Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Friebe (2014)
Individuality, distinguishability, and (non-)entanglement: A defense of Leibniz׳s principleStudies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 48
F. Muller (2015)
The Rise of RelationalsMind, 124
P. Teller (2001)
The Ins and Outs of Counterfactual SwitchingNoûs, 35
T. Bigaj (2020)
Synchronic and diachronic identity for elementary particlesEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Science, 10
D. Krause, J. Arenhart (2006)
Identity in Physics
David Lewis (1968)
Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal LogicThe Journal of Philosophy, 65
S. Saunders (2015)
On the Emergence of Individuals in Physics
Matteo Morganti (2013)
Combining Science and Metaphysics
N. Costa, O. Lombardi (2014)
Quantum Mechanics: Ontology Without IndividualsFoundations of Physics, 44
N. Costa, O. Lombardi, Mariano Lastiri (2013)
A modal ontology of properties for quantum mechanicsSynthese, 190
S. French, J. Ladyman (2010)
In Defence of Ontic Structural RealismBoston studies in the philosophy of science, 281
D. Fara (2009)
Dear HaecceitismErkenntnis, 70
Matteo Morganti (2009)
Inherent Properties and Statistics with Individual Particles in Quantum MechanicsStudies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40
G. Rodriguez-Pereyra (2004)
The Bundle Theory is compatible with distinct but indiscernible particularsAnalysis, 64
O. Lombardi, M. Castagnino (2006)
A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanicsStudies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39
Jaegwon Kim (1976)
Events as Property Exemplifications
P. Inwagen (1981)
THE DOCTRINE OF ARBITRARY UNDETACHED PARTSPacific Philosophical Quarterly, 62
R. Liu, B. Odom, Y. Yamamoto, S. Tarucha (1998)
Quantum interference in electron collisionNature, 391
Nick Huggett, Tom Imbo (2009)
Indistinguishability
Alberto Cortes (1976)
Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles: A False PrinciplePhilosophy of Science, 43
[The final chapter takes into account two further aspects of the identity and identification of quantum particles: diachronic (across temporal instances) and counterfactual (across possible worlds). The problem of diachronic identifications is analyzed with the help of scattering processes involving same-type particles. The differences between the orthodox and heterodox approaches to individuation are highlighted. Counterfactual identifications are discussed within three philosophical conceptions of modality de re: Kripke’s approach, Lewis’s counterpart theory and Lewis’s cheap haecceitism. Finally we try to sketch a future metaphysical theory of objects that could account for the revealed facts regarding various types of identity in the quantum regime.]
Published: Jan 3, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.