Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Mann, R. Hanson, D. Thornton (2010)
Assessing Risk for Sexual Recidivism: Some Proposals on the Nature of Psychologically Meaningful Risk FactorsSexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22
R. Sarre (2001)
Beyond ‘What Works?’ A 25-year Jubilee Retrospective of Robert Martinsons Famous ArticleAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 34
J. Bosker, C. Witteman (2016)
Finding the right focus: Improving the link between risk/needs assessment and case management in probationPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 22
Sandy Jung, Anna Pham, L. Ennis (2013)
Measuring the disparity of categorical risk among various sex offender risk assessment measuresThe Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24
Heather Dyck, M. Campbell, J. Wershler (2018)
Real-World Use of the Risk–Need–Responsivity Model and the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory With Community-Supervised OffendersLaw and Human Behavior, 42
Christopher Romani, R. Morgan, Nicole Gross, B. McDonald (2012)
TREATING CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR: Is the Bang Worth the Buck?Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 18
J. Viglione (2017)
Street-Level Decision Making: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Use of Evidence-Based Practices in Adult ProbationCriminal Justice and Behavior, 44
Duyen Luong, Duyen Luong, J. Wormith (2011)
Applying Risk/Need Assessment to Probation Practice and its Impact on the Recidivism of Young OffendersCriminal Justice and Behavior, 38
Jodi Viljoen, Dana Cochrane, Melissa Jonnson (2018)
Do Risk Assessment Tools Help Manage and Reduce Risk of Violence and Reoffending? A Systematic ReviewLaw and Human Behavior, 42
Jayne Allam, H. Gretton, Andre Haag, L. Harkins, S. Huot, Stephen Kramer, D. Kriegman, I. Lambie, R. Hanson, Guy Bourgon, L. Helmus, S. Hodgson (2009)
The Principles of Effective Correctional Treatment Also Apply To Sexual OffendersCriminal Justice and Behavior, 36
Guy Bourgon, Rebecca Mugford, R. Hanson, Marie Coligado (2017)
Offender Risk Assessment Practices Vary across CanadaCanadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 60
S. Lilienfeld, L. Ritschel, S. Lynn, R. Cautin, R. Latzman (2013)
Why many clinical psychologists are resistant to evidence-based practice: root causes and constructive remedies.Clinical psychology review, 33 7
S. Wormith, D. Andrews, J. Bonta, S. Wormith (2011)
The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) ModelCriminal Justice and Behavior, 38
Demetra Andrews, J. Bonta (2010)
Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 16
Brian Lovins, Christopher Lowenkamp, Edward Latessa (2009)
Applying the Risk Principle to Sex OffendersThe Prison Journal, 89
J. Bonta, Tanya Rugge, Terri Scott, Guy Bourgon, Annie Yessine (2008)
Exploring the Black Box of Community SupervisionJournal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47
D. Andrews, I. Zinger, R. Hoge, J. Bonta, P. Gendreau, F. Cullen (1990)
DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK? A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED META-ANALYSIS *Criminology, 28
J. Bonta, Guy Bourgon, Tanya Rugge, Carmen Gress, Leticia Gutierrez (2013)
Taking the Leap: From Pilot Project to Wide-Scale Implementation of the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS)Justice Research and Policy, 15
H. Barbaree, Calvin Langton, E. Peacock (2006)
Different Actuarial Risk Measures Produce Different Risk Rankings for Sexual OffendersSexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18
G. Zara, D. Farrington, Sandy Jung (2020)
Denial in Sex Offending Treatment: Examining Criminal Career DiversityJournal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 20
[Many advances have led to progress in the field of assessment and treatment of people who have committed a sexual offence (PCSO). A significant advancement that efficiently guides rehabilitation is a set of principles called risk, need, and responsivity (RNR). RNR principles help to identify who should receive services, what factors should be targeted to reduce reoffending, and how services should be delivered to offenders. This chapter provides an overview of the RNR principles and its origins, and the rationale and need for implementing RNR principles in practice. In light of the challenges of adopting RNR principles, caveats related to translation and implementation are explored and steps that we can take to move the field forward by using RNR principles are discussed.]
Published: Jan 1, 2022
Keywords: RNR; Sexual abuse; Criminogenic needs; Responsivity; Treatment
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.