Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Zoback (2007)
Reservoir Geomechanics: Index
J. Amaefule, M. Altunbay, D. Tiab, D. Kersey, D. Keelan (1993)
Enhanced Reservoir Description: Using Core and Log Data to Identify Hydraulic (Flow) Units and Predict Permeability in Uncored Intervals/WellsSoftware - Practice and Experience
A. Jung, Thomas Aigner (2012)
CARBONATE GEOBODIES: HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION AND DATABASE – A NEW WORKFLOW FOR 3D RESERVOIR MODELLINGJournal of Petroleum Geology, 35
Stan Kolodzie (1980)
Analysis Of Pore Throat Size And Use Of The Waxman-Smits Equation To Determine Ooip In Spindle Field, ColoradoSoftware - Practice and Experience
A. Hsieh, D. Allen, J. Maceachern (2017)
Upscaling permeability for reservoir-scale modeling in bioturbated, heterogeneous tight siliciclastic reservoirs: Lower Cretaceous Viking Formation, Provost Field, Alberta, CanadaMarine and Petroleum Geology, 88
H. Li, J. Reynolds (1995)
On definition and quantification of heterogeneityOikos, 73
Xuehang Song, Xingyuan Chen, M. Ye, Z. Dai, G. Hammond, J. Zachara (2019)
Delineating Facies Spatial Distribution by Integrating Ensemble Data Assimilationand Indicator Geostatistics With Level‐Set TransformationWater Resources Research, 55
E. Poeter, D. Gaylord (1990)
Influence of Aquifer Heterogeneity on Contaminant Transport at the Hanford SiteGround Water, 28
E. Flügel (2004)
Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks: Analysis, Interpretation and Application
F. Lucia (1995)
Rock-Fabric/Petrophysical Classification of Carbonate Pore Space for Reservoir CharacterizationAAPG Bulletin, 79
M. Finkel, P. Grathwohl, O. Cirpka (2016)
A travel time‐based approach to model kinetic sorption in highly heterogeneous porous media via reactive hydrofaciesWater Resources Research, 52
V. Tavakoli (2018)
Geological Core Analysis
P. Fitch, M. Lovell, S. Davies, T. Pritchard, P. Harvey (2015)
An integrated and quantitative approach to petrophysical heterogeneityMarine and Petroleum Geology, 63
G. Frazer, M. Wulder, K. Niemann (2005)
Simulation and quantification of the fine-scale spatial pattern and heterogeneity of forest canopy structure: A lacunarity-based method designed for analysis of continuous canopy heightsForest Ecology and Management, 214
J. Bear (1975)
Dynamics of Fluids in Porous MediaSoil Science, 120
V. Bakshevskaya, S. Pozdnyakov (2013)
Methods of modeling hydraulic heterogeneity of sedimentary formationsWater Resources, 40
Maziyar Nazemi, V. Tavakoli, H. Rahimpour-Bonab, M. Hosseini, Masoud Sharifi-Yazdi (2018)
The effect of carbonate reservoir heterogeneity on Archie's exponents (a and m), an example from Kangan and Dalan gas formations in the central Persian GulfJournal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
M. Bianchi, D. Pedretti (2018)
An Entrogram‐Based Approach to Describe Spatial Heterogeneity With Applications to Solute Transport in Porous MediaWater Resources Research, 54
R. Folk (1959)
Practical petrographic classification of limestonesAAPG Bulletin, 43
C. Mcphee, Jules Reed, I. Zubizarreta (2015)
Core Analysis: A Best Practice Guide
K. Nordahl, P. Ringrose (2008)
Identifying the Representative Elementary Volume for Permeability in Heterolithic Deposits Using Numerical Rock ModelsMathematical Geosciences, 40
G. Chilingar, Mengfei Liu (2015)
Evaluation of representative elementary volume for a vuggy carbonate rock—Part: Porosity, permeability and dispersivity, by B. Vik, E. Bastesen and A. Skauge [J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 112 (2013) 36–47]Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 134
Zhengquan Wang, Qingcheng Wang, Yandong Zhang, Harbin Li (1997)
Quantification of spatial heterogeneity in old growth forests of Korean pineJournal of Forestry Research, 8
F. Lucia, R. Conti (1987)
Rock fabric, permeability, and log relationships in an upward-shoaling, vuggy carbonate sequence
K. Weber (1986)
HOW HETEROGENEITY AFFECTS OIL RECOVERY
Glenn Brown, H. Hsieh, D. Lucero (2000)
Evaluation of laboratory dolomite core sample size using representative elementary volume conceptsWater Resources Research, 36
P. Dutilleul (1993)
Spatial Heterogeneity and the Design of Ecological Field ExperimentsEcology, 74
B. Vik, E. Bastesen, A. Skauge (2013)
Evaluation of representative elementary volume for a vuggy carbonate rock—Part: Porosity, permeability, and dispersivityJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 112
D. Tiab, E. Donaldson (1996)
Petrophysics: Theory and Practice of Measuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties
E. Flügel (2004)
Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks
Y. Bachmat, J. Bear (1987)
On the Concept and Size of a Representative Elementary Volume (Rev)
N. Engdahl, E. Vogler, G. Weissmann (2010)
Evaluation of aquifer heterogeneity effects on river flow loss using a transition probability frameworkWater Resources Research, 46
R. Dunham (1962)
Classification of Carbonate Rocks According to Depositional Textures, 38
T. Eaton (2006)
On the importance of geological heterogeneity for flow simulationSedimentary Geology, 184
[The ultimate goal of reservoir studies is predicting the properties and their controlling factors in a reservoir body based on limited data mainly from boreholes. Reservoir heterogeneity means variations of reservoir properties in space and time, and so this concept is the most important factor in reservoir studies. Despite such importance, relatively few works have been focused or documented different aspects of this subject. Evaluating heterogeneity is more complicated in carbonates which have diverse facies and are more prone to diagenetic processes. Textures and allochems vary considerably at small scales of carbonate reservoirs. Different facies are deposited in various depositional environments. They also change in response to sea-level changes and climate conditions. These building blocks integrate to create various facies belts and geometries of the depositional settings. These geometries are used for propagation of reservoir properties in field scale. Diagenetic processes modify these properties. They follow the primary textural characteristics in many cases, especially in early diagenesis. Anyway, many late diagenetic processes, such as fractures, crosscut the primary facies as well as other diagenetic features. While facies variations create heterogeneity at larger scales, diagenesis is responsible for changes at smaller scales.]
Published: Nov 12, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.