Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Muller (2015)
The Rise of RelationalsMind, 124
T Bigaj (2015)
43Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 50
(2009)
Challenging the Spacetime Structuralist
W. Quine (1976)
Grades of DiscriminabilityThe Journal of Philosophy, 73
J. Ketland (2006)
Structuralism and the identity of indiscerniblesAnalysis, 66
K. Hawley (2009)
Identity and IndiscernibilityMind, 118
T. Bigaj (2015)
On Discernibility and SymmetriesErkenntnis, 80
S. Saunders (2006)
Are quantum particles objectsAnalysis, 66
M Black (1952)
153Mind, 61
JRB Arenhart (2013)
461Axiomathes, 23
F. Muller (2011)
Withering away, weaklySynthese, 180
T. Bigaj (2015)
Dissecting weak discernibility of quantaStudies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 50
F. Muller, M Seevinck, Giuntini, Castellani, Huggett Krause (2009)
Discerning Elementary Particles*Philosophy of Science, 76
Øystein Linnebo, F. Muller (2013)
On Witness-Discernibility of Elementary ParticlesErkenntnis, 78
J. Arenhart (2013)
Weak Discernibility in Quantum Mechanics: Does It Save PII?Axiomathes, 23
T Bigaj (2015)
117Erkenntnis, 80
A Caulton (2013)
49Philosophy of Science, 80
D. Krause, J. Arenhart (2006)
Identity in Physics
J. Ladyman, T. Bigaj (2010)
The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and Quantum Mechanics*Philosophy of Science, 77
N. Huggett, Joshua Norton (2014)
Weak Discernibility for Quanta, the Right WayThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65
F. Muller, S. Saunders (2008)
Discerning FermionsThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59
A Caulton (2012)
27British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63
A. Caulton (2013)
Discerning “Indistinguishable” Quantum SystemsPhilosophy of Science, 80
A. Caulton, J. Butterfield (2011)
On Kinds of Indiscernibility in Logic and MetaphysicsThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63
(2006)
Weak discernibility
[This chapter contains a formal analysis of three most popular variants of discernibility—absolute, relative and weak—together with some basic facts regarding their mutual logical connections. The analysis is done in the framework of standard, first-order logic. We point out that the answer to the question of whether some objects can be discerned may depend on the expressive power of the language in which this discernibility is to be formulated, in particular, on whether this language admits the predicate of numerical identity, or the individual names for all objects in the domain. We also connect the issue of discernibility with the symmetry (permutation invariance) of a language in which objects of the domain are supposed to be discerned. It is proved that only weakly discerning formulas are admitted in such languages. Subsequently, we evaluate the approach to the metaphysics of quantum particles based on the notion of weak discernibility. We argue that all quantum-mechanical relations that are supposed to weakly discern same-type fermions and bosons contain hidden reference to the relation of numerical identity, and thus cannot be used as qualitative grounds for facts of numerical identity/diversity.]
Published: Jan 3, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.