Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
René Descartes (2012)
Meditationes de prima philosophia
Lodi Nauta (2001)
Review of Thomas Hobbes, Elementorum Philosophiae Sectio Prima De Corpore, édition critique, notes, appendices et index par Karl Schuhmann, introduction par Karl Schumann avec la collaboration de Martine Pécharman, Parijs: Vrin, 1999British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 3
M. Salamon, P. Anderson, A. Cunningham, R. Glosser, John Hoffman, Joseph Izen, Mark Lee, X. Lou, Wolfgang Rindler, Robert Wallace, A. Zakhidov, Y. Gartstein, M. Ishak-Boushaki, Lindsay King, David Lary, A. Malko, Chuanwei Zhang, Jie Zheng, Lunjin Chen, Xingang Chen, Yves Chabal, J. Ferraris, Massimo Fischetti, Tobias Hagge (1929)
PhysicsNature, 123
N. Malcolm (2002)
Aspects of Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes (1929)
The Elements of LawYale Law Journal, 38
G. Paganini (2008)
Le néant et le vide. Les parcours croisés de Gassendi et Hobbes
Frithiof Brandt
Thomas Hobbes' Mechanical conception of nature
Edward Grant, G. Evans (2008)
Book-Review - much Ado about Nothing - Theories of Space and Vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific RevolutionJournal for the History of Astronomy
F. Salzano (2000)
[Much ado about nothing].Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos, 7 2
Cees Leijenhorst (1996)
Jesuit Concepts of Spatium Imaginarium and Thomas Hobbes's Doctrine of Space1Early Science and Medicine, 1
Cees Leijenhorst (2001)
The Mechanization of Aristotelianism: The Late Aristotelian Setting of Thomas Hobbes Natural Philosophy
M. Pécharman (1995)
La logique de Hobbes et la «tradition aristotélicienne»Hobbes Studies, 8
[Hobbes’s first elaboration of his doctrine of space is directed against the traditional discussion of spatium imaginarium which Thomas White is indebted to in his De mundo dialogi tres (1642). Breaking with the scholastic mode of conceiving spatium imaginarium that considers it as an extracosmic space, Hobbes’s Anti-White (1642–1643) introduces a radically new notion of imaginary space, which identifies it with the very nature of any mental image. From this viewpoint, the paper outlines a difficulty in Hobbes’s criticism of White’s cosmology. In the Anti-White’s construction of the definition of space, the admission of an indefinite image of the whole world runs up against the problem that images are always particular for Hobbes, not universal. The author points out Hobbes’s attempts in De corpore (1655) to address this problem in the Anti-White’s definition. The paper emphasizes that, in connection with De corpore’s reshaping of the definition of space as imaginary space, the late scholastic dyad spatium imaginarium/spatium reale surviving in the Anti-White the redefinition of imaginary space against its traditional meaning is abandoned. Instead, the author argues, ‘real’ space is used in De corpore as a polemic tool against the identification of space with extension in White’s De mundo and Descartes’s Principia philosophiae. Accordingly, interpretations of Hobbes’s doctrine of space viewing it as the same from the Anti-White to De corpore distort Hobbes’s approach to the definition of space required as the first principle for natural philosophy.]
Published: Nov 4, 2020
Keywords: Image; Imaginary space; Extension
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.