Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Structural adjustment was particularly radical in Bolivia. From 1985 to 2000, governments of this country applied a veritable shock therapy, privatizing state firms and reforming public administration. As far as the latter was concerned, a process of decentralization was launched in a hitherto particularly centralized country.1 In the eyes of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, Bolivia was then one of the best students of the Latin American class or at least the most assiduous. Faced with the state’s withdrawal from the national economy and its territorial reorganization, agencies of international cooperation and NGOs of all kinds invested heavily in the field. Bolivia became a laboratory for decentralization policies: hundreds of municipalities were created, and an original system of citizens’ participation in local public affairs was implemented. This experience was the result of an entangled intervention of both local and national transnational actors. It then spread to the entire continent as a reference, a “best practice” to follow.]
Published: Nov 11, 2015
Keywords: International Monetary Fund; Trade Union; Municipal Government; Agrarian Reform; Central Union
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.