Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Kastoryano (2006)
Vers un nationalisme transnational. Redefinir la nation, le nationalisme et le territoire, 56
Ben Bruce (2012)
Gérer l’islam à l’étranger : entre service public et outil de la politique étrangère turque
R. Waldinger, D. FitzGerald (2004)
Transnationalism in Question1American Journal of Sociology, 109
[The most overt consequences of Turkish and Moroccan religious diaspora policies for Muslim fields in France and Germany have been the preservation of ethno-national boundaries in the organization of Islam in both countries, as well as the promotion of a legal-rational model of religious authority that reinforces the position of home state Islamic institutions in religious fields abroad. Nevertheless, the conclusion underscores that both French and German authorities have consciously permitted or even actively solicited this home state involvement, meaning that the governance of Islam abroad by Turkey and Morocco has rarely if ever been a question of “foreign interference” in internal affairs and has rather taken the form of interstate cooperation within the framework of bilateral diplomatic relations.]
Published: Aug 26, 2018
Keywords: Field Abroad; Islam Abroad; Diyanet; German Muslims; Moroccan State
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.