Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Fallacies and Judgments of ReasonablenessThe Opening Stage: The Obligation-to-Defend (II)

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: The Opening Stage: The Obligation-to-Defend (II) [In mixed differences of opinion, unlike in the non-mixed differences of opinion discussed in Chapter 5, the parties take an opposite standpoint with regard to the same proposition. They are both the protagonists of their own standpoints but are furthermore antagonists of each others standpoints. Both parties are therefore resigned to an onus probandi by virtue of the pragma-dialectical burden of proof rule.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Fallacies and Judgments of ReasonablenessThe Opening Stage: The Obligation-to-Defend (II)

Download PDF
22 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/fallacies-and-judgments-of-reasonableness-the-opening-stage-the-ZWGrrsGugl

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
ISBN
978-90-481-2613-2
Pages
139 –161
DOI
10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9_6
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[In mixed differences of opinion, unlike in the non-mixed differences of opinion discussed in Chapter 5, the parties take an opposite standpoint with regard to the same proposition. They are both the protagonists of their own standpoints but are furthermore antagonists of each others standpoints. Both parties are therefore resigned to an onus probandi by virtue of the pragma-dialectical burden of proof rule.]

Published: Jan 1, 2009

Keywords: Sequential Problem; Proof Rule; Opposing Party; Explicit Indicator; Discussion Move

There are no references for this article.