Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/challenges-in-the-management-of-people-convicted-of-a-sexual-offence-HlUfxuTA6B
References (25)
-
Ashley Batastini, M. Vitacco, Lauren Coaker, Michael Lester (2019)
Communicating Violence Risk During Testimony: Do Different Formats Lead to Different Perceptions Among Jurors?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25
-
(2009)
The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. -
W. Smid, J. Kamphuis, Edwin Wever, D. Beek (2014)
A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.Psychological assessment, 26 3
-
C. Miller, E. Kimonis, R. Otto, Suzonne Kline, Adam Wasserman (2012)
Reliability of risk assessment measures used in sexually violent predator proceedings.Psychological assessment, 24 4
-
V. Vogel, C. Ruiter (2006)
Structured professional judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: A prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20Psychology, Crime & Law, 12
-
N. Hilton, E. Ham, K. Nunes, Nicole Rodrigues, Cairina Frank, M. Seto (2017)
Using Graphs to Improve Violence Risk CommunicationCriminal Justice and Behavior, 44
-
Sara Levin, P. Nilsen, P. Bendtsen, Per Bulow (2016)
Structured Risk Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Implementation DeterminantsPsychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23
-
Jodi Viljoen, Dana Cochrane, Melissa Jonnson (2018)
Do Risk Assessment Tools Help Manage and Reduce Risk of Violence and Reoffending? A Systematic ReviewLaw and Human Behavior, 42
-
L. Helmus (2018)
Sex Offender Risk Assessment: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?Current Psychiatry Reports, 20
-
K. Douglas, J. Ogloff (2003)
Multiple Facets of Risk for Violence: The Impact of Judgmental Specificity on Structured Decisions About Violence RiskInternational Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2
-
E. Proctor, Hiie Silmere, R. Raghavan, P. Hovmand, G. Aarons, Alicia Bunger, R. Griffey, Melissa Hensley (2010)
Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research AgendaAdministration and Policy in Mental Health, 38
-
M. Boccaccini, Daniel Murrie, C. Mercado, S. Quesada, S. Hawes, A. Rice, E. Jeglic (2012)
Implications of Static-99 Field Reliability Findings for Score Use and ReportingCriminal Justice and Behavior, 39
-
Jodi Viljoen, G. Vincent (2020)
Risk assessments for violence and reoffending: Implementation and impact on risk management.Clinical Psychology-science and Practice
-
Karl Hanson, L. Helmus, A. Harris, Cathrine Pettersen, Shelley Price, Chelsea Sheahan (2015)
Assessing the Risk and Needs of Supervised Sexual OffendersCriminal Justice and Behavior, 42
-
AB Batastini (2019)
92Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25
-
T. Neal, T. Grisso (2014)
Assessment Practices and Expert Judgment Methods in Forensic Psychology and PsychiatryCriminal Justice and Behavior, 41
-
T. Neal, S. Brodsky (2016)
Forensic psychologists' perceptions of bias and potential correction strategies in forensic mental health evaluationsPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 22
-
Justin Pickett, Christina Mancini, D. Mears (2013)
Vulnerable victims, monstrous offenders, and unmanageable risk: Explaining public opinion on the social control of sex crimeCriminology, 51
-
J. Berg, W. Smid, K. Schepers, Edwin Wever, D. Beek, E. Janssen, L. Gijs (2018)
The Predictive Properties of Dynamic Sex Offender Risk Assessment Instruments: A Meta-AnalysisPsychological Assessment, 30
-
D. Glik (2007)
Risk communication for public health emergencies.Annual review of public health, 28
-
Tamara Beuf, C. Ruiter, V. Vogel (2020)
Staff Perceptions on the Implementation of Structured Risk Assessment with the START:AV: Identifying Barriers and Facilitators in a Residential Youth Care SettingInternational Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 19
-
R. Hanson, K. Babchishin, L. Helmus, D. Thornton, Amy Phenix (2017)
Communicating the Results of Criterion Referenced Prediction Measures: Risk Categories for the Static-99R and Static-2002R Sexual Offender Risk Assessment ToolsPsychological Assessment, 29
-
G. Vincent, Laura Guy, Rachael Perrault, Bernice Gershenson (2016)
Risk assessment matters, but only when implemented well: A multisite study in juvenile probation.Law and human behavior, 40 6
-
Daniel Murrie, M. Boccaccini (2015)
Adversarial Allegiance Among Expert WitnessesAnnual Review of Law and Social Science, 11
-
Ruth Tully, Shihning Chou, K. Browne (2013)
A systematic review on the effectiveness of sex offender risk assessment tools in predicting sexual recidivism of adult male sex offenders.Clinical psychology review, 33 2
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Copyright
- © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
- ISBN
- 978-3-030-80211-0
- Pages
- 103 –119
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-80212-7_7
- Publisher site
- See Chapter on Publisher Site
Abstract
[Over the last decades, risk assessment has gained a firm foothold in the criminal justice system of Western countries. This increased importance of risk assessment aligns with developments in research on mainly the predictive validity of risk assessment instruments. Time has however come to shift the focus from arguments about the predictive value towards other factors that may improve the quality of risk assessment in clinical practice. This chapter focuses on solutions that enhance the field reliability of these instruments, strengthen the link between risk assessment and management, and ensure a thorough practical implementation of these tools; these factors play an important role in making risk assessment better. Key issues are analysed with respect to the current and future challenges they pose to risk assessment.]
Published: Jan 1, 2022
Keywords: Risk assessment; Interrater reliability; Risk management; Risk communication; Implementation