Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Argumentative Indicators in DiscourseIndicators of Confrontation

Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: Indicators of Confrontation [Because each argumentative discussion or text is based on a dispute with a real or imaginary opponent, it must be clear what the dispute entails in order to be able to adequately judge the discussion or discursive text. Which standpoints do the parties involved take, and what type of dispute is exactly at stake? A pragmadialectical analysis identifies the various elements in an argumentative discussion or text that contribute to the constitution of the dispute, and reconstructs the parts involved in terms of moves in the confrontation stage of a critical discussion. In this chapter, we shall examine which words and expressions are able to fulfil an indicative function for this analysis.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Argumentative Indicators in DiscourseIndicators of Confrontation

Part of the Argumentation Library Book Series (volume 12)
Editors: van Eemeren, Frans H.; Houtlosser, Peter; Henkemans, A. Francisca Snoeck
Argumentative Indicators in Discourse — Jan 1, 2007
Download PDF
41 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/argumentative-indicators-in-discourse-indicators-of-confrontation-0a5BuOgEte

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007
ISBN
978-1-4020-6243-8
Pages
21 –62
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5_3
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[Because each argumentative discussion or text is based on a dispute with a real or imaginary opponent, it must be clear what the dispute entails in order to be able to adequately judge the discussion or discursive text. Which standpoints do the parties involved take, and what type of dispute is exactly at stake? A pragmadialectical analysis identifies the various elements in an argumentative discussion or text that contribute to the constitution of the dispute, and reconstructs the parts involved in terms of moves in the confrontation stage of a critical discussion. In this chapter, we shall examine which words and expressions are able to fulfil an indicative function for this analysis.]

Published: Jan 1, 2007

Keywords: Interrogative Word; Argumentative Discussion; Propositional Function; State Visit; Metalinguistic Negation

There are no references for this article.