Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Zohar Kampf (2015)
Political Discourse Analysis
D. Biber, Susan Conrad, R. Reppen (1998)
Corpus linguistics: Index
B. Levin (1993)
English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation
Gerard O’Grady (2019)
SFL and Critical Discourse AnalysisThe Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics
T. Dijk (2008)
Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach
E. Russell (2019)
TheDiscursive Ecology of Homophobia
D. Biber, Susan Conrad, R. Reppen (1998)
Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use
M. Halliday (1985)
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
E. Russell (2018)
Les Hommen: the language of reactionary masculinityGender and Language
S. Kiesling (2011)
The interactional construction of desire as genderGender and Language, 5
Teun Dijk (2006)
Discourse, context and cognitionDiscourse Studies, 8
R. Connell, J. Messerschmidt (2005)
Hegemonic MasculinityGender & Society, 19
Susan Ehrlich (2001)
Representing Rape: Language and sexual consent
Debbie Ging (2017)
Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the ManosphereMen and Masculinities, 22
David Dowty (1991)
Thematic proto-roles and argument selectionLanguage, 67
David Peterson (2011)
Neoliberal Homophobic Discourse: Heteronormative Human Capital and the Exclusion of Queer CitizensJournal of Homosexuality, 58
D. Cameron, D. Kulick (2003)
Language and Sexuality: Frontmatter
D. Harvey (2020)
A Brief History of NeoliberalismThe Anti-Capitalist Chronicles
W. Brown (2019)
In the Ruins of Neoliberalism
J. Lin (2017)
Antifeminism OnlineDigital Environments
N. Fairclough (1995)
Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language
C. Gouveia (2005)
Assumptions about Gender, Power and Opportunity: Gays and Lesbians as Discursive Subjects in a Portuguese Newspaper
[This chapter examines linguistic structures in the discourse corpora following a three-tiered approach. Examination distinguishes between clauses as exchanges, involving participant relations projected into morpho-syntactic structures; clauses as messages, implicating pragmatic patterns that enlanguage contextual meanings; and clauses as representations, incorporating concepts from Systemic Functional Linguistics (Halliday and Matthiessen, Introduction to functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2004). At each level, data attest to the variable positioning of Alpha vis-à-vis Beta and Women. These positionings are argued to be structured realizations of hegemony: Alpha participants hold outsized power as possessors and behavers, their agency is directed against others, and they are holders of knowledge. Beta and Women, on the other hand, are enlanguaged as holders of emotion, negative or failed agency, and the locus of desire, inability, and need.]
Published: Apr 16, 2021
Keywords: Agency; Function; Hegemony; Modality; Pragmatics; Structure
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.