Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
wendy0782@126.com 1 The high-resolution (HR) spatio-temporal flow field plays a decisive role in describing College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, the details of the flow field. In the acquisition of the HR flow field, traditional direct National University of Defense numerical simulation (DNS) and other methods face a seriously high computational Technology, Changsha 410073, burden. To address this deficiency, we propose a novel multi-scale temporal path UNet China Defense Innovation Institute, (MST-UNet) model to reconstruct temporal and spatial HR flow fields from low-resolu- Chinese Academy of Military tion (LR) flow field data. Different from the previous super-resolution (SR) model, which Science, Beijing 100071, China only takes advantage of LR flow field data at instantaneous (SLR) or in a time-series (MTLR), MST-UNet introduces multi-scale information in both time and space. MST- UNet takes the LR data at the current frame and the predicted HR result at the previous moment as the model input to complete the spatial SR reconstruction. On this basis, a temporal model is introduced as the inbetweening model to obtain HR flow field data in space and time to complete spatio-temporal SR reconstruction. Finally, the proposed model is validated by the spatio-temporal SR task of the flow field around two-dimen- sional cylinders. Experimental results show that the outcome of the MST-UNet model in spatial SR tasks is much better than those of SLR and MTLR, which can greatly improve prediction accuracy. In addition, for the spatio-temporal SR task, the spatio-temporal HR flow field predicted by the MST-UNet model has higher accuracy either. Keywords: Super-resolution, Flow field, UNet, Deep learning 1 Introduction The demand for HR data in the flow field has always been a major pursuit in computa - tional fluid dynamics (CFD). Many CFD methods, such as the finite volume (FV) [1], the finite difference (FD) [2] and the lattice Boltzmann (LBM) [3, 4], can be performed for obtaining HR turbulence data. Unlike the CFD methods that directly solve the Navier- Stokes (NS) equations on a macroscopic scale, the LBM simulates the flow field based on the lattice Boltzmann equation on a mesoscopic scale. Compared to FD and FV solv- ers, LBM is simpler in modeling and implementation, has parallel processing capabili- ties, and is more successful in processing complex boundaries [5, 6]. However, for HR turbulent flow data, LBM usually requires a large number of lattice numbers with a very small time step, which makes the acquisition of HR data time-consuming and compu- tationally expensive [7]. Due to the high data cost of LBM results for the flow field, the rapid development of data-driven models provides an effective way to obtain HR flow © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the mate- rial. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 2 of 16 data in real-time [8–10]. In this study, we focus on obtaining HR turbulent flows from LR spatio-temporal data in real-time using deep learning (DL) models. With the mushroom growth of deep learning technology, deep neural networks have been widely used in flow field SR and reconstruction tasks [11–13]. Various deep learn - ing models have been applied in turbulent flow field super-resolution [14–17]. Fukami et al. [18] proposed a hybrid downsampled skip-connection/multi-scale (DSC/MS) model to reconstruct two-dimensional homogeneous turbulence. Considering the multi-scale information of the flow field, Liu et al. [19] designed a multi-resolution con - volutional autoencoder (MrCAE) SR architecture that leverages the multigrid method and transfer learning. MrCAE can dynamically capture different scaled flow informa - tion at different network depths. Given the difficulty of obtaining HR label information, Gao et al. [20] proposed the CNN-SR model, which is trained without any high-resolu- tion labels in a physics-driven way. Han et al. [21] proposed a novel deep learning solu- tion that recovers temporal super-resolution (TSR) of three-dimensional vector field data (VFD) for unsteady flow. In addition to the CNN model, the generative adversarial network (GAN) [22] model is also widely used in flow field super-resolution. Güemes et al. [23] used the super-resolution generative adversarial network (SRGAN) to recon- struct the turbulent flow measured by the coarse wall. The results show that SRGAN can obtain perfect reconstruction even at very low resolution. In addition, Deng et al. [24] compared the results of two models, SRGAN and enhanced-SRGAN (ESRGAN), on super-resolution reconstructions of complicated wake flows behind cylinders. Their results found that ESRGAN has better reconstruction ability than SRGAN in both mean and fluctuation flow fields. To reconstruct HR turbulent flow by minimal flow field data, Yousif et al. [25] proposed the multi-scale ESRGAN with a physics-based loss function. Considering the great performance of reduced-order models in flow field prediction, the combination of reduced-order models with deep learning can also be well applied to flow field super-resolution tasks. Guastoni et al. [26] combined a fully convolutional neural network (FCN) with proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) [27]. They pro - posed the FCN-POD model, which has great performance in reconstructing the flow field from coarse wall measurements. The flow field SR technology based on deep learn - ing can accurately obtain the HR flow field in real-time, which is of great significance for obtaining high-precision flow field information. Most of the models mentioned above only use the spatial information of the low- resolution flow field in the SR reconstruction of the flow field, which will increase the prediction error of the model. In order to improve the quality of the SR reconstruction, Liu et al. [28] proposed multiple temporal paths convolutional neural network (MTPC). The LR information of the current moment and two adjacent moments is adopted as the input of the MTPC network, and then the output of the three moments is weighted to predict the HR image of the current moment. The results indicate that the MTPC has a better reconstruction capability than only using LR information at the current moment. In addition, Fukami et al. [29] further proposed a spatio-temporal SR model based on the temporal SR task. They constructed a temporal model and a spatial model, respec - tively, to reconstruct the HR information over a period of time, only using the LR infor- mation at the first and last moments. Their work has made important contributions to reconstructing the spatio-temporal flow field. Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 3 of 16 In this paper, to further improve the prediction accuracy of the HR flow field, we pro - pose the MST-UNet model for flow field SR tasks with spatio-temporal combination. Since the flow field is usually spatially and temporally coupled, the MST-UNet model not only uses the LR spatial information of the flow field at the current frame but also incorporates the HR information predicted at the previous frame. The information input of this spatio-temporal combination can further improve prediction accuracy. In addi- tion, we apply the MST-UNet model to the spatio-temporal SR task, which can recon- struct the HR information of a series of intermediate frames only from the beginning and end frames of LR information. The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. Section 2 introduces the MST- UNet model and spatio-temporal SR task. The construction of datasets and the results of the MST-UNet model in spatial SR and spatio-temporal SR tasks are presented in Sec- tion 3. Section 4 concludes the paper. 2 Methods The purpose of this study is to reconstruct the spatio-temporal HR flow field from LR data in real time using CNN. In order to predict the HR flow field at the current frame, we use the LR information at the current frame and the HR information at the previous frame. In this way, we can obtain HR flow field information by learning the end-to-end mapping function F, SR HR LR P = F P , P , θ , (1) t t−1 t SR where P is the result of SR reconstruction, and θ means the learnable network param- LR HR eters in CNN, P and P represent LR information at the current frame and HR t−1 HR information at the previous frame, respectively. It should be noted that P is not the t−1 label information but the model output result at the previous frame instead. We can take advantage of the LR information at the current moment only, which is a normal single-input-single-output situation. Compared with this case, using the previous time information can improve the data utilization efficiency and prediction accuracy. In this multiple-input-single-output case, the shared explicit redundancy from adjacent frames will provide more constraints. In the current work, the MST-UNet model is first introduced for the SR tasks. Then, we apply the MST-UNet model in the spatio-temporal SR task. 2.1 MST ‑UNet model HR In the MST-UNet model, the HR images of the previous frame ( P ) and the LR images t−1 LR of the current frame ( P ) are combined as the model input, which is multi-scale infor- LR mation. To fuse this multi-scale information as model input, the P is first up-sampled inter HR inter to the target resolution P using the bicubic interpolation. Then, the P and P t t−1 t are concatenated into a two-channel image as the input of the model (Fig. 1). In this paper, the UNet model [30] is adopted as the basic model of the SR task, which is one outstanding image-to-image CNN model. The UNet model is an encoder- decoder architecture consisting of a contracting path that captures global information (encoder) and an asymmetric expanding path to reconstruct HR information (decoder). Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 4 of 16 HR Fig. 1 Data fusion for the input of the model. The HR images of the previous frame ( P ) and the LR images t−1 LR of the current frame ( P ) are combined as the input of the model, and the interpolation method is used to make two inputs the same size HR Fig. 2 The UNet architecture for SR tasks. The input of the model is a two-channel image consisting of P t−1 inter and P , and the output of the model is the HR image at the current frame In addition to combining LR information during downsampling and HR information during upsampling, the UNet model fills in the underlying information through a feature fusion operation of skip connections to improve prediction accuracy. Due to this par- ticular framework, UNet has gained great success on computer vision tasks. The super-resolution task we deal with is a typical image-to-image regression problem, and the classic UNet structure is modified for better application to this assignment, as HR shown in Fig. 2. The input of the model is a two-channel image consisting of P and t−1 inter P , and the output of the model is the HR image at the current frame. The blue arrow is a basic block made up of three parts, followed by a 3 × 3 convolutional layer, Group- Norm (GN) [31] and ReLU activation functions ( φ(x) = max(x,0) ). Since the batch nor- malization method is relatively dependent on the batch size, when the batch size is too small, the calculated mean and variance are insufficient to represent the entire data dis - tribution. The GN method is employed in this problem, independent of the batch size. The UNet model consists of the contracting path (on the left) and the expansive path (on the right). As for the contracting path, four downsampling blocks (red arrow) using Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 5 of 16 average pooling with 2 × 2 filters and stride 2 are adopted for feature extraction. Cor - respondingly, the expansive path consists of four identical 2× upsampling blocks, using bilinear interpolation instead of the transpose convolution. For our modified UNet model, the contracting path and the expansive path are completely symmetric, which makes the input and output of the model the same size. In the training process, in order to predict the HR image at the t frame, the LR infor- LR LR mation of the t ( P ) and t − 1 ( P ) frames is used. As shown in Fig. 3, in order to t t−1 obtain the HR results of the previous frame, we use interpolation to obtain an initial value in the first epoch of the training process. In the remaining epochs, the idea of the memory bank [32] is adopted. The prediction results of the previous epoch will be stored and used as the HR images of the previous frame. The L1 loss is chosen as the loss function, SR HR Loss = P − P . mst (2) t t t=1 Loss is the loss function of the MST-UNet. According to (2), the network param- mst eters can be updated using the back-propagation algorithm. 2.2 Spatio‑temporal super resolution For reconstructing the spatio-temporal flow field, Fukami et al. [29] proposed two meth - ods. Both methods include temporal and spatial models, but in different orders. As shown in Fig. 4(a), for LR spatial and temporal information ( P(x , t ) ), we apply LR LR ∗ n ×m n ×m LR LR LR HR the inbetweening temporal model ( F : R → R ) to obtain ( P(x , t ) ), LR HR which has HR temporal information. Then the spatial model ( F ) is employed to gain HR spatial and temporal information ( P(x , t )). LR HR Fig. 3 Schematic diagram of the multi-scale temporal path UNet model Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 6 of 16 Fig. 4 Spatio-temporal SR reconstruction of the flow field using deep learning. (a) shows the combine model using the temporal model as the inbetweening model while (b) demonstrates the combine model using the spatial model P(x , t ) = F (P(x , t )), LR HR LR LR P(x , t ) = F (P(x , t )), HR HR x LR HR (3) P(x , t ) = F F (q(x , t )) . HR HR x LR LR Correspondingly, we can use the spatial model as the inbetweening model to obtain HR spatial information ( P(x , t ) ), and then use the temporal model to obtain HR spa- HR LR tial and temporal information (Fig. 4(b)). P(x , t ) = F P x , t , ( ( )) HR LR LR LR P(x , t ) = F (P(x , t )), HR HR t HR LR (4) P(x , t ) = F F (q(x , t )) , HR HR t LR LR where n is the dimension of spatial information and m is the dimension of tempo- ral information. P(x , t ) represents LR spatial and temporal information, which is the LR LR model input. P(x , t ) represents HR temporal information while LR spatial informa- LR HR tion. Similarly, P(x , t ) represents HR spatial while LR temporal information, and HR LR Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 7 of 16 P(x , t ) represents HR temporal and spatial information, which is the output of the HR HR model. In this study, the first model is selected as the spatio-temporal SR model, which uses the temporal model as the inbetweening model. In the temporal model, we still use the UNet model, taking the first and last two frames of the LR image as input, and the out - put is a series of LR images in the middle frame. In this way, the MST-UNet model pro- posed in Section 2.1 can be used as a spatial model to improve the model prediction accuracy further. The loss function of the spatio-temporal SR model is as follows, Loss =�P(x , t ) − F F (P(x , t )) �, ts HR HR x LR LR (5) =�P(x , t ) − P(x , t )�. HR HR HR HR Among them, P(x , t ) represents the label information of a series of frames. HR HR 3 Numerical results To evaluate the ability of the MST-UNet model to reconstruct HR flow fields, the flow around cylinders is used as our test [33, 34]. The entire flow field domain is shown in Fig. 5. In Fig. 5, D = 0.2 m and u = 0.2 m/s represent the cylinder diameter and initial veloc- ity, respectively. The LBM is applied in the construction of the data set. 3.1 T he lattice Boltzmann method The LBM is performed on a square lattice where at each node there is a discrete number of directions in which the fluid particles can move. In this study, a 2D model with nine lattice velocities - the D2Q9, will be discussed and applied. A general form of the LBM equation can be written as follows [35], coll f (x + e �t, t + �t) − f (x, t) = � (x, t), (6) i i i where f is a discrete distribution function at position x , with average particle lattice coll velocity e , pointing in direction i (see Fig. 6), at time t. is the collision operator, and will be discussed later. e = e , e is the directional vector and it takes the following i x,i y,i values: Fig. 5 The illustration of the flow domain around three cylinders Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 8 of 16 Fig. 6 D2Q9 basic lattice velocity directions e , e , . . . e 0, 1, 0,−1, 0, 1,−1,−1, 1 x,0 x,1 x,8 e = = . (7) e , e , . . . e 0, 0, 1, 0,−1, 1, 1,−1,−1 y,0 y,1 y,8 The local fluid density ρ is computed as the sum of all f on site. The expression for the D2Q9 lattice model is the following, ρ(x, t) = f (x, t). i (8) i=0 The local fluid velocity u = u , u can be computed from the expression for x y the local momentum. ρ(x, t)u(x, t) = f (x, t)e . i i (9) i=1 The Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK) model has the simplest form of the presented collision operators, which reads as follows [35, 36], eq coll � =−ω f (x, t) − f (x, t) . (10) eq f is the local equilibrium distribution function, and is computed from the local macroscopic velocity u , and the local density ρ. 9 3 eq f (u, ρ) = w ρ(x, t) 1 + 3e · u(x, t) + (e · u(x, t)) − u(x, t) · u(x, t) , i i i (11) 2 2 where w is the equilibrium weight factor in the i-th direction. Its values add up to 1, and in D2Q9 they equal: 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w = (w ,w , . . .w ) = , , , , , , , , . 0 1 8 (12) 9 9 9 9 9 36 36 36 36 w is the relaxation rate and is the inverse of the relaxation time τ = . From the relaxa- tion rate, the fluid’s kinematic viscosity v can be calculated, 1 1 1 v = − . (13) 3 ω 2 Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 9 of 16 There are three cylinders in the domain, with center coordinates x , y , x , y , and 0 0 1 1 x , y . In our problem, the range of six coordinates is shown in Table 1. Two datasets of 2 2 different sizes are generated to illustrate the effectiveness of our model. One is a small data - set with the size of 5000, denoted as Dataset : 500 groups of different cylindrical positions are generated using the Latin hypercube sampling method. For each set of positions, we generate 10 frames of data at consecutive moments. The other one is a large dataset com - pleted with the size of 19000, which has 1000 groups of different cylindrical positions and 19 frames of data at each position, denoted as Dataset . In each dataset, 80% of the sam- ples are used for training, and the remaining 20% for testing. The position of the cylinder changes, and the flow field at each position varies with time, which increases the difficulty of the SR task. In our problem, the resolution of HR and LR flow fields is 128 × 256 and 16 × 32 separately with an upscaling factor of 8. In the experiments, we first investigate the spatial SR task using the MST-UNet model. Then, on the basis of the spatial super-resolution task, the spatial-temporal SR task is fur - ther studied. The mean absolute error (MAE) and L error norms (ε ) are adopted as the metrics to evaluate the performance of the MST-UNet model and spatial-temporal SR task, where ε is defined as HR LR HR ε = P − F P , θ /P . (14) 2 2 3.2 Spatial super‑resolution task In this task, our MST-UNet model combines the HR information of the previous moment with the LR information of the current moment. By contrast, models with LR information as inputs only are introduced, SR LR P = F P , θ , (15) [t−d:t] LR where P represents a sequence of LR data and θ represents model parameters. In [t−d:t] SR LR the case of d = 0 , the mapping between input and output becomes P = F P , θ , which is the case of general single-input-single-output, denoted as SLR-UNet . Under the circumstances, the model input contains only instantaneous spatial information, not temporal information. When d > 0 , the model input combines LR information from multiple moments, as shown in Fig. 7. Besides the case of d = 0 , the two cases d = 1 and d = 2 are also known as our comparative experiments, denoted as MTLR1-UNet and MTLR2-UNet , respectively. The loss function for these models is as follows, Table 1 The value range of six coordinates Parameter Lower Bound/m Upper Bound/m x 0.6 0.8 y 0.6 0.8 x 0.2 0.4 y 0.2 0.8 x 0.6 0.8 y 0.2 0.4 2 Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 10 of 16 LR HR Loss = F P , θ , P . MTLR (16) [t−d:t] It is worth noting that in order to ensure the fairness of the comparison experiments, the different models used for comparison only have different input information while with the same network structure. We perform SR on the curl of the flow field. These models are evaluated on the test set, and the results of MAE and L error norms on two different dataset sizes are shown in Table 2. Where the MST-UNet model is the model proposed in this paper, SLR-UNet , MTLR1-UNet and MTLR2-UNet correspond to the model in (15) where d is 0, 1 and 2 respectively. It can be seen from the results that the error decreases significantly as the dataset size increases. In the comparison of different models, on both datasets the spatial model containing time information ( MTLR1-UNet and MTLR2-UNet ) is bet- ter than the spatial model using the LR information at the current frame (SLR-UNet ) only. For models with different frames of LR information as input, i.e. MTLR1-UNet and MTLR2-UNet , we find that MTLR2-UNet does not perform well, compared to the MTLR1-UNet model with less input LR information. The main reason is that the LR information of multiple frames as input is redundant or invalid, which will affect the prediction accuracy to a certain extent. In the performance of MST-UNet model, it is obvious from Table 2 that the error of the MST-UNet model proposed in this paper is significantly lower than the rest of the models in each indicator. In addition, this advan - tage is more obvious as the size of the dataset increases. For the results of Dataset , it can be seen that the model prediction errors of the three models SLR-UNet , MTLR1-UNet and MTLR2-UNet , have little difference. From the results, we can find that in the case of sufficient data, the increase of LR temporal information has little effect on the prediction accuracy of the model. However, the MST-UNet model that uses the HR information of the previous frame can greatly improve the prediction accuracy compared to the model which only uses the LR temporal information, since the MST-UNet model uses the HR information of the previous frame in addition to the LR information of the current frame. Generally speaking, the HR information of the previous frame can contain most of the information before the current frame, which allows us to use the information of Fig. 7 Schematic diagram of the multi-scale time path network (MST-UNet) Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 11 of 16 Table 2 Results of the four models on the test set −4 −1 Dataset Model L error norms MAE (×10 s ) 2 Dataset MST-UNet 2.44 0.046 SLR-UNet 4.00 0.065 MTLR1-UNet 2.99 0.055 MTLR2-UNet 3.52 0.062 Dataset MST-UNet 1.24 0.031 SLR-UNet 1.94 0.039 MTLR1-UNet 1.76 0.038 MTLR2-UNet 1.81 0.038 −4 −1 Table 3 The MAE (× 10 s ) of the four models in the test set on Dataset Frame number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MST-UNet 3.53 2.49 2.34 2.31 2.31 2.29 2.28 2.27 2.29 2.32 SLR-UNet 4.03 4.41 5.53 7.16 3.82 3.06 2.98 2.97 2.97 3.04 MTLR1-UNet 3.02 2.94 2.97 2.99 3.00 2.99 2.98 2.98 2.98 3.02 MTLR2-UNet 3.61 3.58 3.45 3.46 3.48 3.49 3.49 3.50 3.53 3.61 the previous frame very efficiently compared to the MTLR1-UNet and MTLR2-UNet models. For the spatio-temporal flow field, since we usually pay more attention to the flow field of the last frame, the overall low average error does not reflect the prediction error of the model at a certain moment, and it is very likely that the error accumulates with time. We calculate the average error over 10 frames across all different cylinder positions in the test set, and the MAE of Dataset and Dataset are shown in Table 3 and Fig. 8, respectively. s l From the results, it can be seen that the prediction error of the MST-UNet model is much lower than that of the SLR-UNet , MTLR1-UNet and MTLR2-UNet models on both Dataset and Dataset except for the first frame. Furthermore, the prediction −4 −1 Fig. 8 The MAE (× 10 s ) of the four models in the test set on Dataset 19000 Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 12 of 16 errors eventually stabilize over time and do not increase. The reason for the high pre - diction error of the first frame is that the HR input of the previous frame is obtained by interpolation. In order to improve the prediction accuracy of the first frame, we can also build a separate model for the first frame to improve the prediction accuracy. However, for the space-time flow field, we generally focus on the information at later moments. The errors of the last frame at one position on the test sets are shown in Figs. 9 and 10, respectively. The results show that the performance of MST-UNet is greatly improved compared to the other three models. Fig. 9 Performance of different models in the test set on Dataset Fig. 10 Performance of different models in the test set on Dataset l Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 13 of 16 3.3 Spatio‑temporal super‑resolution task As shown in Section 2.2, the purpose of the spatio-temporal SR task is to reconstruct HR information of a time series from the LR information at the first and last two frames. As shown in Section 2, two models can be used in the spatio-temporal SR task. One is to obtain HR temporal information through the temporal model first, and then gain HR spatial and temporal information through the spatial model, denoted as TS; the other model is in reverse order, taking the spatial model as the inbetweening model, which acquires the HR spatial information first, denoted as ST. In order to facilitate compari - son, for different cylinder positions in Dataset , we select the first ten frames. In our spatio-temporal SR task, we predict the HR information of eight frames through the LR information at the first and last two frames (frame 1 and frame 10). Fig. 11 Performance of the TS model on the spatio-temporal super-resolution task Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 14 of 16 Our model adopts the TS model. For the temporal model, we employ the UNet model in Fig. 2, which takes the LR images of the 1st and 10th frames as input and the output is a series of LR images between the two frames. Since the temporal model has output a series of LR images, on the spatial model, we adopt the MST-UNet model proposed in Section 2.1. A set of results for the TS model is shown in Fig. 11. The comparison model adopts the ST model. On the spatial model, since there are only two frames of LR images, we use the single model in Section 3.2. The temporal model in ST adopts the UNet model too, while the input and output are HR images. Figure 12 presents a set of results for the ST model. We evaluate the results of both models on the test set, and the results of MAE and L2 error norm are shown in Table 4. The results show that the TS model we use is lower than the ST model in all indicators, which shows that the TS containing the MST-UNet model has good performance on the spatio-temporal SR task. Fig. 12 Performance of the ST model on the spatio-temporal super-resolution task Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 15 of 16 Table 4 Results of the two models on the test set −4 −1 Dataset Model L error norms MAE (×10 s ) 2 Dataset TS 5.20 0.059 ST 7.40 0.076 Dataset TS 3.02 0.039 ST 4.32 0.048 4 Conclusions In this paper, we propose the MST-UNet model for SR reconstruction of spatio-tem- poral flow fields. In order to obtain the HR result of the current frame, the MST-UNet model combines the LR information of the current moment and the HR information of the previous moment. In addition, we apply the MST-UNet model to the task of flow field reconstruction around cylinders and verify the proposed model on two tasks: spatial SR and spatio-temporal SR. The experimental results show that the MST-UNet model is much better than the other models that only use LR information as input in the spatial SR task. In the spatio-temporal SR task, the results of the model with MST-UNet are significantly improved compared with the model that only uses low-resolution information. Although we explore a novel model for the spatio-temporal SR reconstruction prob- lem, many topics still exist for further investigation. Our model adopts a data-driven approach, which requires a lot of label data. We will adopt a physics-informed approach to reduce data costs in future work. Acknowledgements Not applicable. Authors’ contributions Conceptualization: KB, WP, XZ and WY; methodology: KB, XZ and WP; software: KB and WP; validation: KB, WY and XZ; formal analysis: WY and XZ; investigation: KB and WP; resources: KB, WY and WP; data curation: KB and WP; writing—origi- nal draft preparation: KB; writing—review and editing: KB, XZ and WP; visualization: KB and WP; supervision: XZ and WY; project administration: WY. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Funding Not applicable. Availability of data and materials The code of the neural network and data generator can be downloaded at: https:// github. com/ baoka irui/ MST- UNet. Declarations Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Received: 20 December 2022 Accepted: 6 April 2023 References 1. Chang RY, Yang WH (2001) Numerical simulation of mold filling in injection molding using a three-dimensional finite volume approach. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 37(2):125–148 2. Fakhari A, Lee T (2014) Finite-difference lattice Boltzmann method with a block-structured adaptive-mesh-refine - ment technique. Phys Rev E 89(3):033310 3. Strniša F, Urbic T, Plazl I (2020) A lattice Boltzmann study of 2D steady and unsteady flows around a confined cylin- der. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42:103 4. Koda Y, Lien FS (2015) The lattice Boltzmann method implemented on the GPU to simulate the turbulent flow over a square cylinder confined in a channel. Flow Turbulence Combust 94(3):495–512 Bao et al. Advances in Aerodynamics (2023) 5:19 Page 16 of 16 5. Wang Y, Shu C, Teo CJ et al (2015) An immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann flux solver and its applications to fluid- structure interaction problems. J Fluids Struct 54:440–465 6. Zheng HW, Shu C, Chew Y T (2006) A lattice Boltzmann model for multiphase flows with large density ratio. J Com- put Phys 218(1):353–371 7. Hennigh O (2017) Lat-Net: compressing lattice Boltzmann flow simulations using deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1705. 09036 8. Carrillo M, Que U, González JA (2016) Estimation of Reynolds number for flows around cylinders with lattice Boltz- mann methods and artificial neural networks. Phys Rev E 94(6):063304 9. Rabbani A, Babaei M (2019) Hybrid pore-network and lattice-Boltzmann permeability modelling accelerated by machine learning. Adv Water Resour 126:116–128 10. Janssens N, Huysmans M, Swennen R (2020) Computed tomography 3D super-resolution with generative adver- sarial neural networks: implications on unsaturated and two-phase fluid flow. Materials 13(6):1397 11. Kim H, Kim J, Won S et al (2021) Unsupervised deep learning for super-resolution reconstruction of turbulence. J Fluid Mech 910:A29 12. Sekar V, Jiang Q, Shu C et al (2019) Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach. Phys Fluids 31(5):057103 13. Han J, Tao J, Wang C (2018) FlowNet: A deep learning framework for clustering and selection of streamlines and stream surfaces. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 26(4):1732–1744 14. Srinivasan PA, Guastoni L, Azizpour H et al (2019) Predictions of turbulent shear flows using deep neural networks. Phys Rev Fluids 4(5):054603 15. Fukami K, Nabae Y, Kawai K et al (2019) Synthetic turbulent inflow generator using machine learning. Phys Rev Fluids 4(6):064603 16. Nakamura T, Fukami K, Hasegawa K et al (2021) Convolutional neural network and long short-term memory based reduced order surrogate for minimal turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids 33(2):025116 17. Linot AJ, Graham MD (2022) Data-driven reduced-order modeling of spatiotemporal chaos with neural ordinary differential equations. Chaos 32(7):073110 18. Fukami K, Fukagata K, Taira K (2019) Super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows with machine learning. J Fluid Mech 870:106–120 19. Liu Y, Ponce C, Brunton SL et al (2020) Multiresolution convolutional autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2004. 04946 20. Gao H, Sun L, Wang JX (2021) Super-resolution and denoising of fluid flow using physics-informed convolutional neural networks without high-resolution labels. Phys Fluids 33(7):073603 21. Han J, Wang C (2022) TSR-VFD: Generating temporal super-resolution for unsteady vector field data. Comput Graph 103:168–179 22. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M et al (2020) Generative adversarial networks. Commun ACM 63(11):139–144 23. Güemes A, Discetti S, Ianiro A et al (2021) From coarse wall measurements to turbulent velocity fields through deep learning. Phys Fluids 33(7):075121 24. Deng Z, He C, Liu Y et al (2019) Super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent velocity fields using a generative adver - sarial network-based artificial intelligence framework. Phys Fluids 31(12):125111 25. Yousif MZ, Yu L, Lim HC (2021) High-fidelity reconstruction of turbulent flow from spatially limited data using enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial network. Phys Fluids 33(12):125119 26. Guastoni L, Güemes A, Ianiro A et al (2021) Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantities. J Fluid Mech 928:A27 27. Towne A, Schmidt OT, Colonius T (2018) Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and its relationship to dynamic mode decomposition and resolvent analysis. J Fluid Mech 847:821–867 28. Liu B, Tang J, Huang H et al (2020) Deep learning methods for super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows. Phys Fluids 32(2):025105 29. Fukami K, Fukagata K, Taira K (2021) Machine-learning-based spatio-temporal super resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech 909:A9 30. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells W et al (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention – MICCAI 2015. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9351. Springer, Cham, pp 234–241 31. Wu Y, He K (2018) Group normalization. In: Ferrari V, Hebert M, Sminchisescu C et al (eds) Computer vision – ECCV 2018. Lecture notes in computer Science, vol 11217. Springer, Cham, pp 3–19 32. Wu Z, Xiong Y, Yu SX et al (2018) Unsupervised feature learning via non-parametric instance discrimination. In: Pro- ceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Salt Lake City, 18-23 June 2018, pp 3733–3742 33. Zhang K, Haque MdN (2022) Wake interactions between two side-by-side circular cylinders with different sizes. Phys Rev Fluids 7(6):064703 34. Morimoto M, Fukami K, Zhang K et al (2022) Generalization techniques of neural networks for fluid flow estimation. Neural Comput Appl 34(5):3647–3669 35. Succi S (2001) The lattice Boltzmann equation for fluid dynamics and beyond. Clarendon Press, Oxford 36. Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B 37(2):785 Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Advances in Aerodynamics – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 2023
Keywords: Super-resolution; Flow field; UNet; Deep learning
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.