Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Ziman (2000)
Postacademic Science : Constructing Knowledge with Networks and Norms : Royal Society Medawar Lecture, 29 June 1995, 9
B. Godin (1998)
Writing Performative History:Social Studies of Science, 28
H. Etzkowitz (1998)
The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkagesResearch Policy, 27
D. Baird, A. Nordmann, J. Schummer (2004)
Discovering the nanoscale
Cyrus Mody (2004)
How Probe Microscopists Became Nanotechnologists
H. Etzkowitz (2008)
The endless transition
C. Pollitt, G. Bouckaert (2004)
Public Management Reform: A Comparative AnalysisOUP Catalogue
P. Weingart (1997)
From “Finalization” to “Mode 2”: old wine in new bottles?Social Science Information, 36
Merle Jacob (2001)
Managing the Institutionalisation of Mode 2 Knowledge ProductionScience and technology studies
J. Schummer (2004)
Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnologyScientometrics, 59
L. Leydesdorff, M. Meyer (2003)
The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relationsScientometrics, 58
M. Kearnes, P. Macnaghten (2006)
Re)imaging nanotechnology.
R. Mayntz, F. Scharpf (1990)
Chances and Problems in the Political Guidance of Research Systems
F. Jotterand (2006)
The Politicization of Science and Technology: Its Implications for NanotechnologyThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34
M. Roco, W. Bainbridge (2003)
Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance
Richard Litt.D. (2010)
Old Wine In New Bottles
D. Jansen, A. Wald, K. Franke, U. Schmoch, Torben Schubert (2007)
Drittmittel als Performanzindikator der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungKZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 59
Peter Weingart (1999)
Neue Formen der Wissensproduktion: Fakt, Fiktion und Mode, 8
L. Low, B. Efron (1983)
The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78
T. Shinn (1999)
Change or mutation? Reflections on the foundations of contemporary scienceSocial Science Information, 38
M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman (1996)
Where Is Science Going?Science, Technology & Human Values, 21
Ann Johnson (2004)
The End of Pure Science: Science Policy from Bayh-Dole to the NNI
Cynthia Selin (2007)
Expectations and the Emergence of NanotechnologyScience, Technology, & Human Values, 32
Saad Nagl, R. Corwin, J. Fleming (1973)
The Social Contexts of ResearchNursing Research, 22
N. Luhmann (1990)
Soziologische Aufklärung 5
D. Jansen (1996)
Nationale Innovationssysteme, soziales Kapital und Innovationsstrategien von UnternehmenSoziale Welt-zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis, 47
M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow (1994)
The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies
A. Wald (2007)
The Effect of 'Mode 2'-Related Policy on the Research Process: The Case of Publicly Funded German NanotechnologyScience and technology studies, 28
U. Schimank (2008)
Ökonomisierung der Hochschulen: eine Makro-Meso-Mikro-Perspektive
A. Bonaccorsi (2008)
Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of ScienceMinerva, 46
B. Efron (1987)
The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans
N. Luhmann (1970)
Selbststeuerung der Wissenschaft
Thomas Heinze, S. Kuhlmann (2006)
Analysis of heterogeneous collaboration in the German research system with a focus on nanotechnology
K. Franke, A. Wald, Katinka Bartl (2006)
Die Wirkung von Reformen im deutschen Forschungssystem
H. Etzkowitz, Carol Kemelgor (1998)
The Role of Research Centres in the Collectivisation of Academic ScienceMinerva, 36
Brent Goldfarb (2008)
The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific outputResearch Policy, 37
A. Amaral, V. Meek, I. Larsen (2003)
The Higher Education Managerial Revolution
S. Funtowicz, J. Ravetz (1993)
The emergence of post-normal science
Jim Whitman (2007)
The governance of nanotechnologyScience and Public Policy, 34
A. Hullmann, M. Meyer (2003)
Publications and patents in nanotechnologyScientometrics, 58
H. Krupp (1990)
Technikpolitik angesichts der Umweltkatastrophe
N. Luhmann (1970)
Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme
H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff (2014)
The Endless Transition: A "Triple Helix" of University-Industry-Government RelationsMinerva, 36
B. Looy, M. Ranga, J. Callaert, K. Debackere, Edwin Zimmermann (2004)
Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect?Research Policy, 33
R. Schomberg (1989)
Science, politics, and morality.The Cleft palate journal, 26 3
A. Bonaccorsi, G. Thoma (2007)
Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technologyResearch Policy, 36
D. Jansen (2007)
New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations
R. Nelson (1989)
What Is Private and What Is Public About Technology?Science, Technology & Human Values, 14
J. Lenhard, H. Lücking, Holger Schwechheimer (2006)
Expert knowledge, Mode-2 and scientific disciplines: Two contrasting viewsScience and Public Policy, 33
T. Hellstrom, Merle Jacob (2000)
Scientification of politics or politicization of science? Traditionalist science-policy discourse and its quarrels with Mode 2 epistemologySocial Epistemology, 14
D. Jansen (1995)
Convergence of Basic and Applied Research? Research Orientations in German High-Temperature Superconductor ResearchScience, Technology & Human Values, 20
[Nanotechnology is considered a key technology of the twenty-first century. It is widely expected that technological advances in the field of nanoscience will bring about social, environmental and economic benefits. Nanotechnology is also regarded as a paradigmatic field for a new “Mode 2” of knowledge production that is transdisciplinary in nature and oriented towards problem-solving. The aim of this chapter is to measure empirically the prevalence of “Mode 2 knowledge production” for research groups working in the field of nanoscience. Disciplinary differences are shown by comparing the knowledge generation in nanoscience to that of astrophysics (a field of science primarily concerned with basic research) and economics (a social science). In addition, it is determined to what extent policy instruments promote and generate this new form of knowledge production in all three fields. Finally, it is established what effect one of these policies – the promotion of science–industry ties – has on the scientific performance of research groups in nanoscience.]
Published: Jun 5, 2010
Keywords: Knowledge Production; Mode 2Mode; Application Context; Industry Relation; Network Partner
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.