Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Culture and Well-BeingNorms for Experiencing Emotions in Different Cultures: Inter- and Intranational Differences

Culture and Well-Being: Norms for Experiencing Emotions in Different Cultures: Inter- and... [Within- and between-nations differences in norms for experiencing emotions were analyzed in a cross-cultural study with 1,846 respondents from 2 individualistic (United States, Australia) and 2 collectivistic (China, Taiwan) countries. A multigroup latent class analysis revealed that there were both universal and culture-specific types of norms for experiencing emotions. Moreover, strong intranational variability in norms for affect could be detected, particularly for collectivistic nations. Unexpectedly, individualistic nations were most uniform in norms, particularly with regard to pleasant affect. Individualistic and collectivistic nations differed most strongly in norms for self-reflective emotions (e.g., pride and guilt). Norms for emotions were related to emotional experiences within nations. Furthermore, there were strong national differences in reported emotional experiences, even when norms were held constant.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Culture and Well-BeingNorms for Experiencing Emotions in Different Cultures: Inter- and Intranational Differences

Part of the Social Indicators Research Series Book Series (volume 38)
Editors: Diener, Ed
Culture and Well-Being — Jan 1, 2009

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/culture-and-well-being-norms-for-experiencing-emotions-in-different-2tcNgUaGcL

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
© Springer Netherlands 2009
ISBN
978-90-481-2351-3
Pages
169 –202
DOI
10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_9
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[Within- and between-nations differences in norms for experiencing emotions were analyzed in a cross-cultural study with 1,846 respondents from 2 individualistic (United States, Australia) and 2 collectivistic (China, Taiwan) countries. A multigroup latent class analysis revealed that there were both universal and culture-specific types of norms for experiencing emotions. Moreover, strong intranational variability in norms for affect could be detected, particularly for collectivistic nations. Unexpectedly, individualistic nations were most uniform in norms, particularly with regard to pleasant affect. Individualistic and collectivistic nations differed most strongly in norms for self-reflective emotions (e.g., pride and guilt). Norms for emotions were related to emotional experiences within nations. Furthermore, there were strong national differences in reported emotional experiences, even when norms were held constant.]

Published: Jan 1, 2009

Keywords: Negative Emotion; Measurement Invariance; Positive Emotion; Latent Class; Emotional Experience

There are no references for this article.