Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M Yang (2014)
1349Applied Energy, 113
H Esen (2008)
1046Building and Environment, 43
EK Akpinar (2010)
3438Applied Energy, 87
A Suzuki (1988)
102Journal Solar Energy Engineering, 110
A Fudholi (2019)
333Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 102
J Reddy (2022)
1067Energy Science & Engineering, 10
P Velmurugan (2015)
1141Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 40
M Abuşka (2018)
115Applied Thermal Engineering, 131
AJ Mahmood (2017)
31004Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 139
SK Sansaniwal (2018)
1576Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82
AP Omojaro (2010)
3759Applied Energy, 87
A Ghiami (2018)
797Applied Thermal Engineering, 133
MK Gupta (2008)
1691Energy, 33
D Alta (2010)
2953Applied Energy, 87
F Jafarkazemi (2013)
55Renewable Energy, 56
S Debnath (2018)
281Energy, 15
[Alternatives to traditional fossil fuels are being explored, and a switch to solar energy systems is seen as one of the most promising. Solar energy devices, such as solar air collectors (SACs), have been widely employed in various residential, commercial, and industrial settings until quite recently. Unfortunately, the most up-to-date research shows that SAC efficiency rates are still quite low. This chapter attempts to obtain better performance of trapezoidal absorber-based SAC in this chapter. Further, the effectiveness of these SAC systems has been improved with the help of some metaheuristic algorithms. This chapter uses the entropy with the JAYA approach, a hybrid MCDM technique, to model and optimize the SAC. Here, the entropy approach is employed for weight extraction, and JAYA is used to optimize the parameters. In light of this, we have conducted 17 experimental trials, with output metrics including energy, exergy, sustainability index, and environmental impact factor. Trial no. 6 outperforms the others statistically, resulting in the highest total score. The energy efficiency of 17.92%, exergy efficiency of 12.51%, sustainability index of 1.14, and environmental impact factor of 0.87 correspond to the optimal settings of 0.0039 kg/s mass flow rate, 45° tilt angle, 790.40 W/m2, and input temperature of 30.6 °C.]
Published: Apr 30, 2023
Keywords: Trapezoidal absorber plate; SAC; JAYA; Optimization; Thermal efficiency; Sustainability index
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.