Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Lavers, M. Bowie (1987)
Freud, Proust and Lacan: Theory as FictionModern Language Review, 85
[How significant are apparently incidental or subsidiary features of Freud’s writing to his larger theoretical enterprise? How seriously should one take asides, disclaimers, interruptions, digressions, counterintuitive points of textual organization or essayistic structure and, in particular, metaphors and other devices — what, in rhetoric and literary criticism, are called figures or tropes, turns of phrase and thought that somehow shift the meaning of words or ideas? Is it important, for instance, that Freud’s psychoanalysis is often preoccupied by thoughts of physical injury, or that its rational, scientific approach permits the discussion of ghosts and other apparently preternatural phenomena?]
Published: Sep 29, 2015
Keywords: Fairy Tale; Psychoanalytic Theory; Evil Spirit; Pleasure Principle; Freudian Theory
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.