Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[It was understood from the beginning that the use of logically closed sets of sentences to represent belief states is not cognitively realistic. In an article published in 1985 Makinson pointed out that “in real life, when we perform a contraction or derogation, we never do it to the theory itself (in the sense of a set of propositions closed under consequence) but rather on some finite or recursive or at least recursively enumerable base for the theory” [238, p. 357]. The use of belief bases rather than (logically closed) belief sets has turned out to increase the expressive power of the belief change framework in important ways.]
Published: May 24, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.