Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[The introductory chapter discusses the changing status of anatomy with a focus on the intellectual landscape of Brussels and the period after 1850. What role did anatomy play in the clinic, in medical research and in university education, and how did this evolve under the influence of emergent scientific ideals and medical disciplines? Claes shows that through the adjustment and expansion of the disciplinary landscape, anatomy was redefined as a descriptive science, confined to observation and taxonomy, without a larger scientific agenda. Even though descriptive anatomy remained an essential teaching tool and a constituent of medical identity, its contribution to the progress of medical science was considered, in the words of a contemporary observer, ‘done’.]
Published: Nov 21, 2019
Keywords: Anatomy; Medical specialisation; Medical education; Medical identity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.