Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Poorman (2005)
A holistic transportation planning framework for management and operationsIte Journal-institute of Transportation Engineers, 75
E. Diener (1984)
Subjective well-being.Psychological bulletin, 95 3
K. Motamedi (1976)
The quality of American life
M. Sirgy, D. Rahtz, M. Cicic, Robert Underwood (2000)
A method for assessing residents' satisfaction with community-based services: a quality-of-life perspectiveSocial Indicators Research, 49
Marilyn Bruin, Christine Cook (1997)
Understanding Constraints and Residential Satisfaction Among Low-Income Single-Parent FamiliesEnvironment and Behavior, 29
G. Galster, G. Hesser (1981)
Residential SatisfactionEnvironment and Behavior, 13
J. Lansing, R. Marans, R. Zehner (1970)
Planned Residential Environments
V. Preston, G. Galster (1987)
Homeowners and Neighborhood ReinvestmentEconomic Geography, 64
Barrett Lee, A. Guest (1983)
Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Metropolitan-Level Analysis*Sociological Quarterly, 24
Susan Vrbka, E. Combs (1993)
Predictors of Neighborhood and Community Satisfactions in Rural CommunitiesHousing and society, 20
D. Dahmann (1983)
Subjective Assessments of Neighborhood Quality by Size of PlaceUrban Studies, 20
F. Andrews, S. Withey (1976)
Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality
M. Sirgy, T. Cornwell (2001)
Further Validation of the Sirgy et al.'s Measure of Community Quality of LifeSocial Indicators Research, 56
D. Bailey, D. Johnston (1983)
Measurement of Subjective Phenomena.Contemporary Sociology, 12
F. Andrews, S. Withey (1976)
Social Indicators of Well-Being
[In today’s community, members are influenced by a variety of domains that make up the total community in which they live. Organizations from a variety of cities are trying to monitor the community’s well-being for a variety of domains. In Baltimore, The Enterprise Foundation Initiative uses 40 outcome indicators as “vital signs” of community well-being. These indicators are drawn from a variety of domains such as housing and community development, family health, safety, sanitation, education, and even sense of community (Anonymous, 2005). These factors go far beyond the traditional use of basic economic indicators often touted by community officials when they talk about community quality of life (QOL). Disciplines and businesses alike that have not traditionally examined these more subjective measures in their decisions are now beginning to recognize the importance of such community assessment in decisions regarding development. For example, Poorman (2005) examines a community domain, traffic and transportation, which has grown in importance over recent years. In that piece he calls for a planning strategy built taking into account public expectations that include things beyond simple economic concerns. He notes that planners need to consider such things as community structure, public health, and a variety of QOL domains. Difficulties arise, however, when there is not a theoretically sound framework that can guide public policy decisions regarding the integration, application, and monitoring of these domains.]
Published: Jan 1, 2006
Keywords: Life Satisfaction; Life Domain; Government Service; Global Satisfaction; Global Life Satisfaction
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.