Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
I. Horowitz (1972)
On entering the tenth year of transactionSociety, 10
H. Zuckerman (1971)
66Minerva, 9
I. L. Horowitz (1972)
49Society, 10
H. Zuckerman, R. Merton (1971)
Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee systemMinerva, 9
[This is a review of the birth and development of one social science journal. I explain how it began, why I became the editor, why Reidel became the publisher, and why it has the format and style that it has. Operating policies and procedures are reviewed. Profiles of our output according to areas of concern and countries of origin are presented. Acceptance and rejection rates are considered. Problems with book reviews, marketing and complaints are described, and some future prospects are outlined.]
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Keywords: Rejection Rate; Social Indicator; Social Indicator Research; Citation Classic; Social Science Research Council
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.