Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Fallacies and Judgments of ReasonablenessConsiderations Regarding the Design of the Study

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Considerations Regarding the Design of the Study [With the aid of a series of interlinked empirical investigations, we attempt to systematically determine whether and to what extent the norms that ordinary arguers generally speaking take (or say they take) into account when participating in argumentative discourse are in accordance with the rules of the ideal model of critical discussion. To exclude interfering variables and to be able to track the influence of various factors on the judgment concerning the permissibility of certain discussion moves, experimental research was performed in which constructed discussion fragments were employed in which a particular pragma-dialectical discussion rule was sometimes, and sometimes not, violated. In brief, constructed dialogues were used in which a fallacy was committed, or not committed, by the discussion participants.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Fallacies and Judgments of ReasonablenessConsiderations Regarding the Design of the Study

Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/fallacies-and-judgments-of-reasonableness-considerations-regarding-the-7azYYETEDz

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
ISBN
978-90-481-2613-2
Pages
31 –50
DOI
10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9_2
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[With the aid of a series of interlinked empirical investigations, we attempt to systematically determine whether and to what extent the norms that ordinary arguers generally speaking take (or say they take) into account when participating in argumentative discourse are in accordance with the rules of the ideal model of critical discussion. To exclude interfering variables and to be able to track the influence of various factors on the judgment concerning the permissibility of certain discussion moves, experimental research was performed in which constructed discussion fragments were employed in which a particular pragma-dialectical discussion rule was sometimes, and sometimes not, violated. In brief, constructed dialogues were used in which a fallacy was committed, or not committed, by the discussion participants.]

Published: Jan 1, 2009

Keywords: Descriptive Term; Personal Attack; Rule Violation; Heroin Addict; Argumentative Discussion

There are no references for this article.