Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/giving-reasons-the-dialectical-dimension-of-argumentation-PSSCkrsIkj
References (10)
-
R. Pinto (2001)
Logic, Epistemology and Argument Appraisal -
J. Freeman (1991)
Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments -
F. Eemeren, R. Grootendorst (1984)
Speech acts in argumentative discussions -
S. Toulmin (1960)
The uses of argument -
R. Pinto (2001)
Argument, Inference and Dialectic, Collected Papers on Informal Logic with an Introduction by Hans V. Hansen, 4
-
S. Jacobs (2000)
Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative PragmaticsArgumentation, 14
-
H. Siegel, J. Biro (1995)
Epistemic Normativity, Argumentation, and FallaciesArgumentation, 11
-
H. Kyburg, J. Pollock (1990)
Nomic probability and the foundations of induction -
M. Bergmann (1997)
INTERNALISM, EXTERNALISM AND THE NO-DEFEATER CONDITIONSynthese, 110
-
D. Walton (1989)
Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Copyright
- © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
- ISBN
- 978-94-007-1760-2
- Pages
- 117 –137
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9_5
- Publisher site
- See Chapter on Publisher Site
Abstract
[As explained in Chapter 4 regarding the logical normativity of argumentation, in dealing with the dialectical dimension of argumentation, I will also have to fulfill two tasks: on the one hand, showing that any type of argumentation, whether dialogical or monological, involves such a dialectical dimension; but on the other hand, showing that dialectical normativity cannot be reduced to argumentative normativity tout court.]
Published: Jun 30, 2011
Keywords: Argumentation Theory; Argumentative Discourse; Theoretical Correctness; Argumentative Exchange; Dialectical Nature