Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
V. Tavakoli (2018)
Geological Core Analysis
H. Nooruddin, M. Hossain, H. Al-Yousef, Taha Okasha (2016)
IMPROVEMENT OF PERMEABILITY MODELS USING LARGE MERCURY INJECTION CAPILLARY PRESSURE DATASET FOR MIDDLE EAST CARBONATE RESERVOIRSJournal of Porous Media, 19
Stan Kolodzie (1980)
Analysis Of Pore Throat Size And Use Of The Waxman-Smits Equation To Determine Ooip In Spindle Field, ColoradoSoftware - Practice and Experience
Maziyar Nazemi, V. Tavakoli, H. Rahimpour-Bonab, M. Hosseini, Masoud Sharifi-Yazdi (2018)
The effect of carbonate reservoir heterogeneity on Archie's exponents (a and m), an example from Kangan and Dalan gas formations in the central Persian GulfJournal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
H. Nooruddin, M. Hossain, H. Al-Yousef, Taha Okasha (2014)
Comparison of permeability models using mercury injection capillary pressure data on carbonate rock samplesJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 121
[Formation evaluation is one of the most important parts of a reservoir study. This process is mainly performed using wire-line logs. These data are usually available from all wells and reservoir intervals. Various formulas and parameters are used for calculating porosity, water saturation and lithology from logs. Reservoir heterogeneities may considerably change these formulas and their parameters. Matrix responses, pore types, permeabilities and other petrophysical properties are different for each unit or rock type. Therefore, applying one formula for all samples yields erroneous results. These results are used for calculating the final amount of oil in place. The results of these calculations change future development plans and investments in the field. After partitioning the reservoir into different rock types or reservoir units, the appropriate parameters are used in the relevant calculations. These include the log responses for various lithologies of different units as well as special petrophysical characters (such as Archie’s cementation factor) for the unit. In deterministic approach, these are different for each step. In other words, unique parameters are used for each formula in different units or rock types. Then, the results of the previous stage are used for the next calculation. In a stochastic approach, different mathematical models are developed for calculating the reservoir properties in each homogeneous unit. Parameters are different for each model. For example, if pore types control the distribution of water saturation in a reservoir, the reservoir is classified into various parts according to its pore types. Then, a separate model is developed for each part and laboratory-derived data for each rock type are combined with wire-line logs for calculating the water saturation of the entire reservoir interval.]
Published: Nov 12, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.