Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Continuing on interwar developments, this chapter traces the consolidation of fragmented understandings of cirrhosis aetiology under the Nutritional Deficiency Theory (NDT) after the Second World War. A study of scientific journals from the 1930s to the 1950s illustrates the complex and laborious process by which medical scientists came to view cirrhosis as a disease borne out of the deficiency of vital nutrients. The theory owed its international popularity to its endorsement by E. Morton Jellinek, the leading mid-century American alcohol researcher who promoted the disease concept of alcoholism. The widespread acceptance of the NDT in medical circles led to the total dismissal of the Direct Toxicity Theory (DTT), directly coinciding with the diminished problematisation of drink in postwar Britain. Although the NDT transpired to be ‘wrong’ by the 1970s, it nevertheless appeared at the time to be the best explanation for the repeated failure to prove alcohol’s direct toxic action on the liver. The framing of cirrhosis as a disease of malnutrition played a critical role in dismissing its reputation as the quintessential disease of alcoholism.]
Published: Apr 29, 2023
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.