Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

How Philosophers ArgueArgumentation Structures and Operations

How Philosophers Argue: Argumentation Structures and Operations [This chapter and the following two deal with argumentative operations that weave together arguments to produce complex arguments. An argumentative operation is a process by which two or more arguments are integrated into a single, more complex, argument. Many argumentative connectors are commonly used as signs of argumentative operations. An argumentative operation yields an argumentative structure: the arrangement of parts in an argument, either simple or complex. Thus, e.g. the operation of concatenation yields a subordinative argument. The successive interventions of the participants in an argumentative exchange can be seen as applications of these operations, by means of which participants interactively weave a macro-argument in the course of an argumentative exchange.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

How Philosophers ArgueArgumentation Structures and Operations

Part of the Argumentation Library Book Series (volume 41)
How Philosophers Argue — Feb 21, 2022

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/how-philosophers-argue-argumentation-structures-and-operations-TmCsJhLQAC

References (3)

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
ISBN
978-3-030-85367-9
Pages
297 –310
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6_10
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[This chapter and the following two deal with argumentative operations that weave together arguments to produce complex arguments. An argumentative operation is a process by which two or more arguments are integrated into a single, more complex, argument. Many argumentative connectors are commonly used as signs of argumentative operations. An argumentative operation yields an argumentative structure: the arrangement of parts in an argument, either simple or complex. Thus, e.g. the operation of concatenation yields a subordinative argument. The successive interventions of the participants in an argumentative exchange can be seen as applications of these operations, by means of which participants interactively weave a macro-argument in the course of an argumentative exchange.]

Published: Feb 21, 2022

There are no references for this article.