Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[In the conclusion, Claes returns to her main point, namely that anatomists began to treat the body as a subject rather than an object. Carefully comparing her own research on Belgium with other national and regional cases, she argues that the decades around 1900 were a pivotal moment in the history of anatomy. Cultural, religious and personal sensibilities began to affect the treatment of the corpse in anatomy from acquisition to disposal: anatomical donation gradually replaced the involuntary dissection of the poor, the inviolability of the corpse became more important during autopsies and anatomical remains no longer received an anonymous inhumation, but an individual grave.]
Published: Nov 21, 2019
Keywords: Anatomy; Corpse; Objectification; Culture of death; Medical ethics
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.