Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/giving-reasons-acts-of-arguing-n0PuVozWjY
References (6)
-
T. Burge, P. Grice (1989)
Studies in the Way of Words.The Philosophical Quarterly, 40
-
A. Henkemans (2002)
Clues for reconstructing symptomatic argumentation -
J. Searle (1969)
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language -
K. Bach, R. Harnish (1983)
Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts -
R. Pinto (2001)
Argument, Inference and Dialectic, Collected Papers on Informal Logic with an Introduction by Hans V. Hansen, 4
-
P. Houtlosser (2002)
Indicators of a point of view
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Copyright
- © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
- ISBN
- 978-94-007-1760-2
- Pages
- 53 –80
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9_3
- Publisher site
- See Chapter on Publisher Site
Abstract
[Following Chapter 2’s thesis that the only way to overcome the justification problem of Argumentation Theory’s normative models is to deal with the concept of argumentative value as the constitutive goal of the activity of arguing, I propose a characterization of argumentation as a communicative activity aimed at showing a target claim to be correct. My contention throughout this work is that this characterization makes it possible to integrate the logical, dialectical and rhetorical dimensions of argumentation, regarding both its interpretation and its evaluation.]
Published: Jun 30, 2011
Keywords: Propositional Content; Argumentation Theory; Indicative Conditional; Argumentative Discourse; Illocutionary Force