Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. French, M. Redhead (1988)
Quantum Physics and the Identity of Indiscernibles*The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39
T. Bigaj (2016)
On Some Troubles with the Metaphysics of Fermionic CompositionsFoundations of Physics, 46
T. Bigaj (2015)
Exchanging Quantum Particles
A. Caulton (2013)
Discerning “Indistinguishable” Quantum SystemsPhilosophy of Science, 80
G. Ghirardi, L. Marinatto (2002)
Entanglement and propertiesFortschritte der Physik, 51
S. Goldstein (2009)
Projection Postulate
F. Muller, G. Leegwater (2020)
The Case Against Factorism: On the Labels of $$\otimes$$-Factor Hilbert-Spaces of Similar Particles in Quantum MechanicsJournal for General Philosophy of Science
N. Huggett, Joshua Norton (2014)
Weak Discernibility for Quanta, the Right WayThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65
[This chapter develops an alternative (“heterodox”) approach to quantum individuation, which is based on certain types of symmetric projection operators acting in tensor-product Hilbert spaces. The starting point is an analysis of the correct meaning of symmetric combinations of single-particle projectors. An interpretation supporting the claim that same-type particles may be distinguishable by their properties is proposed. Subsequently, a criterion of qualitative individuation based on symmetric projectors is formulated and defended. The main objection to the proposed approach is related to the issue of measurements. In response to this objection, it is argued that in the case of “indistinguishable” particles, measurements performed on the separate components of a composite system must be linked to distinct spatial locations. Therefore it is paramount to properly include the spatial degrees of freedom in the description of a joint state of same-type particles (such as the singlet-spin state). We make a distinction between the genuine singlet-spin state and the “pseudo” singlet state whose antisymmetry is purely “formal”. It is shown that in the case of the former state, all known facts regarding the measurement outcomes are recovered, under both the collapse and “unitary” interpretations of measurements.]
Published: Jan 3, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.