Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Alexander, P. Broadfoot, D. Phillips (1999)
Contexts, classrooms and outcomes
John Hattie (2008)
Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement
Neil Hufton, J. Elliott (2000)
Motivation to Learn: The pedagogical nexus in the Russian school: Some implications for transnational research and policy borrowingEducational Studies, 26
N. Kuz'menko, V. Lunin, O. Ryzhova (2006)
On the Modernization of Education in RussiaRussian Education & Society, 48
H. Andrade, A. Valtcheva (2009)
Promoting Learning and Achievement Through Self-AssessmentTheory Into Practice, 48
P. Black, D. Wiliam (1998)
Assessment and Classroom LearningAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5
Mark Johnson (1996)
Western Models and Russian Realities in Postcommunist Education, 2
V. Pogosian (2012)
Russian Educational Policy: Two Different ErasItalian Journal of Sociology of Education, 4
J. McMillan, J. Hearn (2008)
Student Self-Assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement.educational HORIZONS, 87
J. Finn (1991)
How to Make the Dropout Problem Go Away.Educational Researcher, 20
J. Elliott, Neil Hufton, Leonid Illushin, Wayne Willis (2001)
'The Kids are Doing All Right': Differences in parental satisfaction, expectation and attribution in St Petersburg, Sunderland andCambridge Journal of Education, 31
M. Mclaughlin, J. Talbert (1990)
Constructing a Personalized School Environment.Phi Delta Kappan, 72
V. Filippov (2001)
The Place of Supplementary Education in the System of Russian EducationRussian Education & Society, 43
J. Elliott, J. Tudge (2007)
The impact of the west on post‐Soviet Russian education: change and resistance to changeComparative Education, 43
J. Sandholtz (1997)
Teaching With Technology: Creating Student-Centered Classrooms
T. Plomp, Ronald Anderson, N. Law, A. Quale (2003)
Cross-national Policies and Practices on Information and Communication Technology in Education
J. Culpepper (2007)
National Center for Educational Statistics, 21
Neil Hufton, J. Elliott, Leonid Illushin (2002)
Educational Motivation and Engagement: Qualitative accounts from three countriesBritish Educational Research Journal, 28
M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, Ellen Souberman (1978)
Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes
R. Alexander (2001)
Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education
L. Vygotsky (1978)
Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press
T. Plomp, Ronald Anderson, N. Law, A. Quale (2009)
Cross-National Information and Communication Technology Policies and Practices in Education (Revised Second Edition)
D. Nikolaev, D. Chugunov (2012)
The Education System in the Russian Federation: Education Brief 2012
K. Kraemer, Jason Dedrick, Prakul Sharma (2009)
One laptop per child: vision vs. realityCommun. ACM, 52
David Anderson, I. Zlotnikova (2009)
A Comparative Analysis of ICT Policies and Practices in Russia and the US, 2009
R. Stake (1995)
The art of case study research
Yong Zhao, K. Frank (2003)
Factors Affecting Technology Uses in Schools: An Ecological PerspectiveAmerican Educational Research Journal, 40
[Research suggests that the integration of ICT into teaching moves in phases from the enrichment of existing practices towards more innovative teaching practices. Our research focuses on the experience of two Russian schools that are using the laptops daily to explore how these educators are enriching and transforming Russian educational practices. The impacts of these tools can be seen in classroom practice, student engagement, peer collaboration, assessment, and communication with parents, which in turn, has shifted the dynamic between teachers and students and helped foster a more personalized and humanistic learning environment. Although both Russian schools developed their own approaches to using laptops, there are common elements supporting their success. First, the emerging ICT-rich practices are the result of careful instructional decisions being made at the school level. Both schools are taking advantage of external resources and training, but the actual classroom practices are supported by principals and are carefully tailored and embedded in the classroom by the teachers. Successful integration is a deliberate process, guided by strong principals and administrators working closely with their teachers, who together carefully move these new tools into their practice. The principal is able to set a vibrant and coherent school culture that welcomes innovation, while the teachers figure out how the device compliments their goals and lessons.]
Published: Jul 31, 2014
Keywords: One-to-one learning; Russian education; Technology integration; Laptops
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.