Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jen-Jia Lin, An-Tsei Yang (2009)
Structural Analysis of How Urban Form Impacts Travel Demand: Evidence from TaipeiUrban Studies, 46
W. Anderson, P. Kanaroglou, E. Miller (1996)
Urban Form, Energy and the Environment: A Review of Issues, Evidence and PolicyUrban Studies, 33
M. Zellner, T. Theis, A. Karunanithi, A. Garmestani, H. Cabezas (2008)
A new framework for urban sustainability assessments: Linking complexity, information and policyComput. Environ. Urban Syst., 32
Tracy Mcmillan (2007)
The relative influence of urban form on a child’s travel mode to schoolTransportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 41
E. Holden, I. Norland (2005)
Three Challenges for the Compact City as a Sustainable Urban Form: Household Consumption of Energy and Transport in Eight Residential Areas in the Greater Oslo RegionUrban Studies, 42
Ming Zhang (2005)
Exploring the relationship between urban form and nonwork travel through time use analysisLandscape and Urban Planning, 73
S. Putman (1975)
Urban land use and transportation models: A state-of-the-art summary☆Transportation Research, 9
L. Anselin (1988)
Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models
A. Soltani, A. Allan (2006)
Analyzing the Impacts of Microscale Urban Attributes on Travel: Evidence from Suburban Adelaide, AustraliaJournal of Urban Planning and Development-asce, 132
C. Mulley (2014)
Accessibility and Residential Land Value Uplift: Identifying Spatial Variations in the Accessibility Impacts of a Bus TransitwayUrban Studies, 51
P. Shukla, S. Dhar, D. Mahapatra (2008)
Low-carbon society scenarios for IndiaClimate Policy, 8
Daniel Brown, D. Robinson (2006)
Effects of Heterogeneity in Residential Preferences on an Agent-Based Model of Urban SprawlEcology and Society, 11
M. Kii, K. Doi (2005)
Multiagent Land-Use and Transport Model for the Policy Evaluation of a Compact CityEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32
K. Maat, H. Timmermans (2009)
A causal model relating urban form with daily travel distance through activity/travel decisionsTransportation Planning and Technology, 32
F. Dieleman, M. Dijst, G. Burghouwt (2002)
Urban Form and Travel Behaviour: Micro-level Household Attributes and Residential ContextUrban Studies, 39
A. Kuppam, R. Pendyala (2001)
A structural equations analysis of commuters' activity and travel patternsTransportation, 28
Marc Schlossberg, J. Greene, P. Phillips, Bethany Johnson, Bob Parker (2006)
School Trips: Effects of Urban Form and Distance on Travel ModeJournal of the American Planning Association, 72
Guiyang Zhuang (2008)
How Will China Move Towards Becoming a Low Carbon Economy?Development Economics: Regional & Country Studies eJournal
K. Krizek (2003)
Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel: Does Neighborhood-Scale Urban Form Matter?Journal of the American Planning Association, 69
Chuan-hua Wei, Fei Qi (2012)
On the estimation and testing of mixed geographically weighted regression modelsEconomic Modelling, 29
Haixiao Pan, Q. Shen, Ming Zhang (2009)
Influence of Urban Form on Travel Behavior in Four Neighborhoods of Shanghai
(2005)
Exploring Spatial Data with GeoDa: A Workbook
(2002)
FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern
P. Newman, J. Kenworthy (1987)
GASOLINE CONSUMPTION AND CITIES - A COMPARISON OF U.S. CITIES WITH A GLOBAL SURVEY AND SOME IMPLICATIONS
F. Goetzke (2008)
Network Effects in Public Transit Use: Evidence from a Spatially Autoregressive Mode Choice Model for New YorkUrban Studies, 45
Mizuki Kawabata, Q. Shen (2007)
Commuting Inequality between Cars and Public Transit: The Case of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1990-2000Urban Studies, 44
G. Alford, J. Whiteman (2008)
Macro-urban Form and Transport Energy Outcomes: Investigations for MelbourneRoad & Transport Research, 18
M. Horner (2007)
A multi-scale analysis of urban form and commuting change in a small metropolitan area (1990–2000)The Annals of Regional Science, 41
(2002)
Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships
Gyo-eon Shim, S. Rhee, K. Ahn, S. Chung (2006)
The relationship between the characteristics of transportation energy consumption and urban formThe Annals of Regional Science, 40
W. Cleveland (1979)
Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing ScatterplotsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 74
Peter Newman, J. Kenworthy (1989)
Gasoline Consumption and Cities: A Comparison of U.S. Cities with a Global SurveyJournal of The American Planning Association, 55
G. Box, D. Cox (1964)
An Analysis of TransformationsJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 26
G. Giuliano, D. Narayan (2003)
Another Look at Travel Patterns and Urban Form: The US and Great BritainUrban Studies, 40
J. Hourcade, R. Crassous (2008)
Low-carbon societies: a challenging transition for an attractive futureClimate Policy, 8
Uwe Remme, Markus Blesl (2008)
A global perspective to achieve a low-carbon society (LCS): scenario analysis with the ETSAP-TIAM modelClimate Policy, 8
I. Benenson, Itzhak Omer, E. Hatna (2003)
Agent-Based Modeling of Householders’ Migration Behavior and Its Consequences
[The influence factors on human mobility (e.g. travel length/distance, time and count) are increasingly recognized as essential components of traffic assignment for urban sustainability. But most of the existing studies were based on individual samples, therefore neglected the spatial heterogeneity of mobility patterns. This study performs an examination of the spatially varying impacts of urban form and socioeconomic attributes on human mobility (average travel distance in this chapter) in the Beijing Area based on the Household Travel Survey in 2005. By using Mixed Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR), we incorporate the spatial stationary and non-stationary in one model to estimate the influence surfaces of elements that maters in residential mobility on the Traffic Assignment Zone (TAZ) level. Compared with the results produced by Ordinary Least Square (OLS) and Spatial Auto-Regression (SAR), the outputs of MGWR indicate that semi-parametric model has better performance in presenting the spatial variation of predictive factors’ impacts. The maps further show that urban form features do impact people’s mobility to various extents, both positively and negatively. Additionally, this study also yields that the analysis on the TAZ level by MGWR reveals better prediction in the spatial variability of local estimates in comparison with OLS analysis for the personal level data in the same survey. This empirical effort helps us to understand that people’s mobility behaviors can be influenced by spatially exploring relevant variables of urban form.]
Published: May 14, 2015
Keywords: Urban form; Human mobility; Urban modelling; Mixed geographically weighted regression; Spatial heterogeneity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.