Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Fallacies and Judgments of ReasonablenessTheoretical Background and Organization of the Study

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Theoretical Background and Organization of the Study [Using a rather broad definition, fallacies can be characterized as wrong moves in argumentative exchanges. The concept of fallacy is at the core of every full fledged argumentation theory and the treatment of the fallacies can even be regarded the acid test of any particular approach to argumentation. If an argumentation theory can deal with fallacies in a satisfactory way, this is a positive test as to the scope and explanatory power of that theory.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Fallacies and Judgments of ReasonablenessTheoretical Background and Organization of the Study

Download PDF
29 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/fallacies-and-judgments-of-reasonableness-theoretical-background-and-YWVdxY0Jl0

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
ISBN
978-90-481-2613-2
Pages
1 –30
DOI
10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9_1
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[Using a rather broad definition, fallacies can be characterized as wrong moves in argumentative exchanges. The concept of fallacy is at the core of every full fledged argumentation theory and the treatment of the fallacies can even be regarded the acid test of any particular approach to argumentation. If an argumentation theory can deal with fallacies in a satisfactory way, this is a positive test as to the scope and explanatory power of that theory.]

Published: Jan 1, 2009

Keywords: Argument Scheme; Argumentation Stage; Sophistical Refutation; Discussion Rule; Confrontation Stage

There are no references for this article.