Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Damme (2001)
Quality issues in the internationalisation of higher educationHigher Education, 41
S. Marshall, J. Orrell, A. Cameron, Agnes Bosanquet, S. Thomas (2011)
Leading and managing learning and teaching in higher educationHigher Education Research & Development, 30
S. Bedford, P. Czech, L. Sefcik, Judith Smith, J. Yorke (2016)
External Referencing of Standards (ERoS) - An example of a collaborative end-to-end peer review process for external referencing
W. Wong, Marcel Lavrencic (2016)
Using a Risk Management Approach in Analytics for Curriculum and Program Quality Improvement
M. Patton (1980)
Qualitative research and evaluation methods
B. Daniel (2015)
Big Data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challengesBr. J. Educ. Technol., 46
Amitai Etzioni (2008)
The Unique Methodology of Policy Research
K. McKinnon (2000)
Benchmarking: a manual for Australian universities
[Quality management and the maintenance of educational excellence in higher education have become a complex issue in Australia and elsewhere, particularly as universities increasingly operate in transnational environments and offer an increasing collection of programs and modes of study. Curtin University seeks recognition as a global university with campuses in Western Australia, Malaysia, Singapore, Mauritius and Dubai. The Curtin 2017–2020 strategic plan promotes the university’s campuses as one study destination, resulting in a substantial increase of student mobility across campuses in recent years. Achieving and assessing equivalence of student academic experiences, irrespective of study location and mode is a key strategic aim for the university. The policy research paper provides a case in point of the insights gained through the mandated curriculum analysis, review and renewal (CARR) process employed at the university, which allows for pedagogical and course innovation and addresses a range of risks associated with innovative practices. The CARR process ensures the offering of innovative and high quality, contemporary courses that comply with the Australian Higher Education Standards Framework and other national and transnational legislation. The research provides insight into the nature and purpose of external referencing, outcome and process benchmarking and its relationship to pedagogical and course innovation. The quality management process discussed is able to provide an insight of how it can become a function of pedagogical and course innovation and renewal.]
Published: Jun 5, 2019
Keywords: Quality management; Pedagogical innovation; Course innovation; Curriculum analytics; Policy research
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.