Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[This chapter focuses on how the legal system of the UAE combats ML, with the particular purpose of evaluating the role which the UAE’s FIU plays through dealing with STRs received from the reporting entities. The powers granted to it are also critically assessed. Section “How the Legal System of the UAE Combats ML” examines the UAE’s legal system in relation to counteracting ML. In this section, the requirements, which are imposed on banks and other reporting entities, in respect of detecting and preventing ML, are evaluated. These requirements are set out in regulations and circulars, which are issued by the supervisory and regulatory authorities, for instance the Central Bank. However, some of these requirements are still vague, for instance the meaning of CDD. In this section I also critically analyse the different ML definitions in the FLMLC 2002 and the CBR 24/2000 and the practical consequences of having different definitions for ML.]
Published: Jul 9, 2016
Keywords: Financial Institution; Competent Authority; Legal Person; Public Prosecution; Criminal Liability
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.