Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

How Philosophers ArgueAnalysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments

How Philosophers Argue: Analysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments [Segment V of the debate contains very articulate summaries of the main standpoints and arguments on both sides. Copleston restates his three arguments but dwells especially on the metaphysical argument, which he considers the strongest. He also objects to the intrusion of formal mathematical logic in a metaphysical issue. Russell for his part rejects this objection and repeats the main arguments against Copleston’s position.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

How Philosophers ArgueAnalysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments

Part of the Argumentation Library Book Series (volume 41)
Leal, Fernando; Marraud, Hubert
How Philosophers Argue — Feb 21, 2022
Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/how-philosophers-argue-analysis-of-segment-v-summing-up-of-the-sreZxH8xw9

References (8)

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
ISBN
978-3-030-85367-9
Pages
267 –277
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6_8
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[Segment V of the debate contains very articulate summaries of the main standpoints and arguments on both sides. Copleston restates his three arguments but dwells especially on the metaphysical argument, which he considers the strongest. He also objects to the intrusion of formal mathematical logic in a metaphysical issue. Russell for his part rejects this objection and repeats the main arguments against Copleston’s position.]

Published: Feb 21, 2022

There are no references for this article.