Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Rodriguez-Pereyra (2014)
Leibniz's Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles
R. Hughes, L. Ballentine (1989)
The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
D. Krause, J. Arenhart (2006)
Identity in Physics
M. Redhead, P. Teller (1992)
Particle Labels and the Theory of Indistinguishable Particles in Quantum MechanicsThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 43
T. Hollowood (1975)
Quantum mechanicsNature, 258
H. Attiya, S. Rajsbaum (2020)
IndistinguishabilityCommunications of the ACM, 63
S. French, M. Redhead (1988)
Quantum Physics and the Identity of Indiscernibles*The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39
D. Krause (2008)
Logical Aspects of Quantum (Non-)IndividualityFoundations of Science, 15
J. Arenhart (2017)
The received view on quantum non-individuality: formal and metaphysical analysisSynthese, 194
S. Saunders (2009)
Identity of Quanta
D. Dieks, M. Versteegh (2007)
Identical Quantum Particles and Weak DiscernibilityFoundations of Physics, 38
D. Krause (1992)
On a Quasi-Set TheoryNotre Dame J. Formal Log., 33
F. Muller, G. Leegwater (2020)
The Case Against Factorism: On the Labels of $$\otimes$$-Factor Hilbert-Spaces of Similar Particles in Quantum MechanicsJournal for General Philosophy of Science
J. Arenhart (2013)
Weak Discernibility in Quantum Mechanics: Does It Save PII?Axiomathes, 23
Alberto Cortes (1976)
Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles: A False PrinciplePhilosophy of Science, 43
(1999)
Atomic Metaphysics
[This chapter serves primarily as a brief overview of the basics of the quantum formalism necessary to understand the philosophical debates on the problem of the identity and individuality of quantum objects. We touch upon the standard mathematical representation of states and properties of composite systems, that is, physical systems consisting of many smaller components, with its primary tool of the tensor product of vector spaces. The chapter also articulates the Indistinguishability Postulate and Symmetrization Postulate, which impose an important restriction on joint states and properties of so-called indistinguishable particles. From these assumptions a metaphysical consequence in the form of the Indiscernibility Thesis is usually derived. We analyze typical arguments in favor of this claim, noting the indispensable role of the tacit assumption referred to as Factorism in these derivations. Finally, we briefly discuss the metaphysical role of discernibility by properties in clarifying the notion of individuality, as well as its relation to numerical diversity.]
Published: Jan 3, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.