Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Marsh (2009)
The Euro: The Politics of the New Global Currency
Barry Eichengreen (1993)
European Monetary UnificationJournal of Economic Literature, 31
S. Wall (2012)
The Official History of Britain and the European Community, Vol. II: From Rejection to Referendum, 1963-1975
[Many explanations have been advanced for the failure of the Heath government. It seems, however, that both sides — those who denounce the government as a failure and those who view it with some sympathy for its unprecedented plight — agree that Heath’s U-turn from ‘quiet revolution’ to ‘new capitalism’ was largely responsible for its failure. On 22 May 1972, Labour MP Edmund Dell argued in the House of Commons: ‘Our pragmatic Prime Minister, having marched his troops up the hill to laissez-faire and disengagement, is marching down to selective intervention on a massive scale.’1 Harsh critics go so far as to suggest that the Heath government ‘gained neither political, social nor economic benefits from its policy reversals’.2 With Heath’s U-turn coming under fierce criticism from the Conservative Right and deepening the rift within the Conservative Party, the result was a bitter defeat in the election of February 1974.]
Published: Jan 16, 2016
Keywords: Exchange Rate; Current Account; Monetary Union; Basic Balance; Capital Account
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.