Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research

Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research The potential applications of microCT scanning in the field of archaeobotany are only just beginning to be explored. The imaging technique can extract new archaeobotanical information from existing archaeobotanical collections as well as create new archaeobotanical assemblages within ancient ceramics and other artefact types. The technique could aid in answering archaeobotanical questions about the early histories of some of the world’s most important food crops from geographical regions with amongst the poorest rates of archaeobotanical preservation and where ancient plant exploitation remains poorly understood. This paper reviews current uses of microCT imaging in the investigation of archaeobotanical questions, as well as in cognate fields of geosciences, geoarchaeology, botany and palaeobotany. The technique has to date been used in a small number of novel methodological studies to extract internal anatomical morphologies and three-dimensional quantitative data from a range of food crops, which includes sexually-propagated cereals and legumes, and asexually-propagated underground storage organs (USOs). The large three-dimensional, digital datasets produced by microCT scanning have been shown to aid in taxonomic identification of archaeobotanical specimens, as well as robustly assess domestication status. In the future, as scanning technology, computer processing power and data storage capacities continue to improve, the possible applications of microCT scanning to archaeobotanical studies will only increase with the development of machine and deep learning networks enabling the automation of analyses of large archaeobotanical assemblages. Keywords microCT · Plant domestication · 3D visualization · Archaeological parenchyma · Pottery inclusions · Underground storage organs * Aleese Barron aleese.barron@anu.edu.au School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Banks Building, Canberra, Canberra ACT  2601, Australia Department of Materials Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, Canberra ACT  2601, Australia Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3 A. Barron Introduction Archaeobotanical evidence of early human-mediated exploitation, transportation and alteration of some of the world’s most important crop species is limited. Crop species from geographical regions with low archaeobotanical sampling rates and/ or that produce types of botanical evidence with low archaeological visibility are currently underrepresented in the literature (Paz, 2005; Denham et  al., 2009; Cas- tillo & Fuller, 20,120; Bishop, 2021; Bishop et  al., 2022). These include sexually- propagated cereal and legume species and asexually-propagated fleshy underground storage organs (USOs). In some cases, archaeobotanists are currently reliant on the fields of genomics and historical linguistics rather than direct archaeobotanical evi- dence to fill in major gaps relating to the histories of some major food crops (Dia- mond & Bellwood, 2003; Lebot, 2009; Mikic´, A., Medovic´, A., Jovanovic´, Z., & Stanisavljevic’, N. 2014; Denham et  al., 2020). While new excavations and the consistent application of current archaeobotanical techniques are crucial to helping fill in both geographical and chronological gaps, the development of new archaeobo- tanical techniques, the extraction of new types of archaeobotanical material as well as the reanalysis of previously excavated material should be undertaken to increase both the quantity and quality of currently available archaeobotanical evidence. An emerging imaging and analytical technique currently underutilized in archae- obotany is microCT scanning. The technique is a powerful tool for extracting large amounts of three-dimensional information from archaeological samples quickly and non-destructively, which can be digitally rendered, manipulated and analysed as well as easily shared or stored for prosperity. While microCT has found many novel uses within the field of archaeology, its application to imaging archaeobotanical materials was until recently very limited. Within the last ten years, a handful of studies have presented novel ways in which microCT can be utilized to answer archaeobotanical questions, however, the technique is yet to be applied systematically to analyse large numbers of samples consistently across whole assemblages. The increasing access researchers have to lab-based microCT systems coupled with the development of microCT visualisation protocols specifically designed for imaging and analysing archaeobotanical materials (e.g. Barron & Denham, 2018) could see the technique become regularly employed as part of the wider suite of archaeobotanical analytical methods. In this paper, I will outline the technique’s history of use in the fields of archaeology and archaeobotany, as well as the closely related fields of geoscience, botany and palaeobotany, before outlining possible future methodological develop- ments and potential applications to archaeobotany. Computed Tomography X-ray computed tomography was originally developed in the 1970s (Ambrose, 1976; Beckmann, 2006; Hounsfield, 1973; Ommaya et  al., 1976) and initiallly used for medical imaging (Ledley et  al.,  1974; Paxton & Ambrose, 1974). As the technique 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research has been refined, scanning technology improved and computing power increased exponentially over time (see Kalender, 2006 for review), it has come to be used in an extremely wide range of fields, including biology, geology, materials science, pal- aeontology and biomedical engineering (see Staedler et  al., 2013, Table  S1). X-ray computed tomography is essentially the process of taking multiple 2D X-rays, or pro- jections, from different orientations around an object and reconstructing those projec- tions to form a digital, three-dimensional model of the object (see Brooks & Chiro, 1976; Kak & Slaney, 1988). While X-rays are the most commonly used type of radia- tion for CT imaging, neutrons have also been utilized to image archaeological sam- ples based on comparable principles (see De Beer et al., 2009; Jacobson et al., 2011; Bertrand et al., 2012; Saprykina et al., 2019). X-ray images are formed by differen- tial absorption, deflection and transmission of penetrative X-rays through an object. X-ray attenuation is affected by both the composition, density and thickness of the material and thus provides information regarding morphological form and changes, both internally and externally; however, it can only provide relative compositional information based on comparative attenuation values of assumed or known materials (see Kak & Slaney, 1988; Hsieh, 2015; Stock, 2020 for technique overviews). There- fore, X-ray CT is ideal for imaging heterogeneous samples comprised of materials with vastly different attenuation values. The two-dimensional x-ray projections pro- duced during scanning are processed using dedicated reconstruction algorithms to produce a three-dimensional model, which is essentially a three-dimensional map of X-ray attenuation values at all points throughout a scanned object (see Willemink and Noël 2019 for evolution of image reconstruction methods). MicroCT MicroCT was first developed in the 1980s (Elliott & Dover, 1982, 1985; Feldkamp & Jesion, 1986; Flannery et al., 1987; Sato et al., 1981; Suzuki et al., 1988) as a higher resolution and higher energy type of CT-imaging with no definitive differentiation between traditional CT and microCT. The basic setup of microCT systems differs from medical CT scanners with the sample rotating between a stationary X-ray source and detector for microCT, as opposed to the sample/patient remaining stationary while the X-ray source and detector rotate around them in a medical scanner (see Flannery et al. 1987 Fig. 2 for basic source-detector schematic). X-ray radiation dosage and exposure are severely limited for the health of patients in medical imaging, whereas this is of little importance for imaging archaeobotanical samples using microCT. However, the impact scanning has on aDNA, isotope ratios, and OSL dating remains largely unknown (see Immel et al., 2016; Wanek and Rühli 2016; Sears et al., 2016; Murphy et al., 2019). There are two major types of microCT systems widely in use, lab-based and synchrotron, which differ by their X-ray sources, and, therefore, the types of X-ray beams. Lab-based microCT systems generally use tube X-ray transmitters, which produce polychromatic beams (Sasov and Dyck 1998). Synchrotron microCT sys- tems use synchrotron light sources which produce tunable, monochromatic beams of higher flux and intensity enabling smaller spot sizes resulting in higher image resolution (Grodzins, 1983a, b; Thompson et  al., 1984; Flannery et  al., 1987; 1 3 A. Barron Baruchel et  al., 2006). Generally, synchrotron high-resolution X-ray microCT is carried out at large facilities with a synchrotron radiation source, such as a par- ticle accelerator, making the technique significantly more difficult to access and beam time is severely limited compared to lab-based microCT systems. There are currently no standard protocols for the scanning of archaeobotanical samples, or any other type of samples, so a large number of parameters are deter- mined by the user, dependent on the size and composition of samples and research questions of interest. These parameters include tube voltage and current, exposure time, step size, beam spot size, and the use of any physical filters. The variety of microCT systems, flexibility of scan parameters as well as the subjectivity of subse- quent visualization and segmentation methods make it currently difficult to reliably compare data and analytical results obtained using different microCT systems (Bav - eye et al., 2010). Image resolution (voxel size) is inversely proportional to sample size, specifically sample diameter, meaning that images of large samples may not possess the level of detail required for desired results. In fields such as geology, this limit of voxel size is often overcome by simply extracting subsamples using destructive coring methods, however, this option is not ideal for archaeological samples. The limitation on voxel size can be non-destructively overcome by the implementation of a region of interest (ROI) scan (Chityala et al., 2004; Kyrieleis et al., 2011) in addition to a full object scan. This process produces a higher resolution scan of a portion of the sample, yet extracts the subsample non-destructively (see Fig. 1). Fig. 1 2D radiographic slices of sorghum-tempered pottery sherd. Left. Slice from full sherd scan. Right. Slice from ROI (region of interest scan 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Sample preparation One of the major reasons that microCT scanning has found widespread use in archaeology is the non-destructive nature of both sample preparation and image pro- cessing. When mounting a sample for microCT scanning the primary concerns are to secure it to the stage and stabilize all parts of the sample so that no movement occurs during or between radiographs. If all or part of a sample moves during scan- ning it can lead to blurred 3D images, particularly around the sample edges, after digital reconstruction. Samples are often mounted in any kind of vessel, ideally a tube composed of a low attenuation material, and stabilized inside using packing material (of significantly lower density than the sample if possible). However, sam- ple mounting is dependent on the shape and nature of the sample and the technical specifications of the CT system (see Du Plessis et al., 2017). Figure  2 shows examples of sample preparation and stabilization methods used for the scanning of different types of archaeobotanical samples. All samples are mounted in plastic tubes and the organic-tempered pottery sherds in Fig.  2a are imaged within their plastic sample bags. This was done to avoid separating sherds from the contextual information written on the plastic bags, which attenuate signifi- cantly less X-rays than the sherds and thus do not affect the imaging of the sherds themselves. The pottery sherds in Fig.  2A were able to be stabilized by their own rigidity against the walls of the tube whereas the wood and parenchyma sample in Figs. 2B & C were weighted down by packing foam. The taro fragments in Fig. 2C were also separated from the foam by a sheet of stiff plastic to create a clear separa- tion between the sample and foam to enable simpler digital segmentation for visuali- zation and/or analysis. A B C Fig. 2 2D x-ray slices of samples prepared for tomographic imaging. A. African pottery samples (3 tem- pered with sorghum on the left and 1 tempered with pearl millet on the right) still in plastic sample bags and stacked inside a plastic specimen jar. B. Archaeobotanical samples (five charred parenchyma sam- ples and one wood charcoal) stacked inside a plastic tube and secured from above with packing foam. C. Charred Colocasia esculenta reference sample stacked inside a plastic tube and secured from above with a plastic disc (to aid with post-scanning segmentation) and packing foam 1 3 A. Barron Visualisation and Analysis The digital datasets produced by microCT scanning can be used for visualization or analytical purposes and can be rendered, segmented and/or animated to access inter- nal or external morphologies. The data can be viewed by two-dimensional slice from any direction or as a three-dimensional model, providing perspectives from infinitely more angles than two-dimensional imaging techniques (Fig. 3). MicroCT data can be segmented (i.e. partitioned and labelled) based on various properties such as X-ray attenuation value, shape, size and connectedness and each segment can be visualized and/or analysed individually. Many 3D image processing software packages are com- mercially available such as Avizo, VG Studio Max and Dragonfly, whereas others are open-source, such as Drishti (Hu et al., 2020; Limaye, 2012). Many of these software packages offer both quantitative and qualitative analytical methods with the abilities to alter visual properties—such as rendering colours, lighting, opacity and camera orientation—as well as to calculate quantitative characteristics—such as volume, dis- tribution and compositional ratios (see Maire & Withers, 2013). Fig. 3 3D rendering of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) reference sample and views of 2D tomographic slices in Drishti Paint. A. 3D rendering with orange crosshairs indicating the location of slices C-D. B. 2D view of slice along x-axis. C. 2D view of slice along y-axis. D. 2D view of slice along z-axis 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research The digital nature of microCT datasets makes them easy to share virtually with researchers around the globe (see Stuppy et  al., 2003; Tuniz et  al., 2013). This is particularly useful for the study of rare and/or valuable archaeobotanical samples, which are often too fragile to be transported or are not legally allowed to be trans- ported outside of their country of origin (Calo et  al., 2019). Digital datasets can also reduce the need for researchers to undertake expensive and, in the current pub- lic health and climatic crises, increasingly difficult travel to access archaeological collections. The ability to share microCT datasets is only limited by the size of the datasets and the limited capacity of existing file sharing platforms. Online repositories, often hosted by university-based supercomputer facilities, for the digital storage of 3D vol- umes for research purposes are becoming increasingly more common (e.g. Digital Rocks Portal—www. digitalrocksportal.org; MorphoMuseuM – www. morph omuse um. com; DigiMorph – www. digim orph. org) and their continuing development will enable more and larger archaeological reference datasets to become widely avail- able in the future. The production of animations and 3D printable datasets using microCT data is also effective for media promotion and public outreach and can be employed as engaging tools for teaching purposes. MicroCT can be integrated with 2D dimensional imaging methods by using a process called registration. This process involves locating (either manually or auto- matically) the exact three-dimensional location where a 2D image slice occurs in the 3D microCT data and overlaying that 2D image slice to enable direct comparison between different forms of information. The process an be used for registering com- positional elemental and mineral mapping techniques such as BSEM (back-scattered scanning electron microscopy) and QEMSCAN with microCT data to identify the presence and distribution of compositional types and link their occurrence to spe- cific greyscales values within 3D datasets (Latham et al., 2008a; b). MicroCT applications in Cognate Fields Archaeology Computed tomography has a long history of use in archaeology largely due to the non-destructive nature of the imaging process. This history began with the use of medical scanners to non-destructively image and digitally unwrap mummies and other fragile skeletal remains (Appelboom & Struyven, 1999; Baldock et al., 1994; Cosmacini & Piacentini, 2008; Falke et al., 1987; Hardwood-Nash, 1979; Lynnerup et  al., 1997; Sigmund & Minas., 2002). Medical scanners are able to image large samples relatively quickly and produce images of resolutions high enough to answer some types of archaeological and palaeoanthropological questions. The technique’s use in imaging skeletal remains, including both human and faunal, has become almost standard practice (see Zollikofer et  al., 1998; Zollikofer & Ponce de Leon, 2005; Weber & Bookstein, 2011). It has been used to successfully identify objects 1 3 A. Barron encased within or wrapped with skeletal remains, locate and assess palaeopatholo- gies such as bone fractures or deformities and to analyse general skeletal morphol- ogy, to aid in sex and age determination of human remains and species determina- tion of animal remains (Allam et al., 2009; Coutinho Nogueira et al., 2019; Cramer et  al., 2018; Johnston et al., 2020; Malgora et al., 2020; McKnight, 2010; Melcher et al., 1997; Panzer et al., 2014; Ru, 2000; Shin et al., 2003). The technique has been used to image a number of high profile archaeological skeletal remains including Oetzi (Gostner et al., 2011; Murphy et al., 2003; Pernter et al., 2007), Tutankhamun (Hawass et al., 2010; Hussein et al., 2013), and Richard III (Appleby et al., 2015). The non-destructive nature of CT scanning has also successfully been used to ‘look’ inside sealed artefacts without having to physically deconstruct or damage objects such as sealed funerary urns (Anderson & Fell, 1995; Harvig et al., 2012; Minozzi et al., 2010) and documents (Applbaum et al. 1995; Stromer et al., 2018). In the twenty-first century, X-ray microCT has become the most widely used tomography technique for imaging an increasingly diverse range of archaeological materials. Faunal and human bones have been imaged to identify and assess a range of features such as collagen preservation (Beck et  al., 2012; Tripp et  al., 2018), sur- face cut marks (Bello et  al., 2013a; b; Tuniz et  al., 2012), palaeopathological signs of disease and injury (Rühli et al., 2007; Welsh et al., 2020), histological evidence of diagenesis (Booth et al., 2016), and internal anatomical morphologies (Boschin et al., 2015; Bradfield, 2018). The technique has also been used to carry out complex mor - phological analyses of early hominid fossils (Ponce de Leon & Zollikofer, 1999; Zol- likofer and Ponce de Leon, 2005; Zollikofer et al.,  2005; Bermúdez De Castro et al., 2011; Holloway et al., 2014; Skinner et al., 2016) and to share that morphological data publicly enabling digital comparative analyses with other hominid specimens (Guipert & Lumley, 2004; Skinner et al., 2013). Other types of archaeological artefacts imaged using microCT scanning include papyrus scrolls (Allegra et al., 2016; Mocella et al., 2015), clay plaster (Bernardini et  al., 2018), glass beads (Cheng et  al., 2019; Ngan- Tillard et al., 2018), swords (Stelzner, 2016), and coins (Bude & Bigelow, 2020). Adaptation from geosciences MicroCT has long been a common technique for imaging geological and soil sam- ples in the geosciences (Cnudde & Boone, 2013; Ketcham & Carlson, 2001; Taina et al., 2008), leading to the development of analytical techniques that are beginning to be adopted in geoarchaeological and archaeological ceramic studies. Geological studies frequently use microCT imaging to scan rock cores and study a range of properties such as mineral composition, grain size, shape and orientation, pore char- acterisation and connectedness, and fracture patterns (Bhuiyan et al., 2012; Cnudde et al., 2012; Ersoy et al., 2010; Iovea et al., 2008; Jerram et al., 2009; Ketcham et al., 2010; Rozenbaum, 2011). A number of these properties have since been studied in archaeological ceramics using microCT data to characterize, quantify and visualise the 3D distributions of clay matrices, pores, tempers and other inclusions. These methods have been used to answer archaeological questions relating to vessel manu- facturing methods (Coli et  al., 2022; Kozatsas et  al., 2018; Sanger, 2016) and the 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research provenance of raw materials and vessel types (Bernardini et al., 2019; Kahl & Ram- minger, 2012; McKenzie-Clark & Magnussen, 2014). Soil science studies have used microCT scanning to image intact soil blocks to characterise and quantify solid soil components, physical properties (e.g. porosity and structure) and soil biota without losing 3D contextual information (Cássaro et  al., 2017; Chirol et  al., 2021; Helliwell et  al., 2014; Katuwal et  al., 2015; Taina et  al., 2008; Voltolini et  al., 2017). Traditional soil analysis methods such as 2D thin-section micromorphology can provide higher resolution coverage and addi- tional information (eg. compositional characterization) than microCT, however, it has been shown that microCT is particularly useful complementary technique when used as part of a suite of imaging methods. MicroCT adds three-dimensional con- textual information that was previously inaccessible using solely 2D imaging meth- ods and is crucial to understanding dynamic soil processes. MicroCT analytical techniques previously developed for soil science have been adapted by a number of geoarchaeological studies to image whole soil blocks for virtual investigation (Adderley et  al., 2001; Edwards et  al., 2017; Huisman et  al., 2014; Stelzner et  al., 2010; Villagran et  al., 2019; Ward & Maksimenko, 2019). Archaeological material types that attenuate X-rays at a higher rate than the soil matrix, such as ceramics, lithics, bone, and shell, can be easily extracted and visual- ized in three-dimensions for analysis. The 3D microCT data can be used for mor- phological identification, quantification, or be used as a sampling guide for further analytical methods (i.e. determining the location for 2D thin-section sampling and alerting excavators to the presence of poorly preserved, fragile artefacts during physical excavation). Geoarchaeological case studies to use the technique have so far applied it to the identification of structural features in midden deposits as well as shell, bone, lithic, teeth, scale and gill plate inclusions (Huisman et al., 2014; Ward & Maksimenko, 2019), the characterisation of termite mound materials in archaeo- logical deposits (Villagran et al., 2019), and the visualization of mineral hypo-coat- ings surrounding faunal burrows in archaeological sediments (Edwards et al., 2017). Botany MicroCT is yet to become a popular imaging technique in the field of botany, largely due to the low attenuating nature of carbon-based organic tissues (Piovesan et  al., 2021; Staedler et  al., 2013; Stuppy et  al., 2003). Staining techniques are oftenrequired before scanning to increase image contrast and differentiate between tissue and cell types (Staedler et  al., 2013), or alternatively, phase contrast microCT can be used to detect subtle differences in attenuation (Wilkins et  al., 1996). Scans of plants generally must be carried out at low energies with long exposure times, which can increase the occurrence of imaging artefacts. Despite its infrequent use, microCT has been shown to be extremely beneficial in helping to map and quantify the 3D topography of plant structures such as root systems, pore spaces, vasculature, tissue types, and reproductive organs to better understand physiologically processes such as 1 3 A. Barron the transport of water, metabolic gases and nutrients throughout entire plant organisms (Brodersen et al., 2011; Dhondt et al., 2010; Ho et al., 2014; Mathers et  al., 2018; McElrone et al., 2013; Mendoza et al., 2007; Nugraha et al., 2019; Pajor et al., 2013; Zhao & Takhar, 2017). Multiple studies have used microCT scanning to map live plant root systems in order to observe and quantify live root-soil interactions without the need for destructive sectioning (Flavel et  al., 2017; Maenhout et  al., 2019; Mairhofer et al., 2012; Mooney et al., 2011; Phalempin et al., 2021; Teramoto et al., 2020). One of these methods, Rootine (Gao et  al., 2019; Phalempin et  al., 2021), was originally developed as an adaptation of medical imaging techniques to iden- tify blood vessels based on their tubular shape (Frangi et  al., 1998). In these studies, roots are generally identified based on a combination of X-ray attenu- ation thresholding, shape analysis and object interconnectedness. A number of these root mapping techniques have developed image-processing protocols to, partially (Maenhout et al., 2019; Mairhofer et al., 2012) or fully (Douarre et al., 2018; Gao et al., 2019; Teramoto et al., 2020), automate the processes of iden- tifying and extracting plant roots from within the soil matrix of live plant sam- ples. The trend towards automating the analysis of botanical microCT data is seen in the increasing use of machine and deep learning processes (Earles et al., 2018; Théroux-Rancourt et al., 2020; Soltaninejad et al., 2020; Van De Loover- bosch et al., 2021). Matsushima et  al. (2012) used the high-attenuating nature of calcium oxa- late crystals to extract druse crystals from surrounding tissues in rose stems. This segmentation process enabled the visualization of druse crystal distribu- tion throughout a botanical organism in three-dimensions for the first time and could prove crucial in forming a better understanding of calcium oxalate forma- tion and function in plants, about which much remains unknown (Franceschi & Nakata, 2005; Nakata, 2003, 2012; Paiva, 2019; Tooulakou et  al., 2016). This segmentation method has also proven to be particularly successful at visualiz- ing calcium oxalate crystals in underground storage organs (USOs) to aid in the characterisation of species and identification of archaeological parenchyma frag- ments (Barron et al., 2022a; Denham et al., 2020). MicroCT scanning can enable sequential scans of individual organisms at established time intervals and to be registered to create 4D datasets illustrating changes in plant morphology over time (Keyes et  al., 2016). This 4D scanning technique has the potential to become revolutionary in understanding how plants develop and respond to various growth conditions because it allows 3D imaging of live samples without the need for destructive mounting procedures. The three-dimensional nature of microCT data also enables the technique to capture more and/or additional details of reference samples than the traditional method of using 2D histological thin-sections to form botanical reference collec- tions. Currently, there are very few publicly accessible 3D reference collections utilizing microCT data. X-plant (www.X- plant. org), while still in its infancy, is one example of how these collections could be set up and used. The platform currently hosts 41 datasets representing 34 plant species of accessible and down- loadable microCT data (MeBioS Postharvest Group, 2022). 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Palaeobotany MicroCT scanning has been successfully applied to the morphological study of fos- silized palaeobotanical remains by scanning already extracted botanical samples and scanning rock fragments and digitally extracting contained botanical fossils. Studies have included analysis of prehistoric plant remains consisting of a wide range of botanical material types including seeds (Smith et al., 2009), fruits (Collinson et al., 2016; Devore et al., 2006; Matsunaga et al., 2019; Smith et al., 2009), flowers (Friis et  al., 2014; Moreau et  al., 2014), and cones (Karch et  al., 2017). MicroCT data has enabled the virtual dissection of extremely rare and fragile specimens to view internal features previously inaccessible using 2D imaging techniques, which may have previously led to the destruction of rare samples. The large quantity of mor- phological information provided by microCT is particularly important for extracting the maximum amount of information from possibly unique, unidentified specimens to aid in anatomical characterisation and systematic classification (Matsunaga et al., 2019). In the future, microCT may also be used as a way to digitally preserve palae- obotanical samples that are subject to decay over time, or to make damaged samples available for virtual study (Collinson et al., 2016; Devore et al., 2006). MicroCT Applications in Archaeobotany The application of microCT scanning to the study of archaeobotanical remains was almost non-existent ten years ago. A handful of novel studies have recently begun to explore how microCT-based analytical techniques, developed in geology, botany and palaeontology, can be adapted and applied archaeobotanical materials to com- plement current archaeobotanical techniques and answer archaeobotanical ques- tions. The majority of these studies have concentrated on taxonomic identification of archaeobotanical specimens including wood species used in the manufacture of culturally significant wooden artefacts (Haneca et al., 2012; Kobayashi et al., 2019; Mizuno et al., 2010; Stelzner & Million, 2015; Whitau et al., 2016), fruits extracted from archaeological midden deposits (Calo et  al., 2019, 2020), a citrus-like fruit from a funerary offering deposit (Coubray et al., 2010), and a palm droop from the Royal Palace in Jericho (Moricca et  al., 2020). All of these studies used microCT scans to visualize different internal features dependent on the type of archaeobotani- cal material, the diagnostic value of the feature as well as the voxel size of the scan. These features include cell types such as vascular bundles, fibres and parenchyma (Mizuno et al., 2010; Whitau et al., 2016), seed morphologies (Coubray et al., 2010; Moricca et al., 2020), and tissues layers such as the exocarp, mesocarp, and endo- carp (Calo et  al., 2019, 2020). In some cases, microCT has been able to discount previous identifications, which had been made using only external, 2D imaging methods (Calo et al., 2019; Coubray et al., 2010). Wolcott et  al. (2021) demonstrated how microCT data has the potential to expand upon the application of morphometrical analyses to archaeobo- tanical samples, an approach that has become increasingly popular for species 1 3 A. Barron determination and assessment of domestication status in archaeobotany (Portillo et  al., 2020). Wolcott et al. (2021) scanned archaeological and modern Citrullus seeds and used the placement of three-dimensional landmarks to compare the two groups in the hopes of identifying the archaeological seeds to Citrullus species. While there was not sufficient variation observed to narrow down the identifi- cation to species level using a series of landmarks, Wolcott et  al. noted that in the future differentiation may still be possible by comparing the complete three- dimensional morphologies of the two layers, the exotesta and endotesta, which they were able to segment out from the microCT data. Comparison of entire 3D surfaces (Frank et al., 2021; Galinsky & Frank, 2014; Gao et al., 2018; Koehl & Hass, 2015) or automating the selection of landmarks (Boyer et  al., 2015; Kris- tensen et al., 2008) may prove useful in the future for those types of archaeobot- anical samples where differentiation between possible species using user-selected landmark morphometrics is extremely narrow. Currently, one of the issues with the identification of anatomical features and identification of archaeobotanical remains using microCT is that the process relies upon comparing microCT images to archaeobotanical and modern reference images taken using 2D image techniques (Calo et  al., 2020). Therefore, the comparison with 3D volumes of archaeobotanical samples is currently indirect and requires a degree of subjective interpretation by the observer. This can be solved in time with the development of microCT 3D reference collections of both botanical and archae- obotanical samples. As Calo et  al. (2020) notes, microCT datasets can be virtu- ally sliced to produce two-dimensional images “equivalent to light microscopy” for comparison with existing two-dimensional images and previously published descriptions while still retaining its contextual information in three-dimensional space. As Brodersen (2013) has outlined for wood characterisation, the benefits of using both 2D slices and 3D volumes of the same samples are that traditional diag- nostic features can be retained in the two-dimensional images while also allowing researchers to access and assess the usefulness of a new range of three-dimensional anatomical features for identifying and analyzing archaeobotanical samples. A small number of studies have developed new ways to use microCT to answer other types of archaeobotanical questions, particularly relating to the dating and preservation of archaeological wood. Bird et al. (2008) assessed pore size and interconnectedness as well as the distribution of authigenic mineral contamination in both reference and archaeological charcoal samples to better understand how and the extent to which charcoal is altered or degraded in the environment. This method shows potential to aid in determining the reliability of radiocarbon dates taken from charcoal. Stelzner and Million (2015) also suc- cessfully used microCT to aid in dating archaeobotanical samples by analyzing tree rings for dendrochronological dating of wood remains in soil blocks. More novel studies such as these, which focus on specific archaeobotanical materials and features are needed in order to understand the possible outcomes, benefits and pitfalls in applying microCT systematically to large numbers of samples and archaeobotanical material types. 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Sexually‑propagated cereal and legume crops MicroCT imaging has been used to assess the domestication status of some of the world’s most understudied, sexually-propagated food crops. The technique can image three-dimensional morphological traits of plant remains associated with the ‘domestication syndrome’ (i.e. abscission scars, grain size, oil content, testa thick- ness), namely, traits that change over time under cultivation during the domestica- tion period. Certain traits present within cultivated plant populations are thought to have been selected for by humans, both consciously and unconsciously, over long periods of pre-domestication cultivation. Over time continual trait selection, as well as separation from wild plant populations, led to cultivated plant populations evolving to become set as phenotypically and genotypically distinct from their wild ancestors (Fuller, 2007). The expression of traits and their archaeobotanical visibil- ity differ slightly for each species, but the process to assess the domestication sta- tus of plant populations always involves an assessment of domestication status for each individual plant specimen, which is then added to proportional counts of types across a botanical assemblage. The proportions of domesticated versus wild types for a given period at a site are then geographically and chronologically compared to other assemblages of the same crop species. The qualitative and quantitative characterisation of domestication syndrome traits has been achieved for multiple cereal crops: rice (Barron et  al., 2017, 2020a), sor- ghum (Barron et  al., 2020b) and pearl millet (Fuller et  al., 2021)(Fig.  4), and leg- umes: soybean (Murphy et al., 2019; Zong et al., 2017) and horse gram (Murphy & Fuller, 2017). In each case microCT was able to extract morphological information not accessible using 2D imaging techniques. While 2D imaging techniques such as Fig. 4 3D renderings of archaeobotanical cereal inclusions from organic-tempered pottery sherds. Top row – Wild types. Bottom row – domesticated types. Left – Rice spikelet bases from Gua Sireh, Bor- neo. Middle – Sorghum spikelets from KG23, Sudan. Right – Pearl millet spikelets from AZ22 (top) and MK36 (bottom), Mali 1 3 A. Barron light microscopy and SEM are often sufficient for assessing external morphologies of stratigraphically extracted archaeological remains, in some cases domestication syndrome traits are not accessible externally and therefore require either destructive sectioning or penetrative imaging. Two-dimensional imaging can provide hints as to the likely 3D morphologies of domestication traits by imaging spikelet abscission scars visible on ceramic surfaces or by visualizing seed coat thickness across a sin- gle 2D section, however, studies have shown that for certain domestication traits or certain types of archaeobotanical evidence microCT is the most robust and efficient way to assess domestication status (Barron & Denham, 2018; Barron et al., 2020a; b; Murphy & Fuller, 2017; Murphy et al., 2019; Zong et al., 2017). Barron et al. (2017,  2020a, b) have demonstrated that microCT scanning can be used to visualize archaeobotanical remains used as organic temper and preserved within archaeological pottery sherds, as well as to determine the domestication sta- tus of included cereal spikelets. While 2D surface impression analysis has produced some success in identifying and assessing organic inclusions in the past (Barron et al., 2017; McClatchie & Fuller, 2014; Winchell et al., 2017), the use of microCT imaging provides much greater analytical coverage and therefore is substantially more effective and efficient at extracting archaeobotanical information from pottery sherds (Barron et  al. 2020a). This technique has so far been utilized to study rice in sherds from Vietnam (Barron & Denham, 2018; Barron et  al., 2017) and Bor- neo (Barron et  al., 2020a), sorghum in sherds from Sudan (Barron et  al., 2020b) and pearl millet in sherds from Mali (Fuller et al., 2021). In all these studies, cereal spikelets could be identified in and segmented from the microCT data in order to visualize individual spikelets in three-dimensions for qualitative analysis of abscis- sion scar morphology, which can then be compiled for quantitative assessment of archaeobotanical assemblages. In each case study, the amount of archaeobotanical evidence available to address, globally significant archaeological questions has been significantly increased. MicroCT has granted access to new archaeobotanical assemblages present in “old” (previously excavated) materials from regions of relatively poor archaeobotanical coverage, where traditional archaeobotanical techniques have not been routinely applied (Castillo & Fuller, 2010; Winchell et  al., 2018). For example archaeobot- anical sampling has been inconsistently used at archaeological sites across Southeast Asia, meaning that we have very poor understanding of the timing and mechanisms of diffusion for rice farming into the region (Denham, 2013; Donohue & Denham, 2010; Paz, 1999, 2002). This lack of evidence is particularly pronounced in Island Southeast Asia, where theories regarding the introduction of rice farming to a locale have sometimes been dependent on merely the presence of a single rice grain lodged in the surface of a single pottery sherd from a single site (Barron et al., 2020a; Bell- wood et al., 1992). MicroCT imaging demonstrated that no other rice remains were present in the pottery sherd, thereby calling into question current models of diffu- sion dependent on the single, likely wild, rice grain. Ideally, assertions regarding the timing and trajectories of domestication episodes are based on the analysis of large archaeobotanical assemblages from numerous archaeological sites, of high geographical and chronological diversity (Fuller, 2007; Fuller et al., 2012, 2014; Purugganan & Fuller, 2011). The assemblages can then be 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research collated and compared to form a domestication curve to form a better overall picture of the timing and trajectories specific to each crop or domestication event. Robust domestication curves have been developed for certain crop species such as wheat (Allaby et al., 2017), maize (Kistler et al., 2018) and rice (Fuller et al., 2016), con- sisting of the analysis of thousands of cereal spikelets from increasingly large num- bers of sites. Unfortunately, robust domestication curves have not been established for all sexually propagated crops due to the relative scarcity of available archaeobot- anical specimens. Some of these understudied crops have been the focus of microCT studies including sorghum and pearl millet, which were previously assumed to have originated in Sahelian Africa despite some of the earliest evidence of their domesti- cation being located in India (Kahlheber & Neumann, 2007; Winchell et al., 2018). MicroCT was shown to be so useful at identifying sorghum spikelets in ceramics from the site of KG23 in Sudan that it recovered spikelets at a rate of over eleven times the rate of surface impression analysis (Barron et  al., 2020b). The three- dimensional technique was able to identify 82 spikelets in 12 sherds, equating to a rate of 6.83 spikelets per sherd, compared with the two-dimensional technique of surface impression analysis that identified 51 spikelets on 91 sherds at a rate of only 0.56 spikelets per sherd. The addition of these 82 new sorghum spikelets to the pre- viously studied 51 surface spikelets makes the combined KG23 botanical assem- blage the biggest pre-domestication sorghum assemblage known to date. Therefore, this one study of only a handful of sherds has demonstrated the added efficiency and increase in archaeobotanical evidence that can be achieved by imaging organic- tempered pottery using microCT. Murphy and Fuller (2017) and Zong et  al. (2017) have similarly used microCT to image and assess domestication traits in the legume species of soybean and horse gram respectively. Murphy et al. used synchrotron microCT to image and measure seed coat thickness for a selection of archaeological horse gram specimens from India dating from between 2000 and 1200 BC. Seed coat thinning is thought to be linked to cultivation selection due to the resultant reduction in seed dormancy. Murphy et  al. were able to show that horse gram seed coats became thinner over the time period in a stepped progression from thick (older than 1700 BC) to semi- thin (1800 BC to 1300 BC) and from semi-thin to thin (later than 1300 BC). This was the first time seed coat thinning was demonstrated in a legume species from the analysis of archaeological remains and contradicted assumptions that domesticated forms were derived from low dormancy wild populations. They also found there to be considerable variation in seed coat thickness within individual seeds as well as between different seeds. This highlights the importance of the 3D coverage provided by microCT to enable measurements to be taken at multiple points in order to attain the most accurate morphometric data. Zong et  al. (2017) used microCT to investigate the oil content in archaeologi- cal soybeans as oil content has been shown to be higher in modern domesticated varieties than wild plants. They argue that higher oil content in seeds creates small internal holes whereas higher protein content creates large internal holes. By imag- ing soybeans from four archaeological sites in China, dating from between 7500 cal BP to 4000  cal BP, Zong et  al. found that the occurrence of small holes gradually increased over time showing that soybeans with higher oil content were selected for 1 3 A. Barron under cultivation. Murphy et al. (2019), however, have suggested that the presence of holes in archaeobotanical soybeans and their size could be affected by pre-depo- sitional charring and/or preservation conditions. These studies suggest further work is needed, including the analysis of experimentally charred seeds using microCT imaging, before the cavities in soybeans can be conclusively linked to oil content and, by extension, human-mediated selection under cultivation. All of these methods discussed, which use microCT to assess domestication sta- tus, have relied on the technique’s abilities to image internal morphologies and to visualize those morphologies in three-dimensions. While these techniques are in their initial stages of development, they have opened up new avenues of research in geographic regions and for sexually propagated crop species that are significantly underrepresented in the archaeobotanical literature. Asexually‑propagated USOs The archaeological study of asexually propagated crop species is limited in compari- son to sexually propagated crops, particularly cereals (Denham et al., 2020). There are a number of likely reasons why this is the case including their lower archaeo- logical visibility due to the lack of taphonomically robust forms of evidence (i.e. seeds), the complexity of identification methods, as well as lower archaeobotanical sampling in the regions from which many of these crops originate. Despite these issues, the consumption, management and cultivation of asexually propagated crop species have been shown to be extremely ancient practices (Clarkson et  al., 2017; Denham et al., 2003; Florin et al., 2020; Wadley et al., 2020), which have been over- looked archaeologically for many decades creating an incomplete view of ancient subsistence strategies and likely inflating the importance of seed-based agriculture for populations reliant on mixed subsistence practices. A suite of new archaeobotanical techniques has been developed in recent dec- ades to extract, identify and analyse new types of archaeobotanical evidence such as phytoliths (Piperno, 2006), starch (Barton & Torrence, 2006) and archaeological parenchyma (Hather, 2000) produced by asexually propagated plants. These forms of evidence are less archaeologically visible than the macro-remains of sexually- propagated plants and their identification methods can be inconclusive for taxo- nomic characterisation when used in isolation. Therefore, there is a need to more regularly employ a multi-proxy approach in archaeobotany to increase both the qual- ity and quantity of archaeobotanical data (García-Granero et al., 2015). One type of evidence and investigation technique, which remains extremely rare in the literature is the study of preserved fragments of parenchyma tissues from the fleshy, starchy organs of roots, tuber and corms (Hather, 1991, 1993, 1994, 2000; Kubiak-Martens, 2016; Oliveira, 2008, 2012; Paz, 2001, 2005; Ussher, 2015). These are often known collectively as underground storage organs (USOs), or in archaeo- botanical contexts archaeological parenchyma, and include some of the world’s most economically important food crops such as sweet potato, potato, manioc, taro and yams. A robust technique to characterize fragments of these archaeological paren- chyma tissues was developed by Jon Hather in the 1990s (Hather, 1988, 1991, 1993, 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research 1994; 2000; Hather & Kirch, 1991) but its potential to expand archaeobotanical knowledge has yet to be fully exploited (Hather & Mason, 2009; Kubiak-Martens, 2016). As these USO organs are composed of almost entirely undifferentiated starch- storing parenchyma cells and exhibit high levels of intraspecies phenotypic plastic- ity, Hather’s identification method requires the characterisation of a complex range of anatomical and morphological features for each fragment of archaeological par- enchymatous tissue in order to secure a likely taxonomic identification (Hather, 2000; Paz, 2001). These features include surface morphology, tissue organization, vascular bundle arrangement and distribution, calcium oxalate crystals, and patterns of charring or vesicularisation. Some features are considered more diagnostic due to wide interspecific and narrow intraspecific variety than others that present wide intraspecific variability that overlaps significantly with other species and families. One factor restricting the widespread use of Hather’s identification method is that to characterize diagnostic USO features requires the development of extensive and accessible reference collections, which capture the broad range of morpho- logical variability within and between species. The analytical coverage provided by microCT would be more effective at capturing the range of variability than the 2D sampling methods used to date (light microscopy and SEM), which are incapable of illustrating all of the diagnostic features of a single USO sample in a single or small handful of slices. The ability of microCT to capture those diagnostic features identified by Hather has to date been demonstrated by only three studies, Pritchard et al. (2019) and Bar- ron et al., (2022a & b). Pritchard et al. (2019) used SEM and light microcopy images of yam (Dioscorea nummalaria) and sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) reference sam- ples to compare to microCT images of archaeological parenchyma fragments from Kuk Swamp, Papua New Guinea. Similarities in diagnostic features such as vascular bundle arrangement and distribution were found in the reference images for sweet potato to the microCT data for two archaeological parenchyma fragments, thus sup- porting previous identifications of sweet potato (Lewis et  al., 2016). While these results are archaeobotanically robust, the security of taxonomic determination could only be further increased by the scanning of a wide range of relevant reference spe- cies in three-dimensions for direct comparison. Barron et al. (2022a) in their study of five of the most significant asexually-prop- agated crops in Southeast Asia and the Pacific: taro (Colocasia esculenta), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), giant taro (Alocosia macrorrhiza), and two yams spe- cies, Dioscorea esculenta and Dioscorea alata, have taken the first steps towards compiling an archaeological reference collection of archaeological parenchyma spe- cies using microCT. The five species study scanned Hather’s own charred reference specimens and used his diagnostic criteria as a guide to differentiation of plant fami- lies and species but was also generally focused on qualitative pattern recognition between datasets, as it was assumed that by imaging these organs in three-dimen- sions for the first time new and different features of characterisation would be also captured. It is also likely that complex patterns of differentiation exist in parenchym- atous organs that are not apparent to a human analyst but could be identified with the application of deep learning processes as discussed below. 1 3 A. Barron One significant factor noted by Barron et al. (2022a) was that variation of features such as cell size and shape, damage from charring and the distinction between tis- sue layers was incredibly high even within individual USO fragments. This variation showed that imaging of whole archaeological samples is incredibly important as the characterisation of a USO based on a single 2D image could be extremely mislead- ing as to the nature of the whole organ. Another feature of the reference samples scanned is that there is a much wider range of calcium oxalate crystal-types in sam- ples of the same species than has been documented previously. Samples of taro and sweet potato displayed a variety of crystal types and sizes that suggested some oxa- late crystal attributes could provide more information regarding the environmental growth conditions of a USO organ than species identification and so a combination of characteristics must be taken into consideration, including crystal size, shape, fre- quency and distribution. The reference collection being compiled by Barron et al. (2022a) is planned to be expanded to include other species of USO species significant to the Southeast Asia, Pacific and Oceania regions as well as to be made publically available online to aid in more robust and frequent archaeological parenchyma identifications as well as in the hopes of making the analysis of archaeological parenchyma more accessible.. By making 3D volumes of reference and archaeological samples available online, this will enable other researchers to interrogate those datasets, and any interpreta- tions that may be the result of subjective interpretation by the observer (Baveye, et  al., 2010) as well as facilitate intersample comparability. Barron et al.’s (2022b) subsequent successful use of microCT reference datasets to identify archaeological parenchyma fragments from Nombe, Papua New Guinea, as sweet potato sp. shows that the identification of archaeological parenchyma is a complex process that can benefit from the 3D morphological complexity provided by microCT scanning of relelvant reference specimens. Future Applications The potential for using microCT imaging in archaeobotany is just beginning to be explored. MicroCT scanning technology and 3D image processing capabilities con- tinue to improve, the technique’s benefits to the field could increase exponentially. While a number of novel archaeobotanical applications have already been developed as outlined above, their application to the analysis of larger quantities of samples will ultimately demonstrate the technique’s potential to transform traditional archae- obotanical approaches by the quantity, quality and robustness of results. Subse- quently, the technique could aid in reforming and reframing current archaeobotani- cal questions and assumptions by significantly expanding, what are in some fields, incredibly small pools of available evidence. The two forms of information that microCT has contributed to the archaeobot- anical studies outlined above are: internal morphologies and secure quantitative, and specifically volumetric, measurements. Therefore, it has been shown that microCT can prove useful in answering archaeobotanical questions reliant on these two kinds of information. The technique could also provide useful in  situations where small 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research quantities of fragile or valuable samples exist from which it is important to obtain maximum amounts of information and/or those samples are intended to be used for other destructive sampling methods if it is deemed appropriate. The non-destructive nature of microCT means it can be used for morphological imaging before the appli- cation of subsequent analytical methods, in a similar way to how it has been applied in a number of geoarchaeological studies, as a complementary technique to more traditional methods, as one component in a suite of analytical approaches (Calo et al., 2020; Edwards et al., 2017; Huisman et al., 2014; Machado et al., 2017). The risk with 3D imaging is the temptation to produce large amounts of three- dimensional, high-resolution data under the assumption that this will produce equiv- alently significant results. However, the sheer amount of data produced by microCT can mean that it becomes difficult for even specialist individuals to manually sort through and extract the maximum amount of relevant and/or useful information con- tained in a single dataset (Barron et  al., 2020a). Additionally, these large datasets are currently difficult to store, especially if large reference collections of even tens of samples are compiled, which could equate to many terabytes of data (see Rowe & Frank, 2011 for overview of problems relating to 3D data storage). For example, the 30 datasets analysed by Barron et al. (2022a) representing just five USO species added up to a combined total of 3 terabytes of data. Therefore, using current user- driven processing methods, unless significant time and expertise can be allocated to manual data analysis, it may in many instances be difficult to justify the economic costs of microCT, which for individual samples are much greater than light micros- copy or SEM. The economic costs can be made much more affordable by the scan- ning of many archaeobotanical samples in a single scan and, in the future, the time and energy costs could become much more reasonable with the automation of some or all of the data processing stages. Currently, the dominant trend in 3D data processing is towards the automation of segmentation and analysis processes in order to exploit the ever increasing amounts of data that high-resolution 3D imaging produces. The automation of segmenting microCT datasets can be achieved relatively easily, depending on the sample type and specific research questions, by establishing a series of algorithmic filters through which data is progressively processed to extract all of the specified relevant informa- tion. Simple filters include those discussed above that are widely used to segment geo- logical and botanical samples such greyscale values or gradient, size, shape, or con- nectedness. These series of filters can then be applied to batches of microCT scans to process large amounts of data extremely quickly. Herremans et  al. (2015) developed an automated segmentation protocol to segment void and cell networks of fruit paren- chyma tissues and identified significant differences between genotypes. Segmentation protocols using the same basic concept could be developed in the future to aid in the characterisation and identification of archaeobotanical specimens. The process of automating data segmentation of rice spikelet bases from a pot- tery sherd has been trialed by the author on a rice-tempered sherd from Gua Sireh that was previously analysed by Barron et al. (2020a). In the previous study, only 50 rice spikelet bases were analysed due to the sheer number of spikelet bases found to be contained within the sherd and the long processing times required for each individual spikelet base. While it is relatively easy to segment out all of the organic 1 3 A. Barron inclusions in a sherd using basic greyscale thresholding, the segmented organic frac- tion will inevitably include large amounts of undiagnostic chaff, including husk, leaf and stem fragments, as the organic materials used for temper would have included all the waste products leftover from the rice processing stages (see Harvey & Fuller, 2005; Fig.  3). Therefore, following greyscale thresholding a series of data filters were needed to label each isolated inclusion and then to exclude as much chaff mate- rial as possible while selecting the spikelet bases. The most effective way to achieve this was to filter the data by shape, selecting only the roughly spherical spikelet bases (not the rod-like or more irregular chaff fragments), and by size, eliminating those inclusions with voxels volumes significantly larger or small than the average spikelet base morphology. The visual results of this segmentation process are shown in Fig.  5 including a microCT greyscale slice (5A), the same slice with labelled inclusions after segmentation by size and shape (5B), the same slice with greyscale values of segmented inclusions (5C), and a 3D rendering of segmented inclusions, most of which represent rice spikelet bases (5D). The difficulties of working with archaeological data became apparent during this segmentation experiment and the major barriers to automation were identi- fied. The lack of control over archaeological data, its lack of structure, and pos- sible taphonomic alteration make it incredibly difficult to standardize archaeo- logical imaging protocols. This was evident when attempting to filter the chaff data by shape and size with the overlapping nature of the chaff material resulting in many individual spikelet bases not able to be isolated and, therefore, excluded from subsequent analyses. There were also many chaff pieces that were similar enough to spikelet bases in shape and size that they were not excluded from the segmentation. These issues are not unique to archaeological data, however, they add levels of complexity that do not exist in other fields, such as industrial engi- neering and manufacturing, and will require more complex processing than has yet been attempted in the field of archaeobotany. A B D Fig. 5 Segmentation process to separate rice spikelet bases from tomographic data of whole rice-tem- pered pottery sherd. A. 2D x-ray slice of sherd showing rice temper (lower x-ray attenuation) in black. B. Isolation and labelling of each rice spikelet base based on x-ray attenuation, size and shape. C. 2D slice of isolated rice spikelet bases with x-ray attenuation values. D. 3D rendering of rice spikelet bases from slice A-C (closest to camera) plus all spikelets bases in subsequent slices 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Machine learning The Gua Sireh rice spikelet base segmentation outlined above was undertaken in order to prepare the dataset to be used as a baseline teaching dataset in the devel- opment of a neural network able to automatically identify wild and domesticated rice spikelet bases. Neural networks are essentially sets of algorithms that utilize machine learning to numerically recognize patterns in order to cluster and label data. To prepare the Gua Sireh segmented dataset for training a neural network, half of the individual labelled inclusions were visualized and designated as either ‘a spikelet base’ or ‘not a spikelet base’, the domestication status of the spikelet bases was qualitatively assessed by two specialist archaeobotanists and then the characteri- sation of each inclusion was compiled. In the future, this information will be the initial input layer of a neural network to enable distinction between spikelet bases and non-spikelet bases as well as domes- ticated and wild abscission scar morphologies. The neural network will then be tested against the other half of the inclusions in the Gua Sireh dataset and the results assessed by manual specialist analysis. Multiple iterations of this process are likely to be required before high levels of accuracy can be achieved. The development of this new neural network is ongoing and the initial results appear promising. If the results are successful for the Gua Sireh rice spikelet bases, the neural network could be used to analyse scans of multiple pottery sherds with hundreds of rice spikelet inclusions almost instantaneously. However, to analyse spikelets of other cereal spe- cies used as temper, new neural networks would need to be established to recognize the distinct domestication syndrome traits for each cereal crop species. In archaeobotany, an attempt has previously been made by Wilson et al. (2010) to use supervised learning algorithms to automate the process of taxonomically iden- tifying starch grains from nine crop species. To do so they measured a series of variables relating to the shape, size, curvature and polarization cross of starch grains from botanical reference specimens, to produce the initial input layer of data used to establish the starch grain output labels and their characteristics. The measurements of taxonomically known starch grains were then fed into the network as a test data- set in order to assess the network’s ability to classify each starch grain based on the characteristics of the reference species. The rates of successfully identifying unla- beled starch grains were extremely variable, falling between 14–85% depending on the species. These results illustrate that some species of starch grains possess signifi- cant morphological overlap and, using current methods, cannot yet be robustly iden- tified to species level. Significantly, the authors noted that the results were limited by the fact that they only utilized 2D light-microscopy images meaning that the 3D starch grains would have all been measured in differing orientations. This additional variation is a problem that three-dimensional imaging methods, such as microCT, can be used to overcome. Kobayashi et  al., (2015, 2019) have used CT data of wood reference samples to develop a series of feature extractor and classifier algorithms to automate the identifica- tion of wood species of valuable cultural artefacts. Their input reference data consisted of 10 wood samples from 8 of the most commonly used wood species for Japanese sculptures. While their base datasets were three-dimensional CT scans, the images 1 3 A. Barron selected for feature extraction and classification consisted of 40 two-dimensional slices from each 3D dataset precisely cropped to provide clear transverse sections. To date, Kobayashi et al.’s method has shown promising results, having identified 10 wood sam- ples accurately, however, more species and more samples of each species will ensure more robust results in the future. Deep learning Deep learning networks could also be utilised in the future to tackle particularly com- plex archaeobotanical analyses, like the identification of USO species of archaeological parenchyma, both efficiently and reliably. Deep-learning is a form of machine-learning that can automatically extract features from raw data as that data is processed through multiple hidden layers of algorithmic filtration before classification. Essentially, deep learning has the ability to determine the appropriate parameters for classification inde- pendently, thus creating a classification process that is entirely automated from end-to- end (LeCun et  al., 2015; Schmidhuber, 2015). Deep learning algorithms are already revolutionizing research in fields such as biometrics (Sundararajan & Woodard, 2018), visual, audio and text classification (Minaee et  al., 2021), social network analysis (Pouyanfar et al., 2019) and medicine (Wang et al., 2019), including to accurately diag- nose Covid-19 in lung CT scans (Wang et al., 2021). Most importantly, deep learning processes benefit from large data inputs, as the more data available for analysis creates more robust networks. Therefore, deep learn- ing is a way of exploiting the increasingly large size of 3D datasets created by microCT scanning and extracting the maximum amount of diagnostic information, some of which may not even be evident to a human specialist through visual inspection. In archaeobotany, a deep-learning network could prove particularly useful in differentiat- ing intraspecies and interspecies variation in USOs considering it is already difficult for a human user to quantify the range of variation of some features across single samples or individual species. The technique could also be incredibly useful in efforts to estab- lish and describe a set (or sets) of traits that combine to form a domestication syndrome in these asexually-propagated USO crops by compiling microCT data of a range of ancient and modern samples and determining qualitative and/or quantitative differences between the two. Conclusions Despite computed tomography’s long history of use in archaeology, the potential benefits of utilizing the technique for archaeobotanical research has only begun to be explored in the last ten years. The advent of microCT, with its ever increasing image resolution, coupled with advances in computational processing power mean that microCT’s research capabilities are constantly expanding. A range of microCT visualization and analytical methodologies have been developed in related fields such as archaeology, geosciences, botany and palaeobotany, which could be applied, or adapted for application to a range of archaeobotanical materials. In addition, a 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research handful of recent archaeobotanical studies have presented novel quantitative and qualitative microCT methodologies and identified potential new forms of evidence, which can be extracted from previously excavated materials. These novel method- ologies have already been shown to have expanded the extremely limited knowledge we have of the origins and spread of some of the world’s most economically impor- tant food crops, including a range of sexually-propagated cereal and legume species, and aided in the secure identification of remains of some of the most understudied crops, asexually-propagated underground storage organs. The amount of information produced by microCT imaging may not be required for all archaeobotanical stud- ies and, currently, scanning costs and analysis times are high. However, the rapid development of machine- and deep-learning networks could, in the future, enable extremely fast and efficient analysis of large numbers of samples and/or extremely robust classifications of complex forms of evidence, leading to more widespread use of the technique in the field of archaeobotany. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank the National Laboratory for X-ray Micro Computed Tomography (ANU CTLab), particularly Levi Beeching and Michael Turner, for access to and use of microCT scanning facilities as well as Tim Senden, Jill Middleton and Mohammad Saadatfar, Research School of Physics and Engineering (ANU), for their support. Many thanks also to Tim Denham for his guidance and encouragement during the compilation of this review. This research was funded by an Aus- tralian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship to Barron. Funding Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions The author has no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article. Data Availability CT data used for figures is available from the author upon request. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Com- mons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. References Adderley, W. P., Simpson, I. A., & MacLeod, G. W. (2001). Testing high-resolution X-ray computed tomography for the micromorphological analyses of archaeological soils and sediments. Archaeo- logical Prospection, 8(2), 107–112. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ 1099- 0763(200106) 8:2% 3c107:: AID- ARP152% 3e3.0. CO;2-A Allaby, R. G., Stevens, C., Lucas, L., Maeda, O., & Fuller, D. Q. (2017). Geographic mosaics and chang- ing rates of cereal domestication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1735), 20160429. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rstb. 2016. 0429 Allam, A. H., Thompson, R. C., Wann, L. S., Miyamoto, M. I., & Thomas, G. S. (2009). Computed Tomographic Assessment of Atherosclerosis in Ancient Egyptian Mummies. JAMA, 302(19), 2091–2094. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ JAMA. 2009. 1641 Allegra, D., Ciliberto, E., Ciliberto, P., Petrillo, G., Stanco, F., & Trombatore, C. (2016). X-ray computed tomography for virtually unrolling damaged papyri. Applied Physics A, 122(3), 256. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00339- 016- 9796-1 1 3 A. Barron Ambrose, J. (1976). Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part II. Clinical Application. British Journal of Radiology, 46(552), 1023–1047. Anderson, T., & Fell, C. (1995). Analysis of Roman Cremation Vessels by Computerized Tomography. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 609–617. Appelboom, T., & Struyven, J. (1999). Medical imaging of the Peruvian mummy Rascar Capac. The Lan- cet, 354(9196), 2153–2155. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0140- 6736(99) 07113-5 Applbaum, N., Applbaum, Y. H., & Horowitz, W. (1995). Imaging with the Aid of Computed Tomogra- phy of Sealed Documents from the Ur III Period. Archaeology and Science Bulletin, 3, 8–12. Appleby, J., Rutty, G. N., Hainsworth, S. V., Woosnam-Savage, R. C., Morgan, B., Brough, A., Earp, R. W., Robinson, C., King, T. E., Morris, M., & Buckley, R. (2015). Perimortem trauma in King Richard III: A skeletal analysis. The Lancet, 385(9964), 253–259. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0140- 6736(14) 60804-7 Baldock, C., Hughes, S. W., Whittaker, D. K., Taylor, J., Davis, R., Spencer, A. J., Tonge, K., & Sofat, A. (1994). 3-D reconstruction of an ancient Egyptian mummy using X-ray computer tomography. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 87(12), 806. Barron, A., & Denham, T. (2018). A microCT protocol for the visualisation and identification of domes- ticated plant remains within pottery sherds. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 21, 350– 358. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JASREP. 2018. 07. 024 Barron, A., Datan, I., Bellwood, P., Wood, R., Fuller, D. Q., & Denham, T. (2020a). Sherds as archaeo- botanical assemblages: Gua Sireh reconsidered. Antiquity, 94(377), 1325–1336. https:// doi. org/ 10. 15184/ aqy. 2020. 166 Barron, A., Fuller, D. Q., Stevens, C., Champion, L., Winchell, F., & Denham, T. (2020b). Snapshots in time: MicroCT scanning of pottery sherds determines early domestication of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in East Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 123, 105259. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2020. 105259 Barron, A., Pritchard, J., & Denham, T. (2022a). Identifying archaeological parenchyma in three dimen- sions: Diagnostic assessment of five important food plant species in the Indo-Pacific region. Archaeology in Oceania, 57(3), 189–213. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ arco. 5276 Barron, A., Mountain, M., & Denham, T. A. (2022b). MicroCT scanning and direct AMS dating of charred sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) fragments from Nombe rockshelter in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. Archaeology in Oceania, 57(2), 146–149. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ ARCO. 5266 Barron, A., Turner, M., Beeching, L., Bellwood, P., Piper, P., Grono, E., Jones, R., Oxenham, M., Kien, N. K. T., Senden, & T. Denham, T. (2017). MicroCT reveals domesticated rice (Oryza sativa) within pottery sherds from early Neolithic sites (4150–3265 cal BP) in Southeast Asia. Scientific Reports, 7(1). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 017- 04338-9 Barton, H., & Torrence, R. (2006).Ancient starch research. Left Coast Press Baruchel, J., Buffiere, J. Y., Cloetens, P., Di Michiel, M., Ferrie, E., Ludwig, W., Maire, E., & Salvo, L. (2006). Advances in synchrotron radiation microtomography. Scripta Materialia, 55(1), 41–46. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. SCRIP TAMAT. 2006. 02. 012 Baveye, P. C., Laba, M., Otten, W., Bouckaert, L., Dello Sterpaio, P., Goswami, R. R., Grinev, D., Hou- ston, A., Hu, Y., Liu, J., Mooney, S., Pajor, R., Sleutel, S., Tarquis, A., Wang, W., Wei, Q., & Sezgin, M. (2010). Observer-dependent variability of the thresholding step in the quantitative anal- ysis of soil images and X-ray microtomography data. Geoderma, 157(1–2), 51–63. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. GEODE RMA. 2010. 03. 015 Beck, L., Cuif, J.-P., Pichon, L., Vaubaillon, S., Dambricourt Malassé, A., & Abel, R. L. (2012). Check- ing collagen preservation in archaeological bone by non-destructive studies (Micro-CT and IBA). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, B, 273, 203–207. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. nimb. 2011. 07. 076 Beckmann, E. C. (2006). CT scanning the early days. British Journal of Radiology, 79(937), 5–8. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1259/ BJR/ 29444 122 Bello, S. M., De Groote, I., & Delbarre, G. (2013a). Application of 3-dimensional microscopy and micro- CT scanning to the analysis of Magdalenian portable art on bone and antler. Journal of Archaeologi- cal Science, 40, 2464–2476. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2012. 12. 016 Bello, S. M., Parfitt, S. A., De Groote, I., & Kennaway, G. (2013b). Investigating experimental knapping damage on an antler hammer: A pilot-study using high-resolution imaging and analytical tech- niques. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40, 4528–4537. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2013. 07. 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Bellwood, P., Gillespie, R., Thompson, G. B., Vogel, J. S., Ardika, I. W., & Datan, I. (1992). New Dates for Prehistoric Asian Rice. Asian Perspectives, 31(2), 161–170. Bermúdez De Castro, J. M., Martinón-Torres, M., Gómez-Robles, A., Prado-Simón, L., Martín-Francés, L., Lapresa, M., Olejniczak, A., & Carbonell, E. (2011). Early Pleistocene human mandible from Sima del Elefante (TE) cave site in Sierra de Atapuerca (Spain): A comparative morphological study. Journal of Human Evolution, 61, 12–25. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhevol. 2011. 03. 005 Bernardini, F., Sibilia, E., Kasztovszky, Z., Boscutti, F., De Min, A., Lenaz, D., Turco, G., Micheli, R., Tuniz, C., & Kokelj, M. M. (2018). Evidence of open-air late prehistoric occupation in the Trieste area (north-eastern Italy): Dating, 3D clay plaster characterization and obsidian prov- enancing. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10, 1933–1943. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s12520- 017- 0504-7 Bernardini, F., Leghissa, E., Prokop, D., Velušček, A., De Min, A., Dreossi, D., Donato, S., Tuniz, C., Princivalle, F., & Kokelj, M. M. (2019). X-ray computed microtomography of Late Copper Age decorated bowls with cross-shaped foots from central Slovenia and the Trieste Karst (North-East- ern Italy): Technology and paste characterisation. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11, 4711–4728. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s12520- 019- 00811-w Bertrand, L., Cotte, M., Stampanoni, M., Thoury, M., Marone, F., & Schöder, S. (2012). Development and trends in synchrotron studies of ancient and historical materials. Physics Reports, 519, 51–96. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. physr ep. 2012. 03. 003 Bhuiyan, I. U., Mouzon, J., Forsberg, F., Forsmo, S. P. E., Sjödahl, M., & Hedlund, J. (2012). Considera- tion of X-ray microtomography to quantitatively determine the size distribution of bubble cavities in iron ore pellets. Powder Technology, 233, 312–318. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. powtec. 2012. 09. Bird, M. I., Ascough, P. L., Young, I. M., Wood, C. V., & Scott, A. C. (2008). X-ray microtomographic imaging of charcoal. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2698–2706. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2008. 04. 018 Bishop, R. R. (2021). Hunter-gatherer carbohydrate consumption: plant roots and rhizomes as staple foods in Mesolithic Europe. World Archaeology, 53(2) https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 00438 243. 2021. 20027 15 Bishop, R. R., Kubiak-Martens, L., Warren, G. M., & Church, M. J. (2022). Getting to the root of the problem: New evidence for the use of plant root foods in Mesolithic hunter-gatherer sub- sistence in Europe. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 1–19. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S00334- 022- 00882-1 Booth, T. J., Redfern, R. C., & Gowland, R. L. (2016). Immaculate conceptions: Micro-CT analysis of diagenesis in Romano-British infant skeletons. Journal of Archaeological Science, 74, 124–134. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2016. 08. 007 Boschin, F., Bernardini, F., Zanolli, C., & Tuniz, C. (2015). MicroCT Imaging of Red fox Talus: A Non- Invasive Approach to Evaluate Age at Death. Archaeometry, 57, 194–211. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ arcm. 12122 Boyer, D. M., Puente, J., Gladman, J. T., Glynn, C., Mukherjee, S., Yapuncich, G. S., & Daubechies, I. (2015). A New Fully Automated Approach for Aligning and Comparing Shapes. The Anatomical Record, 298(1), 249–276. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ AR. 23084 Bradfield, J. (2018) Identifying animal taxa used to manufacture bone tools during the Middle Stone Age at Sibudu, South Africa: Results of a CT-rendered histological analysis. PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0208319. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 02083 19 Brodersen, C. R. (2013). Visualizing wood anatomy in three dimensions with high-resolution X-ray micro-tomography (μCT ) – a review. IAWA Journal, 34(4), 408–424. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1163/ 22941 932- 00000 033 Brodersen, C. R., Lee, E. F., Choat, B., Jansen, S., Phillips, R. J., Shackel, K. A., McElrone, A. J., & Matthews, M. A. (2011). Automated analysis of three-dimensional xylem networks using high- resolution computed. The New Phytologist, 191(4), 1168–1179. Brooks, R. A., & Chiro, D. G. (1976). Principles of computer assisted tomography (CAT) in radiographic and radioisotopic imaging. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 21(5), 689. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1088/ 0031- 9155/ 21/5/ 001 Bude, R. O., & Bigelow, E. M. R. (2020). Nano-CT evaluation of totally corroded coins: A demonstration study to determine if detail might still be discernible despite the lack of internal, non-corroded, metal. Archaeometry, 62(6), 1195–1201. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ arcm. 12589 1 3 A. Barron Calo, C. M., Rizzutto, M. A., Watling, J., Furquim, L., Shock, M. P., Andrello, A. C., Appoloni, C. R., Freitas, F. O., Kistler, L., Zimpel, C. A., Hermenegildo, T., Neves, E. G., & Pugliese, F. A. (2019). Study of plant remains from a fluvial shellmound (Monte Castelo, RO, Brazil) using the X-ray MicroCT imaging technique. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 26, 101902. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JASREP. 2019. 101902 Calo, M., Rizzutto, M. A., Carmello-Guerreiro, S. M., Dias, C. S. B., Watling, J., Shock, M. P., Zimpel, C. A., Furquim, L. P., Pugliese, F., & Neves, G. (2020). A correlation analysis of Light Microscopy and X-ray Microct imaging methods applied to archaeological plant remains’ morphological attrib- utes visualization.Scientific Reports, 10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 020- 71726-z Cássaro, F. A. M., Durand, A. N. P., Gimenez, D., & Vaz, C. M. P. (2017). Pore-Size Distributions of Soils Derived using a Geometrical Approach and Multiple Resolution MicroCT Images. Soil Sci- ence Society of America Journal, 81(3), 468–476. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2136/ SSSAJ 2016. 09. 0291 Castillo, C., & Fuller, D. Q. (2010). Still too fragmentary and dependent upon chance? Advances in the study of early Southeast Asian archaeobotany. In B. Bellina (Ed.), 50 Years of Archaeology in Southeast Asia: Essays in Honour of Ian Glover (pp. 91–111). River Books. Cheng, Q., Zhang, X., Guo, J., Wang, B., Lei, Y., Zhou, G., & Fu, Ya’nan. (2019). Application of com- puted tomography in the analysis of glass beads unearthed in Shanpula cemetery (Khotan), Xin- jiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11, 937–945. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s12520- 017- 0582-6 Chirol, C., Carr, S. J., Spencer, K. L., & Moeller, I. (2021). Pore, live root and necromass quantifica- tion in complex heterogeneous wetland soils using X-ray computed tomography. Geoderma, 387, 114898. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. GEODE RMA. 2020. 114898 Chityala, R. N., Hoffmann, K. R., Bednarek, D. R., & Rudin, S. (2004). Region of Interest (ROI) Com- puted Tomography. Proceedings of SPIE-the International Society for Optical Engineering, 5368(2), 534. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1117/ 12. 534568 Clarkson, C., Jacobs, Z., Marwick, B., Fullagar, R., Wallis, L., Smith, M., Roberts, R. G., Hayes, E., Lowe, K., Carah, X., Florin, S. A., McNeil, J., Cox, D., Arnold, L. J., Hua, Q., Huntley, J., Brand, H. E. A., Manne, T., Fairbairn, A., … Pardoe, C. (2017). Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago. Nature, 547(7663), 306–310. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ natur e22968 Cnudde, V., & Boone, M. N. (2013). High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: A review of the current technology and applications. Earth-Science Reviews, 123, 1–17. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. earsc irev. 2013. 04. 003 Cnudde, V., Dewanckele, J., De Boever, W., Brabant, L., De Kock, T., 2012. 3D characterization of grain size distributions in sandstone by means of X-ray computed tomography. In P. Sylvester (Ed.), Quantitative Mineralogy and Microanalysis of Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks (pp. 99–113). Mineralogical Association of Canada (MAC) Coli, V. L., Gomart, L., Pisani, D. F., Cohen, S., Blanc-Féraud, L., Leblond, J., & Binder, D. (2022). Microcomputed tomography for discriminating between different forming techniques in ancient pottery: New segmentation method and pore distribution recognition. Archaeometry, 64(1), 84–99. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ ARCM. 12693 Collinson, M. E., Adams, N. F., Manchester, S. R., Stull, G. W., Herrera, F., Smith, S. Y., Andrew, M. J., Kenrick, P.&, Sykes, D. (2016). X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) of pyrite-permin- eralized fruits and seeds from the London Clay Formation (Ypresian) conserved in silicone oil: a critical evaluation1. Https://Doi-Org.Virtual.Anu.Edu.Au/https:// doi. org/ 10. 1139/ Cjb- 2016- 0078, 94(9), 697–711 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1139/ CJB- 2016- 0078 Cosmacini, P., & Piacentini, P. (2008). Notes on the history of the radiological study of Egyptian mum- mies: From X-rays to new imaging techniques. La Radiologia Medica, 113, 615–626. Coubray, S., Zech-Matterne, V., & Mazurier, A. (2010). The earliest remains of a Citrus fruit from a west- ern Mediterranean archaeological context? A microtomographic-based re-assessment. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 9, 277–282. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. crpv. 2010. 07. 003 Coutinho Nogueira, D., Dutour, O., Coqueugniot, H., & Tillier, A.-M. (2019). Qafzeh 9 mandible (ca 90–100 kyrs BP, Israel) revisited: μ-CT and 3D reveal new pathological conditions. International Journal of Paleopathology, 26, 104–110. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijpp. 2019. 06. 002 Cramer, L., Brix, A., Matin, E., Rühli, F., & Hussein, K. (2018). Computed Tomography-Detected Paleo- pathologies in Ancient Egyptian Mummies. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, 47, 225– 232. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1067/j. cprad iol. 2017. 06. 012 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research De Beer, F. C., Botha, H., Ferg, E., Grundlingh, R., & Smith, A. (2009). Archaeology benefits from neutron tomography investigations in South Africa. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 605, 167–170. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. nima. 2009. 01. 213 Denham, T. (2013). Early farming in Island Southeast Asia: An alternative hypothesis. Antiquity, 87(335), 250–257. Denham, T. P., Haberle, S. G., Lentfer, C., Fullagar, R., Field, J., Therin, M., Porch, N., & Winsbor- ough, B. (2003). Origins of agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of New Guinea. Science, 301(5630), 189–193. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 10852 55 Denham, T., Atchison, J., Austin, J., Bestel, S., Bowdery, D., Crowther, A., Dolby, N., Fairbairn, A., Field, J., Kennedy, A., Lentfer, C., Matheson, C., Nugent, S., Parr, J., Prebble, M., Robertson, G., Specht, J., Torrence, R., Barton, H., … Matthews, P. (2009). Archaeobotany in Australia and New Guinea: Practice. Potential and Prospects. Archaeology, 68, 1–10. Denham, T. P., Barton, H., Castillo, C., Crowther, A., Dotte-Sarout, E., Florin, S. A., Pritchard, J., Bar- ron, A., Zhang, Y., & Fuller, D. Q. (2020). The domestication syndrome in vegetatively propagated field crops. Annals of Botany, 125, 581–597. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ aob/ mcz212 Devore, M. L., Kenrick, P., Pigg, K. B., & Ketcham, R. A. (2006). Utility of High Resolution X-ray Com- puted Tomography (HRXCT) for Paleobotanical Studies: An Example Using London Clay Fruits. American Journal of Botany, 93(12), 1848–1851. Dhondt, S., Vanhaeren, H., Loo, D. V., Cnudde, V., & Inzé, D. (2010). Plant structure visualization by high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Trends in Plant Science, 15(8), 419–422. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. tplan ts. 2010. 05. 002 Diamond, J., & Bellwood., P. (2003) Farmers and Their Languages: The First Expansions. Science, 300(5619), 597-603. http://doi.org/https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 10782 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 10782 Donohue, M., & Denham, T. P. (2010). Farming and Language in Island Southeast Asia Reframing Aus- tronesian History. Current Anthropology, 51(2), 223–256. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ 650991 Douarre, C., Schielein, R., Frindel, C., Gerth, S., & Rousseau, D. (2018). Transfer learning from syn- thetic data applied to soil–root segmentation in X-ray tomography images. Journal of Imaging, 4(5). https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ JIMAG ING40 50065 Du Plessis, A., Broeckhoven, C., Guelpa, A., & Gerhard Le Roux, S. (2017). Laboratory x-ray micro- computed tomography: A user guideline for biological samples. GigaScience, 6, 1–11. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ gigas cience/ gix027 Earles, J. M., Knipfer, T., Tixier, A., Orozco, J., Reyes, C., Zwieniecki, M. A., Brodersen, C. R., & McEl- rone, A. J. (2018). In  vivo quantification of plant starch reserves at micrometer resolution using X-ray microCT imaging and machine learning. New Phytologist, 218(3), 1260–1269. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ NPH. 15068 Edwards, T., Grono, E., Herries, A. I. R., Brink, F. J., Troitzsch, U., Senden, T., Turner, M., Barron, A., Prossor, L., & Denham, T. (2017). Visualising scales of process: Multi-scalar geoarchaeological investigations of microstratigraphy and diagenesis at hominin bearing sites in South African karst. Journal of Archaeological Science, 83, 1–11. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2017. 05. 007 Elliott, J. C., & Dover, S. D. (1982). X-ray microtomography. Journal of Microscopy, 126, 211–213. Elliott, J. C., & Dover, S. D. (1985). X-ray microscopy using computerized axial tomography. Journal of Microscopy, 138(3), 329–331. Ersoy, O., Şen, E., Aydar, E., Tatar, İ, & Çelik, H. H. (2010). Surface area and volume measurements of volcanic ash particles using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT): A comparison with scan- ning electron microscope (SEM) stereoscopic imaging and geometric considerations. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 196, 281–286. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jvolg eores. 2010. 08. 004 Falke, T. H., Zweypfenning-Snijders, M. C., Zweypfenning, R. C., & James, A. E. (1987). Computed tomography of an ancient Egyptian cat. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 11, 745–747. Feldkamp, L. A., & Jesion, G. (1986). 3-D X-ray Computed Tomography. In Review of Progress in Quan- titative Nondestructive Evaluation (Vol. 5 A, pp. 555–566). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-1- 4615- 7763-8_ 57 Flannery, B. P., Deckman, H. W., Roberge, W. G., & D’Amico, K. L. (1987). Three-dimensional X-ray microtomography. Science, 237(4821), 1439–1444. Flavel, R. J., Guppy, C. N., Rabbi, S. M. R., & Young, I. M. (2017). An image processing and analy- sis tool for identifying and analysing complex plant root systems in 3D soil using non-destructive analysis: Root1. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0176433. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ JOURN AL. PONE. 01764 33 1 3 A. Barron Florin, S. A., Fairbairn, A. S., Nango, M., Djandjomerr, D., Marwick, B., Fullagar, R., Smith, M., Wallis, L., & Clarkson, C. (2020). The first Australian plant foods at Madjedbebe, 65000–53000 years ago. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–8. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41467- 020- 14723-0 Franceschi, V. R., & Nakata, P. A. (2005). Calcium Oxalate in Plants: Formation and Function. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 56, 41–71. Frangi, A. F., Niessen, W. J., Vincken, K. L., & Viergever, M. A. (1998). Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. In W. Wells, A. Colchester, & S. Delp (Eds.), Medical image computing and computer- assisted intervention (pp. 130–137). Springer. Frank, L. R., Rowe, T. B., Boyer, D. M., Witmer, L. M., & Galinsky, V. L. (2021). Unveiling the third dimension in morphometry with automated quantitative volumetric computations. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–23. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 021- 93490-4 Friis, E. M., Marone, F., Pedersen, K. R., Crane, P. R., & Stampanoni, M. (2014). Three-dimensional visualization of fossil flowers, fruits, seeds, and other plant remains using synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM): New insights into Cretaceous plant diversity. Journal of Paleontology, 88(4), 684–701. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1666/ 13- 099 Fuller, D. Q. (2007). Contrasting Patterns in Crop Domestication and Domestication Rates: Recent Archaeobotanical Insights from the Old World. Annals of Botany, 100, 903–924. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ aob/ mcm048 Fuller, D. Q., Asouti, E., & Purugganan, M. D. (2012). Cultivation as slow evolutionary entanglement: Comparative data on rate and sequence of domestication. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 21(2), 131–145. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00334- 011- 0329-8 Fuller, D. Q., Denham, T., Arroyo-Kalin, M., Lucas, L., Stevens, C. J., Qin, L., Allaby, R. G., & Purug- ganan, M. D. (2014). Convergent evolution and parallelism in plant domestication revealed by an expanding archaeological record. PNAS, 111(17), 6147–6152. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 13089 Fuller, D. Q., Weisskopf, A. R., & Castillo, C. C. (2016). Pathways of Rice Diversification across Asia. Archaeology International, 19, 84–96. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5334/ AI. 1915 Fuller, D. Q., Barron, A., Champion, L., Dupuy, C., Commelin, D., Raimbault, M., & Denham, T. (2021). Transition From Wild to Domesticated Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum) Revealed in Ceramic Temper at Three Middle Holocene Sites in Northern Mali. African Archaeological Review, 38, 211–230. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10437- 021- 09428-8 Galinsky, V. L., & Frank, L. R. (2014). Automated segmentation and shape characterization of volumet- ric data. NeuroImage, 92, 156–168. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. NEURO IMAGE. 2014. 01. 053 Gao, T., Yapuncich, G. S., Daubechies, I., Mukherjee, S., & Boyer, D. M. (2018). Development and Assessment of Fully Automated and Globally Transitive Geometric Morphometric Methods, With Application to a Biological Comparative Dataset With High Interspecific Variation. The Anatomi- cal Record, 301(4), 636–658. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ AR. 23700 Gao, W., Schlüter, S., Blaser, S. R. G. A., Shen, J., & Vetterlein, D. (2019). A shape-based method for automatic and rapid segmentation of roots in soil from X-ray computed tomography images: Root- ine. Plant and Soil, 441(1–2), 643–655. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S11104- 019- 04053-6/ FIGUR ES/6 García-Granero, J. J., Lancelotti, C., & Madella, M. (2015). A tale of multi-proxies: Integrating macro- and microbotanical remains to understand subsistence strategies. Vegetation History and Archaeo- botany, 24, 121–133. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00334- 014- 0486-7 Gostner, P., Pernter, P., Bonatti, G., Graefen, A., & Zink, A. R. (2011). New radiological insights into the life and death of the Tyrolean Iceman. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(12), 3425–3431. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JAS. 2011. 08. 003 Grodzins, L. (1983a). Optimum energies for x-ray transmission tomography of small samples: Applica- tions of synchrotron radiation to computerized tomography I. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 206(3), 541–545. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0167- 5087(83) 90393-9 Grodzins, L. (1983b). Critical absorption tomography of small samples. Proposed applications of syn- chrotron radiation to computerized tomographyII. Nuclear Instruments and Methods In Physics Research, 206(3) 547–552 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0167- 5087(83) 90394-0 Guipert, G., & de Lumley, M.-A. (2004). Three-dimensional computer imaging of hominid fossils: A new step in human evolution studies. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 55(4), 264–270. Haneca, K., Deforce, K., Boone, M. N., Van Loo, D., Dierick, M., Van Acker, J., & Van Den Bulcke, J. (2012). X-ray sub-micron tomography as a tool for the study of archaeological wood preserved through the corrosion of metal objects. Archaeometry, 54(5), 893–905. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/J. 1475- 4754. 2011. 00640.X 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Hardwood-Nash, D. C. (1979). Computed Tomography of Ancient Egyptian Mummies. Journal of Com- puter Assisted Tomography, 3(6), 768–773. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ 00004 728- 19791 2000- 00011 Harvey, E. L., & Fuller, D. Q. (2005). Investigating crop processing using phytolith analysis: The exam- ple of rice and millets. Journal of Archaeological Research, 32, 739–752. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2004. 12. 010 Harvig, L., Lynnerup, N., & Ebsen, J. A. (2012). Computed tomography and computed radiography of late Bronze Age cremation urns from Denmark: An interdisciplinary attempt to develop methods applied in bioarchaeological cremation research. Archaeometry, 54(2), 369–387. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1475- 4754. 2011. 00629.x Hather, J. G. (1994). The identification of charred root and tuber crops from archaeological sites in the Pacific. In J. G. Hather (Ed.), Tropical Archaeobotany: Applications and new developments (pp. 51–64). Routledge. Hather, J., & Kirch, P. V. (1991). Prehistoric sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) from Mangaia Island. Cen- tral Polynesia. Antiquity, 65(249), 887–893. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S0003 598X0 00806 13 Hather, J., & Mason, S. (2009). Introduction: Some issues in the archaeobotany of hunter-gatherers. In S. L. R. Mason & J. G. Hather (Eds.), Hunter-gatherer archaeobotany: Perspectives from the north- ern temperate zone (pp. 1–14). Routledge. Hather, J. G. (1988).The Morphological and Anatomical Interpretation and Identification of Charred Vegetative Parenchymatous Plant Remains [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University College London Hather, J. G. (1991). The Identification of Charred Archaeological Remains of Vegetative Parenchymous Tissue. Journal of’Archaeologica1 Science, 18, 661–675 Hather, J. (1993).An archaeobotanical guide to root and tuber identification, vol 1: Europe and South West Asia. Oxbow Books Hather, J. G. (2000).Archaeological Parenchyma. Archetype Publications Hawass, Z., Gad, Y. Z., Ismail, S., Khairat, R., Fathalla, D., Hasan, N., Ahmed, A., Elleithy, H., Ball, M., Gaballah, F., Wasef, S., Fateen, M., Amer, H., Gostner, P., Selim, A., Zink, A., & Pusch, C. M. (2010). Ancestry and Pathology in King Tutankhamun’s Family. JAMA, 303(7), 638–647. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ JAMA. 2010. 121 Helliwell, J. R., Miller, A. J., Whalley, W. R., Mooney, S. J., & Sturrock, C. J. (2014). Quantifying the impact of microbes on soil structural development and behaviour in wet soils. Soil Biology & Bio- chemistry, 74, 138–147. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. soilb io. 2014. 03. 009 Herremans, E., Verboven, P., Verlinden, B. E., Cantre, D., Abera, M., Wevers, M., & Nicolaï, B. M. (2015). Automatic analysis of the 3-D microstructure of fruit parenchyma tissue using X-ray micro-CT explains differences in aeration. BMC Plant Biology, 15(1), 1–14. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ S12870- 015- 0650-Y/ FIGUR ES/7 Ho, Q. T., Verboven, P., Fanta, S. W., Abera, M. K., Retta, M. A., Herremans, E., Defraeye, T., & Nicolaï, B. M. (2014). A Multiphase Pore Scale Network Model of Gas Exchange in Apple Fruit. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 7(2), 482–495. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S11947- 012- 1043-Y/ TABLES/5 Holloway, R. L., Broadfield, D. C., & Carlson, K. J. (2014). New high-resolution computed tomogra- phy data of the Taung partial cranium and endocast and their bearing on metopism and hominin brain evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(36), 13022–13027. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ PNAS. 14029 05111/ SUPPL_ FILE/ PNAS. 20140 2905SI. PDF Hounsfield, G. N. (1973). Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part I. Description of system. British Journal of Radiology, 46(552), 1016–1022 Hsieh, J., (2015).Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts and Recent Advances (Third Edi- tion). SPIE Digital Library. https://doi-org.virtual.anu.edu.au/https:// doi. org/ 10. 1117/3. 21977 56 Hu, Y., Limaye, A., & Lu, J. (2020). Three-dimensional segmentation of computed tomography data using Drishti Paint: new tools and developments. Royal Society Open Science, 7, 201033. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rsos. 201033 Huisman, D. J., Ngan-Tillard, D., Tensen, M. A., Laarman, F. J., & Raemaekers, D. C. M. (2014). A question of scales: Studying Neolithic subsistence using micro CT scanning of midden deposits. Journal of Archaeological Science, 49(1), 585–594. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2014. 05. 006 Hussein, K., Matin, E., & Nerlich, A. G. (2013). Paleopathology of the juvenile Pharaoh Tutankha- mun-90th anniversary of discovery. Virchows Archiv, 463, 475–479. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00428- 013- 1441-1 Immel, A., Le Cabec, A., Bonazzi, M., Herbig, A., Temming, H., Schuenemann, V. J., Bos, K. I., Lang- bein, F., Harvati, K., Bridault, A., Pion, G., Julien, M., Krotova, O., Conard, N. J., Münzel, S. C., 1 3 A. Barron Drucker, D. G., Viola, B., Hublin, J., Tafforeau, P., & Krause, J. (2016). Effect of X-ray irradiation on ancient DNA in sub-fossil bones - Guidelines for safe X-ray imaging. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1–14. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ srep3 2969 Iovea, M., Oaie, G., Ricman, C., Mateiasi, G., Neagu, M., Szobotka, S., & Duliu, O. G. (2008). Dual- energy X-ray computer axial tomography and digital radiography investigation of cores and other objects of geological interest. Engineering Geology, 103, 119–126. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. enggeo. 2008. 06. 018 Jacobson, L., De Beer, F. C., & Nshimirimana, R. (2011). Tomography imaging of South African archae- ological and heritage stone and pottery objects. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 651, 240–243. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. nima. 2011. 02. 093 Jerram, D. A., Mock, A., Davis, G. R., Field, M., & Brown, R. J. (2009). 3D crystal size distributions: A case study on quantifying olivine populations in kimberlites. Lithos, 112S, 223–235. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. lithos. 2009. 05. 042 Johnston, R., Thomas, R., Jones, R., Graves-Brown, C., Goodridge, W., & North, L. (2020). Evidence of diet, deification, and death within ancient Egyptian mummified animals. Scientific Reports, 10, 14113. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 020- 69726-0 Kahl, W. A., & Ramminger, B. (2012). Non-destructive fabric analysis of prehistoric pottery using high- resolution X-ray microtomography: A pilot study on the late Mesolithic to Neolithic site Hamburg- Boberg. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(7), 2206–2219. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2012. 02. 029 Kahlheber, S., & Neumann, K. (2007). The development of plant cultivation in semiarid West Africa. In T. Denham, J. Iriarte, & L. Vrydaghs (Eds.), Rethinking Agriculture: Archaeological and Ethnoar- chaeological Perspectives (pp. 320–345). Left Coast Press. Kak, A. C., & Slaney, M. (1988). Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. IEEE Press. Kalender, W. A. (2006). X-ray computed tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51, R29–R43. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1088/ 0031- 9155/ 51/ 13/ R03 Karch, J., Dudák, J., Žemlička, J., Vavřík, D., Kumpová, I., Kvaček, J., Heřmanová, Z., Šoltés, J., Viererbl, L., Morgano, M., Kaestner, A., & Trtík, P. (2017). X-ray micro-CT and neutron CT as complemen- tary imaging tools for non-destructive 3D imaging of rare silicified fossil plants. Journal of Instru- mentation, 12(12), C12004. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1088/ 1748- 0221/ 12/ 12/ C12004 Katuwal, S., Arthur, E., Tuller, M., Moldrup, P., & de Jonge, L. W. (2015). Quantification of Soil Pore Network Complexity with X-ray Computed Tomography and Gas Transport Measurements. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 79(6), 1577–1589. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2136/ SSSAJ 2015. 06. Ketcham, R. A., & Carlson, W. D. (2001). Acquisition, optimization and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: Applications to the geosciences. Computers & Geosciences, 27, 381–400. Ketcham, R. A., Slottke, D. T., & Sharp, J. M. (2010). Three-dimensional measurement of fractures in heterogeneous materials using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Geosphere, 6(5), 499– 514. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1130/ GES00 552.1 Keyes, S. D., Gillard, F., Soper, N., Mavrogordato, M. N., Sinclair, I., & Roose, T. (2016). Mapping soil deformation around plant roots using in vivo 4D X-ray Computed Tomography and Digital Volume Correlation. Journal of Biomechanics, 49(9), 1802–1811. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JBIOM ECH. 2016. 04. 023 Kistler, L., Yoshi Maezumi, S., De Souza, J. G., Przelomska, N. A. S., Costa, F. M., Smith, O., Loi- selle, H., Ramos-Madrigal, J., Wales, N., Ribeiro, E. R., Morrison, R. R., Grimaldo, C., Prous, A. P., Arriaza, B., Thomas, P., Gilbert, M., De Oliveira Freitas, F., & Allaby, R. G. (2018). Mul- tiproxy evidence highlights a complex evolutionary legacy of maize in South America. Science, 362(6420), 1309–1313. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ SCIEN CE. AAV02 07/ SUPPL_ FILE/ AAV02 07_ KISTL ER_ SM. PDF Kobayashi, K., Akada, M., Torigoe, T., Imazu, S., & Sugiyama, J. (2015). Automated recognition of wood used in traditional Japanese sculptures by texture analysis of their low-resolution computed tomog- raphy data. Journal of Wood Science, 61(6), 630–640. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S10086- 015- 1507-6 Kobayashi, K., Hwang, S. W., Okochi, T., Lee, W. H., & Sugiyama, J. (2019). Non-destructive method for wood identification using conventional X-ray computed tomography data. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 38, 88–93. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. CULHER. 2019. 02. 001 Koehl, P., & Hass, J. (2015). Landmark-free geometric methods in biological shape analysis. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12, 20150795. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rsif. 2015. 0795 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Kozatsas, J., Kotsakis, K., Sagris, D., & David, K. (2018). Inside out: Assessing pottery forming tech- niques with micro-CT scanning. An example from Middle Neolithic Thessaly. Journal of Archaeo- logical Science, 100, 102–119. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2018. 10. 007 Kristensen, E., Parsons, T. E., Hallgrímsson, B., & Boyd, S. K. (2008). A novel 3-D image-based mor- phological method for phenotypic analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 55(12), 2826–2831. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1109/ TBME. 2008. 923106 Kubiak-Martens, L. (2016). Scanning electron microscopy and starchy food in Mesolithic Europe: The importance of roots and tubers in Mesolithic diet. In K. Hardy & L. Kubiak-Martens (Eds.), Wild Harvest: Plants in the Hominin and Pre-Agrarian Human Worlds (pp. 113–133). Oxbow Books. Kyrieleis, A., Titarenko, V., Ibison, M., Connolley, T., & Withers, P. J. (2011). Region-of-interest tomog- raphy using filtered backprojection: Assessing the practical limits. Journal of Microscopy, 241(1), 69–82. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/J. 1365- 2818. 2010. 03408.X Latham, S. J., Varslot, T., & Sheppard, A. (2008a). Automated registration for augmenting micro-CT 3D images. ANZIAM Journal, 50, C534–C548 https:// doi. org/ 10. 21914/ ANZIA MJ. V50I0. 1389 Latham, S.,  Varslot, T.,  & Sheppard, A. (2008b) Image registration: Enhancing and Calibrating X-ray Micro-CT Imaging (Vol. 12). International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts Lebot, V. (2009). Tropical root and tuber crops: cassava, sweet potato, yams and aroids (Vol. 88). CABI LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ natur e14539 Ledley, R. S., Dichiro, G., Luessenh, A. J., & Twigg, H. L. (1974). Computerized transaxial X-ray tomog- raphy of human body. Science, 186(4160), 207–212. Lewis, T., Denham, T., & Golson, J. (2016). A renewed archaeological and archaeobotanical assessment of house sites at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. Archaeology in Oceania, 51(S1), 91–103. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ arco. 5113 Limaye, A. (2012). Drishti: A volume exploration and presentation tool. Proceedings SPIE, Developments in X-Ray Tomography VIII, 8506, 191–199. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1117/ 12. 935640 Lynnerup, N., Hjalgrim, H., Nielsen, L. R., Gregersen, H., & Thuesen, I. (1997). Non-invasive Archae- ology of Skeletal Material by CT Scanning and Three-dimensional Reconstruction. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 7(1), 91–94. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ (SICI) 1099- 1212(199701) 7:1% 3c91:: AID- OA309% 3e3.0. CO;2-T Machado, A. S., Oliveira, D. F., Gama Filho, H. S., Latini, R., Bellido, A. V. B., Assis, J. T., Anjos, M. J., & Lopes, R. T. (2017). Archeological ceramic artifacts characterization through computed microtomography and X-ray fluorescence. X-Ray Spectrometry, 46(5), 427–434. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ xrs. 2786 Maenhout, P., Sleutel, S., Xu, H., Van Hoorebeke, L., Cnudde, V., & De Neve, S. (2019). Semi-automated segmentation and visualization of complex undisturbed root systems with X-ray μCT. Soil Tillage Research, 192, 59–65. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. still. 2019. 04. 025 Maire, E., & Withers, P. J. (2013). Quantitative X-ray tomography. International Materials Review, 59(1), 1–43. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1179/ 17432 80413Y. 00000 00023 Mairhofer, S., Zappala, S., Tracy, S. R., Sturrock, C., Bennett, M., Mooney, S. J., & Pridmore, T. (2012). RooTrak: Automated Recovery of Three-Dimensional Plant Root Architecture in Soil from X-ray Microcomputed Tomography Images Using Visual Tracking. Plant Physiology, 158(2), 561–569. Malgora, S., Gibelli, D., Floridi, C., Martinenghi, C., McKnight, L., Ikram, S., Elias, J., Milani, C., Oliva, G., & Cellina, M. (2020). CT examination and 3D analysis of Egyptian animal mummies. Radiolo- gia Medica, 125(10), 943–950. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11547- 020- 01192-0 Mathers, A. W., Hepworth, C., Baillie, A. L., Sloan, J., Jones, H., Lundgren, M., Fleming, A. J., Mooney, S. J., & Sturrock, C. J. (2018). Investigating the microstructure of plant leaves in 3D with lab-based X-ray computed tomography. Plant Methods, 14(99). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13007- 018- 0367-7 Matsunaga, K. K. S., Manchester, S. R., Srivastava, R., Kapgate, D. K., & Smith, S. Y. (2019). Fossil palm fruits from India indicate a Cretaceous origin of Arecaceae tribe Borasseae. Botanical Jour- nal of the Linnean Society, 190(3), 260–280. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ BOTLI NNEAN/ BOZ019 Matsushima, U., Hilger, A., Graf, W., Zabler, S., Manke, I., Dawson, M., Choinka, G., & Herppich, W. B. (2012). Calcium oxalate crystal distribution in rose peduncles: Non-invasive analysis by synchro- tron X-ray micro-tomography. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 72, 27–34. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. posth arvbio. 2012. 04. 013 McClatchie, M., & Fuller, D. Q. (2014). Leaving a lasting impression. In C. Stevens, S. Nixon, M. A. Mur- ray, & D. Q. Fuller (Eds.), Archaeology of African Plant Use (pp. 259–266). Left Coast Press. 1 3 A. Barron McElrone, A. J., Choat, B., Parkinson, D. Y., MacDowell, A. A., & Brodersen, C. R. (2013). Using High Resolution Computed Tomography to Visualize the Three Dimensional Structure and Function of Plant Vasculature. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 74, 50162. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3791/ 50162 McKenzie-Clark, J., & Magnussen, J. (2014). Dual Energy Computed Tomography for the Non-destruc- tive Analysis of Ancient Ceramics. Archaeometry, 56(4), 573–590. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ arcm. McKnight, L. M. (2010). Imaging applied to animal mummification in ancient Egypt. Archaeopress MeBioS Postharvest Group (2022). X-Plant: The CT database of plant organs. KU Leuven. Retrieved March 21, 2022 Melcher, A. H., Holowka, S., Pharoah, M., & Lewin, P. K. (1997). Non-invasive computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction of the dentition of a 2,800-year-old Egyptian mummy exhib- iting extensive dental disease. American Journal Physical Anthropology, 103, 329–340. Mendoza, F., Verboven, P., Mebatsion, H. K., Greet, A., Ae, K., Wevers, M., & Nicola, B. (2007). Three- dimensional pore space quantification of apple tissue using X-ray computed microtomography. Planta, 226, 559–570. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00425- 007- 0504-4 Mikic, A., Medovic, A., Jovanovic, Z., & Stanisavljevic, N. (2014). Integrating archaeobotany, paleo- genetics and historical linguistics may cast more light onto crop domestication: The case of pea (Pisum sativum). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 61, 887–892. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10722- 014- 0102-9 Minaee, S., Kalchbrenner, N., Cambria, E., Nikzad, N., Chenaghlu, M., & Gao, J. (2021). Deep Learn- ing-based Text Classification. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(3) https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 34397 26 Minozzi, S., Giuffra, V., Bagnoli, J., Paribeni, E., & Giustini, D. (2010). An investigation of Etruscan cremations by Computed Tomography (CT). Antiquity, 84(323) Mizuno, S., Torizu, R., & Sugiyama, J. (2010). Wood identification of a wooden mask using synchrotron X-ray microtomography. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(11), 2842–2845. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JAS. 2010. 06. 022 Mocella, V., Brun, E., Ferrero, C., & Delattre, D. (2015). Revealing letters in rolled Herculaneum papyri by X-ray phase-contrast imaging. Nature Communications, 6(1), 1–6. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ ncomm s6895 Mooney, S. J., Pridmore, T. P., Helliwell, J., & Bennett, M. J. (2011). Developing X-ray Computed Tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architecture in soil. Plant and Soil, 352(1), 1–22. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S11104- 011- 1039-9 Moreau, J.-D., Cloetens, P., Gomez, B., Daviero-Gomez, V., Néraudeau, D., Lafford, T. A., & Tafforeau, P. (2014). Multiscale 3D Virtual Dissections of 100-Million-Year-Old Flowers Using X-ray Synchrotron Micro- and Nanotomography. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 20, 305–312. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S1431 92761 30140 25 Moricca, C., Nigro, L., Gallo, E., & Sadori, L. (2020). The dwarf palm tree of the king: A Nannor- rhops ritchiana in the 24th-23rd century BC palace of Jericho. Plant Biosystems, 155(4), 823–832. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 11263 504. 2020. 17859 67 Murphy, W. A., Zur Nedden, D., Gostner, P., Knapp, R., Recheis, W., & Seidler, H. (2003). The Iceman: Discovery and Imaging. Radiology, 226(3), 614–629. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1148/ RADIOL. 22630 Murphy, C., & Fuller, D. Q. (2017). Seed coat thinning during horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) domestication documented through synchrotron tomography of archaeological seeds. Scientific Reports, 7(5369) https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 017- 05244-w Murphy, C., Fuller, D. Q., Stevens, C., Gregory, T., Silva, F., Dal Martello, R., Song, J., Bodey, A. J., & Rau, C. (2019). Looking Beyond the Surface: Use of High Resolution X-ray Computed Tomogra- phy on Archaeobotanical Remains. https:// doi. org/ 10. 24916/ iansa. 2019.1.1 Nakata, P. A. (2003). Advances in our understanding of calcium oxalate crystal formation and function in plants. Plant Science, 164, 901–909. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0168- 9452(03) 00120-1 Nakata, P. A. (2012). Plant calcium oxalate crystal formation, function, and its impact on human health. Frontiers in Biology, 7(3), 254–266. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S11515- 012- 1224-0 Ngan-Tillard, D. J. M., Huisman, D. J., Corbella, F., & Nass, A. V. (2018). Over the rainbow? Micro-CT scanning to non-destructively study Roman and early medieval glass bead manufacture. Journal of Archaeological Science, 98, 7–21. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2018. 07. 007 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Nugraha, B., Verboven, P., Janssen, S., Wang, Z., & Nicolaï, B. M. (2019). Non-destructive porosity mapping of fruit and vegetables using X-ray CT. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 150, 80–88. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. posth arvbio. 2018. 12. 016 Oliveira, N. (2008). Subsistence archaeobotany: Food productionand the agricultural transition in East Timor. [Unpublisheddoctoral dissertation]. Australian National University. Oliveira, N. (2012). Recovering, analysing and identifying Colocasia esculenta and Dioscorea spp. from archaeological contexts in Timor-Leste. In M. Spriggs, D. Addison, & P. Matthews (Eds.), Irri- gated taro (Colocasia esculenta) in the Indo-Pacific: Biological, social and historical perspectives (pp. 265–284). Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology. Ommaya, A. K., Murray, G., Ambrose, J., Richardson, A., & Hounsfield, G. N. (1976). Computerized axial tomography: Estimation of spatial and density resolution capability. British Journal of Radi- ology, 49, 604–611. Paiva, E. A. S. (2019). Are calcium oxalate crystals a dynamic calcium store in plants? New Phytologist, 223(4), 1707–1711. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ nph. 15912 Pajor, R., Fleming, A., Osborne, C. P., Rolfe, S. A., Sturrock, C. J., & Mooney, S. J. (2013). Seeing space: Visualization and quantification of plant leaf structure using X-ray micro-computed tomography. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(2), 385–390. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ jxb/ ers392 Panzer, S., Peschel, O., Haas-Gebhard, B., Bachmeier, B. E., Pusch, C. M., & Nerlich, A. G. (2014). Reconstructing the life of an unknown (ca. 500 years-old South American Inca) mummy-multi- disciplinary study of a Peruvian Inca mummy suggests severe Chagas disease and ritual homicide. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e89528. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ JOURN AL. PONE. 00895 28 Paxton, R., & Ambrose, J. (1974). The EMI scanner. A brief review of the first 650 patients. British Jour- nal of Radiology, 47, 430–565. Paz, V. (1999). Neolithic human movement to Island Southeast Asia: The search for archaeobotanical evidence. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 18, 151–157. Paz, V. (2002). Island Southeast Asia: Spread or friction zone? In P. Bellwood & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis (pp. 275–285). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. Paz, V. (2001). Archaeobotany and cultural transformation: Patterns of early plant utilization in Northern Wal- lacea [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Cambridge Paz, V. 2005. Rock shelters, caves, and archaeobotany in Island Southeast Asia. Asian Perspectives 44(1): 107–118 Pernter, P., Gostner, P., Vigl, E. E., & Rühli, F. J. (2007). Radiologic proof for the Iceman’s cause of death (ca. 5’300 BP). Journal of Archaeological Science, 34(11), 1784–1786. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JAS. 2006. 12. 019 Phalempin, M., Lippold, E., Vetterlein, D., & Schlüter, S. (2021). An improved method for the segmenta- tion of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v.2. Plant Methods, 17(39) https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13007- 021- 00735-4 Piovesan, A., Vancauwenberghe, V., Van, T., Looverbosch, D., Verboven, P., & Nicolaï, B. (2021). X-ray computed tomography for 3D plant imaging. Trends in Plant Science, 26(11), P1171-1185. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. tplan ts. 2021. 07. 010 Piperno, D. R. (2006).Phytoliths: A comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists. Alta Mira Press Ponce de Leon, M. S., & Zollikofer, C. P. E. (1999). New evidence from Le Moustier 1: Computer- assisted reconstruction and morphometry of the skull. The Anatomical Record, 254, 474–489. Portillo, M., Ball, T. B., Wallace, M., Murphy, C., Pérez-Díaz, S., Ruiz-Alonso, M., Aceituno, F. J., & López-Sáez, J. A. (2020). Advances in Morphometrics in Archaeobotany. Environmental Archae- ology, 25(2), 246–256. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 14614 103. 2019. 15693 51 Pouyanfar, S., Sadiq, S., Yan, Y., Tian, H., Reyes, M. P., Chen, S.-C., Sadiq, M. S., Yan, Y., Tao, Y., & Shyu, M.-L. (2019). A Survey on Deep Learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(5), 92. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 32341 50 Pritchard, J., Lewis, T., Beeching, L., & Denham, T. (2019). An assessment of microCT technology for the investigation of charred archaeological parenchyma from house sites at Kuk Swamp, Papua New Guinea. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(5), 1927–1938. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S12520- 018- 0648-0/ FIGUR ES/5 Purugganan, M. D., & Fuller, D. Q. (2011). Archaeological Data Reveal Slow Rates of Evolution dur- ing Plant Domestication. Evolution, 65(1), 171–183. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1558- 5646. 2010. 01093.x 1 3 A. Barron Rowe, T., & Frank, L. R. (2011). The Disappearing Third Dimension. Science New Series, 331(6018), 712–714. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. ll993 05 Rozenbaum, O. (2011). 3-D characterization of weathered building limestones by high resolution syn- chrotron X-ray microtomography. Science of the Total Environment, 409, 1959–1966. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2011. 02. 014 Ru, F. J. (2000). Radiological Aspects and Interpretation of Post-mortem Artefacts in Ancient Egyptian Mummies from Swiss Collections. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 10, 153–157. Rühli, F. J., Kuhn, G., Evison, R., Müller, R., & Schultz, M. (2007). Diagnostic value of micro-CT in comparison with histology in the qualitative assessment of historical human skull bone patholo- gies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 133(4), 1099–1111. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ ajpa. 20611 Sanger, M. C. (2016). Investigating pottery vessel manufacturing techniques using radiographic imaging and computed tomography: Studies from the Late Archaic American Southeast. Journal of Archae- ological Science: Reports, 9, 586–598. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jasrep. 2016. 08. 005 Saprykina, I. A., Kichanov, S. E., & Kozlenko, D. P. (2019). Possibilities, Limitations, and Prospects of Using Neutron Tomography and Radiography for Preservation of Archaeological Heritage Objects. Crystallography Reports, 64(1), 177–180. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1134/ S1063 77451 90102 2X Sasov, A., & Van Dyck, D. (1998). Desktop X-ray microscopy and microtomography. Journal of Micros- copy, 191(2), 151–158. Sato, T., Ikeda, O., Yamakoshi, Y., & Tsubouchi, M. (1981). X-ray tomography for microstructural objects. Applied Optics, 20(22), 3880–3883. Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 61, 85–117. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. NEUNET. 2014. 09. 003 Sears, D. W. G., Sears, H., Ebel, D. S., Wallace, S., & Friedrich, J. M. (2016). X-ray computed tomog- raphy imaging: A not-so-nondestructive technique. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 51(4), 833– 838. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ maps. 12622 Shin, D. H., Choi, Y. H., Kyoung-Jin, S., Han, G. R., Youn, M., Chong-Youl, K., Han, S. H., Seo, J. C., Park, S. S., Cho, Y., & Chang, B. S. (2003). Radiological analysis on a mummy from a medieval tomb in Korea. Annals of Anatomy, 185(4), 377–382. Sigmund, G., & Minas, M. (2002). The Trier mummy Paï-es-tjau-em-aui-nu: Radiological and histologi- cal findings. European Radiology, 12, 1854–1862. Skinner, M. M., Kivell, T. L., Potze, S., & Hublin, J. J. (2013). Microtomographic archive of fossil homi- nin specimens from Kromdraai B, South Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 64(5), 434–447. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JHEVOL. 2013. 01. 007 Skinner, M. M., de Vries, D., Gunz, P., Kupczik, K., Klassen, R. P., Hublin, J. J., & Roksandic, M. (2016). A dental perspective on the taxonomic affinity of the Balanica mandible (BH-1). Journal of Human Evolution, 93, 63–81. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JHEVOL. 2016. 01. 010 Smith, S. Y., Collinson, M. E., Rudall, P. J., Simpson, D. A., Marone, F., & Stampanoni, M. (2009). Virtual taphonomy using synchrotron tomographic microscopy reveals cryptic features and inter- nal structure of modern and fossil plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(29), 12013. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ PNAS. 09014 68106 Soltaninejad, M., Sturrock, C. J., Griffiths, M., Pridmore, T. P., & Pound, M. P. (2020). Three Dimen- sional Root CT Segmentation Using Multi-Resolution Encoder-Decoder Networks. IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing, 29, 6667–6679. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1109/ TIP. 2020. 29928 93 Staedler, Y. M., Masson, D., & Schönenberger, J. (2013). Plant Tissues in 3D via X-ray Tomography: Simple Contrasting Methods Allow High Resolution Imaging. PLOS ONE, 8(9), e75295. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ JOURN AL. PONE. 00752 95 Stelzner, J. (2016). X-ray computed tomography for non-destructive analysis of early Medieval swords. Studies in Conservation, 61(2), 86–101. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1179/ 20470 58414Y. 00000 00157 Stelzner, J., & Million, S. (2015). X-ray Computed Tomography for the anatomical and dendrochrono- logical analysis of archaeological wood. Journal of Archaeological Science, 55, 188–196. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2014. 12. 015 Stelzner, J., Ebinger-Rist, N., Peek, C., & Schillinger, B. (2010). The application of 3D computed tomog- raphy with X-rays and neutrons to visualize archaeological objects in blocks of soil. Conservation, 55(2), 95–106. Stock. (2020).  Microcomputed tomography : methodology and applications  (Second edition.). CRC Press/Taylor and Francis 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Stromer, D., Christlein, V., Martindale, C., Zippert, P., Haltenberger, E., Hausotte, T., & Maier, A. (2018). Browsing through sealed historical manuscripts by using 3-D computed tomography with low-bril- liance X-ray sources. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 018- 33685-4 Stuppy, W. H., Maisano, J. A., Colbert, M. W., Rudall, P. J., & Rowe, T. B. (2003). Three-dimensional analysis of plant structure using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Trends in Plant Sci- ence, 8(1), 2–6. Sundararajan, K., & Woodard, D. L. (2018). Deep Learning for Biometrics. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(3). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 31906 18 Suzuki, Y., Usami, K., Sakamoto, K., Kozaka, H., Hirano, T., Shiono, H., & Kohno, H. (1988). X-Ray computerized tomography using monochromated synchrotron radiation. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 27(3A), L461–L464. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1143/ JJAP. 27. L461 Taina, I. A., Heck, R. J., & Elliot, T. R. (2008). Application of X-ray computed tomography to soil sci- ence: A literature review. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 88(1), 1–20. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4141/ cjss0 6027 Teramoto, S., Takayasu, S., Kitomi, Y., Arai-Sanoh, Y., Tanabata, T., & Uga, Y. (2020). High-throughput three-dimensional visualization of root system architecture of rice using X-ray computed tomogra- phy. Plant Methods, 16(1), 1–14. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ S13007- 020- 00612-6 Théroux-Rancourt, Guillaume Jenkins, M. R., Brodersen, C. R., McElrone, A., Forrestel, E. J., & Earles, J. M. (2020). Digitally deconstructing leaves in 3D using X-ray microcomputed tomography and machine learning.Applications in Plant Sciences, 8(7), e11380 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ aps3. 11380 Thompson, A. C., Llacer, J., Campbell Finman, L., Hughes, E. B., Otis, J. N., Wilson, S., & Zeman, H. D. (1984). Computed tomography using synchrotron radiation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 222(1–2), 319–323. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0167- 5087(84) 90550-7 Tooulakou, G., Giannopoulos, A., Nikolopoulos, D., Bresta, P., Dotsika, E., Orkoula, M. G., Kontoyan- nis, C. G., Fasseas, C., Liakopoulos, G., Klapa, M. I., & Karabourniotis, G. (2016). Reevaluation of the plant “gemstones”: Calcium oxalate crystals sustain photosynthesis under drought condi- tions. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 11(9), e1215793. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 15592 324. 2016. 12157 Tripp, J. A., Squire, M. E., Hedges, R. E. M., & Stevens, R. E. (2018). Use of micro-computed tomog- raphy imaging and porosity measurements as indicators of collagen preservation in archaeologi- cal bone. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 511, 462–471. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. palaeo. 2018. 09. 012 Tuniz, C., Bernardini, F., Turk, I., Dimkaroski, L., Mancini, L., & Dreossi, D. (2012). Did Neanderthals play music? X-ray computed micro-tomography of the Divje babe ‘flute.’ Archaeometry, 54(3), 581–590. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1475- 4754. 2011. 00630.x Tuniz, C., Bernardini, F., Cicuttin, A., Crespo, M. L., Dreossi, D., Gianoncelli, A., Mancini, L., Mendoza Cuevas, A., Sodini, N., Tromba, G., Zanini, F., & Zanolli, C. (2013). The ICTP-Elettra X-ray labo- ratory for cultural heritage and archaeology. Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A, 711, 106–110 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. nima. 2013. 01. 046 Ussher, E. (2015). Agricultural development in Tongan prehistory: An archaeobotanical perspective. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Australian National University. Van De Looverbosch, T., Raeymaekers, E., Verboven, P., Sijbers, J., & Nicolaï, B. (2021). Non-destruc- tive internal disorder detection of Conference pears by semantic segmentation of X-ray CT scans using deep learning. Expert Systes with Applications, 176, 114925. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. ESWA. 2021. 114925 Villagran, X. S., Strauss, A., Alves, M., & Oliveira, R. E. (2019). Virtual micromorphology: The applica- tion of micro-CT scanning for the identification of termite mounds in archaeological sediments. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 24, 785–795. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jasrep. 2019. 02. Voltolini, M., Taş, N., Wang, S., Brodie, E. L., & Ajo-Franklin, J. B. (2017). Quantitative characteriza- tion of soil micro-aggregates: New opportunities from sub-micron resolution synchrotron X-ray microtomography. Geoderma, 305, 382–393. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. geode rma. 2017. 06. 005 Wadley, L., Backwell, L., d’Errico, F., & Sievers, C. (2020). Cooked starchy rhizomes in Africa 170 thousand years ago. Science, 367(6473), 87–91. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. aaz59 26 Wanek, J., & Rühli, F. J. (2016). Risk to fragmented DNA in dry, wet, and frozen states from computed tomography: A comparative theoretical study. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 55(2), 229–241. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S00411- 016- 0637-6/ FIGUR ES/8 1 3 A. Barron Wang, F., Casalino, L. P., & Khullar, D. (2019). Deep Learning in Medicine—Promise, Progress, and Challenges. JAMA Internal Medicine, 179(3), 293–294. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ JAMAI NTERN MED. 2018. 7117 Wang, S., Kang, B., Ma, J., Zeng, X., Xiao, M., Guo, J., Cai, M., Yang, J., Li, Y., Meng, X., & Xu, B. (2021). A deep learning algorithm using CT images to screen for Corona virus disease (COVID- 19). European Radiology, 31(8), 6096–6104. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S00330- 021- 07715-1/ FIGUR ES/5 Ward, I., & Maksimenko, A. (2019). Marine micromorphology in 3D: Visualisation of a submerged midden site from Hjarnø Denmark. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 23, 368–375. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jasrep. 2018. 10. 038 Weber, G. W., & Bookstein, F. L. (2011). Virtual anthropology: A guide to a new interdisciplinary field. Springer. Welsh, H., Nelson, A. J., Van Der Merwe, A. E., De Boer, H. H., & Brickley, M. B. (2020). An Investiga- tion of Micro-CT Analysis of Bone as a New Diagnostic Method for Paleopathological Cases of Osteomalacia. International Journal of Paleopathology, 31, 23–33. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijpp. 2020. 08. 004 Whitau, R., Dilkes-Hall, I. E., Dotte-Sarout, E., Langley, M. C., Balme, J., & O’Connor, S. (2016). X-ray computed microtomography and the identification of wood taxa selected for archaeological arte- fact manufacture: Rare examples from Australian contexts. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 6, 536–546. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jasrep. 2016. 03. 021 Wilkins, S. W., Gureyev, T. E., Gao, D., Pogany, A., & Stevenson, A. W. (1996). Phase-contrast imaging using polychromatic hard X-rays. Nature, 384(6607), 335–338. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ 38433 5A0 Willemink, M. J., & Noël, P. B. (2019). The evolution of image reconstruction for CT—from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. European Radiology, 29(5), 2185. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S00330- 018- 5810-7 Wilson, J., Hardy, K., Allen, R., Copeland, L., Wrangham, R., & Collins, M. (2010). Automated classifi- cation of starch granules using supervised pattern recognition of morphological properties. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 594–604. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2009. 10. 024 Winchell, F., Stevens, C. J., Murphy, C., Champion, L., & Fuller, D. Q. (2017). Evidence for Sorghum Domestication in Fourth Millennium BC Eastern Sudan Spikelet Morphology from Ceramic Impressions of the Butana Group. Current Anthropology, 58(5), 673–683. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ Winchell, F., Brass, M., Manzo, A., Beldados, A., Perna, V., Murphy, C., Stevens, C., & Fuller, D. Q. (2018). On the Origins and Dissemination of Domesticated Sorghum and Pearl Millet across Africa and into India: A View from the Butana Group of the Far Eastern Sahel. African Archaeo- logical Review, 35(4), 483–505. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S10437- 018- 9314-2/ FIGUR ES/8 Wolcott, K. A., Chomicki, G., Staedler, Y. M., Wasylikowa, K., Nesbitt, M., Schönenberger, J., & Renner, S. S. (2021). Three-dimensional X-ray-computed tomography of 3300- to 6000-year-old Citrul- lus seeds from Libya and Egypt compared to extant seeds throws doubts on species assignments. Plants, People, Planet, 3(6), 694–702. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ PPP3. 10220 Zhao, Y., & Takhar, P. S. (2017). Micro X-ray computed tomography and image analysis of frozen pota- toes subjected to freeze-thaw cycles. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 79, 278–286. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. lwt. 2017. 01. 051 Zollikofer, C. P. E., & Ponce de Leon, M. S. (2005). Virtual reconstruction: A primer in  computer- assisted paleontology and biomedicine. John Wiley & Sons Zollikofer, C. P. E., Ponce De León, M. S., & Martin, R. D. (1998). Computer-assisted paleoanthropol- ogy. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 6(2), 41–54. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ (SICI) 1520- 6505(1998)6: 2% 3c41:: AID- EVAN2% 3e3.0. CO;2-Z Zollikofer, C. P. E., Ponce de León, M. S., Lieberman, D. E., Guy, F., Pilbeam, D., Likius, A., Mackaye, H. T., Vignaud, P., & Brunet, M. (2005). Virtual cranial reconstruction of Sahelanthropus tchaden- sis. Letters to Nature, 434(7), 755–759. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ natur e03397 Zong, Y., Yao, S., Crawford, G. W., Fang, H., Lang, J., Fan, J., & Jiang, H. (2017). Selection for Oil Con- tent During Soybean Domestication Revealed by X-ray Tomography of Ancient Beans. Scientific Reports, 7, 43595. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ srep4 3595 Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. 1 3 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Springer Journals

Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory , Volume OnlineFirst – May 29, 2023

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/applications-of-microct-imaging-to-archaeobotanical-research-ZuiEBYvled

References (309)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © Crown 2023
ISSN
1072-5369
eISSN
1573-7764
DOI
10.1007/s10816-023-09610-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The potential applications of microCT scanning in the field of archaeobotany are only just beginning to be explored. The imaging technique can extract new archaeobotanical information from existing archaeobotanical collections as well as create new archaeobotanical assemblages within ancient ceramics and other artefact types. The technique could aid in answering archaeobotanical questions about the early histories of some of the world’s most important food crops from geographical regions with amongst the poorest rates of archaeobotanical preservation and where ancient plant exploitation remains poorly understood. This paper reviews current uses of microCT imaging in the investigation of archaeobotanical questions, as well as in cognate fields of geosciences, geoarchaeology, botany and palaeobotany. The technique has to date been used in a small number of novel methodological studies to extract internal anatomical morphologies and three-dimensional quantitative data from a range of food crops, which includes sexually-propagated cereals and legumes, and asexually-propagated underground storage organs (USOs). The large three-dimensional, digital datasets produced by microCT scanning have been shown to aid in taxonomic identification of archaeobotanical specimens, as well as robustly assess domestication status. In the future, as scanning technology, computer processing power and data storage capacities continue to improve, the possible applications of microCT scanning to archaeobotanical studies will only increase with the development of machine and deep learning networks enabling the automation of analyses of large archaeobotanical assemblages. Keywords microCT · Plant domestication · 3D visualization · Archaeological parenchyma · Pottery inclusions · Underground storage organs * Aleese Barron aleese.barron@anu.edu.au School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Banks Building, Canberra, Canberra ACT  2601, Australia Department of Materials Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, Canberra ACT  2601, Australia Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3 A. Barron Introduction Archaeobotanical evidence of early human-mediated exploitation, transportation and alteration of some of the world’s most important crop species is limited. Crop species from geographical regions with low archaeobotanical sampling rates and/ or that produce types of botanical evidence with low archaeological visibility are currently underrepresented in the literature (Paz, 2005; Denham et  al., 2009; Cas- tillo & Fuller, 20,120; Bishop, 2021; Bishop et  al., 2022). These include sexually- propagated cereal and legume species and asexually-propagated fleshy underground storage organs (USOs). In some cases, archaeobotanists are currently reliant on the fields of genomics and historical linguistics rather than direct archaeobotanical evi- dence to fill in major gaps relating to the histories of some major food crops (Dia- mond & Bellwood, 2003; Lebot, 2009; Mikic´, A., Medovic´, A., Jovanovic´, Z., & Stanisavljevic’, N. 2014; Denham et  al., 2020). While new excavations and the consistent application of current archaeobotanical techniques are crucial to helping fill in both geographical and chronological gaps, the development of new archaeobo- tanical techniques, the extraction of new types of archaeobotanical material as well as the reanalysis of previously excavated material should be undertaken to increase both the quantity and quality of currently available archaeobotanical evidence. An emerging imaging and analytical technique currently underutilized in archae- obotany is microCT scanning. The technique is a powerful tool for extracting large amounts of three-dimensional information from archaeological samples quickly and non-destructively, which can be digitally rendered, manipulated and analysed as well as easily shared or stored for prosperity. While microCT has found many novel uses within the field of archaeology, its application to imaging archaeobotanical materials was until recently very limited. Within the last ten years, a handful of studies have presented novel ways in which microCT can be utilized to answer archaeobotanical questions, however, the technique is yet to be applied systematically to analyse large numbers of samples consistently across whole assemblages. The increasing access researchers have to lab-based microCT systems coupled with the development of microCT visualisation protocols specifically designed for imaging and analysing archaeobotanical materials (e.g. Barron & Denham, 2018) could see the technique become regularly employed as part of the wider suite of archaeobotanical analytical methods. In this paper, I will outline the technique’s history of use in the fields of archaeology and archaeobotany, as well as the closely related fields of geoscience, botany and palaeobotany, before outlining possible future methodological develop- ments and potential applications to archaeobotany. Computed Tomography X-ray computed tomography was originally developed in the 1970s (Ambrose, 1976; Beckmann, 2006; Hounsfield, 1973; Ommaya et  al., 1976) and initiallly used for medical imaging (Ledley et  al.,  1974; Paxton & Ambrose, 1974). As the technique 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research has been refined, scanning technology improved and computing power increased exponentially over time (see Kalender, 2006 for review), it has come to be used in an extremely wide range of fields, including biology, geology, materials science, pal- aeontology and biomedical engineering (see Staedler et  al., 2013, Table  S1). X-ray computed tomography is essentially the process of taking multiple 2D X-rays, or pro- jections, from different orientations around an object and reconstructing those projec- tions to form a digital, three-dimensional model of the object (see Brooks & Chiro, 1976; Kak & Slaney, 1988). While X-rays are the most commonly used type of radia- tion for CT imaging, neutrons have also been utilized to image archaeological sam- ples based on comparable principles (see De Beer et al., 2009; Jacobson et al., 2011; Bertrand et al., 2012; Saprykina et al., 2019). X-ray images are formed by differen- tial absorption, deflection and transmission of penetrative X-rays through an object. X-ray attenuation is affected by both the composition, density and thickness of the material and thus provides information regarding morphological form and changes, both internally and externally; however, it can only provide relative compositional information based on comparative attenuation values of assumed or known materials (see Kak & Slaney, 1988; Hsieh, 2015; Stock, 2020 for technique overviews). There- fore, X-ray CT is ideal for imaging heterogeneous samples comprised of materials with vastly different attenuation values. The two-dimensional x-ray projections pro- duced during scanning are processed using dedicated reconstruction algorithms to produce a three-dimensional model, which is essentially a three-dimensional map of X-ray attenuation values at all points throughout a scanned object (see Willemink and Noël 2019 for evolution of image reconstruction methods). MicroCT MicroCT was first developed in the 1980s (Elliott & Dover, 1982, 1985; Feldkamp & Jesion, 1986; Flannery et al., 1987; Sato et al., 1981; Suzuki et al., 1988) as a higher resolution and higher energy type of CT-imaging with no definitive differentiation between traditional CT and microCT. The basic setup of microCT systems differs from medical CT scanners with the sample rotating between a stationary X-ray source and detector for microCT, as opposed to the sample/patient remaining stationary while the X-ray source and detector rotate around them in a medical scanner (see Flannery et al. 1987 Fig. 2 for basic source-detector schematic). X-ray radiation dosage and exposure are severely limited for the health of patients in medical imaging, whereas this is of little importance for imaging archaeobotanical samples using microCT. However, the impact scanning has on aDNA, isotope ratios, and OSL dating remains largely unknown (see Immel et al., 2016; Wanek and Rühli 2016; Sears et al., 2016; Murphy et al., 2019). There are two major types of microCT systems widely in use, lab-based and synchrotron, which differ by their X-ray sources, and, therefore, the types of X-ray beams. Lab-based microCT systems generally use tube X-ray transmitters, which produce polychromatic beams (Sasov and Dyck 1998). Synchrotron microCT sys- tems use synchrotron light sources which produce tunable, monochromatic beams of higher flux and intensity enabling smaller spot sizes resulting in higher image resolution (Grodzins, 1983a, b; Thompson et  al., 1984; Flannery et  al., 1987; 1 3 A. Barron Baruchel et  al., 2006). Generally, synchrotron high-resolution X-ray microCT is carried out at large facilities with a synchrotron radiation source, such as a par- ticle accelerator, making the technique significantly more difficult to access and beam time is severely limited compared to lab-based microCT systems. There are currently no standard protocols for the scanning of archaeobotanical samples, or any other type of samples, so a large number of parameters are deter- mined by the user, dependent on the size and composition of samples and research questions of interest. These parameters include tube voltage and current, exposure time, step size, beam spot size, and the use of any physical filters. The variety of microCT systems, flexibility of scan parameters as well as the subjectivity of subse- quent visualization and segmentation methods make it currently difficult to reliably compare data and analytical results obtained using different microCT systems (Bav - eye et al., 2010). Image resolution (voxel size) is inversely proportional to sample size, specifically sample diameter, meaning that images of large samples may not possess the level of detail required for desired results. In fields such as geology, this limit of voxel size is often overcome by simply extracting subsamples using destructive coring methods, however, this option is not ideal for archaeological samples. The limitation on voxel size can be non-destructively overcome by the implementation of a region of interest (ROI) scan (Chityala et al., 2004; Kyrieleis et al., 2011) in addition to a full object scan. This process produces a higher resolution scan of a portion of the sample, yet extracts the subsample non-destructively (see Fig. 1). Fig. 1 2D radiographic slices of sorghum-tempered pottery sherd. Left. Slice from full sherd scan. Right. Slice from ROI (region of interest scan 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Sample preparation One of the major reasons that microCT scanning has found widespread use in archaeology is the non-destructive nature of both sample preparation and image pro- cessing. When mounting a sample for microCT scanning the primary concerns are to secure it to the stage and stabilize all parts of the sample so that no movement occurs during or between radiographs. If all or part of a sample moves during scan- ning it can lead to blurred 3D images, particularly around the sample edges, after digital reconstruction. Samples are often mounted in any kind of vessel, ideally a tube composed of a low attenuation material, and stabilized inside using packing material (of significantly lower density than the sample if possible). However, sam- ple mounting is dependent on the shape and nature of the sample and the technical specifications of the CT system (see Du Plessis et al., 2017). Figure  2 shows examples of sample preparation and stabilization methods used for the scanning of different types of archaeobotanical samples. All samples are mounted in plastic tubes and the organic-tempered pottery sherds in Fig.  2a are imaged within their plastic sample bags. This was done to avoid separating sherds from the contextual information written on the plastic bags, which attenuate signifi- cantly less X-rays than the sherds and thus do not affect the imaging of the sherds themselves. The pottery sherds in Fig.  2A were able to be stabilized by their own rigidity against the walls of the tube whereas the wood and parenchyma sample in Figs. 2B & C were weighted down by packing foam. The taro fragments in Fig. 2C were also separated from the foam by a sheet of stiff plastic to create a clear separa- tion between the sample and foam to enable simpler digital segmentation for visuali- zation and/or analysis. A B C Fig. 2 2D x-ray slices of samples prepared for tomographic imaging. A. African pottery samples (3 tem- pered with sorghum on the left and 1 tempered with pearl millet on the right) still in plastic sample bags and stacked inside a plastic specimen jar. B. Archaeobotanical samples (five charred parenchyma sam- ples and one wood charcoal) stacked inside a plastic tube and secured from above with packing foam. C. Charred Colocasia esculenta reference sample stacked inside a plastic tube and secured from above with a plastic disc (to aid with post-scanning segmentation) and packing foam 1 3 A. Barron Visualisation and Analysis The digital datasets produced by microCT scanning can be used for visualization or analytical purposes and can be rendered, segmented and/or animated to access inter- nal or external morphologies. The data can be viewed by two-dimensional slice from any direction or as a three-dimensional model, providing perspectives from infinitely more angles than two-dimensional imaging techniques (Fig. 3). MicroCT data can be segmented (i.e. partitioned and labelled) based on various properties such as X-ray attenuation value, shape, size and connectedness and each segment can be visualized and/or analysed individually. Many 3D image processing software packages are com- mercially available such as Avizo, VG Studio Max and Dragonfly, whereas others are open-source, such as Drishti (Hu et al., 2020; Limaye, 2012). Many of these software packages offer both quantitative and qualitative analytical methods with the abilities to alter visual properties—such as rendering colours, lighting, opacity and camera orientation—as well as to calculate quantitative characteristics—such as volume, dis- tribution and compositional ratios (see Maire & Withers, 2013). Fig. 3 3D rendering of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) reference sample and views of 2D tomographic slices in Drishti Paint. A. 3D rendering with orange crosshairs indicating the location of slices C-D. B. 2D view of slice along x-axis. C. 2D view of slice along y-axis. D. 2D view of slice along z-axis 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research The digital nature of microCT datasets makes them easy to share virtually with researchers around the globe (see Stuppy et  al., 2003; Tuniz et  al., 2013). This is particularly useful for the study of rare and/or valuable archaeobotanical samples, which are often too fragile to be transported or are not legally allowed to be trans- ported outside of their country of origin (Calo et  al., 2019). Digital datasets can also reduce the need for researchers to undertake expensive and, in the current pub- lic health and climatic crises, increasingly difficult travel to access archaeological collections. The ability to share microCT datasets is only limited by the size of the datasets and the limited capacity of existing file sharing platforms. Online repositories, often hosted by university-based supercomputer facilities, for the digital storage of 3D vol- umes for research purposes are becoming increasingly more common (e.g. Digital Rocks Portal—www. digitalrocksportal.org; MorphoMuseuM – www. morph omuse um. com; DigiMorph – www. digim orph. org) and their continuing development will enable more and larger archaeological reference datasets to become widely avail- able in the future. The production of animations and 3D printable datasets using microCT data is also effective for media promotion and public outreach and can be employed as engaging tools for teaching purposes. MicroCT can be integrated with 2D dimensional imaging methods by using a process called registration. This process involves locating (either manually or auto- matically) the exact three-dimensional location where a 2D image slice occurs in the 3D microCT data and overlaying that 2D image slice to enable direct comparison between different forms of information. The process an be used for registering com- positional elemental and mineral mapping techniques such as BSEM (back-scattered scanning electron microscopy) and QEMSCAN with microCT data to identify the presence and distribution of compositional types and link their occurrence to spe- cific greyscales values within 3D datasets (Latham et al., 2008a; b). MicroCT applications in Cognate Fields Archaeology Computed tomography has a long history of use in archaeology largely due to the non-destructive nature of the imaging process. This history began with the use of medical scanners to non-destructively image and digitally unwrap mummies and other fragile skeletal remains (Appelboom & Struyven, 1999; Baldock et al., 1994; Cosmacini & Piacentini, 2008; Falke et al., 1987; Hardwood-Nash, 1979; Lynnerup et  al., 1997; Sigmund & Minas., 2002). Medical scanners are able to image large samples relatively quickly and produce images of resolutions high enough to answer some types of archaeological and palaeoanthropological questions. The technique’s use in imaging skeletal remains, including both human and faunal, has become almost standard practice (see Zollikofer et  al., 1998; Zollikofer & Ponce de Leon, 2005; Weber & Bookstein, 2011). It has been used to successfully identify objects 1 3 A. Barron encased within or wrapped with skeletal remains, locate and assess palaeopatholo- gies such as bone fractures or deformities and to analyse general skeletal morphol- ogy, to aid in sex and age determination of human remains and species determina- tion of animal remains (Allam et al., 2009; Coutinho Nogueira et al., 2019; Cramer et  al., 2018; Johnston et al., 2020; Malgora et al., 2020; McKnight, 2010; Melcher et al., 1997; Panzer et al., 2014; Ru, 2000; Shin et al., 2003). The technique has been used to image a number of high profile archaeological skeletal remains including Oetzi (Gostner et al., 2011; Murphy et al., 2003; Pernter et al., 2007), Tutankhamun (Hawass et al., 2010; Hussein et al., 2013), and Richard III (Appleby et al., 2015). The non-destructive nature of CT scanning has also successfully been used to ‘look’ inside sealed artefacts without having to physically deconstruct or damage objects such as sealed funerary urns (Anderson & Fell, 1995; Harvig et al., 2012; Minozzi et al., 2010) and documents (Applbaum et al. 1995; Stromer et al., 2018). In the twenty-first century, X-ray microCT has become the most widely used tomography technique for imaging an increasingly diverse range of archaeological materials. Faunal and human bones have been imaged to identify and assess a range of features such as collagen preservation (Beck et  al., 2012; Tripp et  al., 2018), sur- face cut marks (Bello et  al., 2013a; b; Tuniz et  al., 2012), palaeopathological signs of disease and injury (Rühli et al., 2007; Welsh et al., 2020), histological evidence of diagenesis (Booth et al., 2016), and internal anatomical morphologies (Boschin et al., 2015; Bradfield, 2018). The technique has also been used to carry out complex mor - phological analyses of early hominid fossils (Ponce de Leon & Zollikofer, 1999; Zol- likofer and Ponce de Leon, 2005; Zollikofer et al.,  2005; Bermúdez De Castro et al., 2011; Holloway et al., 2014; Skinner et al., 2016) and to share that morphological data publicly enabling digital comparative analyses with other hominid specimens (Guipert & Lumley, 2004; Skinner et al., 2013). Other types of archaeological artefacts imaged using microCT scanning include papyrus scrolls (Allegra et al., 2016; Mocella et al., 2015), clay plaster (Bernardini et  al., 2018), glass beads (Cheng et  al., 2019; Ngan- Tillard et al., 2018), swords (Stelzner, 2016), and coins (Bude & Bigelow, 2020). Adaptation from geosciences MicroCT has long been a common technique for imaging geological and soil sam- ples in the geosciences (Cnudde & Boone, 2013; Ketcham & Carlson, 2001; Taina et al., 2008), leading to the development of analytical techniques that are beginning to be adopted in geoarchaeological and archaeological ceramic studies. Geological studies frequently use microCT imaging to scan rock cores and study a range of properties such as mineral composition, grain size, shape and orientation, pore char- acterisation and connectedness, and fracture patterns (Bhuiyan et al., 2012; Cnudde et al., 2012; Ersoy et al., 2010; Iovea et al., 2008; Jerram et al., 2009; Ketcham et al., 2010; Rozenbaum, 2011). A number of these properties have since been studied in archaeological ceramics using microCT data to characterize, quantify and visualise the 3D distributions of clay matrices, pores, tempers and other inclusions. These methods have been used to answer archaeological questions relating to vessel manu- facturing methods (Coli et  al., 2022; Kozatsas et  al., 2018; Sanger, 2016) and the 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research provenance of raw materials and vessel types (Bernardini et al., 2019; Kahl & Ram- minger, 2012; McKenzie-Clark & Magnussen, 2014). Soil science studies have used microCT scanning to image intact soil blocks to characterise and quantify solid soil components, physical properties (e.g. porosity and structure) and soil biota without losing 3D contextual information (Cássaro et  al., 2017; Chirol et  al., 2021; Helliwell et  al., 2014; Katuwal et  al., 2015; Taina et  al., 2008; Voltolini et  al., 2017). Traditional soil analysis methods such as 2D thin-section micromorphology can provide higher resolution coverage and addi- tional information (eg. compositional characterization) than microCT, however, it has been shown that microCT is particularly useful complementary technique when used as part of a suite of imaging methods. MicroCT adds three-dimensional con- textual information that was previously inaccessible using solely 2D imaging meth- ods and is crucial to understanding dynamic soil processes. MicroCT analytical techniques previously developed for soil science have been adapted by a number of geoarchaeological studies to image whole soil blocks for virtual investigation (Adderley et  al., 2001; Edwards et  al., 2017; Huisman et  al., 2014; Stelzner et  al., 2010; Villagran et  al., 2019; Ward & Maksimenko, 2019). Archaeological material types that attenuate X-rays at a higher rate than the soil matrix, such as ceramics, lithics, bone, and shell, can be easily extracted and visual- ized in three-dimensions for analysis. The 3D microCT data can be used for mor- phological identification, quantification, or be used as a sampling guide for further analytical methods (i.e. determining the location for 2D thin-section sampling and alerting excavators to the presence of poorly preserved, fragile artefacts during physical excavation). Geoarchaeological case studies to use the technique have so far applied it to the identification of structural features in midden deposits as well as shell, bone, lithic, teeth, scale and gill plate inclusions (Huisman et al., 2014; Ward & Maksimenko, 2019), the characterisation of termite mound materials in archaeo- logical deposits (Villagran et al., 2019), and the visualization of mineral hypo-coat- ings surrounding faunal burrows in archaeological sediments (Edwards et al., 2017). Botany MicroCT is yet to become a popular imaging technique in the field of botany, largely due to the low attenuating nature of carbon-based organic tissues (Piovesan et  al., 2021; Staedler et  al., 2013; Stuppy et  al., 2003). Staining techniques are oftenrequired before scanning to increase image contrast and differentiate between tissue and cell types (Staedler et  al., 2013), or alternatively, phase contrast microCT can be used to detect subtle differences in attenuation (Wilkins et  al., 1996). Scans of plants generally must be carried out at low energies with long exposure times, which can increase the occurrence of imaging artefacts. Despite its infrequent use, microCT has been shown to be extremely beneficial in helping to map and quantify the 3D topography of plant structures such as root systems, pore spaces, vasculature, tissue types, and reproductive organs to better understand physiologically processes such as 1 3 A. Barron the transport of water, metabolic gases and nutrients throughout entire plant organisms (Brodersen et al., 2011; Dhondt et al., 2010; Ho et al., 2014; Mathers et  al., 2018; McElrone et al., 2013; Mendoza et al., 2007; Nugraha et al., 2019; Pajor et al., 2013; Zhao & Takhar, 2017). Multiple studies have used microCT scanning to map live plant root systems in order to observe and quantify live root-soil interactions without the need for destructive sectioning (Flavel et  al., 2017; Maenhout et  al., 2019; Mairhofer et al., 2012; Mooney et al., 2011; Phalempin et al., 2021; Teramoto et al., 2020). One of these methods, Rootine (Gao et  al., 2019; Phalempin et  al., 2021), was originally developed as an adaptation of medical imaging techniques to iden- tify blood vessels based on their tubular shape (Frangi et  al., 1998). In these studies, roots are generally identified based on a combination of X-ray attenu- ation thresholding, shape analysis and object interconnectedness. A number of these root mapping techniques have developed image-processing protocols to, partially (Maenhout et al., 2019; Mairhofer et al., 2012) or fully (Douarre et al., 2018; Gao et al., 2019; Teramoto et al., 2020), automate the processes of iden- tifying and extracting plant roots from within the soil matrix of live plant sam- ples. The trend towards automating the analysis of botanical microCT data is seen in the increasing use of machine and deep learning processes (Earles et al., 2018; Théroux-Rancourt et al., 2020; Soltaninejad et al., 2020; Van De Loover- bosch et al., 2021). Matsushima et  al. (2012) used the high-attenuating nature of calcium oxa- late crystals to extract druse crystals from surrounding tissues in rose stems. This segmentation process enabled the visualization of druse crystal distribu- tion throughout a botanical organism in three-dimensions for the first time and could prove crucial in forming a better understanding of calcium oxalate forma- tion and function in plants, about which much remains unknown (Franceschi & Nakata, 2005; Nakata, 2003, 2012; Paiva, 2019; Tooulakou et  al., 2016). This segmentation method has also proven to be particularly successful at visualiz- ing calcium oxalate crystals in underground storage organs (USOs) to aid in the characterisation of species and identification of archaeological parenchyma frag- ments (Barron et al., 2022a; Denham et al., 2020). MicroCT scanning can enable sequential scans of individual organisms at established time intervals and to be registered to create 4D datasets illustrating changes in plant morphology over time (Keyes et  al., 2016). This 4D scanning technique has the potential to become revolutionary in understanding how plants develop and respond to various growth conditions because it allows 3D imaging of live samples without the need for destructive mounting procedures. The three-dimensional nature of microCT data also enables the technique to capture more and/or additional details of reference samples than the traditional method of using 2D histological thin-sections to form botanical reference collec- tions. Currently, there are very few publicly accessible 3D reference collections utilizing microCT data. X-plant (www.X- plant. org), while still in its infancy, is one example of how these collections could be set up and used. The platform currently hosts 41 datasets representing 34 plant species of accessible and down- loadable microCT data (MeBioS Postharvest Group, 2022). 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Palaeobotany MicroCT scanning has been successfully applied to the morphological study of fos- silized palaeobotanical remains by scanning already extracted botanical samples and scanning rock fragments and digitally extracting contained botanical fossils. Studies have included analysis of prehistoric plant remains consisting of a wide range of botanical material types including seeds (Smith et al., 2009), fruits (Collinson et al., 2016; Devore et al., 2006; Matsunaga et al., 2019; Smith et al., 2009), flowers (Friis et  al., 2014; Moreau et  al., 2014), and cones (Karch et  al., 2017). MicroCT data has enabled the virtual dissection of extremely rare and fragile specimens to view internal features previously inaccessible using 2D imaging techniques, which may have previously led to the destruction of rare samples. The large quantity of mor- phological information provided by microCT is particularly important for extracting the maximum amount of information from possibly unique, unidentified specimens to aid in anatomical characterisation and systematic classification (Matsunaga et al., 2019). In the future, microCT may also be used as a way to digitally preserve palae- obotanical samples that are subject to decay over time, or to make damaged samples available for virtual study (Collinson et al., 2016; Devore et al., 2006). MicroCT Applications in Archaeobotany The application of microCT scanning to the study of archaeobotanical remains was almost non-existent ten years ago. A handful of novel studies have recently begun to explore how microCT-based analytical techniques, developed in geology, botany and palaeontology, can be adapted and applied archaeobotanical materials to com- plement current archaeobotanical techniques and answer archaeobotanical ques- tions. The majority of these studies have concentrated on taxonomic identification of archaeobotanical specimens including wood species used in the manufacture of culturally significant wooden artefacts (Haneca et al., 2012; Kobayashi et al., 2019; Mizuno et al., 2010; Stelzner & Million, 2015; Whitau et al., 2016), fruits extracted from archaeological midden deposits (Calo et  al., 2019, 2020), a citrus-like fruit from a funerary offering deposit (Coubray et al., 2010), and a palm droop from the Royal Palace in Jericho (Moricca et  al., 2020). All of these studies used microCT scans to visualize different internal features dependent on the type of archaeobotani- cal material, the diagnostic value of the feature as well as the voxel size of the scan. These features include cell types such as vascular bundles, fibres and parenchyma (Mizuno et al., 2010; Whitau et al., 2016), seed morphologies (Coubray et al., 2010; Moricca et al., 2020), and tissues layers such as the exocarp, mesocarp, and endo- carp (Calo et  al., 2019, 2020). In some cases, microCT has been able to discount previous identifications, which had been made using only external, 2D imaging methods (Calo et al., 2019; Coubray et al., 2010). Wolcott et  al. (2021) demonstrated how microCT data has the potential to expand upon the application of morphometrical analyses to archaeobo- tanical samples, an approach that has become increasingly popular for species 1 3 A. Barron determination and assessment of domestication status in archaeobotany (Portillo et  al., 2020). Wolcott et al. (2021) scanned archaeological and modern Citrullus seeds and used the placement of three-dimensional landmarks to compare the two groups in the hopes of identifying the archaeological seeds to Citrullus species. While there was not sufficient variation observed to narrow down the identifi- cation to species level using a series of landmarks, Wolcott et  al. noted that in the future differentiation may still be possible by comparing the complete three- dimensional morphologies of the two layers, the exotesta and endotesta, which they were able to segment out from the microCT data. Comparison of entire 3D surfaces (Frank et al., 2021; Galinsky & Frank, 2014; Gao et al., 2018; Koehl & Hass, 2015) or automating the selection of landmarks (Boyer et  al., 2015; Kris- tensen et al., 2008) may prove useful in the future for those types of archaeobot- anical samples where differentiation between possible species using user-selected landmark morphometrics is extremely narrow. Currently, one of the issues with the identification of anatomical features and identification of archaeobotanical remains using microCT is that the process relies upon comparing microCT images to archaeobotanical and modern reference images taken using 2D image techniques (Calo et  al., 2020). Therefore, the comparison with 3D volumes of archaeobotanical samples is currently indirect and requires a degree of subjective interpretation by the observer. This can be solved in time with the development of microCT 3D reference collections of both botanical and archae- obotanical samples. As Calo et  al. (2020) notes, microCT datasets can be virtu- ally sliced to produce two-dimensional images “equivalent to light microscopy” for comparison with existing two-dimensional images and previously published descriptions while still retaining its contextual information in three-dimensional space. As Brodersen (2013) has outlined for wood characterisation, the benefits of using both 2D slices and 3D volumes of the same samples are that traditional diag- nostic features can be retained in the two-dimensional images while also allowing researchers to access and assess the usefulness of a new range of three-dimensional anatomical features for identifying and analyzing archaeobotanical samples. A small number of studies have developed new ways to use microCT to answer other types of archaeobotanical questions, particularly relating to the dating and preservation of archaeological wood. Bird et al. (2008) assessed pore size and interconnectedness as well as the distribution of authigenic mineral contamination in both reference and archaeological charcoal samples to better understand how and the extent to which charcoal is altered or degraded in the environment. This method shows potential to aid in determining the reliability of radiocarbon dates taken from charcoal. Stelzner and Million (2015) also suc- cessfully used microCT to aid in dating archaeobotanical samples by analyzing tree rings for dendrochronological dating of wood remains in soil blocks. More novel studies such as these, which focus on specific archaeobotanical materials and features are needed in order to understand the possible outcomes, benefits and pitfalls in applying microCT systematically to large numbers of samples and archaeobotanical material types. 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Sexually‑propagated cereal and legume crops MicroCT imaging has been used to assess the domestication status of some of the world’s most understudied, sexually-propagated food crops. The technique can image three-dimensional morphological traits of plant remains associated with the ‘domestication syndrome’ (i.e. abscission scars, grain size, oil content, testa thick- ness), namely, traits that change over time under cultivation during the domestica- tion period. Certain traits present within cultivated plant populations are thought to have been selected for by humans, both consciously and unconsciously, over long periods of pre-domestication cultivation. Over time continual trait selection, as well as separation from wild plant populations, led to cultivated plant populations evolving to become set as phenotypically and genotypically distinct from their wild ancestors (Fuller, 2007). The expression of traits and their archaeobotanical visibil- ity differ slightly for each species, but the process to assess the domestication sta- tus of plant populations always involves an assessment of domestication status for each individual plant specimen, which is then added to proportional counts of types across a botanical assemblage. The proportions of domesticated versus wild types for a given period at a site are then geographically and chronologically compared to other assemblages of the same crop species. The qualitative and quantitative characterisation of domestication syndrome traits has been achieved for multiple cereal crops: rice (Barron et  al., 2017, 2020a), sor- ghum (Barron et  al., 2020b) and pearl millet (Fuller et  al., 2021)(Fig.  4), and leg- umes: soybean (Murphy et al., 2019; Zong et al., 2017) and horse gram (Murphy & Fuller, 2017). In each case microCT was able to extract morphological information not accessible using 2D imaging techniques. While 2D imaging techniques such as Fig. 4 3D renderings of archaeobotanical cereal inclusions from organic-tempered pottery sherds. Top row – Wild types. Bottom row – domesticated types. Left – Rice spikelet bases from Gua Sireh, Bor- neo. Middle – Sorghum spikelets from KG23, Sudan. Right – Pearl millet spikelets from AZ22 (top) and MK36 (bottom), Mali 1 3 A. Barron light microscopy and SEM are often sufficient for assessing external morphologies of stratigraphically extracted archaeological remains, in some cases domestication syndrome traits are not accessible externally and therefore require either destructive sectioning or penetrative imaging. Two-dimensional imaging can provide hints as to the likely 3D morphologies of domestication traits by imaging spikelet abscission scars visible on ceramic surfaces or by visualizing seed coat thickness across a sin- gle 2D section, however, studies have shown that for certain domestication traits or certain types of archaeobotanical evidence microCT is the most robust and efficient way to assess domestication status (Barron & Denham, 2018; Barron et al., 2020a; b; Murphy & Fuller, 2017; Murphy et al., 2019; Zong et al., 2017). Barron et al. (2017,  2020a, b) have demonstrated that microCT scanning can be used to visualize archaeobotanical remains used as organic temper and preserved within archaeological pottery sherds, as well as to determine the domestication sta- tus of included cereal spikelets. While 2D surface impression analysis has produced some success in identifying and assessing organic inclusions in the past (Barron et al., 2017; McClatchie & Fuller, 2014; Winchell et al., 2017), the use of microCT imaging provides much greater analytical coverage and therefore is substantially more effective and efficient at extracting archaeobotanical information from pottery sherds (Barron et  al. 2020a). This technique has so far been utilized to study rice in sherds from Vietnam (Barron & Denham, 2018; Barron et  al., 2017) and Bor- neo (Barron et  al., 2020a), sorghum in sherds from Sudan (Barron et  al., 2020b) and pearl millet in sherds from Mali (Fuller et al., 2021). In all these studies, cereal spikelets could be identified in and segmented from the microCT data in order to visualize individual spikelets in three-dimensions for qualitative analysis of abscis- sion scar morphology, which can then be compiled for quantitative assessment of archaeobotanical assemblages. In each case study, the amount of archaeobotanical evidence available to address, globally significant archaeological questions has been significantly increased. MicroCT has granted access to new archaeobotanical assemblages present in “old” (previously excavated) materials from regions of relatively poor archaeobotanical coverage, where traditional archaeobotanical techniques have not been routinely applied (Castillo & Fuller, 2010; Winchell et  al., 2018). For example archaeobot- anical sampling has been inconsistently used at archaeological sites across Southeast Asia, meaning that we have very poor understanding of the timing and mechanisms of diffusion for rice farming into the region (Denham, 2013; Donohue & Denham, 2010; Paz, 1999, 2002). This lack of evidence is particularly pronounced in Island Southeast Asia, where theories regarding the introduction of rice farming to a locale have sometimes been dependent on merely the presence of a single rice grain lodged in the surface of a single pottery sherd from a single site (Barron et al., 2020a; Bell- wood et al., 1992). MicroCT imaging demonstrated that no other rice remains were present in the pottery sherd, thereby calling into question current models of diffu- sion dependent on the single, likely wild, rice grain. Ideally, assertions regarding the timing and trajectories of domestication episodes are based on the analysis of large archaeobotanical assemblages from numerous archaeological sites, of high geographical and chronological diversity (Fuller, 2007; Fuller et al., 2012, 2014; Purugganan & Fuller, 2011). The assemblages can then be 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research collated and compared to form a domestication curve to form a better overall picture of the timing and trajectories specific to each crop or domestication event. Robust domestication curves have been developed for certain crop species such as wheat (Allaby et al., 2017), maize (Kistler et al., 2018) and rice (Fuller et al., 2016), con- sisting of the analysis of thousands of cereal spikelets from increasingly large num- bers of sites. Unfortunately, robust domestication curves have not been established for all sexually propagated crops due to the relative scarcity of available archaeobot- anical specimens. Some of these understudied crops have been the focus of microCT studies including sorghum and pearl millet, which were previously assumed to have originated in Sahelian Africa despite some of the earliest evidence of their domesti- cation being located in India (Kahlheber & Neumann, 2007; Winchell et al., 2018). MicroCT was shown to be so useful at identifying sorghum spikelets in ceramics from the site of KG23 in Sudan that it recovered spikelets at a rate of over eleven times the rate of surface impression analysis (Barron et  al., 2020b). The three- dimensional technique was able to identify 82 spikelets in 12 sherds, equating to a rate of 6.83 spikelets per sherd, compared with the two-dimensional technique of surface impression analysis that identified 51 spikelets on 91 sherds at a rate of only 0.56 spikelets per sherd. The addition of these 82 new sorghum spikelets to the pre- viously studied 51 surface spikelets makes the combined KG23 botanical assem- blage the biggest pre-domestication sorghum assemblage known to date. Therefore, this one study of only a handful of sherds has demonstrated the added efficiency and increase in archaeobotanical evidence that can be achieved by imaging organic- tempered pottery using microCT. Murphy and Fuller (2017) and Zong et  al. (2017) have similarly used microCT to image and assess domestication traits in the legume species of soybean and horse gram respectively. Murphy et al. used synchrotron microCT to image and measure seed coat thickness for a selection of archaeological horse gram specimens from India dating from between 2000 and 1200 BC. Seed coat thinning is thought to be linked to cultivation selection due to the resultant reduction in seed dormancy. Murphy et  al. were able to show that horse gram seed coats became thinner over the time period in a stepped progression from thick (older than 1700 BC) to semi- thin (1800 BC to 1300 BC) and from semi-thin to thin (later than 1300 BC). This was the first time seed coat thinning was demonstrated in a legume species from the analysis of archaeological remains and contradicted assumptions that domesticated forms were derived from low dormancy wild populations. They also found there to be considerable variation in seed coat thickness within individual seeds as well as between different seeds. This highlights the importance of the 3D coverage provided by microCT to enable measurements to be taken at multiple points in order to attain the most accurate morphometric data. Zong et  al. (2017) used microCT to investigate the oil content in archaeologi- cal soybeans as oil content has been shown to be higher in modern domesticated varieties than wild plants. They argue that higher oil content in seeds creates small internal holes whereas higher protein content creates large internal holes. By imag- ing soybeans from four archaeological sites in China, dating from between 7500 cal BP to 4000  cal BP, Zong et  al. found that the occurrence of small holes gradually increased over time showing that soybeans with higher oil content were selected for 1 3 A. Barron under cultivation. Murphy et al. (2019), however, have suggested that the presence of holes in archaeobotanical soybeans and their size could be affected by pre-depo- sitional charring and/or preservation conditions. These studies suggest further work is needed, including the analysis of experimentally charred seeds using microCT imaging, before the cavities in soybeans can be conclusively linked to oil content and, by extension, human-mediated selection under cultivation. All of these methods discussed, which use microCT to assess domestication sta- tus, have relied on the technique’s abilities to image internal morphologies and to visualize those morphologies in three-dimensions. While these techniques are in their initial stages of development, they have opened up new avenues of research in geographic regions and for sexually propagated crop species that are significantly underrepresented in the archaeobotanical literature. Asexually‑propagated USOs The archaeological study of asexually propagated crop species is limited in compari- son to sexually propagated crops, particularly cereals (Denham et al., 2020). There are a number of likely reasons why this is the case including their lower archaeo- logical visibility due to the lack of taphonomically robust forms of evidence (i.e. seeds), the complexity of identification methods, as well as lower archaeobotanical sampling in the regions from which many of these crops originate. Despite these issues, the consumption, management and cultivation of asexually propagated crop species have been shown to be extremely ancient practices (Clarkson et  al., 2017; Denham et al., 2003; Florin et al., 2020; Wadley et al., 2020), which have been over- looked archaeologically for many decades creating an incomplete view of ancient subsistence strategies and likely inflating the importance of seed-based agriculture for populations reliant on mixed subsistence practices. A suite of new archaeobotanical techniques has been developed in recent dec- ades to extract, identify and analyse new types of archaeobotanical evidence such as phytoliths (Piperno, 2006), starch (Barton & Torrence, 2006) and archaeological parenchyma (Hather, 2000) produced by asexually propagated plants. These forms of evidence are less archaeologically visible than the macro-remains of sexually- propagated plants and their identification methods can be inconclusive for taxo- nomic characterisation when used in isolation. Therefore, there is a need to more regularly employ a multi-proxy approach in archaeobotany to increase both the qual- ity and quantity of archaeobotanical data (García-Granero et al., 2015). One type of evidence and investigation technique, which remains extremely rare in the literature is the study of preserved fragments of parenchyma tissues from the fleshy, starchy organs of roots, tuber and corms (Hather, 1991, 1993, 1994, 2000; Kubiak-Martens, 2016; Oliveira, 2008, 2012; Paz, 2001, 2005; Ussher, 2015). These are often known collectively as underground storage organs (USOs), or in archaeo- botanical contexts archaeological parenchyma, and include some of the world’s most economically important food crops such as sweet potato, potato, manioc, taro and yams. A robust technique to characterize fragments of these archaeological paren- chyma tissues was developed by Jon Hather in the 1990s (Hather, 1988, 1991, 1993, 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research 1994; 2000; Hather & Kirch, 1991) but its potential to expand archaeobotanical knowledge has yet to be fully exploited (Hather & Mason, 2009; Kubiak-Martens, 2016). As these USO organs are composed of almost entirely undifferentiated starch- storing parenchyma cells and exhibit high levels of intraspecies phenotypic plastic- ity, Hather’s identification method requires the characterisation of a complex range of anatomical and morphological features for each fragment of archaeological par- enchymatous tissue in order to secure a likely taxonomic identification (Hather, 2000; Paz, 2001). These features include surface morphology, tissue organization, vascular bundle arrangement and distribution, calcium oxalate crystals, and patterns of charring or vesicularisation. Some features are considered more diagnostic due to wide interspecific and narrow intraspecific variety than others that present wide intraspecific variability that overlaps significantly with other species and families. One factor restricting the widespread use of Hather’s identification method is that to characterize diagnostic USO features requires the development of extensive and accessible reference collections, which capture the broad range of morpho- logical variability within and between species. The analytical coverage provided by microCT would be more effective at capturing the range of variability than the 2D sampling methods used to date (light microscopy and SEM), which are incapable of illustrating all of the diagnostic features of a single USO sample in a single or small handful of slices. The ability of microCT to capture those diagnostic features identified by Hather has to date been demonstrated by only three studies, Pritchard et al. (2019) and Bar- ron et al., (2022a & b). Pritchard et al. (2019) used SEM and light microcopy images of yam (Dioscorea nummalaria) and sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) reference sam- ples to compare to microCT images of archaeological parenchyma fragments from Kuk Swamp, Papua New Guinea. Similarities in diagnostic features such as vascular bundle arrangement and distribution were found in the reference images for sweet potato to the microCT data for two archaeological parenchyma fragments, thus sup- porting previous identifications of sweet potato (Lewis et  al., 2016). While these results are archaeobotanically robust, the security of taxonomic determination could only be further increased by the scanning of a wide range of relevant reference spe- cies in three-dimensions for direct comparison. Barron et al. (2022a) in their study of five of the most significant asexually-prop- agated crops in Southeast Asia and the Pacific: taro (Colocasia esculenta), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), giant taro (Alocosia macrorrhiza), and two yams spe- cies, Dioscorea esculenta and Dioscorea alata, have taken the first steps towards compiling an archaeological reference collection of archaeological parenchyma spe- cies using microCT. The five species study scanned Hather’s own charred reference specimens and used his diagnostic criteria as a guide to differentiation of plant fami- lies and species but was also generally focused on qualitative pattern recognition between datasets, as it was assumed that by imaging these organs in three-dimen- sions for the first time new and different features of characterisation would be also captured. It is also likely that complex patterns of differentiation exist in parenchym- atous organs that are not apparent to a human analyst but could be identified with the application of deep learning processes as discussed below. 1 3 A. Barron One significant factor noted by Barron et al. (2022a) was that variation of features such as cell size and shape, damage from charring and the distinction between tis- sue layers was incredibly high even within individual USO fragments. This variation showed that imaging of whole archaeological samples is incredibly important as the characterisation of a USO based on a single 2D image could be extremely mislead- ing as to the nature of the whole organ. Another feature of the reference samples scanned is that there is a much wider range of calcium oxalate crystal-types in sam- ples of the same species than has been documented previously. Samples of taro and sweet potato displayed a variety of crystal types and sizes that suggested some oxa- late crystal attributes could provide more information regarding the environmental growth conditions of a USO organ than species identification and so a combination of characteristics must be taken into consideration, including crystal size, shape, fre- quency and distribution. The reference collection being compiled by Barron et al. (2022a) is planned to be expanded to include other species of USO species significant to the Southeast Asia, Pacific and Oceania regions as well as to be made publically available online to aid in more robust and frequent archaeological parenchyma identifications as well as in the hopes of making the analysis of archaeological parenchyma more accessible.. By making 3D volumes of reference and archaeological samples available online, this will enable other researchers to interrogate those datasets, and any interpreta- tions that may be the result of subjective interpretation by the observer (Baveye, et  al., 2010) as well as facilitate intersample comparability. Barron et al.’s (2022b) subsequent successful use of microCT reference datasets to identify archaeological parenchyma fragments from Nombe, Papua New Guinea, as sweet potato sp. shows that the identification of archaeological parenchyma is a complex process that can benefit from the 3D morphological complexity provided by microCT scanning of relelvant reference specimens. Future Applications The potential for using microCT imaging in archaeobotany is just beginning to be explored. MicroCT scanning technology and 3D image processing capabilities con- tinue to improve, the technique’s benefits to the field could increase exponentially. While a number of novel archaeobotanical applications have already been developed as outlined above, their application to the analysis of larger quantities of samples will ultimately demonstrate the technique’s potential to transform traditional archae- obotanical approaches by the quantity, quality and robustness of results. Subse- quently, the technique could aid in reforming and reframing current archaeobotani- cal questions and assumptions by significantly expanding, what are in some fields, incredibly small pools of available evidence. The two forms of information that microCT has contributed to the archaeobot- anical studies outlined above are: internal morphologies and secure quantitative, and specifically volumetric, measurements. Therefore, it has been shown that microCT can prove useful in answering archaeobotanical questions reliant on these two kinds of information. The technique could also provide useful in  situations where small 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research quantities of fragile or valuable samples exist from which it is important to obtain maximum amounts of information and/or those samples are intended to be used for other destructive sampling methods if it is deemed appropriate. The non-destructive nature of microCT means it can be used for morphological imaging before the appli- cation of subsequent analytical methods, in a similar way to how it has been applied in a number of geoarchaeological studies, as a complementary technique to more traditional methods, as one component in a suite of analytical approaches (Calo et al., 2020; Edwards et al., 2017; Huisman et al., 2014; Machado et al., 2017). The risk with 3D imaging is the temptation to produce large amounts of three- dimensional, high-resolution data under the assumption that this will produce equiv- alently significant results. However, the sheer amount of data produced by microCT can mean that it becomes difficult for even specialist individuals to manually sort through and extract the maximum amount of relevant and/or useful information con- tained in a single dataset (Barron et  al., 2020a). Additionally, these large datasets are currently difficult to store, especially if large reference collections of even tens of samples are compiled, which could equate to many terabytes of data (see Rowe & Frank, 2011 for overview of problems relating to 3D data storage). For example, the 30 datasets analysed by Barron et al. (2022a) representing just five USO species added up to a combined total of 3 terabytes of data. Therefore, using current user- driven processing methods, unless significant time and expertise can be allocated to manual data analysis, it may in many instances be difficult to justify the economic costs of microCT, which for individual samples are much greater than light micros- copy or SEM. The economic costs can be made much more affordable by the scan- ning of many archaeobotanical samples in a single scan and, in the future, the time and energy costs could become much more reasonable with the automation of some or all of the data processing stages. Currently, the dominant trend in 3D data processing is towards the automation of segmentation and analysis processes in order to exploit the ever increasing amounts of data that high-resolution 3D imaging produces. The automation of segmenting microCT datasets can be achieved relatively easily, depending on the sample type and specific research questions, by establishing a series of algorithmic filters through which data is progressively processed to extract all of the specified relevant informa- tion. Simple filters include those discussed above that are widely used to segment geo- logical and botanical samples such greyscale values or gradient, size, shape, or con- nectedness. These series of filters can then be applied to batches of microCT scans to process large amounts of data extremely quickly. Herremans et  al. (2015) developed an automated segmentation protocol to segment void and cell networks of fruit paren- chyma tissues and identified significant differences between genotypes. Segmentation protocols using the same basic concept could be developed in the future to aid in the characterisation and identification of archaeobotanical specimens. The process of automating data segmentation of rice spikelet bases from a pot- tery sherd has been trialed by the author on a rice-tempered sherd from Gua Sireh that was previously analysed by Barron et al. (2020a). In the previous study, only 50 rice spikelet bases were analysed due to the sheer number of spikelet bases found to be contained within the sherd and the long processing times required for each individual spikelet base. While it is relatively easy to segment out all of the organic 1 3 A. Barron inclusions in a sherd using basic greyscale thresholding, the segmented organic frac- tion will inevitably include large amounts of undiagnostic chaff, including husk, leaf and stem fragments, as the organic materials used for temper would have included all the waste products leftover from the rice processing stages (see Harvey & Fuller, 2005; Fig.  3). Therefore, following greyscale thresholding a series of data filters were needed to label each isolated inclusion and then to exclude as much chaff mate- rial as possible while selecting the spikelet bases. The most effective way to achieve this was to filter the data by shape, selecting only the roughly spherical spikelet bases (not the rod-like or more irregular chaff fragments), and by size, eliminating those inclusions with voxels volumes significantly larger or small than the average spikelet base morphology. The visual results of this segmentation process are shown in Fig.  5 including a microCT greyscale slice (5A), the same slice with labelled inclusions after segmentation by size and shape (5B), the same slice with greyscale values of segmented inclusions (5C), and a 3D rendering of segmented inclusions, most of which represent rice spikelet bases (5D). The difficulties of working with archaeological data became apparent during this segmentation experiment and the major barriers to automation were identi- fied. The lack of control over archaeological data, its lack of structure, and pos- sible taphonomic alteration make it incredibly difficult to standardize archaeo- logical imaging protocols. This was evident when attempting to filter the chaff data by shape and size with the overlapping nature of the chaff material resulting in many individual spikelet bases not able to be isolated and, therefore, excluded from subsequent analyses. There were also many chaff pieces that were similar enough to spikelet bases in shape and size that they were not excluded from the segmentation. These issues are not unique to archaeological data, however, they add levels of complexity that do not exist in other fields, such as industrial engi- neering and manufacturing, and will require more complex processing than has yet been attempted in the field of archaeobotany. A B D Fig. 5 Segmentation process to separate rice spikelet bases from tomographic data of whole rice-tem- pered pottery sherd. A. 2D x-ray slice of sherd showing rice temper (lower x-ray attenuation) in black. B. Isolation and labelling of each rice spikelet base based on x-ray attenuation, size and shape. C. 2D slice of isolated rice spikelet bases with x-ray attenuation values. D. 3D rendering of rice spikelet bases from slice A-C (closest to camera) plus all spikelets bases in subsequent slices 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Machine learning The Gua Sireh rice spikelet base segmentation outlined above was undertaken in order to prepare the dataset to be used as a baseline teaching dataset in the devel- opment of a neural network able to automatically identify wild and domesticated rice spikelet bases. Neural networks are essentially sets of algorithms that utilize machine learning to numerically recognize patterns in order to cluster and label data. To prepare the Gua Sireh segmented dataset for training a neural network, half of the individual labelled inclusions were visualized and designated as either ‘a spikelet base’ or ‘not a spikelet base’, the domestication status of the spikelet bases was qualitatively assessed by two specialist archaeobotanists and then the characteri- sation of each inclusion was compiled. In the future, this information will be the initial input layer of a neural network to enable distinction between spikelet bases and non-spikelet bases as well as domes- ticated and wild abscission scar morphologies. The neural network will then be tested against the other half of the inclusions in the Gua Sireh dataset and the results assessed by manual specialist analysis. Multiple iterations of this process are likely to be required before high levels of accuracy can be achieved. The development of this new neural network is ongoing and the initial results appear promising. If the results are successful for the Gua Sireh rice spikelet bases, the neural network could be used to analyse scans of multiple pottery sherds with hundreds of rice spikelet inclusions almost instantaneously. However, to analyse spikelets of other cereal spe- cies used as temper, new neural networks would need to be established to recognize the distinct domestication syndrome traits for each cereal crop species. In archaeobotany, an attempt has previously been made by Wilson et al. (2010) to use supervised learning algorithms to automate the process of taxonomically iden- tifying starch grains from nine crop species. To do so they measured a series of variables relating to the shape, size, curvature and polarization cross of starch grains from botanical reference specimens, to produce the initial input layer of data used to establish the starch grain output labels and their characteristics. The measurements of taxonomically known starch grains were then fed into the network as a test data- set in order to assess the network’s ability to classify each starch grain based on the characteristics of the reference species. The rates of successfully identifying unla- beled starch grains were extremely variable, falling between 14–85% depending on the species. These results illustrate that some species of starch grains possess signifi- cant morphological overlap and, using current methods, cannot yet be robustly iden- tified to species level. Significantly, the authors noted that the results were limited by the fact that they only utilized 2D light-microscopy images meaning that the 3D starch grains would have all been measured in differing orientations. This additional variation is a problem that three-dimensional imaging methods, such as microCT, can be used to overcome. Kobayashi et  al., (2015, 2019) have used CT data of wood reference samples to develop a series of feature extractor and classifier algorithms to automate the identifica- tion of wood species of valuable cultural artefacts. Their input reference data consisted of 10 wood samples from 8 of the most commonly used wood species for Japanese sculptures. While their base datasets were three-dimensional CT scans, the images 1 3 A. Barron selected for feature extraction and classification consisted of 40 two-dimensional slices from each 3D dataset precisely cropped to provide clear transverse sections. To date, Kobayashi et al.’s method has shown promising results, having identified 10 wood sam- ples accurately, however, more species and more samples of each species will ensure more robust results in the future. Deep learning Deep learning networks could also be utilised in the future to tackle particularly com- plex archaeobotanical analyses, like the identification of USO species of archaeological parenchyma, both efficiently and reliably. Deep-learning is a form of machine-learning that can automatically extract features from raw data as that data is processed through multiple hidden layers of algorithmic filtration before classification. Essentially, deep learning has the ability to determine the appropriate parameters for classification inde- pendently, thus creating a classification process that is entirely automated from end-to- end (LeCun et  al., 2015; Schmidhuber, 2015). Deep learning algorithms are already revolutionizing research in fields such as biometrics (Sundararajan & Woodard, 2018), visual, audio and text classification (Minaee et  al., 2021), social network analysis (Pouyanfar et al., 2019) and medicine (Wang et al., 2019), including to accurately diag- nose Covid-19 in lung CT scans (Wang et al., 2021). Most importantly, deep learning processes benefit from large data inputs, as the more data available for analysis creates more robust networks. Therefore, deep learn- ing is a way of exploiting the increasingly large size of 3D datasets created by microCT scanning and extracting the maximum amount of diagnostic information, some of which may not even be evident to a human specialist through visual inspection. In archaeobotany, a deep-learning network could prove particularly useful in differentiat- ing intraspecies and interspecies variation in USOs considering it is already difficult for a human user to quantify the range of variation of some features across single samples or individual species. The technique could also be incredibly useful in efforts to estab- lish and describe a set (or sets) of traits that combine to form a domestication syndrome in these asexually-propagated USO crops by compiling microCT data of a range of ancient and modern samples and determining qualitative and/or quantitative differences between the two. Conclusions Despite computed tomography’s long history of use in archaeology, the potential benefits of utilizing the technique for archaeobotanical research has only begun to be explored in the last ten years. The advent of microCT, with its ever increasing image resolution, coupled with advances in computational processing power mean that microCT’s research capabilities are constantly expanding. A range of microCT visualization and analytical methodologies have been developed in related fields such as archaeology, geosciences, botany and palaeobotany, which could be applied, or adapted for application to a range of archaeobotanical materials. In addition, a 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research handful of recent archaeobotanical studies have presented novel quantitative and qualitative microCT methodologies and identified potential new forms of evidence, which can be extracted from previously excavated materials. These novel method- ologies have already been shown to have expanded the extremely limited knowledge we have of the origins and spread of some of the world’s most economically impor- tant food crops, including a range of sexually-propagated cereal and legume species, and aided in the secure identification of remains of some of the most understudied crops, asexually-propagated underground storage organs. The amount of information produced by microCT imaging may not be required for all archaeobotanical stud- ies and, currently, scanning costs and analysis times are high. However, the rapid development of machine- and deep-learning networks could, in the future, enable extremely fast and efficient analysis of large numbers of samples and/or extremely robust classifications of complex forms of evidence, leading to more widespread use of the technique in the field of archaeobotany. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank the National Laboratory for X-ray Micro Computed Tomography (ANU CTLab), particularly Levi Beeching and Michael Turner, for access to and use of microCT scanning facilities as well as Tim Senden, Jill Middleton and Mohammad Saadatfar, Research School of Physics and Engineering (ANU), for their support. Many thanks also to Tim Denham for his guidance and encouragement during the compilation of this review. This research was funded by an Aus- tralian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship to Barron. Funding Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions The author has no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article. Data Availability CT data used for figures is available from the author upon request. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Com- mons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. References Adderley, W. P., Simpson, I. A., & MacLeod, G. W. (2001). Testing high-resolution X-ray computed tomography for the micromorphological analyses of archaeological soils and sediments. Archaeo- logical Prospection, 8(2), 107–112. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ 1099- 0763(200106) 8:2% 3c107:: AID- ARP152% 3e3.0. CO;2-A Allaby, R. G., Stevens, C., Lucas, L., Maeda, O., & Fuller, D. Q. (2017). Geographic mosaics and chang- ing rates of cereal domestication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1735), 20160429. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rstb. 2016. 0429 Allam, A. H., Thompson, R. C., Wann, L. S., Miyamoto, M. I., & Thomas, G. S. (2009). Computed Tomographic Assessment of Atherosclerosis in Ancient Egyptian Mummies. JAMA, 302(19), 2091–2094. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ JAMA. 2009. 1641 Allegra, D., Ciliberto, E., Ciliberto, P., Petrillo, G., Stanco, F., & Trombatore, C. (2016). X-ray computed tomography for virtually unrolling damaged papyri. Applied Physics A, 122(3), 256. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00339- 016- 9796-1 1 3 A. Barron Ambrose, J. (1976). Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part II. Clinical Application. British Journal of Radiology, 46(552), 1023–1047. Anderson, T., & Fell, C. (1995). Analysis of Roman Cremation Vessels by Computerized Tomography. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 609–617. Appelboom, T., & Struyven, J. (1999). Medical imaging of the Peruvian mummy Rascar Capac. The Lan- cet, 354(9196), 2153–2155. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0140- 6736(99) 07113-5 Applbaum, N., Applbaum, Y. H., & Horowitz, W. (1995). Imaging with the Aid of Computed Tomogra- phy of Sealed Documents from the Ur III Period. Archaeology and Science Bulletin, 3, 8–12. Appleby, J., Rutty, G. N., Hainsworth, S. V., Woosnam-Savage, R. C., Morgan, B., Brough, A., Earp, R. W., Robinson, C., King, T. E., Morris, M., & Buckley, R. (2015). Perimortem trauma in King Richard III: A skeletal analysis. The Lancet, 385(9964), 253–259. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0140- 6736(14) 60804-7 Baldock, C., Hughes, S. W., Whittaker, D. K., Taylor, J., Davis, R., Spencer, A. J., Tonge, K., & Sofat, A. (1994). 3-D reconstruction of an ancient Egyptian mummy using X-ray computer tomography. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 87(12), 806. Barron, A., & Denham, T. (2018). A microCT protocol for the visualisation and identification of domes- ticated plant remains within pottery sherds. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 21, 350– 358. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JASREP. 2018. 07. 024 Barron, A., Datan, I., Bellwood, P., Wood, R., Fuller, D. Q., & Denham, T. (2020a). Sherds as archaeo- botanical assemblages: Gua Sireh reconsidered. Antiquity, 94(377), 1325–1336. https:// doi. org/ 10. 15184/ aqy. 2020. 166 Barron, A., Fuller, D. Q., Stevens, C., Champion, L., Winchell, F., & Denham, T. (2020b). Snapshots in time: MicroCT scanning of pottery sherds determines early domestication of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in East Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 123, 105259. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2020. 105259 Barron, A., Pritchard, J., & Denham, T. (2022a). Identifying archaeological parenchyma in three dimen- sions: Diagnostic assessment of five important food plant species in the Indo-Pacific region. Archaeology in Oceania, 57(3), 189–213. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ arco. 5276 Barron, A., Mountain, M., & Denham, T. A. (2022b). MicroCT scanning and direct AMS dating of charred sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) fragments from Nombe rockshelter in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. Archaeology in Oceania, 57(2), 146–149. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ ARCO. 5266 Barron, A., Turner, M., Beeching, L., Bellwood, P., Piper, P., Grono, E., Jones, R., Oxenham, M., Kien, N. K. T., Senden, & T. Denham, T. (2017). MicroCT reveals domesticated rice (Oryza sativa) within pottery sherds from early Neolithic sites (4150–3265 cal BP) in Southeast Asia. Scientific Reports, 7(1). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 017- 04338-9 Barton, H., & Torrence, R. (2006).Ancient starch research. Left Coast Press Baruchel, J., Buffiere, J. Y., Cloetens, P., Di Michiel, M., Ferrie, E., Ludwig, W., Maire, E., & Salvo, L. (2006). Advances in synchrotron radiation microtomography. Scripta Materialia, 55(1), 41–46. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. SCRIP TAMAT. 2006. 02. 012 Baveye, P. C., Laba, M., Otten, W., Bouckaert, L., Dello Sterpaio, P., Goswami, R. R., Grinev, D., Hou- ston, A., Hu, Y., Liu, J., Mooney, S., Pajor, R., Sleutel, S., Tarquis, A., Wang, W., Wei, Q., & Sezgin, M. (2010). Observer-dependent variability of the thresholding step in the quantitative anal- ysis of soil images and X-ray microtomography data. Geoderma, 157(1–2), 51–63. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. GEODE RMA. 2010. 03. 015 Beck, L., Cuif, J.-P., Pichon, L., Vaubaillon, S., Dambricourt Malassé, A., & Abel, R. L. (2012). Check- ing collagen preservation in archaeological bone by non-destructive studies (Micro-CT and IBA). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, B, 273, 203–207. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. nimb. 2011. 07. 076 Beckmann, E. C. (2006). CT scanning the early days. British Journal of Radiology, 79(937), 5–8. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1259/ BJR/ 29444 122 Bello, S. M., De Groote, I., & Delbarre, G. (2013a). Application of 3-dimensional microscopy and micro- CT scanning to the analysis of Magdalenian portable art on bone and antler. Journal of Archaeologi- cal Science, 40, 2464–2476. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2012. 12. 016 Bello, S. M., Parfitt, S. A., De Groote, I., & Kennaway, G. (2013b). Investigating experimental knapping damage on an antler hammer: A pilot-study using high-resolution imaging and analytical tech- niques. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40, 4528–4537. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2013. 07. 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Bellwood, P., Gillespie, R., Thompson, G. B., Vogel, J. S., Ardika, I. W., & Datan, I. (1992). New Dates for Prehistoric Asian Rice. Asian Perspectives, 31(2), 161–170. Bermúdez De Castro, J. M., Martinón-Torres, M., Gómez-Robles, A., Prado-Simón, L., Martín-Francés, L., Lapresa, M., Olejniczak, A., & Carbonell, E. (2011). Early Pleistocene human mandible from Sima del Elefante (TE) cave site in Sierra de Atapuerca (Spain): A comparative morphological study. Journal of Human Evolution, 61, 12–25. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhevol. 2011. 03. 005 Bernardini, F., Sibilia, E., Kasztovszky, Z., Boscutti, F., De Min, A., Lenaz, D., Turco, G., Micheli, R., Tuniz, C., & Kokelj, M. M. (2018). Evidence of open-air late prehistoric occupation in the Trieste area (north-eastern Italy): Dating, 3D clay plaster characterization and obsidian prov- enancing. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10, 1933–1943. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s12520- 017- 0504-7 Bernardini, F., Leghissa, E., Prokop, D., Velušček, A., De Min, A., Dreossi, D., Donato, S., Tuniz, C., Princivalle, F., & Kokelj, M. M. (2019). X-ray computed microtomography of Late Copper Age decorated bowls with cross-shaped foots from central Slovenia and the Trieste Karst (North-East- ern Italy): Technology and paste characterisation. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11, 4711–4728. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s12520- 019- 00811-w Bertrand, L., Cotte, M., Stampanoni, M., Thoury, M., Marone, F., & Schöder, S. (2012). Development and trends in synchrotron studies of ancient and historical materials. Physics Reports, 519, 51–96. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. physr ep. 2012. 03. 003 Bhuiyan, I. U., Mouzon, J., Forsberg, F., Forsmo, S. P. E., Sjödahl, M., & Hedlund, J. (2012). Considera- tion of X-ray microtomography to quantitatively determine the size distribution of bubble cavities in iron ore pellets. Powder Technology, 233, 312–318. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. powtec. 2012. 09. Bird, M. I., Ascough, P. L., Young, I. M., Wood, C. V., & Scott, A. C. (2008). X-ray microtomographic imaging of charcoal. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2698–2706. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2008. 04. 018 Bishop, R. R. (2021). Hunter-gatherer carbohydrate consumption: plant roots and rhizomes as staple foods in Mesolithic Europe. World Archaeology, 53(2) https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 00438 243. 2021. 20027 15 Bishop, R. R., Kubiak-Martens, L., Warren, G. M., & Church, M. J. (2022). Getting to the root of the problem: New evidence for the use of plant root foods in Mesolithic hunter-gatherer sub- sistence in Europe. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 1–19. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S00334- 022- 00882-1 Booth, T. J., Redfern, R. C., & Gowland, R. L. (2016). Immaculate conceptions: Micro-CT analysis of diagenesis in Romano-British infant skeletons. Journal of Archaeological Science, 74, 124–134. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2016. 08. 007 Boschin, F., Bernardini, F., Zanolli, C., & Tuniz, C. (2015). MicroCT Imaging of Red fox Talus: A Non- Invasive Approach to Evaluate Age at Death. Archaeometry, 57, 194–211. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ arcm. 12122 Boyer, D. M., Puente, J., Gladman, J. T., Glynn, C., Mukherjee, S., Yapuncich, G. S., & Daubechies, I. (2015). A New Fully Automated Approach for Aligning and Comparing Shapes. The Anatomical Record, 298(1), 249–276. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ AR. 23084 Bradfield, J. (2018) Identifying animal taxa used to manufacture bone tools during the Middle Stone Age at Sibudu, South Africa: Results of a CT-rendered histological analysis. PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0208319. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 02083 19 Brodersen, C. R. (2013). Visualizing wood anatomy in three dimensions with high-resolution X-ray micro-tomography (μCT ) – a review. IAWA Journal, 34(4), 408–424. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1163/ 22941 932- 00000 033 Brodersen, C. R., Lee, E. F., Choat, B., Jansen, S., Phillips, R. J., Shackel, K. A., McElrone, A. J., & Matthews, M. A. (2011). Automated analysis of three-dimensional xylem networks using high- resolution computed. The New Phytologist, 191(4), 1168–1179. Brooks, R. A., & Chiro, D. G. (1976). Principles of computer assisted tomography (CAT) in radiographic and radioisotopic imaging. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 21(5), 689. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1088/ 0031- 9155/ 21/5/ 001 Bude, R. O., & Bigelow, E. M. R. (2020). Nano-CT evaluation of totally corroded coins: A demonstration study to determine if detail might still be discernible despite the lack of internal, non-corroded, metal. Archaeometry, 62(6), 1195–1201. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ arcm. 12589 1 3 A. Barron Calo, C. M., Rizzutto, M. A., Watling, J., Furquim, L., Shock, M. P., Andrello, A. C., Appoloni, C. R., Freitas, F. O., Kistler, L., Zimpel, C. A., Hermenegildo, T., Neves, E. G., & Pugliese, F. A. (2019). Study of plant remains from a fluvial shellmound (Monte Castelo, RO, Brazil) using the X-ray MicroCT imaging technique. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 26, 101902. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JASREP. 2019. 101902 Calo, M., Rizzutto, M. A., Carmello-Guerreiro, S. M., Dias, C. S. B., Watling, J., Shock, M. P., Zimpel, C. A., Furquim, L. P., Pugliese, F., & Neves, G. (2020). A correlation analysis of Light Microscopy and X-ray Microct imaging methods applied to archaeological plant remains’ morphological attrib- utes visualization.Scientific Reports, 10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 020- 71726-z Cássaro, F. A. M., Durand, A. N. P., Gimenez, D., & Vaz, C. M. P. (2017). Pore-Size Distributions of Soils Derived using a Geometrical Approach and Multiple Resolution MicroCT Images. Soil Sci- ence Society of America Journal, 81(3), 468–476. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2136/ SSSAJ 2016. 09. 0291 Castillo, C., & Fuller, D. Q. (2010). Still too fragmentary and dependent upon chance? Advances in the study of early Southeast Asian archaeobotany. In B. Bellina (Ed.), 50 Years of Archaeology in Southeast Asia: Essays in Honour of Ian Glover (pp. 91–111). River Books. Cheng, Q., Zhang, X., Guo, J., Wang, B., Lei, Y., Zhou, G., & Fu, Ya’nan. (2019). Application of com- puted tomography in the analysis of glass beads unearthed in Shanpula cemetery (Khotan), Xin- jiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11, 937–945. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s12520- 017- 0582-6 Chirol, C., Carr, S. J., Spencer, K. L., & Moeller, I. (2021). Pore, live root and necromass quantifica- tion in complex heterogeneous wetland soils using X-ray computed tomography. Geoderma, 387, 114898. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. GEODE RMA. 2020. 114898 Chityala, R. N., Hoffmann, K. R., Bednarek, D. R., & Rudin, S. (2004). Region of Interest (ROI) Com- puted Tomography. Proceedings of SPIE-the International Society for Optical Engineering, 5368(2), 534. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1117/ 12. 534568 Clarkson, C., Jacobs, Z., Marwick, B., Fullagar, R., Wallis, L., Smith, M., Roberts, R. G., Hayes, E., Lowe, K., Carah, X., Florin, S. A., McNeil, J., Cox, D., Arnold, L. J., Hua, Q., Huntley, J., Brand, H. E. A., Manne, T., Fairbairn, A., … Pardoe, C. (2017). Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago. Nature, 547(7663), 306–310. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ natur e22968 Cnudde, V., & Boone, M. N. (2013). High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: A review of the current technology and applications. Earth-Science Reviews, 123, 1–17. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. earsc irev. 2013. 04. 003 Cnudde, V., Dewanckele, J., De Boever, W., Brabant, L., De Kock, T., 2012. 3D characterization of grain size distributions in sandstone by means of X-ray computed tomography. In P. Sylvester (Ed.), Quantitative Mineralogy and Microanalysis of Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks (pp. 99–113). Mineralogical Association of Canada (MAC) Coli, V. L., Gomart, L., Pisani, D. F., Cohen, S., Blanc-Féraud, L., Leblond, J., & Binder, D. (2022). Microcomputed tomography for discriminating between different forming techniques in ancient pottery: New segmentation method and pore distribution recognition. Archaeometry, 64(1), 84–99. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ ARCM. 12693 Collinson, M. E., Adams, N. F., Manchester, S. R., Stull, G. W., Herrera, F., Smith, S. Y., Andrew, M. J., Kenrick, P.&, Sykes, D. (2016). X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) of pyrite-permin- eralized fruits and seeds from the London Clay Formation (Ypresian) conserved in silicone oil: a critical evaluation1. Https://Doi-Org.Virtual.Anu.Edu.Au/https:// doi. org/ 10. 1139/ Cjb- 2016- 0078, 94(9), 697–711 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1139/ CJB- 2016- 0078 Cosmacini, P., & Piacentini, P. (2008). Notes on the history of the radiological study of Egyptian mum- mies: From X-rays to new imaging techniques. La Radiologia Medica, 113, 615–626. Coubray, S., Zech-Matterne, V., & Mazurier, A. (2010). The earliest remains of a Citrus fruit from a west- ern Mediterranean archaeological context? A microtomographic-based re-assessment. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 9, 277–282. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. crpv. 2010. 07. 003 Coutinho Nogueira, D., Dutour, O., Coqueugniot, H., & Tillier, A.-M. (2019). Qafzeh 9 mandible (ca 90–100 kyrs BP, Israel) revisited: μ-CT and 3D reveal new pathological conditions. International Journal of Paleopathology, 26, 104–110. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijpp. 2019. 06. 002 Cramer, L., Brix, A., Matin, E., Rühli, F., & Hussein, K. (2018). Computed Tomography-Detected Paleo- pathologies in Ancient Egyptian Mummies. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, 47, 225– 232. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1067/j. cprad iol. 2017. 06. 012 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research De Beer, F. C., Botha, H., Ferg, E., Grundlingh, R., & Smith, A. (2009). Archaeology benefits from neutron tomography investigations in South Africa. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 605, 167–170. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. nima. 2009. 01. 213 Denham, T. (2013). Early farming in Island Southeast Asia: An alternative hypothesis. Antiquity, 87(335), 250–257. Denham, T. P., Haberle, S. G., Lentfer, C., Fullagar, R., Field, J., Therin, M., Porch, N., & Winsbor- ough, B. (2003). Origins of agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of New Guinea. Science, 301(5630), 189–193. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 10852 55 Denham, T., Atchison, J., Austin, J., Bestel, S., Bowdery, D., Crowther, A., Dolby, N., Fairbairn, A., Field, J., Kennedy, A., Lentfer, C., Matheson, C., Nugent, S., Parr, J., Prebble, M., Robertson, G., Specht, J., Torrence, R., Barton, H., … Matthews, P. (2009). Archaeobotany in Australia and New Guinea: Practice. Potential and Prospects. Archaeology, 68, 1–10. Denham, T. P., Barton, H., Castillo, C., Crowther, A., Dotte-Sarout, E., Florin, S. A., Pritchard, J., Bar- ron, A., Zhang, Y., & Fuller, D. Q. (2020). The domestication syndrome in vegetatively propagated field crops. Annals of Botany, 125, 581–597. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ aob/ mcz212 Devore, M. L., Kenrick, P., Pigg, K. B., & Ketcham, R. A. (2006). Utility of High Resolution X-ray Com- puted Tomography (HRXCT) for Paleobotanical Studies: An Example Using London Clay Fruits. American Journal of Botany, 93(12), 1848–1851. Dhondt, S., Vanhaeren, H., Loo, D. V., Cnudde, V., & Inzé, D. (2010). Plant structure visualization by high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Trends in Plant Science, 15(8), 419–422. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. tplan ts. 2010. 05. 002 Diamond, J., & Bellwood., P. (2003) Farmers and Their Languages: The First Expansions. Science, 300(5619), 597-603. http://doi.org/https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 10782 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 10782 Donohue, M., & Denham, T. P. (2010). Farming and Language in Island Southeast Asia Reframing Aus- tronesian History. Current Anthropology, 51(2), 223–256. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ 650991 Douarre, C., Schielein, R., Frindel, C., Gerth, S., & Rousseau, D. (2018). Transfer learning from syn- thetic data applied to soil–root segmentation in X-ray tomography images. Journal of Imaging, 4(5). https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ JIMAG ING40 50065 Du Plessis, A., Broeckhoven, C., Guelpa, A., & Gerhard Le Roux, S. (2017). Laboratory x-ray micro- computed tomography: A user guideline for biological samples. GigaScience, 6, 1–11. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ gigas cience/ gix027 Earles, J. M., Knipfer, T., Tixier, A., Orozco, J., Reyes, C., Zwieniecki, M. A., Brodersen, C. R., & McEl- rone, A. J. (2018). In  vivo quantification of plant starch reserves at micrometer resolution using X-ray microCT imaging and machine learning. New Phytologist, 218(3), 1260–1269. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ NPH. 15068 Edwards, T., Grono, E., Herries, A. I. R., Brink, F. J., Troitzsch, U., Senden, T., Turner, M., Barron, A., Prossor, L., & Denham, T. (2017). Visualising scales of process: Multi-scalar geoarchaeological investigations of microstratigraphy and diagenesis at hominin bearing sites in South African karst. Journal of Archaeological Science, 83, 1–11. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2017. 05. 007 Elliott, J. C., & Dover, S. D. (1982). X-ray microtomography. Journal of Microscopy, 126, 211–213. Elliott, J. C., & Dover, S. D. (1985). X-ray microscopy using computerized axial tomography. Journal of Microscopy, 138(3), 329–331. Ersoy, O., Şen, E., Aydar, E., Tatar, İ, & Çelik, H. H. (2010). Surface area and volume measurements of volcanic ash particles using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT): A comparison with scan- ning electron microscope (SEM) stereoscopic imaging and geometric considerations. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 196, 281–286. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jvolg eores. 2010. 08. 004 Falke, T. H., Zweypfenning-Snijders, M. C., Zweypfenning, R. C., & James, A. E. (1987). Computed tomography of an ancient Egyptian cat. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 11, 745–747. Feldkamp, L. A., & Jesion, G. (1986). 3-D X-ray Computed Tomography. In Review of Progress in Quan- titative Nondestructive Evaluation (Vol. 5 A, pp. 555–566). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-1- 4615- 7763-8_ 57 Flannery, B. P., Deckman, H. W., Roberge, W. G., & D’Amico, K. L. (1987). Three-dimensional X-ray microtomography. Science, 237(4821), 1439–1444. Flavel, R. J., Guppy, C. N., Rabbi, S. M. R., & Young, I. M. (2017). An image processing and analy- sis tool for identifying and analysing complex plant root systems in 3D soil using non-destructive analysis: Root1. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0176433. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ JOURN AL. PONE. 01764 33 1 3 A. Barron Florin, S. A., Fairbairn, A. S., Nango, M., Djandjomerr, D., Marwick, B., Fullagar, R., Smith, M., Wallis, L., & Clarkson, C. (2020). The first Australian plant foods at Madjedbebe, 65000–53000 years ago. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–8. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41467- 020- 14723-0 Franceschi, V. R., & Nakata, P. A. (2005). Calcium Oxalate in Plants: Formation and Function. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 56, 41–71. Frangi, A. F., Niessen, W. J., Vincken, K. L., & Viergever, M. A. (1998). Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. In W. Wells, A. Colchester, & S. Delp (Eds.), Medical image computing and computer- assisted intervention (pp. 130–137). Springer. Frank, L. R., Rowe, T. B., Boyer, D. M., Witmer, L. M., & Galinsky, V. L. (2021). Unveiling the third dimension in morphometry with automated quantitative volumetric computations. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–23. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 021- 93490-4 Friis, E. M., Marone, F., Pedersen, K. R., Crane, P. R., & Stampanoni, M. (2014). Three-dimensional visualization of fossil flowers, fruits, seeds, and other plant remains using synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM): New insights into Cretaceous plant diversity. Journal of Paleontology, 88(4), 684–701. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1666/ 13- 099 Fuller, D. Q. (2007). Contrasting Patterns in Crop Domestication and Domestication Rates: Recent Archaeobotanical Insights from the Old World. Annals of Botany, 100, 903–924. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ aob/ mcm048 Fuller, D. Q., Asouti, E., & Purugganan, M. D. (2012). Cultivation as slow evolutionary entanglement: Comparative data on rate and sequence of domestication. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 21(2), 131–145. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00334- 011- 0329-8 Fuller, D. Q., Denham, T., Arroyo-Kalin, M., Lucas, L., Stevens, C. J., Qin, L., Allaby, R. G., & Purug- ganan, M. D. (2014). Convergent evolution and parallelism in plant domestication revealed by an expanding archaeological record. PNAS, 111(17), 6147–6152. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 13089 Fuller, D. Q., Weisskopf, A. R., & Castillo, C. C. (2016). Pathways of Rice Diversification across Asia. Archaeology International, 19, 84–96. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5334/ AI. 1915 Fuller, D. Q., Barron, A., Champion, L., Dupuy, C., Commelin, D., Raimbault, M., & Denham, T. (2021). Transition From Wild to Domesticated Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum) Revealed in Ceramic Temper at Three Middle Holocene Sites in Northern Mali. African Archaeological Review, 38, 211–230. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10437- 021- 09428-8 Galinsky, V. L., & Frank, L. R. (2014). Automated segmentation and shape characterization of volumet- ric data. NeuroImage, 92, 156–168. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. NEURO IMAGE. 2014. 01. 053 Gao, T., Yapuncich, G. S., Daubechies, I., Mukherjee, S., & Boyer, D. M. (2018). Development and Assessment of Fully Automated and Globally Transitive Geometric Morphometric Methods, With Application to a Biological Comparative Dataset With High Interspecific Variation. The Anatomi- cal Record, 301(4), 636–658. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ AR. 23700 Gao, W., Schlüter, S., Blaser, S. R. G. A., Shen, J., & Vetterlein, D. (2019). A shape-based method for automatic and rapid segmentation of roots in soil from X-ray computed tomography images: Root- ine. Plant and Soil, 441(1–2), 643–655. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S11104- 019- 04053-6/ FIGUR ES/6 García-Granero, J. J., Lancelotti, C., & Madella, M. (2015). A tale of multi-proxies: Integrating macro- and microbotanical remains to understand subsistence strategies. Vegetation History and Archaeo- botany, 24, 121–133. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00334- 014- 0486-7 Gostner, P., Pernter, P., Bonatti, G., Graefen, A., & Zink, A. R. (2011). New radiological insights into the life and death of the Tyrolean Iceman. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(12), 3425–3431. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JAS. 2011. 08. 003 Grodzins, L. (1983a). Optimum energies for x-ray transmission tomography of small samples: Applica- tions of synchrotron radiation to computerized tomography I. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 206(3), 541–545. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0167- 5087(83) 90393-9 Grodzins, L. (1983b). Critical absorption tomography of small samples. Proposed applications of syn- chrotron radiation to computerized tomographyII. Nuclear Instruments and Methods In Physics Research, 206(3) 547–552 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0167- 5087(83) 90394-0 Guipert, G., & de Lumley, M.-A. (2004). Three-dimensional computer imaging of hominid fossils: A new step in human evolution studies. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 55(4), 264–270. Haneca, K., Deforce, K., Boone, M. N., Van Loo, D., Dierick, M., Van Acker, J., & Van Den Bulcke, J. (2012). X-ray sub-micron tomography as a tool for the study of archaeological wood preserved through the corrosion of metal objects. Archaeometry, 54(5), 893–905. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/J. 1475- 4754. 2011. 00640.X 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Hardwood-Nash, D. C. (1979). Computed Tomography of Ancient Egyptian Mummies. Journal of Com- puter Assisted Tomography, 3(6), 768–773. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ 00004 728- 19791 2000- 00011 Harvey, E. L., & Fuller, D. Q. (2005). Investigating crop processing using phytolith analysis: The exam- ple of rice and millets. Journal of Archaeological Research, 32, 739–752. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2004. 12. 010 Harvig, L., Lynnerup, N., & Ebsen, J. A. (2012). Computed tomography and computed radiography of late Bronze Age cremation urns from Denmark: An interdisciplinary attempt to develop methods applied in bioarchaeological cremation research. Archaeometry, 54(2), 369–387. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1475- 4754. 2011. 00629.x Hather, J. G. (1994). The identification of charred root and tuber crops from archaeological sites in the Pacific. In J. G. Hather (Ed.), Tropical Archaeobotany: Applications and new developments (pp. 51–64). Routledge. Hather, J., & Kirch, P. V. (1991). Prehistoric sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) from Mangaia Island. Cen- tral Polynesia. Antiquity, 65(249), 887–893. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S0003 598X0 00806 13 Hather, J., & Mason, S. (2009). Introduction: Some issues in the archaeobotany of hunter-gatherers. In S. L. R. Mason & J. G. Hather (Eds.), Hunter-gatherer archaeobotany: Perspectives from the north- ern temperate zone (pp. 1–14). Routledge. Hather, J. G. (1988).The Morphological and Anatomical Interpretation and Identification of Charred Vegetative Parenchymatous Plant Remains [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University College London Hather, J. G. (1991). The Identification of Charred Archaeological Remains of Vegetative Parenchymous Tissue. Journal of’Archaeologica1 Science, 18, 661–675 Hather, J. (1993).An archaeobotanical guide to root and tuber identification, vol 1: Europe and South West Asia. Oxbow Books Hather, J. G. (2000).Archaeological Parenchyma. Archetype Publications Hawass, Z., Gad, Y. Z., Ismail, S., Khairat, R., Fathalla, D., Hasan, N., Ahmed, A., Elleithy, H., Ball, M., Gaballah, F., Wasef, S., Fateen, M., Amer, H., Gostner, P., Selim, A., Zink, A., & Pusch, C. M. (2010). Ancestry and Pathology in King Tutankhamun’s Family. JAMA, 303(7), 638–647. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ JAMA. 2010. 121 Helliwell, J. R., Miller, A. J., Whalley, W. R., Mooney, S. J., & Sturrock, C. J. (2014). Quantifying the impact of microbes on soil structural development and behaviour in wet soils. Soil Biology & Bio- chemistry, 74, 138–147. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. soilb io. 2014. 03. 009 Herremans, E., Verboven, P., Verlinden, B. E., Cantre, D., Abera, M., Wevers, M., & Nicolaï, B. M. (2015). Automatic analysis of the 3-D microstructure of fruit parenchyma tissue using X-ray micro-CT explains differences in aeration. BMC Plant Biology, 15(1), 1–14. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ S12870- 015- 0650-Y/ FIGUR ES/7 Ho, Q. T., Verboven, P., Fanta, S. W., Abera, M. K., Retta, M. A., Herremans, E., Defraeye, T., & Nicolaï, B. M. (2014). A Multiphase Pore Scale Network Model of Gas Exchange in Apple Fruit. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 7(2), 482–495. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S11947- 012- 1043-Y/ TABLES/5 Holloway, R. L., Broadfield, D. C., & Carlson, K. J. (2014). New high-resolution computed tomogra- phy data of the Taung partial cranium and endocast and their bearing on metopism and hominin brain evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(36), 13022–13027. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ PNAS. 14029 05111/ SUPPL_ FILE/ PNAS. 20140 2905SI. PDF Hounsfield, G. N. (1973). Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part I. Description of system. British Journal of Radiology, 46(552), 1016–1022 Hsieh, J., (2015).Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts and Recent Advances (Third Edi- tion). SPIE Digital Library. https://doi-org.virtual.anu.edu.au/https:// doi. org/ 10. 1117/3. 21977 56 Hu, Y., Limaye, A., & Lu, J. (2020). Three-dimensional segmentation of computed tomography data using Drishti Paint: new tools and developments. Royal Society Open Science, 7, 201033. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rsos. 201033 Huisman, D. J., Ngan-Tillard, D., Tensen, M. A., Laarman, F. J., & Raemaekers, D. C. M. (2014). A question of scales: Studying Neolithic subsistence using micro CT scanning of midden deposits. Journal of Archaeological Science, 49(1), 585–594. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2014. 05. 006 Hussein, K., Matin, E., & Nerlich, A. G. (2013). Paleopathology of the juvenile Pharaoh Tutankha- mun-90th anniversary of discovery. Virchows Archiv, 463, 475–479. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00428- 013- 1441-1 Immel, A., Le Cabec, A., Bonazzi, M., Herbig, A., Temming, H., Schuenemann, V. J., Bos, K. I., Lang- bein, F., Harvati, K., Bridault, A., Pion, G., Julien, M., Krotova, O., Conard, N. J., Münzel, S. C., 1 3 A. Barron Drucker, D. G., Viola, B., Hublin, J., Tafforeau, P., & Krause, J. (2016). Effect of X-ray irradiation on ancient DNA in sub-fossil bones - Guidelines for safe X-ray imaging. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1–14. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ srep3 2969 Iovea, M., Oaie, G., Ricman, C., Mateiasi, G., Neagu, M., Szobotka, S., & Duliu, O. G. (2008). Dual- energy X-ray computer axial tomography and digital radiography investigation of cores and other objects of geological interest. Engineering Geology, 103, 119–126. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. enggeo. 2008. 06. 018 Jacobson, L., De Beer, F. C., & Nshimirimana, R. (2011). Tomography imaging of South African archae- ological and heritage stone and pottery objects. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 651, 240–243. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. nima. 2011. 02. 093 Jerram, D. A., Mock, A., Davis, G. R., Field, M., & Brown, R. J. (2009). 3D crystal size distributions: A case study on quantifying olivine populations in kimberlites. Lithos, 112S, 223–235. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. lithos. 2009. 05. 042 Johnston, R., Thomas, R., Jones, R., Graves-Brown, C., Goodridge, W., & North, L. (2020). Evidence of diet, deification, and death within ancient Egyptian mummified animals. Scientific Reports, 10, 14113. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 020- 69726-0 Kahl, W. A., & Ramminger, B. (2012). Non-destructive fabric analysis of prehistoric pottery using high- resolution X-ray microtomography: A pilot study on the late Mesolithic to Neolithic site Hamburg- Boberg. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(7), 2206–2219. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2012. 02. 029 Kahlheber, S., & Neumann, K. (2007). The development of plant cultivation in semiarid West Africa. In T. Denham, J. Iriarte, & L. Vrydaghs (Eds.), Rethinking Agriculture: Archaeological and Ethnoar- chaeological Perspectives (pp. 320–345). Left Coast Press. Kak, A. C., & Slaney, M. (1988). Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. IEEE Press. Kalender, W. A. (2006). X-ray computed tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51, R29–R43. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1088/ 0031- 9155/ 51/ 13/ R03 Karch, J., Dudák, J., Žemlička, J., Vavřík, D., Kumpová, I., Kvaček, J., Heřmanová, Z., Šoltés, J., Viererbl, L., Morgano, M., Kaestner, A., & Trtík, P. (2017). X-ray micro-CT and neutron CT as complemen- tary imaging tools for non-destructive 3D imaging of rare silicified fossil plants. Journal of Instru- mentation, 12(12), C12004. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1088/ 1748- 0221/ 12/ 12/ C12004 Katuwal, S., Arthur, E., Tuller, M., Moldrup, P., & de Jonge, L. W. (2015). Quantification of Soil Pore Network Complexity with X-ray Computed Tomography and Gas Transport Measurements. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 79(6), 1577–1589. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2136/ SSSAJ 2015. 06. Ketcham, R. A., & Carlson, W. D. (2001). Acquisition, optimization and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: Applications to the geosciences. Computers & Geosciences, 27, 381–400. Ketcham, R. A., Slottke, D. T., & Sharp, J. M. (2010). Three-dimensional measurement of fractures in heterogeneous materials using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Geosphere, 6(5), 499– 514. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1130/ GES00 552.1 Keyes, S. D., Gillard, F., Soper, N., Mavrogordato, M. N., Sinclair, I., & Roose, T. (2016). Mapping soil deformation around plant roots using in vivo 4D X-ray Computed Tomography and Digital Volume Correlation. Journal of Biomechanics, 49(9), 1802–1811. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JBIOM ECH. 2016. 04. 023 Kistler, L., Yoshi Maezumi, S., De Souza, J. G., Przelomska, N. A. S., Costa, F. M., Smith, O., Loi- selle, H., Ramos-Madrigal, J., Wales, N., Ribeiro, E. R., Morrison, R. R., Grimaldo, C., Prous, A. P., Arriaza, B., Thomas, P., Gilbert, M., De Oliveira Freitas, F., & Allaby, R. G. (2018). Mul- tiproxy evidence highlights a complex evolutionary legacy of maize in South America. Science, 362(6420), 1309–1313. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ SCIEN CE. AAV02 07/ SUPPL_ FILE/ AAV02 07_ KISTL ER_ SM. PDF Kobayashi, K., Akada, M., Torigoe, T., Imazu, S., & Sugiyama, J. (2015). Automated recognition of wood used in traditional Japanese sculptures by texture analysis of their low-resolution computed tomog- raphy data. Journal of Wood Science, 61(6), 630–640. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S10086- 015- 1507-6 Kobayashi, K., Hwang, S. W., Okochi, T., Lee, W. H., & Sugiyama, J. (2019). Non-destructive method for wood identification using conventional X-ray computed tomography data. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 38, 88–93. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. CULHER. 2019. 02. 001 Koehl, P., & Hass, J. (2015). Landmark-free geometric methods in biological shape analysis. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12, 20150795. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rsif. 2015. 0795 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Kozatsas, J., Kotsakis, K., Sagris, D., & David, K. (2018). Inside out: Assessing pottery forming tech- niques with micro-CT scanning. An example from Middle Neolithic Thessaly. Journal of Archaeo- logical Science, 100, 102–119. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2018. 10. 007 Kristensen, E., Parsons, T. E., Hallgrímsson, B., & Boyd, S. K. (2008). A novel 3-D image-based mor- phological method for phenotypic analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 55(12), 2826–2831. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1109/ TBME. 2008. 923106 Kubiak-Martens, L. (2016). Scanning electron microscopy and starchy food in Mesolithic Europe: The importance of roots and tubers in Mesolithic diet. In K. Hardy & L. Kubiak-Martens (Eds.), Wild Harvest: Plants in the Hominin and Pre-Agrarian Human Worlds (pp. 113–133). Oxbow Books. Kyrieleis, A., Titarenko, V., Ibison, M., Connolley, T., & Withers, P. J. (2011). Region-of-interest tomog- raphy using filtered backprojection: Assessing the practical limits. Journal of Microscopy, 241(1), 69–82. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/J. 1365- 2818. 2010. 03408.X Latham, S. J., Varslot, T., & Sheppard, A. (2008a). Automated registration for augmenting micro-CT 3D images. ANZIAM Journal, 50, C534–C548 https:// doi. org/ 10. 21914/ ANZIA MJ. V50I0. 1389 Latham, S.,  Varslot, T.,  & Sheppard, A. (2008b) Image registration: Enhancing and Calibrating X-ray Micro-CT Imaging (Vol. 12). International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts Lebot, V. (2009). Tropical root and tuber crops: cassava, sweet potato, yams and aroids (Vol. 88). CABI LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ natur e14539 Ledley, R. S., Dichiro, G., Luessenh, A. J., & Twigg, H. L. (1974). Computerized transaxial X-ray tomog- raphy of human body. Science, 186(4160), 207–212. Lewis, T., Denham, T., & Golson, J. (2016). A renewed archaeological and archaeobotanical assessment of house sites at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. Archaeology in Oceania, 51(S1), 91–103. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ arco. 5113 Limaye, A. (2012). Drishti: A volume exploration and presentation tool. Proceedings SPIE, Developments in X-Ray Tomography VIII, 8506, 191–199. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1117/ 12. 935640 Lynnerup, N., Hjalgrim, H., Nielsen, L. R., Gregersen, H., & Thuesen, I. (1997). Non-invasive Archae- ology of Skeletal Material by CT Scanning and Three-dimensional Reconstruction. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 7(1), 91–94. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ (SICI) 1099- 1212(199701) 7:1% 3c91:: AID- OA309% 3e3.0. CO;2-T Machado, A. S., Oliveira, D. F., Gama Filho, H. S., Latini, R., Bellido, A. V. B., Assis, J. T., Anjos, M. J., & Lopes, R. T. (2017). Archeological ceramic artifacts characterization through computed microtomography and X-ray fluorescence. X-Ray Spectrometry, 46(5), 427–434. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ xrs. 2786 Maenhout, P., Sleutel, S., Xu, H., Van Hoorebeke, L., Cnudde, V., & De Neve, S. (2019). Semi-automated segmentation and visualization of complex undisturbed root systems with X-ray μCT. Soil Tillage Research, 192, 59–65. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. still. 2019. 04. 025 Maire, E., & Withers, P. J. (2013). Quantitative X-ray tomography. International Materials Review, 59(1), 1–43. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1179/ 17432 80413Y. 00000 00023 Mairhofer, S., Zappala, S., Tracy, S. R., Sturrock, C., Bennett, M., Mooney, S. J., & Pridmore, T. (2012). RooTrak: Automated Recovery of Three-Dimensional Plant Root Architecture in Soil from X-ray Microcomputed Tomography Images Using Visual Tracking. Plant Physiology, 158(2), 561–569. Malgora, S., Gibelli, D., Floridi, C., Martinenghi, C., McKnight, L., Ikram, S., Elias, J., Milani, C., Oliva, G., & Cellina, M. (2020). CT examination and 3D analysis of Egyptian animal mummies. Radiolo- gia Medica, 125(10), 943–950. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11547- 020- 01192-0 Mathers, A. W., Hepworth, C., Baillie, A. L., Sloan, J., Jones, H., Lundgren, M., Fleming, A. J., Mooney, S. J., & Sturrock, C. J. (2018). Investigating the microstructure of plant leaves in 3D with lab-based X-ray computed tomography. Plant Methods, 14(99). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13007- 018- 0367-7 Matsunaga, K. K. S., Manchester, S. R., Srivastava, R., Kapgate, D. K., & Smith, S. Y. (2019). Fossil palm fruits from India indicate a Cretaceous origin of Arecaceae tribe Borasseae. Botanical Jour- nal of the Linnean Society, 190(3), 260–280. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ BOTLI NNEAN/ BOZ019 Matsushima, U., Hilger, A., Graf, W., Zabler, S., Manke, I., Dawson, M., Choinka, G., & Herppich, W. B. (2012). Calcium oxalate crystal distribution in rose peduncles: Non-invasive analysis by synchro- tron X-ray micro-tomography. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 72, 27–34. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. posth arvbio. 2012. 04. 013 McClatchie, M., & Fuller, D. Q. (2014). Leaving a lasting impression. In C. Stevens, S. Nixon, M. A. Mur- ray, & D. Q. Fuller (Eds.), Archaeology of African Plant Use (pp. 259–266). Left Coast Press. 1 3 A. Barron McElrone, A. J., Choat, B., Parkinson, D. Y., MacDowell, A. A., & Brodersen, C. R. (2013). Using High Resolution Computed Tomography to Visualize the Three Dimensional Structure and Function of Plant Vasculature. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 74, 50162. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3791/ 50162 McKenzie-Clark, J., & Magnussen, J. (2014). Dual Energy Computed Tomography for the Non-destruc- tive Analysis of Ancient Ceramics. Archaeometry, 56(4), 573–590. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ arcm. McKnight, L. M. (2010). Imaging applied to animal mummification in ancient Egypt. Archaeopress MeBioS Postharvest Group (2022). X-Plant: The CT database of plant organs. KU Leuven. Retrieved March 21, 2022 Melcher, A. H., Holowka, S., Pharoah, M., & Lewin, P. K. (1997). Non-invasive computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction of the dentition of a 2,800-year-old Egyptian mummy exhib- iting extensive dental disease. American Journal Physical Anthropology, 103, 329–340. Mendoza, F., Verboven, P., Mebatsion, H. K., Greet, A., Ae, K., Wevers, M., & Nicola, B. (2007). Three- dimensional pore space quantification of apple tissue using X-ray computed microtomography. Planta, 226, 559–570. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00425- 007- 0504-4 Mikic, A., Medovic, A., Jovanovic, Z., & Stanisavljevic, N. (2014). Integrating archaeobotany, paleo- genetics and historical linguistics may cast more light onto crop domestication: The case of pea (Pisum sativum). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 61, 887–892. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10722- 014- 0102-9 Minaee, S., Kalchbrenner, N., Cambria, E., Nikzad, N., Chenaghlu, M., & Gao, J. (2021). Deep Learn- ing-based Text Classification. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(3) https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 34397 26 Minozzi, S., Giuffra, V., Bagnoli, J., Paribeni, E., & Giustini, D. (2010). An investigation of Etruscan cremations by Computed Tomography (CT). Antiquity, 84(323) Mizuno, S., Torizu, R., & Sugiyama, J. (2010). Wood identification of a wooden mask using synchrotron X-ray microtomography. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(11), 2842–2845. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JAS. 2010. 06. 022 Mocella, V., Brun, E., Ferrero, C., & Delattre, D. (2015). Revealing letters in rolled Herculaneum papyri by X-ray phase-contrast imaging. Nature Communications, 6(1), 1–6. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ ncomm s6895 Mooney, S. J., Pridmore, T. P., Helliwell, J., & Bennett, M. J. (2011). Developing X-ray Computed Tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architecture in soil. Plant and Soil, 352(1), 1–22. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S11104- 011- 1039-9 Moreau, J.-D., Cloetens, P., Gomez, B., Daviero-Gomez, V., Néraudeau, D., Lafford, T. A., & Tafforeau, P. (2014). Multiscale 3D Virtual Dissections of 100-Million-Year-Old Flowers Using X-ray Synchrotron Micro- and Nanotomography. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 20, 305–312. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S1431 92761 30140 25 Moricca, C., Nigro, L., Gallo, E., & Sadori, L. (2020). The dwarf palm tree of the king: A Nannor- rhops ritchiana in the 24th-23rd century BC palace of Jericho. Plant Biosystems, 155(4), 823–832. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 11263 504. 2020. 17859 67 Murphy, W. A., Zur Nedden, D., Gostner, P., Knapp, R., Recheis, W., & Seidler, H. (2003). The Iceman: Discovery and Imaging. Radiology, 226(3), 614–629. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1148/ RADIOL. 22630 Murphy, C., & Fuller, D. Q. (2017). Seed coat thinning during horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) domestication documented through synchrotron tomography of archaeological seeds. Scientific Reports, 7(5369) https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 017- 05244-w Murphy, C., Fuller, D. Q., Stevens, C., Gregory, T., Silva, F., Dal Martello, R., Song, J., Bodey, A. J., & Rau, C. (2019). Looking Beyond the Surface: Use of High Resolution X-ray Computed Tomogra- phy on Archaeobotanical Remains. https:// doi. org/ 10. 24916/ iansa. 2019.1.1 Nakata, P. A. (2003). Advances in our understanding of calcium oxalate crystal formation and function in plants. Plant Science, 164, 901–909. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0168- 9452(03) 00120-1 Nakata, P. A. (2012). Plant calcium oxalate crystal formation, function, and its impact on human health. Frontiers in Biology, 7(3), 254–266. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S11515- 012- 1224-0 Ngan-Tillard, D. J. M., Huisman, D. J., Corbella, F., & Nass, A. V. (2018). Over the rainbow? Micro-CT scanning to non-destructively study Roman and early medieval glass bead manufacture. Journal of Archaeological Science, 98, 7–21. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2018. 07. 007 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Nugraha, B., Verboven, P., Janssen, S., Wang, Z., & Nicolaï, B. M. (2019). Non-destructive porosity mapping of fruit and vegetables using X-ray CT. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 150, 80–88. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. posth arvbio. 2018. 12. 016 Oliveira, N. (2008). Subsistence archaeobotany: Food productionand the agricultural transition in East Timor. [Unpublisheddoctoral dissertation]. Australian National University. Oliveira, N. (2012). Recovering, analysing and identifying Colocasia esculenta and Dioscorea spp. from archaeological contexts in Timor-Leste. In M. Spriggs, D. Addison, & P. Matthews (Eds.), Irri- gated taro (Colocasia esculenta) in the Indo-Pacific: Biological, social and historical perspectives (pp. 265–284). Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology. Ommaya, A. K., Murray, G., Ambrose, J., Richardson, A., & Hounsfield, G. N. (1976). Computerized axial tomography: Estimation of spatial and density resolution capability. British Journal of Radi- ology, 49, 604–611. Paiva, E. A. S. (2019). Are calcium oxalate crystals a dynamic calcium store in plants? New Phytologist, 223(4), 1707–1711. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ nph. 15912 Pajor, R., Fleming, A., Osborne, C. P., Rolfe, S. A., Sturrock, C. J., & Mooney, S. J. (2013). Seeing space: Visualization and quantification of plant leaf structure using X-ray micro-computed tomography. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(2), 385–390. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ jxb/ ers392 Panzer, S., Peschel, O., Haas-Gebhard, B., Bachmeier, B. E., Pusch, C. M., & Nerlich, A. G. (2014). Reconstructing the life of an unknown (ca. 500 years-old South American Inca) mummy-multi- disciplinary study of a Peruvian Inca mummy suggests severe Chagas disease and ritual homicide. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e89528. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ JOURN AL. PONE. 00895 28 Paxton, R., & Ambrose, J. (1974). The EMI scanner. A brief review of the first 650 patients. British Jour- nal of Radiology, 47, 430–565. Paz, V. (1999). Neolithic human movement to Island Southeast Asia: The search for archaeobotanical evidence. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 18, 151–157. Paz, V. (2002). Island Southeast Asia: Spread or friction zone? In P. Bellwood & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis (pp. 275–285). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. Paz, V. (2001). Archaeobotany and cultural transformation: Patterns of early plant utilization in Northern Wal- lacea [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Cambridge Paz, V. 2005. Rock shelters, caves, and archaeobotany in Island Southeast Asia. Asian Perspectives 44(1): 107–118 Pernter, P., Gostner, P., Vigl, E. E., & Rühli, F. J. (2007). Radiologic proof for the Iceman’s cause of death (ca. 5’300 BP). Journal of Archaeological Science, 34(11), 1784–1786. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JAS. 2006. 12. 019 Phalempin, M., Lippold, E., Vetterlein, D., & Schlüter, S. (2021). An improved method for the segmenta- tion of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v.2. Plant Methods, 17(39) https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13007- 021- 00735-4 Piovesan, A., Vancauwenberghe, V., Van, T., Looverbosch, D., Verboven, P., & Nicolaï, B. (2021). X-ray computed tomography for 3D plant imaging. Trends in Plant Science, 26(11), P1171-1185. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. tplan ts. 2021. 07. 010 Piperno, D. R. (2006).Phytoliths: A comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists. Alta Mira Press Ponce de Leon, M. S., & Zollikofer, C. P. E. (1999). New evidence from Le Moustier 1: Computer- assisted reconstruction and morphometry of the skull. The Anatomical Record, 254, 474–489. Portillo, M., Ball, T. B., Wallace, M., Murphy, C., Pérez-Díaz, S., Ruiz-Alonso, M., Aceituno, F. J., & López-Sáez, J. A. (2020). Advances in Morphometrics in Archaeobotany. Environmental Archae- ology, 25(2), 246–256. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 14614 103. 2019. 15693 51 Pouyanfar, S., Sadiq, S., Yan, Y., Tian, H., Reyes, M. P., Chen, S.-C., Sadiq, M. S., Yan, Y., Tao, Y., & Shyu, M.-L. (2019). A Survey on Deep Learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(5), 92. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 32341 50 Pritchard, J., Lewis, T., Beeching, L., & Denham, T. (2019). An assessment of microCT technology for the investigation of charred archaeological parenchyma from house sites at Kuk Swamp, Papua New Guinea. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(5), 1927–1938. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S12520- 018- 0648-0/ FIGUR ES/5 Purugganan, M. D., & Fuller, D. Q. (2011). Archaeological Data Reveal Slow Rates of Evolution dur- ing Plant Domestication. Evolution, 65(1), 171–183. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1558- 5646. 2010. 01093.x 1 3 A. Barron Rowe, T., & Frank, L. R. (2011). The Disappearing Third Dimension. Science New Series, 331(6018), 712–714. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. ll993 05 Rozenbaum, O. (2011). 3-D characterization of weathered building limestones by high resolution syn- chrotron X-ray microtomography. Science of the Total Environment, 409, 1959–1966. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2011. 02. 014 Ru, F. J. (2000). Radiological Aspects and Interpretation of Post-mortem Artefacts in Ancient Egyptian Mummies from Swiss Collections. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 10, 153–157. Rühli, F. J., Kuhn, G., Evison, R., Müller, R., & Schultz, M. (2007). Diagnostic value of micro-CT in comparison with histology in the qualitative assessment of historical human skull bone patholo- gies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 133(4), 1099–1111. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ ajpa. 20611 Sanger, M. C. (2016). Investigating pottery vessel manufacturing techniques using radiographic imaging and computed tomography: Studies from the Late Archaic American Southeast. Journal of Archae- ological Science: Reports, 9, 586–598. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jasrep. 2016. 08. 005 Saprykina, I. A., Kichanov, S. E., & Kozlenko, D. P. (2019). Possibilities, Limitations, and Prospects of Using Neutron Tomography and Radiography for Preservation of Archaeological Heritage Objects. Crystallography Reports, 64(1), 177–180. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1134/ S1063 77451 90102 2X Sasov, A., & Van Dyck, D. (1998). Desktop X-ray microscopy and microtomography. Journal of Micros- copy, 191(2), 151–158. Sato, T., Ikeda, O., Yamakoshi, Y., & Tsubouchi, M. (1981). X-ray tomography for microstructural objects. Applied Optics, 20(22), 3880–3883. Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 61, 85–117. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. NEUNET. 2014. 09. 003 Sears, D. W. G., Sears, H., Ebel, D. S., Wallace, S., & Friedrich, J. M. (2016). X-ray computed tomog- raphy imaging: A not-so-nondestructive technique. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 51(4), 833– 838. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ maps. 12622 Shin, D. H., Choi, Y. H., Kyoung-Jin, S., Han, G. R., Youn, M., Chong-Youl, K., Han, S. H., Seo, J. C., Park, S. S., Cho, Y., & Chang, B. S. (2003). Radiological analysis on a mummy from a medieval tomb in Korea. Annals of Anatomy, 185(4), 377–382. Sigmund, G., & Minas, M. (2002). The Trier mummy Paï-es-tjau-em-aui-nu: Radiological and histologi- cal findings. European Radiology, 12, 1854–1862. Skinner, M. M., Kivell, T. L., Potze, S., & Hublin, J. J. (2013). Microtomographic archive of fossil homi- nin specimens from Kromdraai B, South Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 64(5), 434–447. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JHEVOL. 2013. 01. 007 Skinner, M. M., de Vries, D., Gunz, P., Kupczik, K., Klassen, R. P., Hublin, J. J., & Roksandic, M. (2016). A dental perspective on the taxonomic affinity of the Balanica mandible (BH-1). Journal of Human Evolution, 93, 63–81. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JHEVOL. 2016. 01. 010 Smith, S. Y., Collinson, M. E., Rudall, P. J., Simpson, D. A., Marone, F., & Stampanoni, M. (2009). Virtual taphonomy using synchrotron tomographic microscopy reveals cryptic features and inter- nal structure of modern and fossil plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(29), 12013. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ PNAS. 09014 68106 Soltaninejad, M., Sturrock, C. J., Griffiths, M., Pridmore, T. P., & Pound, M. P. (2020). Three Dimen- sional Root CT Segmentation Using Multi-Resolution Encoder-Decoder Networks. IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing, 29, 6667–6679. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1109/ TIP. 2020. 29928 93 Staedler, Y. M., Masson, D., & Schönenberger, J. (2013). Plant Tissues in 3D via X-ray Tomography: Simple Contrasting Methods Allow High Resolution Imaging. PLOS ONE, 8(9), e75295. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ JOURN AL. PONE. 00752 95 Stelzner, J. (2016). X-ray computed tomography for non-destructive analysis of early Medieval swords. Studies in Conservation, 61(2), 86–101. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1179/ 20470 58414Y. 00000 00157 Stelzner, J., & Million, S. (2015). X-ray Computed Tomography for the anatomical and dendrochrono- logical analysis of archaeological wood. Journal of Archaeological Science, 55, 188–196. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2014. 12. 015 Stelzner, J., Ebinger-Rist, N., Peek, C., & Schillinger, B. (2010). The application of 3D computed tomog- raphy with X-rays and neutrons to visualize archaeological objects in blocks of soil. Conservation, 55(2), 95–106. Stock. (2020).  Microcomputed tomography : methodology and applications  (Second edition.). CRC Press/Taylor and Francis 1 3 Applications of Microct Imaging to Archaeobotanical Research Stromer, D., Christlein, V., Martindale, C., Zippert, P., Haltenberger, E., Hausotte, T., & Maier, A. (2018). Browsing through sealed historical manuscripts by using 3-D computed tomography with low-bril- liance X-ray sources. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 018- 33685-4 Stuppy, W. H., Maisano, J. A., Colbert, M. W., Rudall, P. J., & Rowe, T. B. (2003). Three-dimensional analysis of plant structure using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Trends in Plant Sci- ence, 8(1), 2–6. Sundararajan, K., & Woodard, D. L. (2018). Deep Learning for Biometrics. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(3). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 31906 18 Suzuki, Y., Usami, K., Sakamoto, K., Kozaka, H., Hirano, T., Shiono, H., & Kohno, H. (1988). X-Ray computerized tomography using monochromated synchrotron radiation. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 27(3A), L461–L464. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1143/ JJAP. 27. L461 Taina, I. A., Heck, R. J., & Elliot, T. R. (2008). Application of X-ray computed tomography to soil sci- ence: A literature review. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 88(1), 1–20. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4141/ cjss0 6027 Teramoto, S., Takayasu, S., Kitomi, Y., Arai-Sanoh, Y., Tanabata, T., & Uga, Y. (2020). High-throughput three-dimensional visualization of root system architecture of rice using X-ray computed tomogra- phy. Plant Methods, 16(1), 1–14. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ S13007- 020- 00612-6 Théroux-Rancourt, Guillaume Jenkins, M. R., Brodersen, C. R., McElrone, A., Forrestel, E. J., & Earles, J. M. (2020). Digitally deconstructing leaves in 3D using X-ray microcomputed tomography and machine learning.Applications in Plant Sciences, 8(7), e11380 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ aps3. 11380 Thompson, A. C., Llacer, J., Campbell Finman, L., Hughes, E. B., Otis, J. N., Wilson, S., & Zeman, H. D. (1984). Computed tomography using synchrotron radiation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 222(1–2), 319–323. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0167- 5087(84) 90550-7 Tooulakou, G., Giannopoulos, A., Nikolopoulos, D., Bresta, P., Dotsika, E., Orkoula, M. G., Kontoyan- nis, C. G., Fasseas, C., Liakopoulos, G., Klapa, M. I., & Karabourniotis, G. (2016). Reevaluation of the plant “gemstones”: Calcium oxalate crystals sustain photosynthesis under drought condi- tions. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 11(9), e1215793. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 15592 324. 2016. 12157 Tripp, J. A., Squire, M. E., Hedges, R. E. M., & Stevens, R. E. (2018). Use of micro-computed tomog- raphy imaging and porosity measurements as indicators of collagen preservation in archaeologi- cal bone. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 511, 462–471. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. palaeo. 2018. 09. 012 Tuniz, C., Bernardini, F., Turk, I., Dimkaroski, L., Mancini, L., & Dreossi, D. (2012). Did Neanderthals play music? X-ray computed micro-tomography of the Divje babe ‘flute.’ Archaeometry, 54(3), 581–590. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1475- 4754. 2011. 00630.x Tuniz, C., Bernardini, F., Cicuttin, A., Crespo, M. L., Dreossi, D., Gianoncelli, A., Mancini, L., Mendoza Cuevas, A., Sodini, N., Tromba, G., Zanini, F., & Zanolli, C. (2013). The ICTP-Elettra X-ray labo- ratory for cultural heritage and archaeology. Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A, 711, 106–110 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. nima. 2013. 01. 046 Ussher, E. (2015). Agricultural development in Tongan prehistory: An archaeobotanical perspective. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Australian National University. Van De Looverbosch, T., Raeymaekers, E., Verboven, P., Sijbers, J., & Nicolaï, B. (2021). Non-destruc- tive internal disorder detection of Conference pears by semantic segmentation of X-ray CT scans using deep learning. Expert Systes with Applications, 176, 114925. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. ESWA. 2021. 114925 Villagran, X. S., Strauss, A., Alves, M., & Oliveira, R. E. (2019). Virtual micromorphology: The applica- tion of micro-CT scanning for the identification of termite mounds in archaeological sediments. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 24, 785–795. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jasrep. 2019. 02. Voltolini, M., Taş, N., Wang, S., Brodie, E. L., & Ajo-Franklin, J. B. (2017). Quantitative characteriza- tion of soil micro-aggregates: New opportunities from sub-micron resolution synchrotron X-ray microtomography. Geoderma, 305, 382–393. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. geode rma. 2017. 06. 005 Wadley, L., Backwell, L., d’Errico, F., & Sievers, C. (2020). Cooked starchy rhizomes in Africa 170 thousand years ago. Science, 367(6473), 87–91. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. aaz59 26 Wanek, J., & Rühli, F. J. (2016). Risk to fragmented DNA in dry, wet, and frozen states from computed tomography: A comparative theoretical study. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 55(2), 229–241. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S00411- 016- 0637-6/ FIGUR ES/8 1 3 A. Barron Wang, F., Casalino, L. P., & Khullar, D. (2019). Deep Learning in Medicine—Promise, Progress, and Challenges. JAMA Internal Medicine, 179(3), 293–294. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ JAMAI NTERN MED. 2018. 7117 Wang, S., Kang, B., Ma, J., Zeng, X., Xiao, M., Guo, J., Cai, M., Yang, J., Li, Y., Meng, X., & Xu, B. (2021). A deep learning algorithm using CT images to screen for Corona virus disease (COVID- 19). European Radiology, 31(8), 6096–6104. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S00330- 021- 07715-1/ FIGUR ES/5 Ward, I., & Maksimenko, A. (2019). Marine micromorphology in 3D: Visualisation of a submerged midden site from Hjarnø Denmark. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 23, 368–375. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jasrep. 2018. 10. 038 Weber, G. W., & Bookstein, F. L. (2011). Virtual anthropology: A guide to a new interdisciplinary field. Springer. Welsh, H., Nelson, A. J., Van Der Merwe, A. E., De Boer, H. H., & Brickley, M. B. (2020). An Investiga- tion of Micro-CT Analysis of Bone as a New Diagnostic Method for Paleopathological Cases of Osteomalacia. International Journal of Paleopathology, 31, 23–33. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijpp. 2020. 08. 004 Whitau, R., Dilkes-Hall, I. E., Dotte-Sarout, E., Langley, M. C., Balme, J., & O’Connor, S. (2016). X-ray computed microtomography and the identification of wood taxa selected for archaeological arte- fact manufacture: Rare examples from Australian contexts. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 6, 536–546. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jasrep. 2016. 03. 021 Wilkins, S. W., Gureyev, T. E., Gao, D., Pogany, A., & Stevenson, A. W. (1996). Phase-contrast imaging using polychromatic hard X-rays. Nature, 384(6607), 335–338. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ 38433 5A0 Willemink, M. J., & Noël, P. B. (2019). The evolution of image reconstruction for CT—from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. European Radiology, 29(5), 2185. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S00330- 018- 5810-7 Wilson, J., Hardy, K., Allen, R., Copeland, L., Wrangham, R., & Collins, M. (2010). Automated classifi- cation of starch granules using supervised pattern recognition of morphological properties. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 594–604. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jas. 2009. 10. 024 Winchell, F., Stevens, C. J., Murphy, C., Champion, L., & Fuller, D. Q. (2017). Evidence for Sorghum Domestication in Fourth Millennium BC Eastern Sudan Spikelet Morphology from Ceramic Impressions of the Butana Group. Current Anthropology, 58(5), 673–683. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ Winchell, F., Brass, M., Manzo, A., Beldados, A., Perna, V., Murphy, C., Stevens, C., & Fuller, D. Q. (2018). On the Origins and Dissemination of Domesticated Sorghum and Pearl Millet across Africa and into India: A View from the Butana Group of the Far Eastern Sahel. African Archaeo- logical Review, 35(4), 483–505. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S10437- 018- 9314-2/ FIGUR ES/8 Wolcott, K. A., Chomicki, G., Staedler, Y. M., Wasylikowa, K., Nesbitt, M., Schönenberger, J., & Renner, S. S. (2021). Three-dimensional X-ray-computed tomography of 3300- to 6000-year-old Citrul- lus seeds from Libya and Egypt compared to extant seeds throws doubts on species assignments. Plants, People, Planet, 3(6), 694–702. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ PPP3. 10220 Zhao, Y., & Takhar, P. S. (2017). Micro X-ray computed tomography and image analysis of frozen pota- toes subjected to freeze-thaw cycles. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 79, 278–286. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. lwt. 2017. 01. 051 Zollikofer, C. P. E., & Ponce de Leon, M. S. (2005). Virtual reconstruction: A primer in  computer- assisted paleontology and biomedicine. John Wiley & Sons Zollikofer, C. P. E., Ponce De León, M. S., & Martin, R. D. (1998). Computer-assisted paleoanthropol- ogy. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 6(2), 41–54. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ (SICI) 1520- 6505(1998)6: 2% 3c41:: AID- EVAN2% 3e3.0. CO;2-Z Zollikofer, C. P. E., Ponce de León, M. S., Lieberman, D. E., Guy, F., Pilbeam, D., Likius, A., Mackaye, H. T., Vignaud, P., & Brunet, M. (2005). Virtual cranial reconstruction of Sahelanthropus tchaden- sis. Letters to Nature, 434(7), 755–759. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ natur e03397 Zong, Y., Yao, S., Crawford, G. W., Fang, H., Lang, J., Fan, J., & Jiang, H. (2017). Selection for Oil Con- tent During Soybean Domestication Revealed by X-ray Tomography of Ancient Beans. Scientific Reports, 7, 43595. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ srep4 3595 Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. 1 3

Journal

Journal of Archaeological Method and TheorySpringer Journals

Published: May 29, 2023

Keywords: microCT; Plant domestication; 3D visualization; Archaeological parenchyma; Pottery inclusions; Underground storage organs

There are no references for this article.