution. In his four-volume another. Style-based industrial-modernist images over- masterwork The Nature of Order: The Art of Building ride ideas of adaptation and beauty. and the Nature of the Universe, he identifies “Fifteen Properties” that are common to the geometries of living 7.2 A pa ttern language for designing the metaverse systems, including human creations and human envi- Surprisingly, metaverse designers have not yet utilized the ronments (Alexander, 2001; Alexander, 2002; Salingaros, time-tested technique of cataloging and developing useful 2015; Salingaros, 2013). design patterns, by now a standard method in computer Importantly, these properties arise spontaneously as a science. Drawing inspiration from the work of Christopher result of common symmetry-generating and self-organ- Alexander, developers document design patterns and prac- izing processes. One of the most familiar is the property tices that work, and also note those “anti-patterns” that may of fractal structure, or “levels of scale”. Other properties at first seem attractive, but which later turn out to mess can be considered as classes of symmetry, including tiling things up (Salingaros, 2000). Pattern catalogs for behav- symmetries (“alternating repetition”), coherence work- ior, organization, software, etc. have saved an enormous ing through radial symmetry (“strong centers”), and the amount of effort in the tech industry. Cataloguing anti-pat - nested “local symmetries”. terns helps other developers from falling into the same trap These properties are not extraneously applied to the and repeating mistakes that could easily be avoided. structures in question  (as added aesthetics), but arise It would make sense to develop a patterns catalog for from the network interactions of their spatial elements. designing the metaverse, just as has been done for video The process of generating coherent structure has its games (Barney, 2018; Barney, 2021a; Barney, 2021b), and counterpart in the product of environmental form. Self- for user interfaces and web design applications (Vora, organization creates coherence. The Fifteen Properties 2009; Design Patterns, 2023; Juliver, 2022). Success- are identified in the deep network structure of living sys - ful, tested elements of metaverse design should be cata- tems — and indeed, one can see many of these properties logued into an open archive for use by other developers. arising from living processes, including embryogenesis By following the design pattern format, no design com- (Newman & Bhat, 2009) (Fig. 1). ponent or element is automatically assumed to function It is notable that contemporary design partly or wholly well before testing, especially as many of those are ported lacks these properties. In part, this omission can be from different fields/platforms. A useful pattern collec - explained by the influence of simplification through ele - tion will emerge, hopefully in open source, as more and mentary processes of industrial manufacturing, including more working design patterns are added to the list. Also, stamping, rolling, slicing, and the like. The limiting aes - the designers get a better idea of how to optimally com- thetic that resulted then gave rise to a kind of thematic bine those patterns to obtain a more coherent, functional branding of modernity, as characterized by precisely result. Such relationships are never obvious. the  stark “look” of these limited geometries. This was Christopher Barney, author of Pattern Language for the regime of “geometrical fundamentalism” described Game Design, devotes a chapter of his book to Alex- earlier. ander’s “Fifteen Fundamental Properties” (which we Other contributing factors for this violation of the Fif- describe in the next section). There is an intimate con - teen Properties can be explained by the over-reliance nection between design patterns (Alexander’s earlier of economies of scale and standardization (stamping work) and the geometrical concepts presented in Alexan- identical parts, creating copies at large scales); and the der’s later work, The Nature of Order. The discussion and comparative minimization of economies of place and dif- recognition of the purposes and functional requirements ferentiation, as is seen more commonly in natural phe- or performance criteria, which surely impact morphol- nomena (e.g. local signaling, mutual adaptive evolution, ogy, lie in the domain of the proposed pattern language self-organization in place). Scale and standardization are for designing the metaverse. We make no attempt to not absent from biological processes (e.g. standard DNA derive any of that specific material in this paper, since it molecules, large-scale seeding, etc.) but they are strictly extends beyond matters of beauty. balanced with differentiation and local adaptation. Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 12 of 18 Fig. 1 Alexander’s “Fifteen Fundamental Properties” that characterize organized complexity. Image by Michael Mehaffy Fig. 2 On the left, a symmetry-breaking event (Harold Edgerton’s famous photograph of a milk drop shattering against a sheet of milk) produces characteristic geometric properties, including levels of scale, alternating repetition, strong centers, local symmetries, etc. But the relatively crude “modern” industrial processes of manipulating fundamental geometric shapes (lines, planes, cubes, on the right) and then stamping, replicating, enlarging the scale, do not produce these characteristic properties. Image credits: Left, revision by Michael Mehaffy of image courtesy the Edgerton Digital Collection; right, drawing by Michael Mehaffy Human technologies have not yet adopted this crucial 8.2 What is beauty, anyway? countercheck. It seems essential for us to anchor “beauty” in a frame- With the advent of computer technologies, and par- work of shareable experiences instead of esoteric notions ticularly the pattern technology of Alexander, with of architectural aesthetics that may not be shared beyond its lineage of deep networks and organized complex- academia and a narrow section of the profession (Lavdas ity (wiki and Wikipedia, many AI systems, et al.), this & Salingaros, 2022). Encouragement comes from the new goal of fully using insights from how nature organizes discipline of neuroaesthetics, in which the perception of complexity is now within reach (Salingaros, 2014a; beauty can be correlated with the way that objects and Salingaros, 2018; Cunningham & Mehaffy, 2013). In physical settings trigger reactions in the human brain. order to proceed with confidence, we must clarify There is now abundant evidence against the proposi - one misconception about aesthetics and the nature of tion that beauty is entirely subjective and “socially con- beauty (Fig. 2). structed”. While it is true that some aspects of beauty are La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 13 of 18 socially defined and individually differentiated, the expe - 2018). The informational experience of the environment rience we call “beauty” is a universal human phenom- is dynamic and multimodal, whereas when we talk about enon rooted in our common shared biological structures the beauty of a building, we are mostly talking about vis- and evolutionary histories. We might refer to objective ual beauty anyway, unless we are inhabiting it. beauty as this basic  shared experience, whereas the  sub- Multiple nested symmetries organize visual complexity, jective  component of beauty is shaped by other factors, displaying it in a more “fluent” manner. This constraint and is what we might experience separately from oth- adds to randomly-distributed forms that happen to be ers, or other groups that were not exposed to those same fractal (such as, for example, Jackson Pollock’s paintings). factors. Stochastic fractals (as opposed to exact fractals, which A brief definition of “objective beauty” relies upon are mathematical constructs) are an important part of what triggers any emotionally-nourishing unconscious the geometry of Nature, and thus part of what medi- response to visual (and other) stimuli. This approach pri - ates the positive effects of exposure to natural environ - oritizes the impact that “beauty” has on user experience ments. Evolutionary preference for specific natural forms and health, and it also pushes beauty as a measurable — offering meaningful information from particular geo - construct towards a layman’s experience of the environ- metrical characteristics and color qualities — appears to ment. Most importantly, the interactive process that pro- be built into the human body. The perception of fractal vides the experience of beauty is revealed to be just as forms utilizes different brain networks and appears to important as inherent characteristics of the object. require a more fluid, less intensive processing, as sug - Interestingly, the experience of beauty across differ - gested in functional brain imaging studies (Fischmeister ent modalities has been correlated with the strength et al., 2017; Martins et al., 2014). of activity in a specific brain region, the medial orbito- Among promising investigations into quantifying frontal cortex (mOFC) (Ishizu & Zeki, 2011). Increased beauty, another related approach measures the three fac- activation in the same area has also been correlated with tors: coherence, fascination, and hominess (Coburn et al., non-sensory experience of beauty, such as coming from 2020; Gregorians et  al., 2022). Originally introduced in mathematics (Zeki et  al., 2014), and the experience of a study of how architectural interiors affect neurological sorrow (Ishizu & Zeki, 2017). And, while individual brain responses, this idea is now being applied to evaluate exte- responses to certain stimuli can be considered as sub- riors, and, more importantly, to study the dynamic effects jective by definition, this new research reveals objective of moving through a scene. Data is gathered either with invariants. Such responses correlate with the experience portable sensors, or with virtual reality simulations using of beauty, while the correlation of this experience with videos. These studies are directly relevant to coherence certain structural features of the stimuli fits well with a explained by mathematical complexity. direct objective causal sequence between stimulus struc- Visual coherence is only roughly equivalent to beauty. ture, brain reaction, and subjective experience. In the real world, buildings that most people would call Extensive studies on evolutionary aesthetics identify ugly are quite often visually coherent through an overall the mechanism for the perception of beauty as confer- symmetry; but they lack fractality and multiple, nested ring an evolutionary advantage (Turner, 1996; Swami & sub-symmetries. At the other extreme, fractals — espe- Furnham, 2006; Prum, 2017; Seghers, 2015; Confer et al., cially exact fractals (Bies et  al., 2016) — can be used 2010; Leder et  al., 2016; Deutsch & Sainani, 2015). In to design ugly buildings whose awkward proportions order to profit from such a beneficial effect, one expects and asymmetrical geometries are viscerally unappeal- the mechanism of perception to have high visual fluency; ing (Langdon, 2015). There are many more factors that i.e. the specific visual information must be processed contribute to objective architectural beauty (Olszewska, very easily by the neural system. The basis for estimating 2020a; Olszewska, 2020b). architectural beauty as an objective value (that is to say, We can, at this point, answer a question raised by as a value relevant to all by nature) is to realize, following admirers of contemporary architecture in buildings: cumulating evidence, that the human body is an exqui- “Why is there no recognition of recent architecture with sitely-tuned instrument for perceiving specific geom - high levels of organized complexity, as high as those etries that are experienced as beauty. found in Nature, and arguably much higher than classi- All experience of beauty, regardless of the source, cal facades?” As developed in our other publications, and seems to have some specific converging neural correlates. supported by the research of other authors, the type of Informational input is to a large degree visual, and even complexity responsible for human engagement and well- more so in the case of architecture, which is why this and being is very special. It is not enough to design and build a related discussions necessarily focus on visual stimula- complex-looking façade. The difference between natural- tion even though all of our senses are at play (Hirst et al., looking buildings (engaging) versus merely complex (but Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 14 of 18 not engaging) is due to basic mathematical distinctions in data, these results correspond to the neurological their respective geometries. Non-engaging buildings  fail mechanisms that guaranteed human survival during to satisfy several  of the 8 qualities of  human-adaptive evolution. Avoiding subjective aesthetic definitions architecture listed earlier, as well as necessary design pat- influenced by habit, ideology, or the media, new tech- terns. This mechanism has nothing to do with style, and nology resolves ages-old questions. By virtue of their is certainly not limited to classical façades. enormous data base, AI text-to-image generators rep- resent the vox populi missing for a century from archi- 9 Roku City gets it right tectural discourse. Scientific research has discovered A screen saver for a streaming television platform man- innate preferences for salutogenic (health-inducing) aged to overcome the design misfires of the metaverse, environments, which embody human informational and is now talked about as a huge VR success (Winkie & needs. At the same time, a critical break was revealed New York Times, 2022). Roku is a continuously scrolling with dominant architectural culture. painting of a street front consisting of traditional building Acknowledgments façades ranging in style from Art-Deco to Neoclassical. We thank Tim Gorichanaz for very helpful advice and discussions. An extensive natural park and open water separates the Authors’ contributions foreground buildings from a dense built-up city seen in Conceptualization, N.A.S.; methodology, N.A.S.; validation, A.A.L., M.W.M. the far distance. The user’s immediate experience is with and N.A.S.; formal analysis, A.A.L., M.W.M. and N.A.S.; investigation, A.A.L. and the façades, which are drawn in a way that embodies ele- N.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.A.S.; writing—review and editing, M.W.M. and N.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version ments of design coherence such as Alexander’s 15 prop- of the manuscript. erties (intuitively so, as graphic artists do not implement those by name). Funding None. The irony here is that Roku City contains some far from realistic characteristics; for example, it is bathed Availability of data and materials in a dim blue-purple light. Yet the façades’ coherent and Not applicable. detailed  human-scale design attracts people to want to inhabit it, and this is a recurring comment from internet Declarations readers (Craighead, 2021). Another surprise is that the Competing interests over-dense modernist city in the background is actually None. unappealing, but it is situated at a far enough distance so that it doesn’t alarm a viewer concentrating on the fore- Received: 21 October 2022 Accepted: 14 March 2023 ground experience. Kyle Jones, the artist who created Roku City, placed alien invaders, an erupting volcano, giant robots, and other monsters among the skyscrapers in the background city, yet those seem more funny than References menacing. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press. Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. Oxford University Press. Alexander, C. (2001). The Nature of Order. Volume 1: The Phenomenon of Life. 10 Conclusions Center for Environmental Structure. This paper suggested reasons for why the visual expe- Alexander, C. (2002). The Nature of Order. Volume 2: The Process of Creating Life. Center for Environmental Structure. rience of the metaverse, as it is presently conceived, Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & has thus far not met expectations in attracting users. Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language. Oxford University Press. We hypothesized one possible cause (among other Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2022). The Metaverse in 2040. Pew Research Center Available online: https:// www. pewre search. org/ inter net/ wp- conte nt/ unknowns). There is a basic contradiction in the emo- uploa ds/ sites/9/ 2022/ 06/ PI_ 2022. 06. 30_ Metav erse- Predi ctions_ FINAL. tional appeal of architectural industrial-modernist pdf (Accessed 6 Nov 2022) images, versus an entirely different type of environ- ANI. (2022). Metaverse design international program launched in Asia. Big News Network Available online: https:// www. bigne wsnet work. com/ news/ mental geometry based on objective beauty. Research 27257 3224/ metav erse- design- inter natio nal- progr am- launc hed- in- asia findings reveal unexplored impacts of the “beauty (Accessed 11 Sept 2022) of place” on users that designers should pay more Aresta, M., & Salingaros, N. A. (2021). The importance of domestic space in the times of COVID-19. Challenges, 12(2), 27. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ chall attention to. Evidence-based knowledge of attrac- e1202 0027 tive environments is critical in the field of metaverse Armstrong, T., & Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2008). Beauty as an emotion: the exhila- development, and provides insights into how to solve rating prospect of mastering a challenging world. Review of General Psychology, 12, 305–329. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ a0012 558 those challenges.  AI text-to-image generators confirm Asch, S. E. (1951). Eec ff ts of group pressure upon the modification and distor - that a majority of people use their intuition to judge tion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men; architectural beauty. Drawing upon massive internet research in human relations (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press. La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 15 of 18 Audry, S., & Ippolito, J. (2019). Can artificial intelligence make art without art - Craighead, O. (2021). Take me down to the Roku City. Gawker Available online: ists? Ask the viewer. Arts, 8, 35. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ arts8 010035https:// www. gawker. com/ cultu re/ take- me- down- to- the- roku- city Aviat, F., Gerhards, C., Rodriguez-Jerez, J., Michel, V., Le Bayon, I., Rached, I., & (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Federighi, M. (2016). Microbial Safety of Wood in Contact with Food: A Critton, B. (2013). Evil people in modernist homes in popular films. Draw Down Review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 15(3), Books. 491–505. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ 1541- 4337. 12199 Cunningham, G. (2019). Why architectural elites love ugly buildings. The American Ball, M. (2021). Framework for the Metaverse. MatthewBall.vc https:// www. matth Conservative Available online: https:// www. theam erica ncons ervat ive. ewball. vc/ all/ forwa rdtot hemet avers eprim er (Accessed 28 Jan 2023)com/ why- archi tectu ral- elites- love- ugly- build ings/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Barney, C. (2018). A Pattern Language for Games. Perspectives in Game Design Cunningham, W., & Mehaffy, M. W. (2013). Wiki as pattern language. In Proceed- https:// persp ectiv esing amede sign. com/a- patte rn- langu age- for- games- ings of the 20th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP13) 3d1c6 849a3 cd (Accessed 27 Jan 2023) ( Vol. 1, pp. 32–47) https:// www. resea rchga te. net/ publi cation/ 32034 Barney, C. (2021a). Pattern language for game design. CRC Press. https:// doi. org/ 10. 6419_ Wiki_ as_ Patte rn_ Langu age (Accessed 28 Jan 2023) 1201/ 97810 03119 029https:// www. resea rchga te. net/ publi cation/ 34620 Curl, J. S. (2018). Making dystopia: the strange rise and survival of architectural 3762_ Patte rn_ Langu age_ for_ Game_ Design (Accessed 27 Jan 2023) barbarism. Oxford University Press. Barney, C. A. (2021b). Application of pattern language for game design in Curl, J. S., & Calder, B. (2019). The Duel: Has modern architecture ruined Britain? pedagogy and design practice. Information, 12(10), 393. https:// doi. org/ Prospect Magazine Available online: https:// www. prosp ectma gazine. 10. 3390/ info1 21003 93co. uk/ magaz ine/ the- duel- has- modern- archi tectu re- ruined- brita in Beauty.AI 2.0. (2022). Welcome to the first international beauty contest judged (accessed 9 Jul 2022) by artificial intelligence. Wayco International Limited Available online: Dayma, B. Craiyon, 2022. Available online: https:// www. craiy on. com (Accessed https:// beauty. ai (Accessed 9 July 2022) 9 July 2022). Benedikt, M. (1992). Cyberspace: first steps. MIT Press. Design Patterns. UI Patterns. https:// ui- patte rns. com/ patte rns (Accessed 27 Berns, G. S., Chappelow, J., Zink, C. F., Pagnoni, G., Martin-Skurski, M. E., & Jan 2023). Richards, J. (2005). Neurobiological correlates of social conformity Deutsch, D., & Sainani, K. (2015). Objective Beauty. Nature, 526, S16. https:// doi. and independence during mental rotation. Biological Psychiatry, 58(3), org/ 10. 1038/ 526S1 6a 245–253. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biops ych. 2005. 04. 012 Douglas-Home, J. (2021). Why is modern architecture so ugly? The Spectator Bibri, S. E., & Allam, Z. (2022). The metaverse as a virtual form of data-driven Available online: https:// www. spect ator. co. uk/ artic le/ why- is- modern- smart urbanism: on post-pandemic Governance through the prism of archi tectu re- so- ugly (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) the logic of surveillance capitalism. Smart Cities, 5, 715–727. https:// doi. DreamStudio, Stable Diffusion 2022. Available online: https:// beta. dream org/ 10. 3390/ smart citie s5020 037studio. ai/ dream (accessed 11 Sept 2022). Bies, A. J., Blanc-Goldhammer, D. R., Boydston, C. R., Taylor, R. P., & Sereno, M. Du, T. (2022). W. Zuckerberg’s revenge. The Critic (London) Available online: E. (2016). Aesthetic Responses to Exact Fractals Driven by Physical https:// thecr itic. co. uk/ zucke rbergs- reven ge/ (accessed 6 Nov 2022) Complexity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 210. https:// doi. org/ 10. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., et al. (2022). Metaverse beyond 3389/ fnhum. 2016. 00210 the hype: multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, Bourgeois, J. P., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., & Rakic, P. (1994). Synaptogenesis in opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Interna- the Prefrontal Cortex of Rhesus Monkeys. Cerebral Cortex, 4(1), 78–96. tional Journal of Information Management, 66, 102542. https:// doi. org/ https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ cercor/ 4.1. 7810. 1016/j. ijinf omgt. 2022. 102542 Boys-Smith, A. (2022). A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away: what does Star Eloy, S., Kreutzberg, A., & Symeonidou, I. (Eds.). (2021). Virtual aesthetics in Wars tell us about architecture for goodies and baddies? New Design architecture: designing in mixed realities. Routledge. https:// doi. org/ 10. Ideas, 6(1), 25–30 Available online: http:// jomar dpubl ishing. com/ Uploa 4324/ 97810 03183 105 dFiles/ Files/ journ als/ NDI/ V6N1/ Boys- SmithA. pdf (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Elvenar. (2022). Fantasy city builder game. InnoGames Available online: https:// Brielmann, A., Buras, N., Salingaros, N., & Taylor, R. (2022). What happens in your www. innog ames. com/ games/ elven ar/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) brain when you walk down the street? Implications of architectural Fernández-Caballero, A., Martínez-Rodrigo, A., Pastor, J. M., Castillo, J. C., proportions, biophilia, and fractal geometry for urban science. Urban Lozano-Monasor, E., López, M. T., et al. (2016). Smart environment Science, 6(1), 3. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ urban sci60 10003 architecture for emotion detection and regulation. Journal of Biomedical Brielmann, A.A.; Pelli, D.G. Intense beauty requires intense pleasure. Frontiers Informatics, 64, 55–73. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jbi. 2016. 09. 015 in Psychology 2019, 10, 2420. https://doi.org/https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ Fischmeister, F. P., Martins, M., Beisteiner, R., & Fitch, W. T. (2017). Self-similarity fpsyg. 2019. 02420. and recursion as default modes in human cognition. Cortex, 97, Buras, N. H. (2020). The art of classic planning: building beautiful and enduring 183–201. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cortex. 2016. 08. 016 communities. Harvard University Press. Franco, J. T., González, M., & Salingaros, N. (2019). Contemporary public spaces Chambe, M., Cozot, R., & Le Meur, O. (2022). Deep learning for assessing the are designed for lifeless beings, without any sex or sexual desire. ArchDaily aesthetics of professional photographs. Computer Animation and Virtual https:// www. archd aily. com/ 914267/ nikos- salin garos- conte mpora Worlds, e2105 https:// onlin elibr ary. wiley. com/ doi/ 10. 1002/ cav. 2105ry- public- spaces- are- desig ned- for- lifel ess- beings- witho ut- any- sex- or- Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sci-sexual- desire (accessed 27 Jan 2023) ences, 18, 370–375. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. tics. 2014. 03. 003 Frew, S. (2022). The metaverse is doomed. change my mind. Architizer Available Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., & Chatterjee, A. (2017). Buildings, beauty, and the online: https:// archi tizer. com/ blog/ inspi ration/ indus try/ change- my- brain: a neuroscience of architectural experience. Journal of Cognitive mind- the- metav erse- is- doomed/ (Accessed 29 Aug 2022) Neuroscience, 29, 1521–1531. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1162/ jocn_a_ 01146 Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., Kenett, Y. N., Nadal, M., Hartung, F., Hayn-Leichsenring, Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127–138. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ nrn27 87 G., et al. (2020). Psychological and neural responses to architectural interi- Galle, P. (2020). Christopher Alexander’s Battle for Beauty in a World Turning ors. Cortex, 126, 217–241. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cortex. 2020. 01. 009 Ugly: The Inception of a Science of Architecture? She Ji: The Journal of Colette, E. (2022). A brief compendium of modernist homes for movie villains with Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(3), 345–375. https:// doi. org/ 10. flawless taste. Messy Nessy Available online: https:// www. messy nessy 1016/j. sheji. 2020. 03. 002 chic. com/ 2022/ 01/ 12/a- brief- compe ndium- of- moder nist- homes- for- Gallese, V., & Freedberg, D. (2007). Mirror and canonical neurons are crucial ele- movie- villa ins- with- flawl ess- taste/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) ments in esthetic response. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 411. https:// Confer, J. C., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). More than just a pretty face: doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. tics. 2007. 07. 007 men’s priority shifts toward bodily attractiveness in short-term versus Gifford, R., Hine, D. W., Muller-Clemm, W., & Shaw, K. T. (2002). Why architects long-term mating contexts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 348–353. and laypersons judge buildings differently: cognitive properties and https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. evolh umbeh av. 2010. 04. 002 physical bases. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 19(2), Corradi, G., Chuquichambi, E. G., Barrada, J. R., Clemente, A., & Nadal, M. (2020). 131–148 Available online: https:// www. resea rchga te. net/ publi cation/ A new conception of visual aesthetic sensitivity. British Journal of Psy-22891 1177_ Why_ archi tects_ and_ laype rsons_ judge_ build ings_ diffe chology, 111(4), 630–658. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ bjop. 12427rently_ Cogni tive_ prope rties_ and_ physi cal_ bases (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 16 of 18 Goree, S. (2021). What does it take to cross the aesthetic gap? The develop- Lavdas, A. A., Salingaros, N., & Sussman, A. (2021). Visual attention software: ment of image aesthetic quality assessment in computer vision. In Pro- a new tool for understanding the ‘subliminal’ experience of the built ceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Creativity environment. Applied Sciences, 11, 6197. (ICCC 2021) (pp. 11–15) Available online: https:// samgo ree. github. io/ Lavdas, A. A., & Salingaros, N. A. (2021). Can suboptimal visual environments assets/ ICCC_ 2021_ paper_ 112. pdf (Accessed 11 Sept 2022) negatively affect children’s cognitive development? Challenges, 12(2), Gorichanaz, T. (2022a). Being at Home in the Metaverse? Prospectus 28. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ chall e1202 0028 for a Social Imaginary. AI and Ethics. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ Lavdas, A. A., & Salingaros, N. A. (2022). Architectural beauty: developing a s43681- 022- 00198-w measurable and objective scale. Challenges, 13(2), 56. https:// doi. org/ 10. Gorichanaz, T. (2022b). How ‘living architecture’ could help the world avoid a 3390/ chall e1302 0056 soul-deadening digital future. The Conversation Available online: https:// Lavdas, A. A., & Schirpke, U. (2020). Aesthetic preference is related to organized theco nvers ation. com/ how- living- archi tectu re- could- help- the- world- complexity. PLoS One, 15(6), e0235257. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. avoid-a- soul- deade ning- digit al- future- 182831 (Accessed 11 Sept 2022)pone. 02352 57 Goschenko, S. Chinese Zhejiang Province Aims to Build a $28.7 Billion Leach, N. (2022). In the mirror of AI: what is creativity? Architectural Intelligence, Metaverse Industry by 2025, Bitcoin.com 2022. https:// news. bitco in. 1, 15. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s44223- 022- 00012-x com/ chine se- zheji ang- provi nce- aims- to- build-a- 28-7- billi on- metav Leder, H., Mitrovic, A., & Goller, J. (2016). How beauty determines gaze! Facial erse- indus try- by- 2025/ (Accessed 19 Dec 2022). attractiveness and gaze duration in images of real world scenes. Grammer, K., Fink, B., Moller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: I-Perception, 7(4). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 20416 69516 664355 Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78, Li, R., & Zhang, J. (2020). Review of computational neuroaesthetics: bridging 385–407 Available online: https:// www. resea rchga te. net/ publi cation/ the gap between neuroaesthetics and computer science. Brain Infor- 22271 3652_ Darwi nian_ aesth etics_ Sexual_ selec tion_ and_ the_ biolo matics, 7(16). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s40708- 020- 00118-w gy_ of_ beauty (Accessed 9 July 2022) Lind, W. S. (2022). The Ugliness of Everything. The American Conservative Avail- Greenfield, A. (2018). New architecture is almost universally ugly. What can we able online: https:// www. theam erica ncons ervat ive. com/ the- uglin ess- do about it? The Plaza Perspective Available online: http:// plaza persp of- every thing/ (Accessed 10 Aug 2022) ective. com/ can- stop- build ing- ugly- modern- archi tectu re/ (Accessed Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: evolu- 9 Jul 2022) tionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Gregorians, L., Fernández-Velasco, P., Zisch, F., & Spiers, H. J. (2022). Archi- Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rstb. tectural experience: Clarifying its central components and their 2010. 0404 relation to core affect with a set of first-person-view videos. Journal of Liu, D., Puri, R., Kamath, N., & Bhattacharya, S. (2020). Composition-Aware Environmental Psychology, 82, 101841. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvp. Image Aesthetics Assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Con- 2022. 101841 ference on Applications of Computer Vision ( WACV 2020) (pp. 3569–3578) Hesslinger, V. M., Carbon, C. C., & Hecht, H. (2017). Social factors in aesthet- Available online: https:// opena ccess. thecvf. com/ conte nt_ WACV_ 2020/ ics: Social conformity pressure and a sense of being watched affect papers/ Liu_ Compo sition- Aware_ Image_ Aesth etics_ Asses sment_ aesthetic judgments. i-Perception, 8(6), 2041669517736322. https:// WACV_ 2020_ paper. pdf (Accessed 11 Sept 2022) doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 20416 69517 736322 Mack, L. (2019). Eight of the ugliest, most hated buildings in the world. Insider Hirst, R. J., Cragg, L., & Allen, H. A. (2018). Vision dominates audition in adults Available online: https:// www. insid er. com/ the- uglie st- most- hated- but not children: a meta-analysis of the colavita effect. Neuroscience build ings- in- the- world (accessed 9 Jul 2022) and Biobehavioral Reviews, 94, 286–301. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Malfanti, F. (2022). Can AI appreciate the beauty of artwork? Forbes Available neubi orev. 2018. 07. 012 online: https:// www. forbes. com/ sites/ forbe stech counc il/ 2022/ 03/ 02/ Holmquist, A. (2021). Beauty and the brutalist: the architectural effect on our can- ai- appre ciate- the- beauty- of- artwo rk (Accessed 24 July 2022) souls. Intellectual Takeout Available online: https:// intel lectu altak Manjoo, F. (2022). My Sad, Lonely, Expensive Adventures in Zuckerberg’s VR. New eout. org/ 2021/ 07/ beauty- and- the- bruta list- the- archi tectu ral- effect- York Times Available online: https:// www. nytim es. com/ 2022/ 11/ 04/ on- our- souls/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022)opini on/ faceb ook- meta- zucke rberg- virtu al- reali ty. html (Accessed 6 Holz, D. Midjourney, 2022. Available online: https:// www. midjo urney. com/ Nov 2022) home/ (accessed 12 Aug 2022). Marín-Morales, J., Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., Greco, A., et al. (2018). Aec ff tive comput - Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS One, ing in virtual reality: emotion recognition from brain and heartbeat 6(7), e21852. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 00218 52 dynamics using wearable sensors. Scientific Reports, 8, 13657. https:// Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2017). The experience of beauty derived from sorrow. doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 018- 32063-4 Human Brain Mapping, 38, 4185–4200. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ hbm. Martins, M. J., Fischmeister, F. P., Puig-Waldmüller, E., Oh, J., Geißler, A., Robin- 23657 son, S., et al. (2014). Fractal image perception provides novel insights Jones, B., & Wong, Y. (2008). Virtual and Physical: architect Christopher Alex- into hierarchical cognition. NeuroImage, 96, 300–308. https:// doi. org/ 10. ander on living spaces. In Proceedings of VALA: Libraries, Technology 1016/j. neuro image. 2014. 03. 064 and the Future Conference (pp. 1–11) Available online: https:// www. Mazzone, M., & Elgammal, A. (2019). Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial acade mia. edu/ 719414/ Virtu al_ and_ physi cal_ archi tect_ Chris topher_ intelligence. Arts, 8, 26. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ arts8 010026 Alexa nder_ on_ living_ spaces (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Mehaffy, M. From Systems to Patterns: Toward curated web-networks of share - JRailPass. (2022). Studio Ghibli Theme Park is now open: what to expect. Japan able knowledge in the age of clickbait and fake news. Proceedings of Rail Pass Available online: https:// www. jrail pass. com/ blog/ studio- the 63rd Annual Meeting of the ISSS–2019, 63(1), 2020a. https:// journ ghibli- theme- park (Accessed 12 Nov 2022)als. isss. org/ index. php/ proce eding s63rd/ artic le/ view/ 3629 Juliver, J. (2022). The Beginner’s Guide to Web Design Patterns. HubSpot https:// Mehaffy, M., & Salingaros, N. (2015). Design for a living planet. Sustasis Press. blog. hubsp ot. com/ websi te/ design- patte rns (Accessed 27 Jan 2023) Mehaffy, M., & Salingaros, N. A. (2011). Architectural Myopia. Shareable Available Kagan, B. J., Kitchen, A. C., Tran, N. T., et al. (2022). In vitro neurons learn and online: https:// www. share able. net/ archi tectu ral- myopia- desig ning- for- exhibit sentience when embodied in a simulated game-world. Neuron, indus try- not- people/ (accessed 9 Jul 2022) 110, 1–18. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2022. 09. 001 Mehaffy, M., & Salingaros, N. A. (2012). Intelligence and the Information Environ- Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural Correlates of Beauty. Journal of Neuro- ment. Metropolis Available online: https:// patte rns. archi textu rez. net/ physiology, 91, 1699–1705. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1152/ jn. 00696. 2003doc/ az- cf- 172600 (Accessed on 26 Aug 2021) Kirk, U., Skov, M., Christensen, M. S., & Nygaard, N. (2009). Brain correlates of Mehaffy, M.W. Why do architects make ugly buildings? Traditional Building aesthetic expertise: A parametric fMRI study. Brain and Cognition, 69, 2020b. Available online: https:// www. tradi tiona lbuil ding. com/ opini ons/ 306315. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. bandc. 2008. 08. 004why- do- archi tects- make- ugly- build ings (accessed 9 July 2022). Langdon, D. (2015). AD Classics: V&A Spiral / Daniel Libeskind + Cecil Balmond. Mehaffy, M. W., Kryazheva, Y., Rudd, A., Salingaros, N. A., Gren, A., Mehaffy, L., ArchDaily Available online: https:// www. archd aily. com/ 768565/ ad- class et al. (2020). A new pattern language for growing regions: places, networks, ics-v- and-a- spiral- daniel- libes kind- plus- cecil- balmo nd (Accessed 12 processes. Sustasis Press, USA with Centre for the Future of Places KTH Oct 2022) Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden and UN-Habitat. La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 17 of 18 Mehaffy, M. W., & Salingaros, N. A. (2019a). Building Tomorrow’s Heritage. I. What Paßmann, J., & Schubert, C. (2020). Liking as taste making: Social media prac- Historic Structures Can Teach Us About Making a Better Future. Preserva- tices as generators of aesthetic valuation and distinction. New Media & tion Leadership Forum, National Trust for Historic Preservation Available Society, 23(10), 2947–2963. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 14614 44820 939458 online: https:// forum. savin gplac es. org/ blogs/ speci al- contr ibutor/ 2019/ Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, 02/ 26/ what- histo ric- struc tures- teach- better- future (accessed 9 Jul astonish me delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna integrated model 2022) of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception ( VIMAP) and Mehaffy, M. W., & Salingaros, N. A. (2019b). Building Tomorrow’s Heritage. III. Cor - corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. recting “Architectural Myopia”. Preservation Leadership Forum, National Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80–125. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. plrev. 2017. Trust for Historic Preservation Available online: https:// forum. savin gplac 02. 003 es. org/ blogs/ speci al- contr ibutor/ 2019/ 09/ 26/ build ing- tomor rows- herit Petrigna, L., & Musumeci, G. (2022). The metaverse: a new challenge for the age- archi tectu ral- myopia (accessed 9 Jul 2022) healthcare system: a scoping review. Journal of Functional Morphology Mehaffy, M. W., & Salingaros, N. A. (2020). Building Tomorrow’s Heritage. IV. Mak- and Kinesiology, 7, 63. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ jfmk7 030063 ing Places For All, By All. Preservation Leadership Forum, National Trust Prum, R. O. (2017). The evolution of beauty: how Darwin’s forgotten theory of for Historic Preservation Available online: https:// forum. savin gplac es. mate choice shapes the animal world — and Us. Anchor Books. org/ blogs/ speci al- contr ibutor/ 2020/ 05/ 20/ build ing- tomor rows- herit Revell, G. (2022). Madeleine: poetry and art of an artificial intelligence. Arts, 11, age- making- places- for- all (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) 83. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ arts1 10500 83 Menzel, C., Dennenmoser, F., & Reese, G. (2020). Feeling stressed and ugly? Rosenberg, L. (2021). Fixing the metaverse: augmented reality pioneer shares Leave the city and visit nature! An experiment on self- and other- ideas for avoiding dystopia. Big Think Available online: https:// bigth ink. perceived stress and attractiveness levels. International Journal of com/ the- future/ metav erse- dysto pia/ (Accessed 6 Nov 2022) Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 8519. https:// doi. org/ 10. Ruggles, D. H. (2018). Beauty, neuroscience, and architecture: timeless patterns 3390/ ijerp h1722 8519 and their impact on our well-being. Fibonacci Press. Millais, M. (2019). Exploding the myths of modern architecture (2nd ed.). Safarova, K., Pirko, M., Jurik, V., Pavlica, T., & Németh, O. (2019). Differences Mijnbestseller. between young architects’ and non-architects’ aesthetic evaluation of Miranda, R. C., & Schaffner, D. W. (2016). Longer contact times increase cross- buildings. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(2), 229–237. https:// doi. contamination of enterobacter aerogenes from surfaces to food. org/ 10. 1016/j. foar. 2019. 04. 001 Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 82(21). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1128/ Sakai, J. (2020). How synaptic pruning shapes neural wiring during develop- AEM. 01838- 16 ment and, possibly, in disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Moffat, C. (2022). Elven Villages and Architecture. Nerdovore Available online: Sciences, 117(28), 16096–16099. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 20102 811 http:// www. nerdo vore. com/ 2017/ 02/ elven- villa ges- and- archi tectu re. Salingaros, N. (2005). Principles of Urban Structure. Sustasis Press. html (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Salingaros, N., & Sussman, A. (2020). Biometric pilot-studies reveal the arrange- Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M., & Lauber, E. A. (2017). A ment and shape of windows on a traditional façade to be implicitly re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated ‘engaging’, whereas contemporary façades are not. Urban Science, 4, 26. exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, Salingaros, N. A. (1995). A New Type of Work Environment: Christopher Alexander’s 143(5), 459–498. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ bul00 00085 Ideas on Office Furniture and Interiors. UTSA Available online: https:// Moon, G. J. (2017). Inhuman characteristics of modern architecture repre-appli ed. math. utsa. edu/ ~yxk833/ Chris. furni ture. html (Accessed 9 Jul sented in Jacques Tati’s Films. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building 2022) Engineering, 16(1), 91–97. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3130/ jaabe. 16. 91 Salingaros, N. A. (2000). The structure of pattern languages. Architectural Moore, F. R., Cornwell, R. E., Law-Smith, M. J., Al Dujaili, E. A., Sharp, M., & Perrett, Research Quarterly, 4(2), 149–162. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S1359 13550 D. I. (2011). Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap 00025 91 hypothesis in human male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biologi- Salingaros, N. A. (2013). Unified Architectural Theory: Form, Language, Complex- cal Sciences, 278, 774–780. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rspb. 2010. 1678 ity. Sustasis Press. MPHonline. Surfaces And Covid-19: A Public Health Perspective. https:// www. Salingaros, N. A. (2014a). Complexity in Architecture and Design. Oz Journal, 36, mphon line. org/ coron avirus- live- on- surfa ces/ (Accessed 28 Jan 2023). 18–25. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4148/ 2378- 5853. 1527 Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2, 486–497. https:// doi. org/ 10. Salingaros, N. A. (2014b). Cognitive dissonance and non-adaptive architecture: 3390/ encyc loped ia201 0031 seven tactics for denying the truth. Doxa, 11, 100–117 Available online: Naiada. (2022). The most promising works of art. Kellify Available online: https:// https:// patte rns. archi textu rez. net/ doc/ az- cf- 172607 (Accessed 9 July naiada. kelli fy. com (Accessed 24 July 2022) 2022) Newman, S. A., & Bhat, R. (2009). Dynamical patterning modules: a “pattern Salingaros, N. A. (2014c). A theory of architecture (2nd ed.). Sustasis Press. language” for development and evolution of multicellular form. Inter- Salingaros, N. A. (2014d). Anti-Architecture and Deconstruction (4th ed.). Sustasis national Journal of Developmental Biology, 53(5–6), 693–705. https:// doi. Press. org/ 10. 1387/ ijdb. 07248 1sn Salingaros, N. A. (2015). Alexander’s Fifteen Fundamental Properties. ArchDaily Nickerson, C. (2022). What is the Mere Exposure Eec ff t? Simply Psychology https:// www. archd aily. com/ 626429/ unifi ed- archi tectu ral- theory- chapt Available online: www. simpl ypsyc hology. org/ mere- expos ure- effect. er- 11 (Accessed 28 Jan 2023) html (Accessed 9 July 2022) Salingaros, N. A. (2017). Why we need to “grasp” our surroundings: object Olszewska N. Why Has Beauty Disappeared? #1. Venetian Letter 2020a. Avail- affordance and prehension in architecture. Journal of Architecture and able online: https:// www. venet ianle tter. com/ 2020/ 11/ 14/ why- has- Urbanism, 41(3), 163–169. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3846/ 20297 955. 2017. beauty- disap peared- 1/ (Accessed 9 July 2022).13760 03 Olszewska N. Why Has Beauty Disappeared? #2. Venetian Letter 2020b. Avail- Salingaros, N. A. (2018). Adaptive versus random complexity. New Design Ideas, able online: https:// www. venet ianle tter. com/ 2020/ 12/ 18/ why- has- 2(2), 51–61 Available online: http:// jomar dpubl ishing. com/ Uploa dFiles/ beauty- disap peared- 2/ (Accessed 9 July 2022).Files/ journ als/ NDI/ V2N2/ Salin garosN. pdf (Accessed 23 Aug 2022) OpenAI. DALL·E 2, 2022 Available online: https:// openai. com/ dall-e- 2/ Salingaros, N. A. (2021). Rules for Urban Space: Design Patterns Create the (accessed 9 July 2022). Human Scale. Journal of Urban Research and Development, 2(1), 4–16 Oppenheim, C., & Gollin, A. (2019). Lair: radical homes and hideouts of movie https:// patte rns. archi textu rez. net/ doc/ az- cf- 226173 (Accessed 27 Jan villains. Tra Publishing. 2023) Pahwa, N. (2022). Why the Metaverse Has to Look So Stupid. Slate Available Salingaros, N. A., & Mehaffy, M. W. (2014). Chapter 9 of A Theory of Architecture. online: https:// slate. com/ techn ology/ 2022/ 08/ mark- zucke rberg- metav In Geometrical Fundamentalism (2nd ed., pp. 172–194). Sustasis Press erse- horiz on- worlds- faceb ook- looks- crappy- expla ined. html (Accessed Available online: https:// www. acade mia. edu/ 50741 96/ Geome trical_ 29 Aug 2022)funda menta lism (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Parr, T., & Friston, K. J. (2018). The discrete and continuous brain: from decisions Salingaros, N.A.; Pagliardini, P. Geometry and life of urban space, Chapter in: to movement-and back again. Neural Computation, 30(9), 2319–2347. Back to the Sense of the City, 11th Virtual City & Territory International https:// doi. org/ 10. 1162/ neco_a_ 01102 Monograph Book, Centre of Land Policy and Valuations (Centre de Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 18 of 18 Política de Sòl i Valoracions), 2016:13–31. https:// upcom mons. upc. edu/ Weinberger, A. B., Christensen, A., Coburn, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2021). Psy- bitst ream/ handle/ 2117/ 90890/ CH00_ CONTE NTS% 20INT RO_ geome try. chological responses to buildings and natural landscapes. Journal of pdf (Accessed 27 Jan 2023). Environmental Psychology, 77, 101676. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvp. Seghers, E. (2015). The artful mind: a critical review of the evolutionary psycho-2021. 101676 logical study of art. British Journal of Aesthetics, 55, 225–248. https:// doi. Weinberger, A. B., Garside, E., Christensen, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2022). Eec ff ts of org/ 10. 1093/ aesthj/ ayu073 expertise on psychological responses to buildings and natural land- Shin, D. (2022). The actualization of meta affordances: Conceptualizing scapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 101903. https:// doi. org/ affordance actualization in the metaverse games. Computers in Human 10. 1016/j. jenvp. 2022. 101903 Behavior, 133, 107292. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chb. 2022. 107292 Wharry, G. (2022). Which beauty subculture will you belong to in the metaverse? Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: the science Dazed Available online: https:// www. dazed digit al. com/ beauty/ artic le/ of early childhood development. National Research Council (US) and 56515/1/ which- beauty- subcu lture- will- you- belong- metav erse- future- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Integrating the Science of trend (Accessed 11 Sept 2022) Early Childhood Development, National Academies Press. https:// doi. Winkie, L. (2022). In New York Times (Ed.), Pack Your Bags, We’re Moving to ‘Roku org/ 10. 17226/ 9824 City’ Available online: https:// www. nytim es. com/ 2022/ 11/ 02/ style/ Silber, J. (2007). Architecture of the Absurd. Quantuck Lane Press.roku- city- scree nsaver. html (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Spapé, M., Davis, K., Kangassalo, L., Ravaja, N., Sovijarvi-Spape, Z., & Ruotsalo, Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality T. (2021). Brain-computer interface for generating personally attractive and Social Psychology, 9(2–2), 1–27. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ h0025 848 images. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1(1). https:// doi. org/ 10. Zeki, S. (2019). Beauty in architecture: not a luxury — only a necessity. Archi- 1109/ TAFFC. 2021. 30590 43 tectural Design, 89(5), 14–19. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ ad. 2473 Available Stable Diffusion. Stability AI. Available online: https:// huggi ngface. co/ spaces/ online: https:// disco very. ucl. ac. uk/ id/ eprint/ 10075 797/3/ Zeki_ Archi stabi lityai/ stable- diffu sion (Accessed 9 Oct 2022).tectu ral% 20Bea uty% 20Feb% 2016% 20A,% 202019. pdf (Accessed 26 Sun, J., & Zhang, T. (2022). How the Metaverse could become China’s next bubble. June 2022) Sixth Tone Available online: https:// www. sixth tone. com/ news/ 10095 Zeki, S., Romaya, J., Benincasa, D., & Atiyah, M. (2014). The experience of math- 60/ how- the- metav erse- could- become- chinas- next- bubble (Accessed ematical beauty and its neural correlates. Frontiers in Human Neurosci- 11 Sept 2022) ence, 8, 68. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fnhum. 2014. 00068 Sussman, A. How Boston’s glassy seaport fails + why it always will! genetics of Zhu, C., & Lu, M. (2022). Shanghai built its own silicon valley, and very few came. design 2019. Available online: https:// genet icsof design. com/ 2019/ 07/ Bloomberg News Available online: https:// www. bloom berg. com/ news/ 27/ how- bosto ns- glassy- seapo rt- fails/ (Accessed 9 July 2022).artic les/ 2022- 09- 15/ china- tech- hub- linga ng- in- shang hai- lured- tesla- Sussman, A., & Hollander, J. B. (2021). Cognitive Architecture: Designing for How strug gles- to- attra ct- others (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) We Respond to the Built Environment (2nd ed.). Routledge. Zylinska, J. (2020). AI Art: machine visions and warped dreams. Open Humanities Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2006). The science of attraction. The Psychologist, 19, Press. 362–365 Available online: https:// theps ychol ogist. bps. org. uk/ volume- 19/ editi on-6/ scien ce- attra ction (Accessed 26 June 2022) Publisher’s Note Takimoto, H., Omori, F., & Kanagawa, A. (2021). Image aesthetics assessment Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub- based on multi-stream CNN architecture and saliency features. Applied lished maps and institutional affiliations. Artificial Intelligence, 35(1), 25–40. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 08839 514. 2020. 18391 97 Talebi, H., & Milanfar, P. (2018). NIMA: neural image assessment. IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing, 27(8), 3998–4011. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1109/ TIP. 2018. 28318 99 The School of Life collective. (2021). Most “nice architecture” built before 1900. Dezeen Available online: https:// www. dezeen. com/ 2021/ 01/ 13/ alain- de- botton- ugly- archi tectu re- beaut iful- build ings/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Thompson, C. (2022). It’s lonely in the metaverse. CoinDesk Available online: https:// www. coind esk. com/ web3/ 2022/ 10/ 07/ its- lonely- in- the- metav erse- decen trala nds- 38- daily- active- users- in-a- 13b- ecosy stem/ (Accessed 13 Oct 2022) Turner, F. (1996). An evolutionary/chaotic theory of beauty and meaning. Jour- nal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 19(2), 103–124. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S1061- 7361(96) 90020-X Tylecote, R. (2018). The establishment has fallen in love with ugliness — and we are all worse off for it. Institute of Economic Affairs Available online: https:// iea. org. uk/ the- estab lishm ent- has- fallen- in- love- with- uglin ess- and- we- are- all- worse- off- for- it/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Valenzise, G., Kang, C., & Dufaux, F. (2022). Advances and challenges in com- putational image aesthetics. In Human perception of visual information: psychological and computational perspectives (pp. 133–181). Springer hal-03311344. Vessel, E. A., Isik, A. I., & Belfi, A. M. (2019). The default-mode network represents aesthetic appeal that generalizes across visual domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(38), 19155–19164. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 19026 50116 Vessel, E. A., Maurer, N., Denker, A. H., & Starr, G. (2018). Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture. Cogni- tion, 179, 121–131. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cogni tion. 2018. 06. 009 Viladas, P. (1987). Design in the movies: Good Guys Don’t Live in White Boxes. In Today’s movies, modern design signifies ambition, money, power—and now evil. Los Angeles Times Available online: https:// www. latim es. com/ archi ves/ la- xpm- 1987- 11- 01- tm- 17886- story. html (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Vora, P. (2009). Web application design patterns. Morgan Kaufmann. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Architectural Intelligence Springer Journals

AI, the beauty of places, and the metaverse: beyond “geometrical fundamentalism”

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/ai-the-beauty-of-places-and-the-metaverse-beyond-geometrical-QVBKor53PN

References (171)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2023
eISSN
2731-6726
DOI
10.1007/s44223-023-00026-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

As the tech world moves increasingly toward an AI-generated virtual universe — the so-called “metaverse” — new paradigms define the impacts of this technology on its human users. AI and VR, like the Internet before them, offer both remarkable opportunities and pitfalls. Virtual Reality constitutes a new kind of human environment, and experi- encing it relies upon human neurological mechanisms evolved to negotiate — and survive in — our ancestral physi- cal environments. Despite the unrestricted freedom of designing the virtual universe, interacting with it is affected strongly by the body’s built-in physiological and psychological constraints. The eventual success of the metaverse will be determined by how successfully its designers manage to accommodate unconscious mechanisms of emo- tional attachment and wellbeing. Some fundamental misunderstandings coming from antiquated design models have influenced virtual environmental structures. It is likely that those design decisions may be handicapping the metaverse’s ultimate appeal and utility. Keywords AI, Architecture, Artificial intelligence, Beauty, Christopher Alexander, Design, Digital aesthetics, Emotional attachment, Engagement, Healing environments, Metaverse, Objective beauty, Text-to-image system, Virtual Reality One definition of the metaverse is that it is a “massively 1 Introduction scaled and interoperable network of real-time rendered Digital aesthetics are rapidly assuming a central role in 3D virtual worlds and environments which can be expe- both the commercial sector and cutting-edge technol- rienced synchronously and persistently by an effectively ogy. Virtual environments are defining new concepts unlimited number of users with an individual sense of and opportunities in the art world (Mazzone & Elgam- presence, and with continuity of data, such as identity, mal, 2019; Audry & Ippolito, 2019; Revell, 2022; Zylinska, history, entitlements, objects, communications, and pay- 2020) and in architecture (Eloy et  al., 2021). This essay ments.” (Ball, 2021) The metaverse is often confused with will argue, however, that most of what has been devel- VR, but VR is but one component of the metaverse. If oped up to now has been extremely limited in the key the metaverse is ever going to take off on a  large scale, respect of objective beauty. it will be as an immersive sensory environment whose visual attraction far surpasses that of most physical set- tings. Curiosity may trigger a first visit, but it is sensual *Correspondence: feedback that will draw users back. Both real and virtual Nikos A. Salingaros worlds are subject to the same design principles because salingar@gmail.com 1 human beings experience the environment unconsciously Eurac Research, Institute for Biomedicine, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Via Galvani 31, 39100 Bolzano, Italy in order to use it. So the question is really about beauty. The Human Architecture & Planning Institute, Inc, 43 Bradford St, Is it possible to create a virtual world that is more emo- Concord, MA 01742, USA 3 tionally enticing than the real one of a user’s desk and the Sustasis Foundation, P.O. Box 2579, White Salmon, WA 98672, USA Departments of Mathematics and Architecture, The University of Texas, immediately perceivable surroundings? San Antonio, TX 78249, USA © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 2 of 18 Technologists and investors are understandably excited engagement as possible. Otherwise, it feels too “alien”, too about the potential capacities of a digital universe. As detached. with any technological advance — particularly those The outline of this paper is as follows. The associa - involving the prodigious capacities of AI — there are sig- tion of beauty with special configurations of ordered nificant uncertainties ahead (Rosenberg, 2021; Anderson complexity has been developed by scientists, including & Rainie, 2022; Gorichanaz, 2022a). Many saw similarly the present authors. The concept of “objective beauty” optimistic, even utopian possibilities in the first genera - remains problematic and questionable to many readers, tion of the Internet, only to later experience an age of yet it is established by a considerable body of research clickbait, fake news, and deeply negative impacts on the and follows from derivations of its mathematical and wellbeing of human users, notably including children neurological characteristics. (Mehaffy, 2020a). It is too early to predict what conse- Two additional, distinct sources give evidence that vis- quences might arise as this interconnected set of virtual- ual information from more complex, traditional enviro- reality projects moves forward. nents is preferred unconsciously over what architectural Architect Michael Benedikt outlined some specula- culture offers today. First, a clear predisposition comes tive ideas about Cyberspace early on following, unsur- from AI image generators, which combine preferences of prisingly, an architectural approach (Benedikt, 1992). billions of ordinary people; and second, from films and However, the key design and grounding tools for cre- video games. AI text-to-image programs help to con- ating a viscerally-attractive Virtual Reality setting for firm survey popularity through films and videogames navigation are not generally known to mainstream by establishing the distinct characteristics of objective architects. Having focused upon other, formal concerns beauty: we are not claiming that those programs alone for decades, architectural culture is not the best source are sufficient. to provide an emotionally-engaging environment People might think that different-looking architecture where it is most needed. And developers of virtual is good or not for misguided reasons, which we explain worlds have prioritized dominant architectural styles as the phenomenon of “geometrical fundamentalism”. over the totally distinct look of the gaming world. This Despite established historical and political arguments point is critical.  for the stark plainness of geometrical fundamentalism, it This paper offers a conjectural explanation of why the in fact contradicts human psychophysiology. Data from virtual world known as the metaverse has so far strug- Medicine and Neuroscience reveal that good design gled to realize its potential appeal among users (Manjoo, based on objective beauty — that is, from  evolved bio- 2022; Du, 2022). For example, according to Samantha logically-grounded responses — helps to boost human Frew: “Compared to the impressive CGI (computer-gen- health. Dominant architecture tends to have the opposite erated imagery) we are accustomed to in gaming and cin- informational effect, and evidence suggests that this con - ema ... [the metaverse] appears as a basic world designed trast could be detrimental. by tech moguls who are excited by minimalism. People Therefore, it is not such a good idea for the metaverse with little to no imagination regarding the design of phys- to be drawing its cues from mainstream architectural ical spaces.” (Frew, 2022). This criticism is harsh indeed. culture. The metaverse should instead rely upon beauti - But how could a multi-billion dollar project, with access ful architecture (as defined by precise biological codes to the latest scientific advances, start off on the wrong underlying objective beauty) and thus promote not only track? (Thompson, 2022) pleasure and engagement, but also human health. We The metaverse’s lack of appeal may be due, in part, to propose the need for a “pattern language of metaverse a lack of biologically-based beauty in its intrinsic struc- design” that documents discovered and tested design ele- ture (Lavdas & Salingaros, 2022). If this is a contributing ments and best practices, following the example of pat- factor, then by responding to the innate need for “objec- tern languages in other fields. This approach towards tive beauty” (a term to be explained later), the metaverse creating a better virtual reality experience would begin could greatly increase its user allure. Moreover, there with objective beauty. is tantalizing evidence that the metaverse could even The rest of this paper outlines our understanding of become a new healing environment. Technical limita- beauty and how to implement it. Biologically-based tions in a virtual world cut down most of the neurologi- beauty is objective. The evidence for this comes from cal channels of the unconscious engagement possible in AI beauty ratings, experiments in neuroaesthetics, the a comparable real  physical setting. An experience that mathematics of organic form, etc. We also give details drastically reduces the biological sensory experience of of beauty as a prescription of how to create it. Objective the real world nevertheless needs to maintain as much beauty is grounded in geometric structure that combines La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 3 of 18 fractals with informational complexity and multiple example, by travel companies as “the most beautiful nested symmetries. This part of our discussion is neces - places in the world” — to ones that many might consider sary to debunk the mistaken notion that it is somehow ugly. Those places share the common geometrical char - not possible to create visceral beauty today. acteristics responsible for objective beauty, which we describe later in this paper, and those are easily imple- 2 How unattractive design might impact mented in the metaverse. The truly revolutionary next the metaverse step will occur when users begin to demand that physi- The metaverse is becoming a big player in generating new cal places embody the same quality of elevated objective virtual worlds (Dwivedi et al., 2022; Bibri & Allam, 2022). beauty they have already experienced in a virtual world. Yet major developers seem to have miscalculated in mov- Virtual environments wishing to have some semblance ing over to virtual universes being created for online of reality that attracts regular participants must draw on socializing and participatory gaming. An infatuation with positive-valence emotions. Absurdly, in today’s world of contemporary minimalist architecture reflects the same almost unlimited technical possibilities, architecture — subjective aesthetic in a virtual world into which billions both material and virtual — tends to be limited by design of dollars have been invested; but the public is reacting elements that diminish its degree of objective beauty. An unenthusiastically or even negatively to the perceived ingrained professional and social inertia inhibits build- aesthetics of the result (Pahwa, 2022). This problem ing new physical structures today with a high degree of will remain unresolved as long as metaverse designers objective beauty, thus limiting emotional engagement. continue to rely uncritically upon favored architectural To realize its full creative potential, metaverse designers images. need to embrace a biology-based understanding of archi- Major companies of several countries in the Asia- tectural elements that give rise to healing environments. Pacific region are investing massively on competitive Alexandrian design patterns (discussed later in this individual metaverse platforms (Sun & Zhang, 2022; paper) and traditional architecture already spell out ANI, 2022; Goschenko, 2022). It is no coincidence that what makes an attractive space, so there is no excuse not those governments have, for decades, replaced human- to apply this knowledge, or in trying to figure out what scale traditional urban fabric with clusters of skyscrap- we already know. Yet today’s metaverse settings tend to ers and unattractive urban spaces that, because of their look like high-tech industrial districts. This is under - form and size, appear “alien” and oppressive to common standable, as clients and patrons, from governments to people. The metaverse offers a welcome escape from private companies, pay design firms to be cutting-edge this perceived physical dystopia. Yet the “look-and-feel” and innovative but do not insist on testing adaptation of previewed metaverse scenes seems informationally before and after implementation. We now have evidence deficient, handicapped by inadequately-engaging design that new high-tech industrial districts such as Shanghai’s styles. Lingang industrial district and Boston’s Seaport technol- Metaverse designers do not realize that dated futuris- ogy hub fail as attractive environments (Zhu & Lu, 2022; tic architecture might be precisely the sort of inhuman Sussman, 2019) What about the open-ended nature of experience users are trying to sneak away from. One the metaverse? Whereas metaverse users freely alter virtual universe looks like it’s made out of giant LEGO human features and form in search of “digital beauty”, blocks, with intentionally crude modular geometries. they regard the virtual environment itself as untouchable Other metaverse developers brought in fashionable (Wharry, 2022). In practice, users are able to choose to international architects as consultants, who then offered alter their own avatar, but leave the background environ- their signature curved, industrial, metallic, shiny, and ment and spaces alone. We are not even sure whether sleek spaces lacking human qualities. This “look” may any such mechanism exists for users to shape spaces and be fashionable in cutting-edge architecture, but does it visual surroundings; hence we assume not. At present, really generate a viscerally-attractive virtual environ- therefore, user-generated creative content will not solve ment? We claim not, based on medical and neurological the potential visual problems with the metaverse setting. data.  Alarmingly, educational institutions are promot- ing this vision as a metaverse paradigm before testing its 3 Aor ff dance, healing environments, kinesthesia, commercial success. This is a big gamble.  objective beauty, and proprioception The metaverse provides a unique opportunity for re- This paper attempts to tackle what for some is the “ele - establishing architectural beauty by selecting architec- phant in the room” of architectural design, i.e. beauty; tural styles based entirely on visual emotional appeal to define what it is, how is it understood, and how it (Gorichanaz, 2022b). Millions of online users prefer might influence virtual worlds. Others do not see an objectively beautiful environments — documented, for “elephant in the room” since they regard beauty as a Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 4 of 18 subject that is objectively non-measurable. The argu - with an unprejudiced sense of objective beauty can cre- ments presented here are pushing the debate forward ate the successful metaverse. Individuals such as game at a time when beauty is being measured, crudely and designers have no problem applying new and tradi- ignorantly, by AI. Yet, amazingly, those results corrob- tional design tools in designing beautiful environments orate other measures of objective beauty based upon that dominant architectural culture dismisses  because mathematics and neuroscience. of style. Special attention should be paid to the subtle but This opens up a promising new application: the extremely powerful emotional/neurological forces that metaverse as a therapeutic (visually salutogenic) envi- define the spatial experience in dance and sport. The ronment (Petrigna & Musumeci, 2022). Wearable sen- same experiences are obviously felt by metaverse users sors that recognize emotions detect the user’s state moving their body while wearing a headset. Insuffi - of wellbeing. The healing response from feedback is cient attention has been paid to the body-space inter- supposed to regulate participants’ emotions towards action due to kinesthesia/proprioception, and, while it a positive mood (Fernández-Caballero et  al., 2016; is difficult to envisage a real solution for this gap, we Marín-Morales et  al., 2018). Until now, changing the can at least point it out. Related mechanisms involve “smart” health environment was limited to adjusting affordances, whereby the human neural system per - piped music and color illumination. It is hardly feasi- ceives unconsciously the bodily “fit” of geometrical ble to change the physical architecture in real time, and components in the immediate environment for human this is where a virtual environment opens up enormous actions, including actual or potential handles available opportunities. A better understanding of those mecha- for “grasping” (Salingaros, 2017). nisms will help to make salutogenic virtual environ- We call for research that generalizes the perception of ments feasible. beauty so as to include other factors such as fundamen- The technological basis for this development is already tal influences of cultural conditioning, environmental in place, since the new generation of metaverse headsets literacy, regional and peer iconography, age, etc. There includes built-in eye-tracking and facial expression sen- are really two distinct topics that the metaverse experi- sors. It should be straightforward to use this feedback to ence intertwines: (i) objective beauty of the surround- change the appearance of the virtual environment in real ings; and (ii) the emotional feedback from the geometry time. The second half of this paper offers a new “form of the virtual spatial experience. Elsewhere, we talk at language” for achieving emotionally-nourishing virtual th length about the inadequacy of 20 Century physical (as well as real) places. urban spaces to accommodate people’s movements and to elicit positive emotional responses (Salingaros, 2005; Salingaros & Pagliardini, 2016; Franco et  al., 2019; 4 The computable and geometrical basis Salingaros, 2021). of objective beauty To truly enhance our understanding of beauty, one 4.1 Definition and independent verification of objective needs to investigate topics that are usually consid- beauty ered less architectural, even though they underpin the Objective beauty combines fractals with nested symme- immediate physical (or virtual) experience. We need to tries, together with other sources of biologically-mean- open the conversation to investigating notions of com- ingful visual information (Lavdas & Salingaros, 2022). fort, contradiction between human biology and learned Unconscious viewer engagement is clearly not based on preferences, cultural baggage, environmental triggers intellectualizing subjective criteria. The more intense of spontaneity, and other related topics. It is essential to yet mathematically ordered the stimulus, the higher the delve deeper into the infinite diversity of human cultures degree of objective beauty. This definition is complexity- and psychologies that propel us to make beautiful things, based: it outlines a beauty scale in which low values cor- whether they be cities, buildings, tools, or artifacts. respond either to less visual information or disordered Designing affordance (i.e. physiological and psycho - information; while high values correspond to coherent, logical “fit” to the physical environment) creates viscer - high-content, organized information (Salingaros, 2014a; ally engaging materiality (Mystakidis, 2022; Shin, 2022). Salingaros, 2018). Affordance — neglected in favor of abstract visual for - Experimental results and industry initiatives support malism ever since the 1920s — significantly enhances methods for evaluating objective beauty using AI. On the user’s embedded experience. (But minimalist design the one hand, experimental neuroaesthetics is fast estab- identifies both physical and visual “handles” as “clutter” lishing the physiological basis of how the body reacts to and eliminates them.) As an architectural license is not environmental information. On the other, computational required to practice in the metaverse, non-architects neuroaesthetics is making possible new insights through La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 5 of 18 machine learning. Their overlap has already created can overwhelm their own body’s signals. The psycho - breakthroughs in aesthetic commercial applications. The logical “familiarity principle” or “mere-exposure effect” following list contains a synopsis of basic points, whose (Zajonc, 1968; Montoya et  al., 2017; Nickerson, 2022) detailed explanation follows in the main text. shapes the discipline because consumer culture is tied to images of modernity. The media are engaged in market - 1. Neuroscience supports the existence of objective ing architecture through images that draw attention to correlates of the experience of beauty, and helps to design qualities not indicative of engagement. For dec- distinguish between what we can call objective and ades, the most prestigious architecture prizes have been subjective beauty. awarded for buildings ranking low in objective beauty, 2. Computational methods of assessing objective archi- thus validating this stylistic standard through authority. tectural beauty correlate well with intuitive methods. Much of the business of architecture occurs strictly in a 3. The personal beauty industry now employs revolu - world of images with little or no further analysis. Images tionary software tools to carry out diagnostics and become buildings, fueling a self-reinforcing loop that evaluations. transforms architecture into image. 4. AI-based graphics/painting programs confirm the high and low evaluations on the beauty scale, hence 4.2 Artificial intelligence and neuroscience support its directionality (which is very important). biologically‑based architectural beauty 5. The digital art world is beginning to use such meth - The neurological approach resurrects historical archi - ods of evaluation to rate fine artworks for the global tecture’s instinctive basis that was replaced by abstract, market. th formal ideals at the beginning of the 20 Century. These 6. “Ugliness” in the built environment induces facial two foundational bases — AI and neuroscience — are distortions, perceived as ugly, and physiological sen- mutually supportive. Recent software can not only help sors combined with AI-based software detect this to evaluate visual beauty, but moreover, is now trained to effect. generate it. This is important because it fixes the direc - 7. Biomedical research to date rates the design styles tionality of the beauty axis, thus validating the biolog- promoted by architectural culture very poorly as ically-based beauty scale. AI diagnoses design rather healing environments, because of the ugliness-stress than implementing an already-decided formal design connection. vocabulary (which is what dominant architectural culture chooses to focus on). Individuals certainly differ in their beauty judgments AI is rapidly evolving, with revolutionary develop- (Vessel et  al., 2018; Vessel et  al., 2019; Corradi et  al., ments motivated, in part, by the realism of the video 2020). Researchers find agreement among subjects game industry. The AI text-to-image generators Craiyon responding to life and natural scenes such as images of and DALL·E 2 are each capable of generating photoreal- faces and landscapes. This result is consistent with the istic original images in response to a verbal description. underlying commonality of the unconscious response, These programs were trained on online images and their 8 9 which links to emotional and physical wellbeing. We captions (more than 10 for Craiyon and 10 for DALL·E would argue that this response comes into play not only 2). The prompt “beautiful building” produces traditional- when people are confronted with natural scenes, but looking buildings high in objective beauty, whereas ask- also when confronted with artwork and architecture that ing for “ugly building” produces industrial-modernist shares certain geometrical organizational features of nat- high-rise buildings low in objective beauty (OpenAI, ural scenes. Also, divergent education, media influence, 2022; Dayma, 2022). peer pressure, and social conformity shape people’s tastes The same results arise when using the photorealistic on consumer and cultural objects (Asch, 1951; Berns AI text-to-image generators DreamStudio (DreamStu- et  al., 2005; Salingaros, 2014b; Hesslinger et  al., 2017). dio, 2022) and Stable Diffusion (Stable Diffusion, n.d.), Artifacts of human culture exist in a feedback loop that two direct competitors of DALL·E 2. Asking for “beau- enforces — and generates — culturally-specific acquired tiful building” produces neo-classical traditional build- tastes (Paßmann & Schubert, 2020). This effect is prob - ings high in objective beauty, whereas asking for an “ugly ably responsible for the observed low agreement among building” generates industrial-modernist high-rises low participants when responding to artworks and to interior in objective beauty. and exterior architecture, where a shared aesthetic taste Using Midjourney, yet another AI-based image-gen- is not observed. erating program that creates artistic paintings rather People’s understanding of architectural beauty is influ - than photorealistic images, the same two prompts as enced by what they see promoted around them, which above generate colorful and curved buildings closer to Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 6 of 18 Art-Nouveau (high objective beauty), versus drab and objective beauty  in photos. Current programs develop structurally top-heavy brutalist ones (low objective Google’s initial NIMA (Neural Image Assessment) by beauty) (Holz, 2022). The results are unequivocal: Art training it on sets of images (Talebi & Milanfar, 2018). Nouveau and traditional buildings satisfy the require- The ones relevant to the present study use prize-win - ments for biologically-based beauty, whereas industrial- ning photographs to train the software: design minimal- modernist/brutalist buildings violate them. Verbal cues ism scores very low. Assessments so far tend to cluster signifying positive-valence emotional engagement thus around a mean value, hence they do not represent the generate a spectrum of traditional architectures. wide range of results that are intuitively obvious from rat- These software packages correlate with general opinion ing architecture on an objective beauty scale. worldwide about what is beautiful. Consistency between It is also possible to measure “ugliness” indirectly intuitive beauty rankings and AI-based imaging/painting through physiological sensors. AI-based programs couple programs is remarkable, because that software was not with input from portable body sensors to detect people’s originally conceived for this purpose. Each of the above unconscious reactions to objective beauty. This informa - AI programs represents a “black box” that is trained from tion is unconscious, hence unbiased when compared to actual user responses to images, and has learned what surveys based on self-reporting (Moore et al., 2011; Men- most people consider beautiful and ugly, so it can gen- zel et  al., 2020). Any signal that alters facial features so erate images corresponding to these reactions. While, in that those are perceived as being “uglier” than normal (a principle, the programs tell us something that we could relative, not absolute measure) indicates induced stress find from a survey, the scale of their data base makes this on the entire body. In this manner, visual ugliness — as application exceed all normal expectations. Duplication information that triggers alarm in the neural system — is not possible in any survey that we can do, or that has induces stress, a reaction that permits “ugliness” to be been done before. detected through its negative effect on wellbeing. As if anticipating our proposals, the new generation of 4.3 Human ph ysiology implies a directionality metaverse headsets are equipped with eye-tracking and of enhancing objective beauty facial expression sensors. This capability makes possible AI applied to image-processing establishes a direction the instant evaluation of virtual environments on the for increasing objective architectural beauty. Going “up” basis of how emotionally-comfortable they are to experi- correlates with increasing informational richness organ- ence, versus any stress they impose. We expect a wealth ized by multiple nested symmetries that guarantee per- of research to be done in classifying the visual “look” of ceptual processing fluency. This result brings to light a places according to a spectrum of differing degrees of basic incompatibility between architectural culture and engagement. the personal beauty industry. Although personal beauty standards vary widely in his- 4.4 Objective beauty in the world of fine art tory, a specific direction of enhancing natural beauty in In a separate application, Naiada software by Kellify com- the millennial quest to improve one’s appearance would pany classifies fine artworks according to their AI-per - seem to be fixed (Grammer et al., 2003; Little et al., 2011). ceived beauty or ugliness (Naiada, 2022; Malfanti, 2022). People are driven by an innate need to display biological By simulating human cognitive processes, the program attractiveness that signals health, and not its opposite. combines a tiny minority opinion, which in the past vali- The huge cosmetics and facial beauty industry is capital - dated art exclusively, with majority popular preferences. izing on AI-based beauty measures (Spapé et  al., 2021; Published details are sketchy; however, regardless of Beauty.AI 2.0, 2022). Applications in that field are grow - whether the results agree or not with objective beauty, all ing exponentially, despite cautionary warnings of possi- of this new research shares a common analytical ground ble bias and stereotyping. It’s only a matter of time before combining AI with measured neurological responses. the same type of software is trained to evaluate objective Going beyond neural networks, software is trained to architectural beauty directly. recognize objective beauty from features in an image AI tools are already available for assessing image aes- directly. thetics through convolutional neural networks (CNN) Many design professionals hold a strong opinion of (Li & Zhang, 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Takimoto et al., 2021; what constitutes a beautiful or ugly building. Architects Goree, 2021; Valenzise et al., 2022; Chambe et al., 2022). evaluate architectural beauty by how far a design con- Originally developed for selecting technically-superior forms to “approved” versus “unacceptable” design styles, images from a set of photos, this method has evolved to in an absolute, all-or-none appraisal. Standard evalua- measure aesthetic appeal. General agreement on like- tions go in an opposite direction to the biology-based ability or intuitive pleasure response is used to evaluate beauty scale, however; what architects now consider La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 7 of 18 desirable (substituting for “beautiful”) actually points (often new) traditional place. Or the character who is in towards lower values of objective beauty (Gifford et  al., a sleek modern place is revealed to be a villain later (e.g. 2002; Greenfield, 2018; Tylecote, 2018; Mehaffy, 2020b; a wealthy corporate figure). This is not entirely universal, Safarova et  al., 2019; Cunningham, 2019; Mack, 2019; e.g. “Tony Stark” AKA “Iron Man” lives in modernist sur- The School of Life collective, 2021; Douglas-Home, 2021; roundings. But it is surely a very high percentage in one Holmquist, 2021; Lind, 2022). The cumulative result direction, revealing something unconscious about audi- is that with very few exceptions, structures built every- ence preferences and perceptions. (And “Tony Stark” has where following World War II fall significantly below a a slightly ironic and comical attitude towards all his sur- median objective beauty value. The generic International roundings and technologies — as if to say they are some- Style is made possible by excessive simplification. This is what silly toys for silly boys ...). the reason why the modern world clashes dramatically The Japanese Studio Ghibli has produced popular ani - with previous millennia of human building activity. mated feature films that portray a colorful, detailed, The overt antagonism between architectural culture human-scaled world. The depicted urban spaces mix and common preferences is therefore also about the with nature and are viscerally attractive, emphasizing fundamental directionality of the beauty axis. Society the engagement of the characters to the place occur- has accepted an ideological predilection for low-ranking ring through biologically-based beauty. Paralleling Dis- buildings, and puts its faith in the postulate that “better” ney, which capitalized on its animated features to create means lower on the beauty scale. These results are likely hugely successful theme parks, Studio Ghibli is opening to generate a controversy, since they favor more tradi- its own theme park in Nagoya (JRailPass, 2022). tional environments over buildings embodying indus- trial modernism. A biology-based model of architectural 4.6 What the profession is doing about this beauty does not favor certain design styles, even though All of this discussion comes from outside mainstream those may be popular in global construction today and be design. Contemporary architectural discourse skirts praised by the architectural media. Yet arguments rely- around “beauty” and “ugliness” while turning a blind eye ing upon scientific analysis are not style-based, and have to debates occurring outside its restricted sphere of influ - nothing to do with promoting traditional design for rea- ence. The profession’s strategy of uncritically trusting a sons of historicism. rigid and  subjective design canon evades the core ques- tion of emotional wellbeing by emphasizing other, unre- 4.5 L essons on biologically‑based beauty from the film lated topics. th industry Styles of the 20 Century and the first two decades st While dominant architectural culture has doggedly pur- of the 21 predominate in commercial-industrial and sued its own aesthetic standards for decades, the film and state-sponsored construction today. Abstract minimal- videogame industries have catered to the public’s sen- ism has had a long and successful run — about one cen- sory cravings and basic intuitions in architecture. It is no tury — and has consequently become established in a accident that architectural settings associated with mor- collectively-shared social identity. Nevertheless, it does ally “good” elements look overwhelmingly friendly-tradi- not correspond to the objective-based aesthetics of most tional (high in objective beauty), whereas their opposites people outside the profession; these common aesthetic are likely to be techno-modernist (very low in objective attitudes are explained by neuroscience, whereas the sub- beauty) (Viladas, 1987; Critton, 2013; Oppenheim & Gol- jective aesthetics established in the 1920s are explained lin, 2019; Colette, 2022; Boys-Smith, 2022; Moffat, 2022; mostly in socio-political terms. Elvenar, 2022). The much-vaunted recent applications of AI to design The brilliant actor and film director Jacques Tati cre - within the profession are limited so far to taking care of ated two comedies, Mon Oncle (1958) (https:// www. technical problems, machine fabrication, and generat- archd aily. com/ 259325/ films- archi tectu re- my- uncle) and ing innovative (usually strange-looking) shapes. Major Playtime (1967) (https:// www. archd aily. com/ 395674/ architecture firms doing this work are apparently not at films- and- archi tectu re- play- time), that are scathing con- all curious about using AI to learn how those structures demnations of industrial-modernist architecture (Moon, will be experienced by the users after they are in place. 2017). Audiences inside the cinemas laughed at these They assume that they already know this; or perhaps the satirical put-downs. Once outside, however, the people question never arises. Architectural culture holds onto its never took any corrective action to halt modernist archi- preferred images, and uses AI-based analytical software tecture replacing their traditional cities. only to implement them, not to challenge them. There are many films that portray the villain(s) in a In every historical case where a new tool has been sleek modernist redoubt, while the hero is in a beautiful developed, it can be used either to extend an existing Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 8 of 18 paradigm, or to question the basis of the paradigm itself been taught to actively ignore engagement and what so as to open up new possibilities. In the case of design, the human perceptive system registers as violations of architects have embraced text-to-image programs to visual organization.  We are dealing with two groups generate more of the same type of product as before. For having opposite preferences, and not comparing an edu- example, AI software is used to mimic the style of current cated versus an ignorant group.  “star” architects, or the styles of an established minimal- The “novices”, along with all humans (and animals), ist design canon (Leach, 2022). We interpret this phe- start to process complex environmental information as nomenon as a limited application of technology. babies, and that interaction in turn contributes to the Remarkably, none of the technology discussed so far is shaping of the synaptic profile and, effectively, the wir - used by the mainstream design profession to evaluate the ing of their brains (Mehaffy & Salingaros, 2012; Lavdas health responses in users. An insistence on reusing a very & Salingaros, 2021; Aresta & Salingaros, 2021; Bourgeois limited set of design and tectonic typologies prevents the et  al., 1994; Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000; Sakai, 2020). It physiological and psychological evaluation of a building is therefore wrong to use this term, because it hints at before it is erected; as well as discouraging the same anal- someone who has come to a topic only now without any ysis in post-occupancy evaluations. previous background. That impression is deceiving, since from birth, people use their neurophysiology to engage 5 How the misuse of language prejudices with and negotiate the built environment, while they experimenters instinctively avoid immersing themselves in a setting that Readers who admire contemporary and minimalist evokes anxiety. architecture will probably react to the above prefer- ences, derived from film and AI-based programs, with a 6 Geometrical fundamentalism predictable objection: that those represent the popular 6.1 Biological complexity is the basis for life preferences of an ignorant public. But this then raises the A deep network structure is a key to living processes, question of whom the architecture of buildings and vir- including human intelligence, and by extension, human tual reality settings is actually for. And, while the debate environments. Much of what it means to be alive, and about the visual style of physical buildings can range much of what humans create, is based on organized com- without resolution, the metaverse is supposed to attract plexity, with its overlapping, pattern-like relationships. paying users, and not to make an ideological statement. It Life itself is an emergent property of highly complicated is, therefore, imperative to re-establish the aesthetic value and organized structure. Its main function is to construct of common shared experience. and maintain — and also reproduce — this remarkable There exists a split between ordinary people endowed “discovered” complexity. Death occurs when an organ- with common biological responses, and individuals who ism can no longer preserve its organized complexity. If it have been psychologically conditioned into a simulated is unable to pass on the encoded information on how to universe where neuro-responses are muted (Weinberger recreate itself, then the pattern is lost forever. et  al., 2021; Weinberger et  al., 2022). These two catego - Human creations can be interpreted as natural exten- ries of humans react very differently to buildings (both sions of the geometry of life, which is why traditional real and virtual). An unfortunate choice of language architecture, art, design, music, ornament, etc. depend perpetuates an old confusion. Instead of identifying the upon and embody organized complexity. Respecting conditioning process that causes clustering in judging this link amounts to a re-focusing of the design profes- beauty, some authors divide the world into “novices” and sions on the essential needs for humans, and the planet, “experts”. But these labels prejudice the situation because so that they can maintain a healthy life. There are specific they belittle people with evolved, unsullied neuro- geometrical and informational attributes required in the responses as being “novices”, while endowing an unde- environment, which reflect human evolution and sur - served authority on “experts” who diverge from the vival. They cannot be obscured or “undone”; and when intrinsic, shareable basis of beauty. societies try to do that, it leads to long-term problems. Categorizing the participants in any experimental sur- vey into “novices” and “experts” can be quite misleading. 6.2 Oversimplification removes essential life qualities In common language, “experts” are people who possess The architectural character of many recent VR designs technical knowledge and an understanding of the sub- seems to be no accident, but rather, a deliberate choice of ject matter as, for instance, when comparing musicians the designers. In part this is because they are influenced and non-musicians in experiments studying reactions by the current design fashions prevalent in the physical to tonal or harmonic violations. But regarding contem- world. In part, too, they are limited by the same oversim- porary architecture, that label refers to people who have plified mechanical forms that are rooted in a primitive La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 9 of 18 stage of industrial development — what we have previ- The neural sensing system tries to predict sensory ously described as “geometrical fundamentalism” (Salin- inputs from the environment in a way that optimizes garos & Mehaffy, 2014). Industrial design has moved informational meaning, thus assuring the organism’s sur- through several historic phases of increasing complexity, vival. Such a fit between the external environment and a but styles remain in a relatively crude phase — particu- small set of internal patterns cannot waste energy in pro- larly when compared to complex biological structures. cessing random or structurally-surprising forms. It is this The architect Christopher Alexander made a key con - “free-energy” minimization that favors the organization tribution to this growing understanding with his first of complexity (Friston, 2010; Parr & Friston, 2018), and book, Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Alexander,1964), which apparently gives rise to animal — and eventually, and a later successor, A Pattern Language: Towns, Build- human — intelligence (Kagan et al., 2022). ings, Construction (Alexander et al., 1977). His “patterns” were design elements that could be operated upon in 6.4 Architectural myopia context, while remaining “interrelated into an organic Today’s interconnected world working through infor- whole”. For Alexander, designers had over-emphasized mation and communications technologies is precisely the neat, top-down (tree-like) hierarchies of many men- what Alexander predicted, decades before the fact. tal constructs, erasing the critical web-like connections Nevertheless, we will argue that the dominant (and that formed overlapping, reinforcing relationships. These flawed) conceptual model of the living world goes back in turn formed clusters of “strong forces”, surrounded by much further, to a non-network hierarchy, and that connections he called “weak forces”. Clusters of relation- has never changed despite all the intervening technical ships, called “patterns”, could be managed more success- advances. fully within a language-like web of larger relationships Alexander observed that contemporary design was lag- — a “pattern language”. ging far behind in coming to terms with the insights of organized complexity. If the life sciences have made such brilliant progress, why do architects and city planners 6.3 The “deep net” structure of Alexander’s patterns, (among other designers) continue to lag behind? We have artificial intelligence, and organized complexity previously pointed to several interrelated causes, includ- Alexander pointed to an essential web-like structure ing the continued dominance of the outmoded pre-bio- within human environments, which was not captured logical models, the continuation of economic incentives in earlier scientific and technological models. A related that tend to reduce design to marketing and commodifi - recognition of network structures is occurring across cation (e.g. an image of the future as a marketable fantasy, the biological sciences. These insights have been con - not one grounded in human realities), and, most relevant firmed and greatly expanded in the intervening years, here, forms of cognitive bias that result from overspe- in fields like ecology, genetics, and even brain science. It cialized training and cognitive distance. We refer to this is now recognized that, just as the genome of DNA and phenomenon as “architectural myopia”: the inability to the “proteome” of proteins are not simple linear or sta- actually see what users experience, and thus the failure tistically average collections of elements, but have an to serve the users’ actual needs (Mehaffy & Salingaros, essential interrelated network structure, the so-called 2011). “connectome” of the brain has an essential deep network th More broadly, both contemporary and 20 century structure. architectural geometries are in fact very poorly adapted These “deep network” insights are finding particular to the complexity of human physiology and psychol- relevance in the field of artificial intelligence. There is ogy (Salingaros, 2014c; Lavdas & Schirpke, 2020; Lav- an intriguing coorollary with the structure of the most das et  al., 2021; Salingaros & Sussman, 2020; Mehaffy & robust neural networks at the heart of many AI systems. Salingaros, 2019a; Mehaffy & Salingaros, 2019b; Mehaffy The process of machine learning mimics what happens & Salingaros, 2020; Brielmann et  al., 2022; Mehaffy & in human brains to some degree, as the neural networks Salingaros, 2015; Mehaffy et al., 2020). As part of a grow - are allowed to evolve and “learn”, in order to more accu- ing movement, researchers use scientific analysis to rately manage the structure of their subject of interest. expose the limitations of the architectural tradition of For example, an elementary AI program “learns” to dis- the past hundred years, and propose a return to more tinguish a dog from a cat, not by absorbing principles or human-centered design techniques, both new and tradi- rules, but by generating and evolving neural networks in tional (Buras, 2020; Alexander, 1979; Ruggles, 2018; Suss- response to numerous examples, and “learning” through man & Hollander, 2021; Galle, 2020). feedback. The system develops its own overlapping A new adaptive design paradigm becomes apparent, pattern-like structure, and its own form of organized which is based on scientific experimental data (Zeki, complexity. Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 10 of 18 2019; Chatterjee & Vartanian, 2014; Coburn et  al., 2017; 3. Geometrical coherence defined by continuity and Armstrong & Detweiler-Bedell, 2008; Pelowski et  al., multiple nested sub-symmetries (whereas an overall 2017; Gallese & Freedberg, 2007; Kirk et al., 2009; Kawa- bilateral symmetry is unimportant). bata & Zeki, 2004; Brielmann & Pelli, 2019). Evidence 4. Definition of the vertical axis through symmetries reveals a four-way relationship among: (1) the web-like that privilege the gravitational sense and also allude structure of organized complexity in buildings and cities; to bilateral face-like symmetries. (2) the design pattern structure employed by Alexander 5. Curvature, especially in the smaller scales (whereas and his associates, and later applied to design patterns in arbitrary, unbalanced curvature strictly on the largest software; (3) the pattern structure of wikis and Wikipe- scale can be disorienting). dia, and the logic behind Agile Methodology and other 6. The presence of rich colors intensified and made developments in software and project management; coherent through color contrast and color harmony. and (4) the structure of neural networks and machine 7. Organized complexity containing a large amount of learning. visual information that is made coherent — hence Our point is that the architecture of the virtual uni- easy to process — via multiple nested symmetries. verse does not have to abide by limitations — the dictates 8. Representations of living organisms, and the actual of fashion, the imperatives of a technocracy, and the eco- presence of plants, animals, and other people. nomic and institutional power structures — that control and influence physical architecture. A new world, and It is useful to itemize the elements found in Indus- one that can be controlled and shaped totally without trial-Modernist, Post-Modernist, and Deconstructiv- investing in building materials or engineering, can define ist buildings that this list excludes. Anxiety-inducing its own logic. So far, the digital universe has inherited architectural styles include standard design and tec- contradictions from the architecture of physical build- tonic characteristics such as: plate-glass curtain-walls; ings. Those stylistic priorities are unnecessary baggage.  minimalist grey, metal, or white surfaces; brutalist raw concrete walls; exaggerated horizontal windows; mis- aligned or randomly-distributed windows on a façade; 7 Toward a “Form Language” of new geometries tilted columns, edges, pilasters, tectonic elements, and 7.1 R ediscovering the biological basis for design windows; a lack of frames and borders; elimination of Bonna Jones and Yen Wong already suggested that virtual organized detail; willful avoidance or distortion of any environments be made more viscerally attractive through symmetries in patterns, etc. Those design typologies human biology, designed by following Christopher Alex- are visually hostile because the neural system does not ander’s results (Jones & Wong, 2008). They wished to expect them (Silber, 2007; Millais, 2019; Curl, 2018; endow online virtual library spaces with the same beauty Curl & Calder, 2019; Salingaros, 2014d). and human feeling found in the most emotionally attrac- While the above list may appear to be deliberately tive of evolved traditional places. But more recently, the anti-modernist, including some arguments of other Lingang Digital Technology Library, claiming to be the schools of thought in favor of minimalism or modern- world’s first metaverse library, simply mimics the high- ism is problematic. We are unaware of scientifically- tech industrial architecture of Lingang Science and Tech- validated arguments (among a very large volume of nology City. This misses an opportunity.  writings promoting the exceptionalism of a narrow Below is a summary of the qualities that human-adap- set of styles) that justify those dominant styles by the tive architecture requires to promote wellbeing through effect they have on the user, as opposed to advantages the physiological and psychological reactions of the for the construction industry. A genuinely salutogenic viewer. These qualities combine descriptions from theo - aspect of the modernist style was the development of retical constructs suggested by Christopher Alexander the glass curtain wall, which let in more light than the (the Fifteen Properties), Donald Ruggles, Ann Sussman, typical building at the time around World War I. The researchers on Biophilic Design, several generations of antiseptic and antibiotic properties of sunlight are ben- traditional practitioners, and a complexity model devel- eficial. Yet the widely accepted notion of smooth, shiny oped by one of the present co-authors (NAS). surfaces having antiseptic properties is not supported by the data (MPHonline, 2023; Miranda & Schaffner, 1. Fractal scaling, in which structure is present at 2016; Aviat et al., 2016). every magnification, possibly with scaling symmetry We mention the history of workspace environments, (where a magnified portion looks similar to the origi - settings that provide closely related precedents to work- nal). ing in the metaverse. A sequence of invented — but 2. Sufficient detail and coherent detailed structure to untested — design ideas have continuously re-shaped define the smaller scales sharply (through contrast). La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 11 of 18 office distribution and interiors ever since World War II 8 Approaching environmental aesthetics (Salingaros, 1995). Dominant architectural culture con- through biology siders that workers have to inhabit the latest “concept” 8.1 The incompleteness of “modern” aesthetics imposed top-down. Corporate and government clients What, then, are the missing aesthetic characteristics, and buy into this “innovative” thinking without insisting how can we re-integrate them into the structures of the on prior user evaluation. The result has been one sub- metaverse? Once again, the work of Christopher Alexan- optimal working environment transformed into yet der offers an instructive contribution. In his four-volume another. Style-based industrial-modernist images over- masterwork The Nature of Order: The Art of Building ride ideas of adaptation and beauty. and the Nature of the Universe, he identifies “Fifteen Properties” that are common to the geometries of living 7.2 A pa ttern language for designing the metaverse systems, including human creations and human envi- Surprisingly, metaverse designers have not yet utilized the ronments (Alexander, 2001; Alexander, 2002; Salingaros, time-tested technique of cataloging and developing useful 2015; Salingaros, 2013). design patterns, by now a standard method in computer Importantly, these properties arise spontaneously as a science. Drawing inspiration from the work of Christopher result of common symmetry-generating and self-organ- Alexander, developers document design patterns and prac- izing processes. One of the most familiar is the property tices that work, and also note those “anti-patterns” that may of fractal structure, or “levels of scale”. Other properties at first seem attractive, but which later turn out to mess can be considered as classes of symmetry, including tiling things up (Salingaros, 2000). Pattern catalogs for behav- symmetries (“alternating repetition”), coherence work- ior, organization, software, etc. have saved an enormous ing through radial symmetry (“strong centers”), and the amount of effort in the tech industry. Cataloguing anti-pat - nested “local symmetries”. terns helps other developers from falling into the same trap These properties are not extraneously applied to the and repeating mistakes that could easily be avoided. structures in question  (as added aesthetics), but arise It would make sense to develop a patterns catalog for from the network interactions of their spatial elements. designing the metaverse, just as has been done for video The process of generating coherent structure has its games (Barney, 2018; Barney, 2021a; Barney, 2021b), and counterpart in the product of environmental form. Self- for user interfaces and web design applications (Vora, organization creates coherence. The Fifteen Properties 2009; Design Patterns, 2023; Juliver, 2022). Success- are identified in the deep network structure of living sys - ful, tested elements of metaverse design should be cata- tems — and indeed, one can see many of these properties logued into an open archive for use by other developers. arising from living processes, including embryogenesis By following the design pattern format, no design com- (Newman & Bhat, 2009) (Fig. 1). ponent or element is automatically assumed to function It is notable that contemporary design partly or wholly well before testing, especially as many of those are ported lacks these properties. In part, this omission can be from different fields/platforms. A useful pattern collec - explained by the influence of simplification through ele - tion will emerge, hopefully in open source, as more and mentary processes of industrial manufacturing, including more working design patterns are added to the list. Also, stamping, rolling, slicing, and the like. The limiting aes - the designers get a better idea of how to optimally com- thetic that resulted then gave rise to a kind of thematic bine those patterns to obtain a more coherent, functional branding of modernity, as characterized by precisely result. Such relationships are never obvious. the  stark “look” of these limited geometries. This was Christopher Barney, author of Pattern Language for the regime of “geometrical fundamentalism” described Game Design, devotes a chapter of his book to Alex- earlier. ander’s “Fifteen Fundamental Properties” (which we Other contributing factors for this violation of the Fif- describe in the next section). There is an intimate con - teen Properties can be explained by the over-reliance nection between design patterns (Alexander’s earlier of economies of scale and standardization (stamping work) and the geometrical concepts presented in Alexan- identical parts, creating copies at large scales); and the der’s later work, The Nature of Order. The discussion and comparative minimization of economies of place and dif- recognition of the purposes and functional requirements ferentiation, as is seen more commonly in natural phe- or performance criteria, which surely impact morphol- nomena (e.g. local signaling, mutual adaptive evolution, ogy, lie in the domain of the proposed pattern language self-organization in place). Scale and standardization are for designing the metaverse. We make no attempt to not absent from biological processes (e.g. standard DNA derive any of that specific material in this paper, since it molecules, large-scale seeding, etc.) but they are strictly extends beyond matters of beauty. balanced with differentiation and local adaptation. Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 12 of 18 Fig. 1 Alexander’s “Fifteen Fundamental Properties” that characterize organized complexity. Image by Michael Mehaffy Fig. 2 On the left, a symmetry-breaking event (Harold Edgerton’s famous photograph of a milk drop shattering against a sheet of milk) produces characteristic geometric properties, including levels of scale, alternating repetition, strong centers, local symmetries, etc. But the relatively crude “modern” industrial processes of manipulating fundamental geometric shapes (lines, planes, cubes, on the right) and then stamping, replicating, enlarging the scale, do not produce these characteristic properties. Image credits: Left, revision by Michael Mehaffy of image courtesy the Edgerton Digital Collection; right, drawing by Michael Mehaffy Human technologies have not yet adopted this crucial 8.2 What is beauty, anyway? countercheck. It seems essential for us to anchor “beauty” in a frame- With the advent of computer technologies, and par- work of shareable experiences instead of esoteric notions ticularly the pattern technology of Alexander, with of architectural aesthetics that may not be shared beyond its lineage of deep networks and organized complex- academia and a narrow section of the profession (Lavdas ity (wiki and Wikipedia, many AI systems, et al.), this & Salingaros, 2022). Encouragement comes from the new goal of fully using insights from how nature organizes discipline of neuroaesthetics, in which the perception of complexity is now within reach (Salingaros, 2014a; beauty can be correlated with the way that objects and Salingaros, 2018; Cunningham & Mehaffy, 2013). In physical settings trigger reactions in the human brain. order to proceed with confidence, we must clarify There is now abundant evidence against the proposi - one misconception about aesthetics and the nature of tion that beauty is entirely subjective and “socially con- beauty (Fig. 2). structed”. While it is true that some aspects of beauty are La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 13 of 18 socially defined and individually differentiated, the expe - 2018). The informational experience of the environment rience we call “beauty” is a universal human phenom- is dynamic and multimodal, whereas when we talk about enon rooted in our common shared biological structures the beauty of a building, we are mostly talking about vis- and evolutionary histories. We might refer to objective ual beauty anyway, unless we are inhabiting it. beauty as this basic  shared experience, whereas the  sub- Multiple nested symmetries organize visual complexity, jective  component of beauty is shaped by other factors, displaying it in a more “fluent” manner. This constraint and is what we might experience separately from oth- adds to randomly-distributed forms that happen to be ers, or other groups that were not exposed to those same fractal (such as, for example, Jackson Pollock’s paintings). factors. Stochastic fractals (as opposed to exact fractals, which A brief definition of “objective beauty” relies upon are mathematical constructs) are an important part of what triggers any emotionally-nourishing unconscious the geometry of Nature, and thus part of what medi- response to visual (and other) stimuli. This approach pri - ates the positive effects of exposure to natural environ - oritizes the impact that “beauty” has on user experience ments. Evolutionary preference for specific natural forms and health, and it also pushes beauty as a measurable — offering meaningful information from particular geo - construct towards a layman’s experience of the environ- metrical characteristics and color qualities — appears to ment. Most importantly, the interactive process that pro- be built into the human body. The perception of fractal vides the experience of beauty is revealed to be just as forms utilizes different brain networks and appears to important as inherent characteristics of the object. require a more fluid, less intensive processing, as sug - Interestingly, the experience of beauty across differ - gested in functional brain imaging studies (Fischmeister ent modalities has been correlated with the strength et al., 2017; Martins et al., 2014). of activity in a specific brain region, the medial orbito- Among promising investigations into quantifying frontal cortex (mOFC) (Ishizu & Zeki, 2011). Increased beauty, another related approach measures the three fac- activation in the same area has also been correlated with tors: coherence, fascination, and hominess (Coburn et al., non-sensory experience of beauty, such as coming from 2020; Gregorians et  al., 2022). Originally introduced in mathematics (Zeki et  al., 2014), and the experience of a study of how architectural interiors affect neurological sorrow (Ishizu & Zeki, 2017). And, while individual brain responses, this idea is now being applied to evaluate exte- responses to certain stimuli can be considered as sub- riors, and, more importantly, to study the dynamic effects jective by definition, this new research reveals objective of moving through a scene. Data is gathered either with invariants. Such responses correlate with the experience portable sensors, or with virtual reality simulations using of beauty, while the correlation of this experience with videos. These studies are directly relevant to coherence certain structural features of the stimuli fits well with a explained by mathematical complexity. direct objective causal sequence between stimulus struc- Visual coherence is only roughly equivalent to beauty. ture, brain reaction, and subjective experience. In the real world, buildings that most people would call Extensive studies on evolutionary aesthetics identify ugly are quite often visually coherent through an overall the mechanism for the perception of beauty as confer- symmetry; but they lack fractality and multiple, nested ring an evolutionary advantage (Turner, 1996; Swami & sub-symmetries. At the other extreme, fractals — espe- Furnham, 2006; Prum, 2017; Seghers, 2015; Confer et al., cially exact fractals (Bies et  al., 2016) — can be used 2010; Leder et  al., 2016; Deutsch & Sainani, 2015). In to design ugly buildings whose awkward proportions order to profit from such a beneficial effect, one expects and asymmetrical geometries are viscerally unappeal- the mechanism of perception to have high visual fluency; ing (Langdon, 2015). There are many more factors that i.e. the specific visual information must be processed contribute to objective architectural beauty (Olszewska, very easily by the neural system. The basis for estimating 2020a; Olszewska, 2020b). architectural beauty as an objective value (that is to say, We can, at this point, answer a question raised by as a value relevant to all by nature) is to realize, following admirers of contemporary architecture in buildings: cumulating evidence, that the human body is an exqui- “Why is there no recognition of recent architecture with sitely-tuned instrument for perceiving specific geom - high levels of organized complexity, as high as those etries that are experienced as beauty. found in Nature, and arguably much higher than classi- All experience of beauty, regardless of the source, cal facades?” As developed in our other publications, and seems to have some specific converging neural correlates. supported by the research of other authors, the type of Informational input is to a large degree visual, and even complexity responsible for human engagement and well- more so in the case of architecture, which is why this and being is very special. It is not enough to design and build a related discussions necessarily focus on visual stimula- complex-looking façade. The difference between natural- tion even though all of our senses are at play (Hirst et al., looking buildings (engaging) versus merely complex (but Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 14 of 18 not engaging) is due to basic mathematical distinctions in data, these results correspond to the neurological their respective geometries. Non-engaging buildings  fail mechanisms that guaranteed human survival during to satisfy several  of the 8 qualities of  human-adaptive evolution. Avoiding subjective aesthetic definitions architecture listed earlier, as well as necessary design pat- influenced by habit, ideology, or the media, new tech- terns. This mechanism has nothing to do with style, and nology resolves ages-old questions. By virtue of their is certainly not limited to classical façades. enormous data base, AI text-to-image generators rep- resent the vox populi missing for a century from archi- 9 Roku City gets it right tectural discourse. Scientific research has discovered A screen saver for a streaming television platform man- innate preferences for salutogenic (health-inducing) aged to overcome the design misfires of the metaverse, environments, which embody human informational and is now talked about as a huge VR success (Winkie & needs. At the same time, a critical break was revealed New York Times, 2022). Roku is a continuously scrolling with dominant architectural culture. painting of a street front consisting of traditional building Acknowledgments façades ranging in style from Art-Deco to Neoclassical. We thank Tim Gorichanaz for very helpful advice and discussions. An extensive natural park and open water separates the Authors’ contributions foreground buildings from a dense built-up city seen in Conceptualization, N.A.S.; methodology, N.A.S.; validation, A.A.L., M.W.M. the far distance. The user’s immediate experience is with and N.A.S.; formal analysis, A.A.L., M.W.M. and N.A.S.; investigation, A.A.L. and the façades, which are drawn in a way that embodies ele- N.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.A.S.; writing—review and editing, M.W.M. and N.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version ments of design coherence such as Alexander’s 15 prop- of the manuscript. erties (intuitively so, as graphic artists do not implement those by name). Funding None. The irony here is that Roku City contains some far from realistic characteristics; for example, it is bathed Availability of data and materials in a dim blue-purple light. Yet the façades’ coherent and Not applicable. detailed  human-scale design attracts people to want to inhabit it, and this is a recurring comment from internet Declarations readers (Craighead, 2021). Another surprise is that the Competing interests over-dense modernist city in the background is actually None. unappealing, but it is situated at a far enough distance so that it doesn’t alarm a viewer concentrating on the fore- Received: 21 October 2022 Accepted: 14 March 2023 ground experience. Kyle Jones, the artist who created Roku City, placed alien invaders, an erupting volcano, giant robots, and other monsters among the skyscrapers in the background city, yet those seem more funny than References menacing. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press. Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. Oxford University Press. Alexander, C. (2001). The Nature of Order. Volume 1: The Phenomenon of Life. 10 Conclusions Center for Environmental Structure. This paper suggested reasons for why the visual expe- Alexander, C. (2002). The Nature of Order. Volume 2: The Process of Creating Life. Center for Environmental Structure. rience of the metaverse, as it is presently conceived, Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & has thus far not met expectations in attracting users. Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language. Oxford University Press. We hypothesized one possible cause (among other Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2022). The Metaverse in 2040. Pew Research Center Available online: https:// www. pewre search. org/ inter net/ wp- conte nt/ unknowns). There is a basic contradiction in the emo- uploa ds/ sites/9/ 2022/ 06/ PI_ 2022. 06. 30_ Metav erse- Predi ctions_ FINAL. tional appeal of architectural industrial-modernist pdf (Accessed 6 Nov 2022) images, versus an entirely different type of environ- ANI. (2022). Metaverse design international program launched in Asia. Big News Network Available online: https:// www. bigne wsnet work. com/ news/ mental geometry based on objective beauty. Research 27257 3224/ metav erse- design- inter natio nal- progr am- launc hed- in- asia findings reveal unexplored impacts of the “beauty (Accessed 11 Sept 2022) of place” on users that designers should pay more Aresta, M., & Salingaros, N. A. (2021). The importance of domestic space in the times of COVID-19. Challenges, 12(2), 27. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ chall attention to. Evidence-based knowledge of attrac- e1202 0027 tive environments is critical in the field of metaverse Armstrong, T., & Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2008). Beauty as an emotion: the exhila- development, and provides insights into how to solve rating prospect of mastering a challenging world. Review of General Psychology, 12, 305–329. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ a0012 558 those challenges.  AI text-to-image generators confirm Asch, S. E. (1951). Eec ff ts of group pressure upon the modification and distor - that a majority of people use their intuition to judge tion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men; architectural beauty. Drawing upon massive internet research in human relations (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press. La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 15 of 18 Audry, S., & Ippolito, J. (2019). Can artificial intelligence make art without art - Craighead, O. (2021). Take me down to the Roku City. Gawker Available online: ists? Ask the viewer. Arts, 8, 35. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ arts8 010035https:// www. gawker. com/ cultu re/ take- me- down- to- the- roku- city Aviat, F., Gerhards, C., Rodriguez-Jerez, J., Michel, V., Le Bayon, I., Rached, I., & (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Federighi, M. (2016). Microbial Safety of Wood in Contact with Food: A Critton, B. (2013). Evil people in modernist homes in popular films. Draw Down Review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 15(3), Books. 491–505. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ 1541- 4337. 12199 Cunningham, G. (2019). Why architectural elites love ugly buildings. The American Ball, M. (2021). Framework for the Metaverse. MatthewBall.vc https:// www. matth Conservative Available online: https:// www. theam erica ncons ervat ive. ewball. vc/ all/ forwa rdtot hemet avers eprim er (Accessed 28 Jan 2023)com/ why- archi tectu ral- elites- love- ugly- build ings/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Barney, C. (2018). A Pattern Language for Games. Perspectives in Game Design Cunningham, W., & Mehaffy, M. W. (2013). Wiki as pattern language. In Proceed- https:// persp ectiv esing amede sign. com/a- patte rn- langu age- for- games- ings of the 20th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP13) 3d1c6 849a3 cd (Accessed 27 Jan 2023) ( Vol. 1, pp. 32–47) https:// www. resea rchga te. net/ publi cation/ 32034 Barney, C. (2021a). Pattern language for game design. CRC Press. https:// doi. org/ 10. 6419_ Wiki_ as_ Patte rn_ Langu age (Accessed 28 Jan 2023) 1201/ 97810 03119 029https:// www. resea rchga te. net/ publi cation/ 34620 Curl, J. S. (2018). Making dystopia: the strange rise and survival of architectural 3762_ Patte rn_ Langu age_ for_ Game_ Design (Accessed 27 Jan 2023) barbarism. Oxford University Press. Barney, C. A. (2021b). Application of pattern language for game design in Curl, J. S., & Calder, B. (2019). The Duel: Has modern architecture ruined Britain? pedagogy and design practice. Information, 12(10), 393. https:// doi. org/ Prospect Magazine Available online: https:// www. prosp ectma gazine. 10. 3390/ info1 21003 93co. uk/ magaz ine/ the- duel- has- modern- archi tectu re- ruined- brita in Beauty.AI 2.0. (2022). Welcome to the first international beauty contest judged (accessed 9 Jul 2022) by artificial intelligence. Wayco International Limited Available online: Dayma, B. Craiyon, 2022. Available online: https:// www. craiy on. com (Accessed https:// beauty. ai (Accessed 9 July 2022) 9 July 2022). Benedikt, M. (1992). Cyberspace: first steps. MIT Press. Design Patterns. UI Patterns. https:// ui- patte rns. com/ patte rns (Accessed 27 Berns, G. S., Chappelow, J., Zink, C. F., Pagnoni, G., Martin-Skurski, M. E., & Jan 2023). Richards, J. (2005). Neurobiological correlates of social conformity Deutsch, D., & Sainani, K. (2015). Objective Beauty. Nature, 526, S16. https:// doi. and independence during mental rotation. Biological Psychiatry, 58(3), org/ 10. 1038/ 526S1 6a 245–253. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biops ych. 2005. 04. 012 Douglas-Home, J. (2021). Why is modern architecture so ugly? The Spectator Bibri, S. E., & Allam, Z. (2022). The metaverse as a virtual form of data-driven Available online: https:// www. spect ator. co. uk/ artic le/ why- is- modern- smart urbanism: on post-pandemic Governance through the prism of archi tectu re- so- ugly (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) the logic of surveillance capitalism. Smart Cities, 5, 715–727. https:// doi. DreamStudio, Stable Diffusion 2022. Available online: https:// beta. dream org/ 10. 3390/ smart citie s5020 037studio. ai/ dream (accessed 11 Sept 2022). Bies, A. J., Blanc-Goldhammer, D. R., Boydston, C. R., Taylor, R. P., & Sereno, M. Du, T. (2022). W. Zuckerberg’s revenge. The Critic (London) Available online: E. (2016). Aesthetic Responses to Exact Fractals Driven by Physical https:// thecr itic. co. uk/ zucke rbergs- reven ge/ (accessed 6 Nov 2022) Complexity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 210. https:// doi. org/ 10. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., et al. (2022). Metaverse beyond 3389/ fnhum. 2016. 00210 the hype: multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, Bourgeois, J. P., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., & Rakic, P. (1994). Synaptogenesis in opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Interna- the Prefrontal Cortex of Rhesus Monkeys. Cerebral Cortex, 4(1), 78–96. tional Journal of Information Management, 66, 102542. https:// doi. org/ https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ cercor/ 4.1. 7810. 1016/j. ijinf omgt. 2022. 102542 Boys-Smith, A. (2022). A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away: what does Star Eloy, S., Kreutzberg, A., & Symeonidou, I. (Eds.). (2021). Virtual aesthetics in Wars tell us about architecture for goodies and baddies? New Design architecture: designing in mixed realities. Routledge. https:// doi. org/ 10. Ideas, 6(1), 25–30 Available online: http:// jomar dpubl ishing. com/ Uploa 4324/ 97810 03183 105 dFiles/ Files/ journ als/ NDI/ V6N1/ Boys- SmithA. pdf (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Elvenar. (2022). Fantasy city builder game. InnoGames Available online: https:// Brielmann, A., Buras, N., Salingaros, N., & Taylor, R. (2022). What happens in your www. innog ames. com/ games/ elven ar/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) brain when you walk down the street? Implications of architectural Fernández-Caballero, A., Martínez-Rodrigo, A., Pastor, J. M., Castillo, J. C., proportions, biophilia, and fractal geometry for urban science. Urban Lozano-Monasor, E., López, M. T., et al. (2016). Smart environment Science, 6(1), 3. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ urban sci60 10003 architecture for emotion detection and regulation. Journal of Biomedical Brielmann, A.A.; Pelli, D.G. Intense beauty requires intense pleasure. Frontiers Informatics, 64, 55–73. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jbi. 2016. 09. 015 in Psychology 2019, 10, 2420. https://doi.org/https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ Fischmeister, F. P., Martins, M., Beisteiner, R., & Fitch, W. T. (2017). Self-similarity fpsyg. 2019. 02420. and recursion as default modes in human cognition. Cortex, 97, Buras, N. H. (2020). The art of classic planning: building beautiful and enduring 183–201. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cortex. 2016. 08. 016 communities. Harvard University Press. Franco, J. T., González, M., & Salingaros, N. (2019). Contemporary public spaces Chambe, M., Cozot, R., & Le Meur, O. (2022). Deep learning for assessing the are designed for lifeless beings, without any sex or sexual desire. ArchDaily aesthetics of professional photographs. Computer Animation and Virtual https:// www. archd aily. com/ 914267/ nikos- salin garos- conte mpora Worlds, e2105 https:// onlin elibr ary. wiley. com/ doi/ 10. 1002/ cav. 2105ry- public- spaces- are- desig ned- for- lifel ess- beings- witho ut- any- sex- or- Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sci-sexual- desire (accessed 27 Jan 2023) ences, 18, 370–375. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. tics. 2014. 03. 003 Frew, S. (2022). The metaverse is doomed. change my mind. Architizer Available Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., & Chatterjee, A. (2017). Buildings, beauty, and the online: https:// archi tizer. com/ blog/ inspi ration/ indus try/ change- my- brain: a neuroscience of architectural experience. Journal of Cognitive mind- the- metav erse- is- doomed/ (Accessed 29 Aug 2022) Neuroscience, 29, 1521–1531. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1162/ jocn_a_ 01146 Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., Kenett, Y. N., Nadal, M., Hartung, F., Hayn-Leichsenring, Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127–138. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ nrn27 87 G., et al. (2020). Psychological and neural responses to architectural interi- Galle, P. (2020). Christopher Alexander’s Battle for Beauty in a World Turning ors. Cortex, 126, 217–241. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cortex. 2020. 01. 009 Ugly: The Inception of a Science of Architecture? She Ji: The Journal of Colette, E. (2022). A brief compendium of modernist homes for movie villains with Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(3), 345–375. https:// doi. org/ 10. flawless taste. Messy Nessy Available online: https:// www. messy nessy 1016/j. sheji. 2020. 03. 002 chic. com/ 2022/ 01/ 12/a- brief- compe ndium- of- moder nist- homes- for- Gallese, V., & Freedberg, D. (2007). Mirror and canonical neurons are crucial ele- movie- villa ins- with- flawl ess- taste/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) ments in esthetic response. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 411. https:// Confer, J. C., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). More than just a pretty face: doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. tics. 2007. 07. 007 men’s priority shifts toward bodily attractiveness in short-term versus Gifford, R., Hine, D. W., Muller-Clemm, W., & Shaw, K. T. (2002). Why architects long-term mating contexts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 348–353. and laypersons judge buildings differently: cognitive properties and https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. evolh umbeh av. 2010. 04. 002 physical bases. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 19(2), Corradi, G., Chuquichambi, E. G., Barrada, J. R., Clemente, A., & Nadal, M. (2020). 131–148 Available online: https:// www. resea rchga te. net/ publi cation/ A new conception of visual aesthetic sensitivity. British Journal of Psy-22891 1177_ Why_ archi tects_ and_ laype rsons_ judge_ build ings_ diffe chology, 111(4), 630–658. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ bjop. 12427rently_ Cogni tive_ prope rties_ and_ physi cal_ bases (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 16 of 18 Goree, S. (2021). What does it take to cross the aesthetic gap? The develop- Lavdas, A. A., Salingaros, N., & Sussman, A. (2021). Visual attention software: ment of image aesthetic quality assessment in computer vision. In Pro- a new tool for understanding the ‘subliminal’ experience of the built ceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Creativity environment. Applied Sciences, 11, 6197. (ICCC 2021) (pp. 11–15) Available online: https:// samgo ree. github. io/ Lavdas, A. A., & Salingaros, N. A. (2021). Can suboptimal visual environments assets/ ICCC_ 2021_ paper_ 112. pdf (Accessed 11 Sept 2022) negatively affect children’s cognitive development? Challenges, 12(2), Gorichanaz, T. (2022a). Being at Home in the Metaverse? Prospectus 28. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ chall e1202 0028 for a Social Imaginary. AI and Ethics. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ Lavdas, A. A., & Salingaros, N. A. (2022). Architectural beauty: developing a s43681- 022- 00198-w measurable and objective scale. Challenges, 13(2), 56. https:// doi. org/ 10. Gorichanaz, T. (2022b). How ‘living architecture’ could help the world avoid a 3390/ chall e1302 0056 soul-deadening digital future. The Conversation Available online: https:// Lavdas, A. A., & Schirpke, U. (2020). Aesthetic preference is related to organized theco nvers ation. com/ how- living- archi tectu re- could- help- the- world- complexity. PLoS One, 15(6), e0235257. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. avoid-a- soul- deade ning- digit al- future- 182831 (Accessed 11 Sept 2022)pone. 02352 57 Goschenko, S. Chinese Zhejiang Province Aims to Build a $28.7 Billion Leach, N. (2022). In the mirror of AI: what is creativity? Architectural Intelligence, Metaverse Industry by 2025, Bitcoin.com 2022. https:// news. bitco in. 1, 15. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s44223- 022- 00012-x com/ chine se- zheji ang- provi nce- aims- to- build-a- 28-7- billi on- metav Leder, H., Mitrovic, A., & Goller, J. (2016). How beauty determines gaze! Facial erse- indus try- by- 2025/ (Accessed 19 Dec 2022). attractiveness and gaze duration in images of real world scenes. Grammer, K., Fink, B., Moller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: I-Perception, 7(4). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 20416 69516 664355 Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78, Li, R., & Zhang, J. (2020). Review of computational neuroaesthetics: bridging 385–407 Available online: https:// www. resea rchga te. net/ publi cation/ the gap between neuroaesthetics and computer science. Brain Infor- 22271 3652_ Darwi nian_ aesth etics_ Sexual_ selec tion_ and_ the_ biolo matics, 7(16). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s40708- 020- 00118-w gy_ of_ beauty (Accessed 9 July 2022) Lind, W. S. (2022). The Ugliness of Everything. The American Conservative Avail- Greenfield, A. (2018). New architecture is almost universally ugly. What can we able online: https:// www. theam erica ncons ervat ive. com/ the- uglin ess- do about it? The Plaza Perspective Available online: http:// plaza persp of- every thing/ (Accessed 10 Aug 2022) ective. com/ can- stop- build ing- ugly- modern- archi tectu re/ (Accessed Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: evolu- 9 Jul 2022) tionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Gregorians, L., Fernández-Velasco, P., Zisch, F., & Spiers, H. J. (2022). Archi- Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rstb. tectural experience: Clarifying its central components and their 2010. 0404 relation to core affect with a set of first-person-view videos. Journal of Liu, D., Puri, R., Kamath, N., & Bhattacharya, S. (2020). Composition-Aware Environmental Psychology, 82, 101841. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvp. Image Aesthetics Assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Con- 2022. 101841 ference on Applications of Computer Vision ( WACV 2020) (pp. 3569–3578) Hesslinger, V. M., Carbon, C. C., & Hecht, H. (2017). Social factors in aesthet- Available online: https:// opena ccess. thecvf. com/ conte nt_ WACV_ 2020/ ics: Social conformity pressure and a sense of being watched affect papers/ Liu_ Compo sition- Aware_ Image_ Aesth etics_ Asses sment_ aesthetic judgments. i-Perception, 8(6), 2041669517736322. https:// WACV_ 2020_ paper. pdf (Accessed 11 Sept 2022) doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 20416 69517 736322 Mack, L. (2019). Eight of the ugliest, most hated buildings in the world. Insider Hirst, R. J., Cragg, L., & Allen, H. A. (2018). Vision dominates audition in adults Available online: https:// www. insid er. com/ the- uglie st- most- hated- but not children: a meta-analysis of the colavita effect. Neuroscience build ings- in- the- world (accessed 9 Jul 2022) and Biobehavioral Reviews, 94, 286–301. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Malfanti, F. (2022). Can AI appreciate the beauty of artwork? Forbes Available neubi orev. 2018. 07. 012 online: https:// www. forbes. com/ sites/ forbe stech counc il/ 2022/ 03/ 02/ Holmquist, A. (2021). Beauty and the brutalist: the architectural effect on our can- ai- appre ciate- the- beauty- of- artwo rk (Accessed 24 July 2022) souls. Intellectual Takeout Available online: https:// intel lectu altak Manjoo, F. (2022). My Sad, Lonely, Expensive Adventures in Zuckerberg’s VR. New eout. org/ 2021/ 07/ beauty- and- the- bruta list- the- archi tectu ral- effect- York Times Available online: https:// www. nytim es. com/ 2022/ 11/ 04/ on- our- souls/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022)opini on/ faceb ook- meta- zucke rberg- virtu al- reali ty. html (Accessed 6 Holz, D. Midjourney, 2022. Available online: https:// www. midjo urney. com/ Nov 2022) home/ (accessed 12 Aug 2022). Marín-Morales, J., Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., Greco, A., et al. (2018). Aec ff tive comput - Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS One, ing in virtual reality: emotion recognition from brain and heartbeat 6(7), e21852. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 00218 52 dynamics using wearable sensors. Scientific Reports, 8, 13657. https:// Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2017). The experience of beauty derived from sorrow. doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 018- 32063-4 Human Brain Mapping, 38, 4185–4200. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ hbm. Martins, M. J., Fischmeister, F. P., Puig-Waldmüller, E., Oh, J., Geißler, A., Robin- 23657 son, S., et al. (2014). Fractal image perception provides novel insights Jones, B., & Wong, Y. (2008). Virtual and Physical: architect Christopher Alex- into hierarchical cognition. NeuroImage, 96, 300–308. https:// doi. org/ 10. ander on living spaces. In Proceedings of VALA: Libraries, Technology 1016/j. neuro image. 2014. 03. 064 and the Future Conference (pp. 1–11) Available online: https:// www. Mazzone, M., & Elgammal, A. (2019). Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial acade mia. edu/ 719414/ Virtu al_ and_ physi cal_ archi tect_ Chris topher_ intelligence. Arts, 8, 26. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ arts8 010026 Alexa nder_ on_ living_ spaces (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Mehaffy, M. From Systems to Patterns: Toward curated web-networks of share - JRailPass. (2022). Studio Ghibli Theme Park is now open: what to expect. Japan able knowledge in the age of clickbait and fake news. Proceedings of Rail Pass Available online: https:// www. jrail pass. com/ blog/ studio- the 63rd Annual Meeting of the ISSS–2019, 63(1), 2020a. https:// journ ghibli- theme- park (Accessed 12 Nov 2022)als. isss. org/ index. php/ proce eding s63rd/ artic le/ view/ 3629 Juliver, J. (2022). The Beginner’s Guide to Web Design Patterns. HubSpot https:// Mehaffy, M., & Salingaros, N. (2015). Design for a living planet. Sustasis Press. blog. hubsp ot. com/ websi te/ design- patte rns (Accessed 27 Jan 2023) Mehaffy, M., & Salingaros, N. A. (2011). Architectural Myopia. Shareable Available Kagan, B. J., Kitchen, A. C., Tran, N. T., et al. (2022). In vitro neurons learn and online: https:// www. share able. net/ archi tectu ral- myopia- desig ning- for- exhibit sentience when embodied in a simulated game-world. Neuron, indus try- not- people/ (accessed 9 Jul 2022) 110, 1–18. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2022. 09. 001 Mehaffy, M., & Salingaros, N. A. (2012). Intelligence and the Information Environ- Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural Correlates of Beauty. Journal of Neuro- ment. Metropolis Available online: https:// patte rns. archi textu rez. net/ physiology, 91, 1699–1705. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1152/ jn. 00696. 2003doc/ az- cf- 172600 (Accessed on 26 Aug 2021) Kirk, U., Skov, M., Christensen, M. S., & Nygaard, N. (2009). Brain correlates of Mehaffy, M.W. Why do architects make ugly buildings? Traditional Building aesthetic expertise: A parametric fMRI study. Brain and Cognition, 69, 2020b. Available online: https:// www. tradi tiona lbuil ding. com/ opini ons/ 306315. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. bandc. 2008. 08. 004why- do- archi tects- make- ugly- build ings (accessed 9 July 2022). Langdon, D. (2015). AD Classics: V&A Spiral / Daniel Libeskind + Cecil Balmond. Mehaffy, M. W., Kryazheva, Y., Rudd, A., Salingaros, N. A., Gren, A., Mehaffy, L., ArchDaily Available online: https:// www. archd aily. com/ 768565/ ad- class et al. (2020). A new pattern language for growing regions: places, networks, ics-v- and-a- spiral- daniel- libes kind- plus- cecil- balmo nd (Accessed 12 processes. Sustasis Press, USA with Centre for the Future of Places KTH Oct 2022) Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden and UN-Habitat. La vdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 17 of 18 Mehaffy, M. W., & Salingaros, N. A. (2019a). Building Tomorrow’s Heritage. I. What Paßmann, J., & Schubert, C. (2020). Liking as taste making: Social media prac- Historic Structures Can Teach Us About Making a Better Future. Preserva- tices as generators of aesthetic valuation and distinction. New Media & tion Leadership Forum, National Trust for Historic Preservation Available Society, 23(10), 2947–2963. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 14614 44820 939458 online: https:// forum. savin gplac es. org/ blogs/ speci al- contr ibutor/ 2019/ Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, 02/ 26/ what- histo ric- struc tures- teach- better- future (accessed 9 Jul astonish me delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna integrated model 2022) of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception ( VIMAP) and Mehaffy, M. W., & Salingaros, N. A. (2019b). Building Tomorrow’s Heritage. III. Cor - corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. recting “Architectural Myopia”. Preservation Leadership Forum, National Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80–125. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. plrev. 2017. Trust for Historic Preservation Available online: https:// forum. savin gplac 02. 003 es. org/ blogs/ speci al- contr ibutor/ 2019/ 09/ 26/ build ing- tomor rows- herit Petrigna, L., & Musumeci, G. (2022). The metaverse: a new challenge for the age- archi tectu ral- myopia (accessed 9 Jul 2022) healthcare system: a scoping review. Journal of Functional Morphology Mehaffy, M. W., & Salingaros, N. A. (2020). Building Tomorrow’s Heritage. IV. Mak- and Kinesiology, 7, 63. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ jfmk7 030063 ing Places For All, By All. Preservation Leadership Forum, National Trust Prum, R. O. (2017). The evolution of beauty: how Darwin’s forgotten theory of for Historic Preservation Available online: https:// forum. savin gplac es. mate choice shapes the animal world — and Us. Anchor Books. org/ blogs/ speci al- contr ibutor/ 2020/ 05/ 20/ build ing- tomor rows- herit Revell, G. (2022). Madeleine: poetry and art of an artificial intelligence. Arts, 11, age- making- places- for- all (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) 83. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ arts1 10500 83 Menzel, C., Dennenmoser, F., & Reese, G. (2020). Feeling stressed and ugly? Rosenberg, L. (2021). Fixing the metaverse: augmented reality pioneer shares Leave the city and visit nature! An experiment on self- and other- ideas for avoiding dystopia. Big Think Available online: https:// bigth ink. perceived stress and attractiveness levels. International Journal of com/ the- future/ metav erse- dysto pia/ (Accessed 6 Nov 2022) Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 8519. https:// doi. org/ 10. Ruggles, D. H. (2018). Beauty, neuroscience, and architecture: timeless patterns 3390/ ijerp h1722 8519 and their impact on our well-being. Fibonacci Press. Millais, M. (2019). Exploding the myths of modern architecture (2nd ed.). Safarova, K., Pirko, M., Jurik, V., Pavlica, T., & Németh, O. (2019). Differences Mijnbestseller. between young architects’ and non-architects’ aesthetic evaluation of Miranda, R. C., & Schaffner, D. W. (2016). Longer contact times increase cross- buildings. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(2), 229–237. https:// doi. contamination of enterobacter aerogenes from surfaces to food. org/ 10. 1016/j. foar. 2019. 04. 001 Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 82(21). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1128/ Sakai, J. (2020). How synaptic pruning shapes neural wiring during develop- AEM. 01838- 16 ment and, possibly, in disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Moffat, C. (2022). Elven Villages and Architecture. Nerdovore Available online: Sciences, 117(28), 16096–16099. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 20102 811 http:// www. nerdo vore. com/ 2017/ 02/ elven- villa ges- and- archi tectu re. Salingaros, N. (2005). Principles of Urban Structure. Sustasis Press. html (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Salingaros, N., & Sussman, A. (2020). Biometric pilot-studies reveal the arrange- Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M., & Lauber, E. A. (2017). A ment and shape of windows on a traditional façade to be implicitly re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated ‘engaging’, whereas contemporary façades are not. Urban Science, 4, 26. exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, Salingaros, N. A. (1995). A New Type of Work Environment: Christopher Alexander’s 143(5), 459–498. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ bul00 00085 Ideas on Office Furniture and Interiors. UTSA Available online: https:// Moon, G. J. (2017). Inhuman characteristics of modern architecture repre-appli ed. math. utsa. edu/ ~yxk833/ Chris. furni ture. html (Accessed 9 Jul sented in Jacques Tati’s Films. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building 2022) Engineering, 16(1), 91–97. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3130/ jaabe. 16. 91 Salingaros, N. A. (2000). The structure of pattern languages. Architectural Moore, F. R., Cornwell, R. E., Law-Smith, M. J., Al Dujaili, E. A., Sharp, M., & Perrett, Research Quarterly, 4(2), 149–162. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S1359 13550 D. I. (2011). Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap 00025 91 hypothesis in human male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biologi- Salingaros, N. A. (2013). Unified Architectural Theory: Form, Language, Complex- cal Sciences, 278, 774–780. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rspb. 2010. 1678 ity. Sustasis Press. MPHonline. Surfaces And Covid-19: A Public Health Perspective. https:// www. Salingaros, N. A. (2014a). Complexity in Architecture and Design. Oz Journal, 36, mphon line. org/ coron avirus- live- on- surfa ces/ (Accessed 28 Jan 2023). 18–25. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4148/ 2378- 5853. 1527 Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2, 486–497. https:// doi. org/ 10. Salingaros, N. A. (2014b). Cognitive dissonance and non-adaptive architecture: 3390/ encyc loped ia201 0031 seven tactics for denying the truth. Doxa, 11, 100–117 Available online: Naiada. (2022). The most promising works of art. Kellify Available online: https:// https:// patte rns. archi textu rez. net/ doc/ az- cf- 172607 (Accessed 9 July naiada. kelli fy. com (Accessed 24 July 2022) 2022) Newman, S. A., & Bhat, R. (2009). Dynamical patterning modules: a “pattern Salingaros, N. A. (2014c). A theory of architecture (2nd ed.). Sustasis Press. language” for development and evolution of multicellular form. Inter- Salingaros, N. A. (2014d). Anti-Architecture and Deconstruction (4th ed.). Sustasis national Journal of Developmental Biology, 53(5–6), 693–705. https:// doi. Press. org/ 10. 1387/ ijdb. 07248 1sn Salingaros, N. A. (2015). Alexander’s Fifteen Fundamental Properties. ArchDaily Nickerson, C. (2022). What is the Mere Exposure Eec ff t? Simply Psychology https:// www. archd aily. com/ 626429/ unifi ed- archi tectu ral- theory- chapt Available online: www. simpl ypsyc hology. org/ mere- expos ure- effect. er- 11 (Accessed 28 Jan 2023) html (Accessed 9 July 2022) Salingaros, N. A. (2017). Why we need to “grasp” our surroundings: object Olszewska N. Why Has Beauty Disappeared? #1. Venetian Letter 2020a. Avail- affordance and prehension in architecture. Journal of Architecture and able online: https:// www. venet ianle tter. com/ 2020/ 11/ 14/ why- has- Urbanism, 41(3), 163–169. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3846/ 20297 955. 2017. beauty- disap peared- 1/ (Accessed 9 July 2022).13760 03 Olszewska N. Why Has Beauty Disappeared? #2. Venetian Letter 2020b. Avail- Salingaros, N. A. (2018). Adaptive versus random complexity. New Design Ideas, able online: https:// www. venet ianle tter. com/ 2020/ 12/ 18/ why- has- 2(2), 51–61 Available online: http:// jomar dpubl ishing. com/ Uploa dFiles/ beauty- disap peared- 2/ (Accessed 9 July 2022).Files/ journ als/ NDI/ V2N2/ Salin garosN. pdf (Accessed 23 Aug 2022) OpenAI. DALL·E 2, 2022 Available online: https:// openai. com/ dall-e- 2/ Salingaros, N. A. (2021). Rules for Urban Space: Design Patterns Create the (accessed 9 July 2022). Human Scale. Journal of Urban Research and Development, 2(1), 4–16 Oppenheim, C., & Gollin, A. (2019). Lair: radical homes and hideouts of movie https:// patte rns. archi textu rez. net/ doc/ az- cf- 226173 (Accessed 27 Jan villains. Tra Publishing. 2023) Pahwa, N. (2022). Why the Metaverse Has to Look So Stupid. Slate Available Salingaros, N. A., & Mehaffy, M. W. (2014). Chapter 9 of A Theory of Architecture. online: https:// slate. com/ techn ology/ 2022/ 08/ mark- zucke rberg- metav In Geometrical Fundamentalism (2nd ed., pp. 172–194). Sustasis Press erse- horiz on- worlds- faceb ook- looks- crappy- expla ined. html (Accessed Available online: https:// www. acade mia. edu/ 50741 96/ Geome trical_ 29 Aug 2022)funda menta lism (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Parr, T., & Friston, K. J. (2018). The discrete and continuous brain: from decisions Salingaros, N.A.; Pagliardini, P. Geometry and life of urban space, Chapter in: to movement-and back again. Neural Computation, 30(9), 2319–2347. Back to the Sense of the City, 11th Virtual City & Territory International https:// doi. org/ 10. 1162/ neco_a_ 01102 Monograph Book, Centre of Land Policy and Valuations (Centre de Lavdas et al. Architectural Intelligence (2023) 2:8 Page 18 of 18 Política de Sòl i Valoracions), 2016:13–31. https:// upcom mons. upc. edu/ Weinberger, A. B., Christensen, A., Coburn, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2021). Psy- bitst ream/ handle/ 2117/ 90890/ CH00_ CONTE NTS% 20INT RO_ geome try. chological responses to buildings and natural landscapes. Journal of pdf (Accessed 27 Jan 2023). Environmental Psychology, 77, 101676. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvp. Seghers, E. (2015). The artful mind: a critical review of the evolutionary psycho-2021. 101676 logical study of art. British Journal of Aesthetics, 55, 225–248. https:// doi. Weinberger, A. B., Garside, E., Christensen, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2022). Eec ff ts of org/ 10. 1093/ aesthj/ ayu073 expertise on psychological responses to buildings and natural land- Shin, D. (2022). The actualization of meta affordances: Conceptualizing scapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 101903. https:// doi. org/ affordance actualization in the metaverse games. Computers in Human 10. 1016/j. jenvp. 2022. 101903 Behavior, 133, 107292. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chb. 2022. 107292 Wharry, G. (2022). Which beauty subculture will you belong to in the metaverse? Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: the science Dazed Available online: https:// www. dazed digit al. com/ beauty/ artic le/ of early childhood development. National Research Council (US) and 56515/1/ which- beauty- subcu lture- will- you- belong- metav erse- future- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Integrating the Science of trend (Accessed 11 Sept 2022) Early Childhood Development, National Academies Press. https:// doi. Winkie, L. (2022). In New York Times (Ed.), Pack Your Bags, We’re Moving to ‘Roku org/ 10. 17226/ 9824 City’ Available online: https:// www. nytim es. com/ 2022/ 11/ 02/ style/ Silber, J. (2007). Architecture of the Absurd. Quantuck Lane Press.roku- city- scree nsaver. html (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Spapé, M., Davis, K., Kangassalo, L., Ravaja, N., Sovijarvi-Spape, Z., & Ruotsalo, Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality T. (2021). Brain-computer interface for generating personally attractive and Social Psychology, 9(2–2), 1–27. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ h0025 848 images. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1(1). https:// doi. org/ 10. Zeki, S. (2019). Beauty in architecture: not a luxury — only a necessity. Archi- 1109/ TAFFC. 2021. 30590 43 tectural Design, 89(5), 14–19. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ ad. 2473 Available Stable Diffusion. Stability AI. Available online: https:// huggi ngface. co/ spaces/ online: https:// disco very. ucl. ac. uk/ id/ eprint/ 10075 797/3/ Zeki_ Archi stabi lityai/ stable- diffu sion (Accessed 9 Oct 2022).tectu ral% 20Bea uty% 20Feb% 2016% 20A,% 202019. pdf (Accessed 26 Sun, J., & Zhang, T. (2022). How the Metaverse could become China’s next bubble. June 2022) Sixth Tone Available online: https:// www. sixth tone. com/ news/ 10095 Zeki, S., Romaya, J., Benincasa, D., & Atiyah, M. (2014). The experience of math- 60/ how- the- metav erse- could- become- chinas- next- bubble (Accessed ematical beauty and its neural correlates. Frontiers in Human Neurosci- 11 Sept 2022) ence, 8, 68. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fnhum. 2014. 00068 Sussman, A. How Boston’s glassy seaport fails + why it always will! genetics of Zhu, C., & Lu, M. (2022). Shanghai built its own silicon valley, and very few came. design 2019. Available online: https:// genet icsof design. com/ 2019/ 07/ Bloomberg News Available online: https:// www. bloom berg. com/ news/ 27/ how- bosto ns- glassy- seapo rt- fails/ (Accessed 9 July 2022).artic les/ 2022- 09- 15/ china- tech- hub- linga ng- in- shang hai- lured- tesla- Sussman, A., & Hollander, J. B. (2021). Cognitive Architecture: Designing for How strug gles- to- attra ct- others (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) We Respond to the Built Environment (2nd ed.). Routledge. Zylinska, J. (2020). AI Art: machine visions and warped dreams. Open Humanities Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2006). The science of attraction. The Psychologist, 19, Press. 362–365 Available online: https:// theps ychol ogist. bps. org. uk/ volume- 19/ editi on-6/ scien ce- attra ction (Accessed 26 June 2022) Publisher’s Note Takimoto, H., Omori, F., & Kanagawa, A. (2021). Image aesthetics assessment Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub- based on multi-stream CNN architecture and saliency features. Applied lished maps and institutional affiliations. Artificial Intelligence, 35(1), 25–40. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 08839 514. 2020. 18391 97 Talebi, H., & Milanfar, P. (2018). NIMA: neural image assessment. IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing, 27(8), 3998–4011. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1109/ TIP. 2018. 28318 99 The School of Life collective. (2021). Most “nice architecture” built before 1900. Dezeen Available online: https:// www. dezeen. com/ 2021/ 01/ 13/ alain- de- botton- ugly- archi tectu re- beaut iful- build ings/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Thompson, C. (2022). It’s lonely in the metaverse. CoinDesk Available online: https:// www. coind esk. com/ web3/ 2022/ 10/ 07/ its- lonely- in- the- metav erse- decen trala nds- 38- daily- active- users- in-a- 13b- ecosy stem/ (Accessed 13 Oct 2022) Turner, F. (1996). An evolutionary/chaotic theory of beauty and meaning. Jour- nal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 19(2), 103–124. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S1061- 7361(96) 90020-X Tylecote, R. (2018). The establishment has fallen in love with ugliness — and we are all worse off for it. Institute of Economic Affairs Available online: https:// iea. org. uk/ the- estab lishm ent- has- fallen- in- love- with- uglin ess- and- we- are- all- worse- off- for- it/ (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Valenzise, G., Kang, C., & Dufaux, F. (2022). Advances and challenges in com- putational image aesthetics. In Human perception of visual information: psychological and computational perspectives (pp. 133–181). Springer hal-03311344. Vessel, E. A., Isik, A. I., & Belfi, A. M. (2019). The default-mode network represents aesthetic appeal that generalizes across visual domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(38), 19155–19164. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 19026 50116 Vessel, E. A., Maurer, N., Denker, A. H., & Starr, G. (2018). Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture. Cogni- tion, 179, 121–131. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cogni tion. 2018. 06. 009 Viladas, P. (1987). Design in the movies: Good Guys Don’t Live in White Boxes. In Today’s movies, modern design signifies ambition, money, power—and now evil. Los Angeles Times Available online: https:// www. latim es. com/ archi ves/ la- xpm- 1987- 11- 01- tm- 17886- story. html (Accessed 9 Jul 2022) Vora, P. (2009). Web application design patterns. Morgan Kaufmann.

Journal

Architectural IntelligenceSpringer Journals

Published: Mar 28, 2023

Keywords: AI; Architecture; Artificial intelligence; Beauty; Christopher Alexander; Design; Digital aesthetics; Emotional attachment; Engagement; Healing environments; Metaverse; Objective beauty; Text-to-image system; Virtual Reality

There are no references for this article.