Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Henri Bénac (1956)
Dictionnaire des Synonymes
Béatrice Longuenesse (1998)
Synthèse et donation reponse a Michel Fichant
Antoine Tracy, A. Deneys, H. Deneys (1992)
Mémoire sur la faculté de penser ; De la métaphysique de Kant, et autres textes
F. Azouvi, D. Bourel (1991)
De Königsberg à Paris : la réception de Kant en France (1788-1804)
Elaine Koppelman (1971)
The calculus of operations and the rise of abstract algebraArchive for History of Exact Sciences, 8
B. Russell (1957)
An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry
E. Schwartz (1999)
Les transformations de la sensation condillacienne: ''un opèrateur secret'': ''un opèrateur secret''
Béatrice Longuenesse (1993)
Kant et le pouvoir de juger
M. Fichant (2004)
Espace esthétique et espace géométrique chez KantRevue de métaphysique et de morale, 44
Immanuel Kant (2004)
Kritik Der Reinen Vernunft
[Last representatives of the French movement of ‘construction’ of space starting from unextended sensory elements, the idéologues played an important role in the movement of metaphysical construction of space in the mind. Succeeding Kant, they offer a sort of obscure and little-known alternative to the usual way the history of the evolution of the way space was conceived during the Enlightenment is told, a story whose main thread is that this evolution culminated with Kant, whose philosophy alone was capable of synthesizing the knowledge acquired by the empiricists and Leibnizian idealism. On the contrary, the idéologues tried to defend the idea that there was an alternative future to that offered by nascent German idealism. The object of this article is therefore to demonstrate in what way Condillac’s philosophy can be thought of as an ‘empiricist’ alternative to Kantianism with regards to space and in what way, after Kant and Condillac, the idea of space and movement were related. This article will more particularly focus on how the idéologues replaced the classical empiricist analysis of the idea of space with one proposing that forming the idea of space is based on the sensation of movement. In that, they initiated a way out of the limits set by an analysis of signs. Their very loyalty to the idea of a genesis of a space of signs, in their immediate aftermath, however, was at the origin of a split between a sensory and an intellectual ideal of space, whereas the aim of their empiricist idealism was to propose their fundamental union.]
Published: Nov 4, 2020
Keywords: Idéologues; Space; Movement
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.