Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Carrying out any kind of excavation—literal or metaphorical—requires a constant negotiation between two opposing processes. Every attempt to strip away another layer of matter, history, or discourse necessarily involves adding an additional layer or surface as the debris piles up around us. Moreover, it is important to recognize the impossibility of doing this cleanly and evenly—what one ends up with is a collection of uneven lumps and patches—and the attempt and failure to make definitive sense of these fragments and traces is perhaps part of the human condition or, at the very least, what keeps academics in business. To assume the role of archaeologist inevitably involves getting dirt under one’s fingernails. Not only are we ourselves bound up, implicated in this process of excavating, we also must and should recognize ourselves as such, acknowledging the ways in which our handling of the material that we are sifting through both adds and takes away from it.]
Published: Oct 29, 2015
Keywords: Master Narrative; Continental Philosophy; Political Theology; Negative Theology; Archaeological Approach
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.