Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[In 1958, a colloquium was held at Royaumont Abbey titled ‘La Philosophie Analytique’.1 In its attempt to bring French philosophers face-to-face with a certain Anglo-American trend in philosophy, the colloquium was analogous to the attempt, thirty years earlier, to bring together the French and German philosophical establishments at Davos. But where Davos had succeeded in bringing the disciples of phenomenology to the forefront of both French and German academic philosophy, Royaumont has been viewed as an example of miscommunication and misunderstanding. Its mission had been to bring together the two national philosophical cultures in ‘une tentative de dialogue’ (Beck et al., 1962, p. 7). Instead, the colloque de Royaumont presented an array of resources to those who wished to keep the philosophers of the two nations in cultural apartheid.2 As Charles Taylor notes in his review of its published proceedings, Royaumont can be seen as a ‘dialogue de sourds’ (dialogue of the deaf) (1964, p. 132).3]
Published: Nov 5, 2015
Keywords: Analytic Philosophy; Category Mistake; Aristotelian Society; Continental Philosophy; Husserlian Phenomenology
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.