Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Descartes-AgonistesAnalytical Mathematics, Universal Mathematics and Method: Descartes’ Identity and Agenda Entering the 1620s

Descartes-Agonistes: Analytical Mathematics, Universal Mathematics and Method: Descartes’... [This chapter shows that since his early days with Beeckman, Descartes had pursued a set of projects related to physico-mathematics, but far outstripping even it in potential scope and invested hopes. From 1618, Descartes had entertained an analytical, problem-solving oriented agenda in mathematics, which in these respects resembled his physico-mathematics, or so he thought. The parallels he perceived between his mathematical and physico-mathematical work triggered, in 1619–1620, his dream of a unified analytical approach to all mathematically based disciplines—practical, pure and physico-mathematical. To this project he appropriated the already circulating name ‘universal mathematics’. However, that overheated conception quickly gave way to the even more encompassing mirage of a universal method, which remained with him from 1619 to the late 1620s, when, after his optical breakthrough, he picked up universal mathematics and method again in detail. These compounding enlargements of his original mathematical and physico-mathematical agendas are traced in this Chapter.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Descartes-AgonistesAnalytical Mathematics, Universal Mathematics and Method: Descartes’ Identity and Agenda Entering the 1620s

Part of the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Book Series (volume 27)
Descartes-Agonistes — Aug 14, 2012

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/descartes-agonistes-analytical-mathematics-universal-mathematics-and-pllLkccCwZ

References (27)

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013
ISBN
978-94-007-4745-6
Pages
225 –264
DOI
10.1007/978-94-007-4746-3_5
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[This chapter shows that since his early days with Beeckman, Descartes had pursued a set of projects related to physico-mathematics, but far outstripping even it in potential scope and invested hopes. From 1618, Descartes had entertained an analytical, problem-solving oriented agenda in mathematics, which in these respects resembled his physico-mathematics, or so he thought. The parallels he perceived between his mathematical and physico-mathematical work triggered, in 1619–1620, his dream of a unified analytical approach to all mathematically based disciplines—practical, pure and physico-mathematical. To this project he appropriated the already circulating name ‘universal mathematics’. However, that overheated conception quickly gave way to the even more encompassing mirage of a universal method, which remained with him from 1619 to the late 1620s, when, after his optical breakthrough, he picked up universal mathematics and method again in detail. These compounding enlargements of his original mathematical and physico-mathematical agendas are traced in this Chapter.]

Published: Aug 14, 2012

Keywords: Heuristic Rule; Universal Method; Latticework Vision; Analogical Extension; Analytical Discipline

There are no references for this article.