Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[As mentioned at the end of the previous chapter, there are insufficient data and information available about the functions of the AMLSCU to fight ML and to deal with STRs in particular. This information is important for removing any ambiguities and vagueness and to analyse critically the functions of the AMLSCU. No UAE case law exists to clarify or interpret the statutory responsibilities of the AMLSCU, the basis of STRs or even the role which compliance officers at reporting entities play within the STRs regime. Moreover, in order to analyse the negative consequences of the AMLSCU’s current functions, it is necessary to examine whether the current model is an ideal type, which enables it to carry on its functions to deal with STRs properly. For these reasons, in the present chapter I adopt an empirical approach which makes use of the qualitative method in order to analyse the outcomes highlighted in the previous chapter and to evaluate the functions and legal powers of the AMLSCU when dealing with STRs.]
Published: Jul 9, 2016
Keywords: Banking Sector; Public Prosecution; Previous Chapter; Legal Power; Reasonable Ground
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.