Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Kuan-hsing Chen (2010)
Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization
R. Rodriguez (2010)
Migrants for Export: How the Philippine State Brokers Labor to the World
L. Labrianidis, Brikena Kazazi (2006)
Albanian Return-migrants from Greece and ItalyEuropean Urban and Regional Studies, 13
B. Anderson (2020)
Imagined CommunitiesThe New Social Theory Reader
R. Parreñas (2001)
Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration, and Domestic Work
K. Koser (2000)
Return, readmission and reintegration: changing agendas, policy frameworks and operational programmes
H. Haas (2006)
Migration, Remittances and Regional Development in Southern Morocco 1
W. Form, P. Evans (1996)
Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 42
Xiang Biao, B. Yeoh, M. Toyota (2013)
Transnational Encapsulation: Compulsory Return as a Labor-Migration Control in East Asia
Xiang Biao (2011)
A Ritual Economy of ‘Talent’: China and Overseas Chinese ProfessionalsJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37
C. Guarneri (1991)
Cornell University Press
D. Frisby, M. Featherstone (1984)
Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings
P. White, Russell King (2015)
Return Migration and Regional Economic ProblemsTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 11
B. Xiang (2012)
Labor Transplant: “Point-to-Point” Transnational Labor Migration in East AsiaSouth Atlantic Quarterly, 111
R. Black, K. Koser (1999)
The end of the refugee cycle? Refugee repatriation & reconstruction.
D. Ley, A. Kobayashi (2005)
Back to Hong Kong: return migration or transnational sojourn?Global Networks-a Journal of Transnational Affairs, 5
K. Unger (2015)
Return Migration and Regional Characteristics: The Case of Greece
S. Castles (2006)
Guestworkers in Europe: A Resurrection?International Migration Review, 40
Adam McKeown (2008)
Melancholy Order: Asian Migration and the Globalization of Borders
Aihwa Ong (2006)
Neoliberalism as exception
K. Sugihara (2005)
Patterns of Chinese Emigration to Patterns of Chinese Emigration to Southeast Asia, 1869–1939
B. Ghosh (2000)
Return migration : journey of hope or despair?
Christine Chin (2008)
‘Diversification’ and ‘Privatisation’: Securing Insecurities in the Receiving Country of MalaysiaThe Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 9
J. Briggs, Mark Wyman (1995)
Round-Trip to America: The Immigrants Return to Europe, 1880-1930.The Journal of American History, 81
Kishore Mahbubani (2008)
The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East
C. Upadhya (2013)
Return of the ‘Global Indian’: Software professionals and the worlding of Bangalore
P. Nijkamp, M. Voskuilen (1996)
International Migration: A Comprehensive Framework for a Survey of the LiteratureEuropean Spatial Research and Policy, 3
B. Xiang, B. Yeoh, M. Toyota (2013)
Return : nationalizing transnational mobility in Asia
B. Ghosh (1998)
Huddled Masses and Uncertain Shores
K. Koser, R. Black (2022)
The End of the Refugee Cycle?
R. Cohen, In Totoricagüena (2008)
Creolization and diaspora : the cultural politics of divergence and some convergence
S. Castles (2004)
Why migration policies failEthnic and Racial Studies, 27
A. Mabogunje (2010)
Systems Approach to a Theory of Rural‐Urban MigrationGeographical Analysis, 2
R. Parreñas (2010)
Homeward bound: the circular migration of entertainers between Japan and the PhilippinesGlobal Networks-a Journal of Transnational Affairs, 10
Jean-Pierre Cassarino (2004)
Theorising Return Migration: a Revisited Conceptual Approach to Return Migrants
(1996)
Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization
R. Bauböck, Thomas Faist (2010)
Diaspora and transnationalism : concepts, theories and methods
G. Simmel (1994)
Bridge and DoorTheory, Culture & Society, 11
[Some scholars have argued that the notion of “return” should give way to transnational mobility and circular exchange. But at the same time return migrations of different types are on the rise in Asia and beyond since the 1990s, and return is becoming a defining factor of how transnational migration in general is managed, as evidenced by circular migration programs. Yet, the movements covered by the rubric of “return” are extremely diverse. This chapter explores how the heterogeneity of the experiences of return and the ambiguity of its meaning can be turned into sources of theoretical innovation. The chapter first argues that we need to move away from the predominant perspective that regards migration as a behavior, and should instead regard migration as phenomena co-constituted by different actors. By examining how the recent intensification of return movements in Asia is deeply tied to other larger socio-political changes, this article theorizes return as a mode of order making in the world that is formally consisted of nation-states but faces ever escalating transnational movements. Asia is significant here not because it is different from the “West” or the “rest,” but on the contrary, Asia typifies some aspects of the relation between return migration and social transformations that are potentially global.]
Published: Sep 13, 2014
Keywords: Human Trafficking; Return Migration; National Sovereignty; Trafficking Victim; Migration Management
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.